Coral Reef Diagnostics

Saudi Red Sea - Cave Reef (Thuwal)

⬇ Download this page as a report card
05
Photo: Anderson Mayfield/Coral Reef Diagnostics
Survey date(s)
2024-02-09
Coordinates
22.3875, 38.8600
Coral cover
17%
Manual point count (68 photos) · other methods below
Observations
Heat stress
Today’s heat load
16 Sep 2026 · Bleaching Warning
5-year thermal stress load
5-year mean max. degree heating weeks (DHW)
2021–2025
NOAA Coral Reef Watch — Makkah-Madine Saudi Arabia virtual station
i 5-year mean max. DHW is the mean of the annual maximum DHWs over the five complete years named above, not conditions today.
More infoMakkah-Madine Saudi Arabia (NOAA CRW virtual station) · Northern and Central Red Sea ecoregion mean=12.2°C-heating weeks
Photographs
50
Site summary
Read this summary in:

Cave Reef, named for its caverns and overhangs, is a field of eroded, heavily bioeroded limestone pinnacles rising from sand, with coral patchy and mostly small - massive Lobophyllia, faviid domes, and giant clams rather than a continuous framework. A single February 2024 visit found 17% cover with 26.8% of coral tissue bleached despite zero accumulated heat stress at the time, and fresh parrotfish grazing scars ('fish bites,' in Anderson's own caption) were visible on several faviid colonies.

Max. depth dived
27.2 m
Water temp. during survey
24.0°Cii
-5.2°C vs the 2024 mean sea temperature (29.2°C)
ii Note: NOAA's regional station series averages 1.9°C warmer than the satellite pixel nearest this site (2.1 km away), which is used here instead.

One independent survey station shown with the program’s logo — click one to see how far it is from this site.

Two other CRD dive sites within 5 km shown in orange — click a marker to open its page.

4 of these 50 photographs are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.

567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041424344454647484950

Photo credit & attribution

Site description

Setting

The site is named for its caverns, and one frame is shot from inside one — looking up through a ragged gap in the reef roof at bright surface light, the walls in silhouette. Outside the caves the structure is a field of eroded limestone pinnacles and buttresses rising from white sand, tall, undercut, and heavily bioeroded, standing in hazy blue water (e.g., Image 1, Image 2).

General benthic features

Coral is patchy and mostly small. The living component is dominated by massive and encrusting forms rather than branching ones: red-brown meandroid Lobophyllia/Symphyllia-type colonies sitting free on sand, olive and khaki Goniastrea, Favites, and Astreopora domes on pinnacle shoulders, purple and lavender pocilloporids, encrusting Montipora-type sheets, and giant clams (Tridacna) with electric-blue and green mantles set into the pavement (e.g., Image 3).

Between them, a great deal of the surface is old, algal-filmed, coralline-crusted dead framework (e.g., Image 4).

Coral cover

Coral cover is 16.5% ± 19.7 across 68 photographs, quoted verbatim from Mayfield, A.B. (2025) Environments 12:248 — Red Sea 2023-24 bleaching; CoralNet point annotation, Appendix A — a manual, diver-annotated CoralNet point count from Anderson's own published work, not a computer vision output and not recomputed here. The standard deviation of 20 is larger than the mean itself, which is the honest signature of a site where individual frames swing between bare pavement and dense colony clusters. The site record's prose gives the 9 February visit as 16% cover with 26.8% of coral tissue bleached, with no accumulated heat stress at the time.

Stressors

Grazing pressure is visible: Anderson captioned one frame "fish bites" for the scatter of small fresh white parrotfish scars across the faviid colonies in it.

Comparisons with other data

No independent survey was made at this exact site; the nearest ones are listed in the table below.

Dive record

A single winter dive to 27.2 m on 9 February 2024 at 24°C, the second dive of a day that started at Rose Reef, worked with Coastline (KAUST).

CV model comparison

Computer vision on this site's own photographs gives ⚠ In-house DINOv3 point classifier 48% — reported alongside rather than merged, because as of September 2026 no computer-vision method estimates coral cover accurately on new images.
Headline is the reference value; every other row is listed beside it for comparison and none is averaged in.
More infoThe reference row is this dive site's own published value (Mayfield 2025, Appendix A, 68 photos); the other rows are AREA-level (Thuwal) comparisons, not run on this site's frames. ⚠ The comparison rows are REGIONS, not dive sites: the paper's main tables report cover by region, and this site's own value comes from its Appendix A. ⚠ The manual column and the CV columns are on DIFFERENT FRAME SETS. The published cover spans the region's full photo set (173–2,567 frames, most of them CoralNet robot-labeled); the CV arms ran only on the hand-scored reference subset, which is 6 frames at Thuwal, 274 at Jeddah and 173 at Rabigh. Read Thuwal's model columns as indicative only. CoralNet is n/a by design: the reference set IS the hand-scored set, so those frames carry no independent robot label to compare against. DINOv3 is restricted to frames it never saw, and reads roughly double the published cover at every Red Sea region. ⚠ 'unassigned region' is not a place: 135 frames carry no region label in the CoralNet metadata and map to no published row. It has no manual value and is excluded from the pooled reference. CoralNet automated point classifier: n/a — the reference set IS the hand-scored set; these frames carry no independent CoralNet robot label to compare against CoralSCOP (SAM-based mask-sum), unedited photos: pending — CoralSCOP run: 370/747 images scored at build time CoralSCOP (SAM-based mask-sum), edited photos: pending — CoralSCOP run: 370/747 images scored at build time
MethodHard-coral cover (%)
Manual (published)16.5
In-house DINOv347.5
Claude23.9

Independent surveys nearby

Within 5 km, 1 independent survey station recorded hard coral cover in 2010. The most recent nearby survey is from 2010, so these values predate recent heat stress. This site's own estimate (17%) sits 14.5 points below the range of these surveys (31%); the methods differ, so the comparison is context, not a like-for-like test.

Collected by other programs using different methods, so these are context for the figures above, not a like-for-like comparison. Where a station was surveyed more than once the range is shown. Station names are not dive-site names.

Independent survey data near this site
AgencySite / locationDateHard coral cover (%)DistanceLink
Furby et al. (2013)Offshore reef 1201031% (3 surveys)1.07 kmHeatCRD database

Data & links

All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from Coral Reef Diagnostics and the organizations named in the data-sources table above.

© Coral Reef Diagnostics.

References

  1. Furby KA, Bouwmeester J, Berumen ML (2013). Susceptibility of central Red Sea corals during a major bleaching event. Coral Reefs 32:505-513. DOI
  2. Mayfield AB (2025). Using Tourist Diver Photos to Assess the Effects of Marine Heatwaves on Central Red Sea Coral Reefs. Environments 12:248. PDF