Coral Reef Diagnostics

Saudi Red Sea - Drogon Corals (Jeddah)

⬇ Download this page as a report card
05
Photo: Anderson Mayfield/Coral Reef Diagnostics
Survey date(s)
2024-08-02
Coordinates
21.7700, 38.9000
Approximate position.
Coral cover
14%
Published point count (Mayfield 2025; CoralNet-assisted, 67 photos) · details below
Coral bleached
25%
of coral tissue · Mayfield (2025), Environments 12:248
Observations
Heat stress
Most recent heat load record
26 Oct 2026 · Alert Level 2
5-year thermal stress load
5-year mean max. degree heating weeks (DHW)
2021–2025
NOAA Coral Reef Watch — Al Madinah and Makkah virtual station
i 5-year mean max. DHW is the mean of the annual maximum DHWs over the five complete years named above, not conditions today.
More infoAl Madinah and Makkah (NOAA CRW virtual station)
Photographs
78
44 shown on this page
Site summary
Read this summary in:

Drogon Corals mixes a densely rugose, coral-dense shallow flat with a wide bare sand plain of isolated bommies — the sand plain is what pulls this site's cover down into the low teens despite a visibly dense crest. A large fluted giant clam was photographed, and the published record puts 25% of coral tissue bleached at the time of this August 2024 dive, visible as white-capped massive colonies beside brown, pigmented neighbors on the sand-plain bommies.

Water temp. during survey
33.0°Cii
+3.7°C vs the 2024 mean sea temperature (29.3°C)
ii Note: NOAA's regional station series averages 1.8°C warmer than the satellite pixel nearest this site (2.6 km away), which is used here instead.

7 of the 44 photographs on this page are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.

5689101112131416171819202122232426272830323335373839414243444546484950

Photo credit & attribution

Site description

General benthic features

The site has three distinct zones and the frames move between them. A shallow reef flat sits a meter or two under a mirror-calm surface: dark, densely rugose framework with pocilloporids, small Acropora, and encrusting growth packed over it, photographed against the underside of the water (e.g., Image 1, Image 2).

A wide white sand plain below it carries widely spaced, isolated coral bommies with tens of meters of open sand between them — those frames are close to empty, and they are what pulls a site with a dense-looking crest down into the low teens (e.g., Image 3).

And a reef face drops from the flat into deep blue, hung with tan and mustard corymbose Acropora, pocilloporids, and encrusting Millepora-type plates (e.g., Image 4).

Coral cover

Stressors

The published record puts 25% of coral tissue bleached on this dive, and the sand-plain bommies show it: small knobby and lobed massive colonies with white to pale blue-white tops sit beside dark brown, pigmented colonies in the same frames (e.g., Image 15, Image 25).

Fish and other fauna

The dive's photographs include a large fluted giant clam set on sand, its dark olive-green mantle finely speckled and its scalloped shell margins rimmed pink and magenta by encrusting coralline algae, with a skirt of xeniid pulse corals around it (e.g., Image 51).

Comparisons with other data

Apart from our own published survey shown here, we found no other surveys at this site as of 2026. If you would like to share yours, please email us.

Dive record

A single dive on 2 August 2024 with Saudia SCUBA, the first of a Jeddah day that continued to Chicken Wreck.

CV model comparison

Computer-vision estimates from this site's own photographs are listed in the comparison table below, alongside the headline rather than merged into it.
Headline is the reference value; every other row is listed beside it for comparison and none is averaged in.
More infoThe reference is this dive site's own published CoralNet point count by the author (Mayfield 2025, Environments 12:248, Appendix A; most frames annotated by CoralNet's AI, trained and checked by the author). The computer-vision rows are this site's own values: Claude is a blind point count of all of the site's edited photographs, DINOv3 ran on the site's benchmark frames (the photographs the author annotated point by point), and CoralSCOP is the site's finished survey of its edited photographs. They are on different frame sets from the published count, a row under 30 frames is indicative only, and no computer-vision method yet estimates coral cover accurately on new images.
MethodHard coral cover (%)Photos (n) ± SE
Published point count (CoralNet-assisted)13.9
In-house DINOv3too few photos (n=1)
CoralSCOP edited21.6n = 66
Claude (edited photos)10.2n = 65 · SE 1.6

The two computer-vision methods disagree by 11.4 pp (10.2–21.6%) and read on both sides of the published point count (13.9%); the headline is the published point count because it is the site's published value (CoralNet-assisted: most frames were annotated by CoralNet's AI, trained and checked by the author).

In-house DINOv3: this method was run on 1 of 67 photos, under the 10 needed for a value, so it is not shown and is left out of any mean; every other row rests on its own photo count.

Data & links

All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from Coral Reef Diagnostics.

© Coral Reef Diagnostics.