Coral Reef Diagnostics

Philippines - Verde Island Passage: Sombrero Island

Reef Check Foundation
⬇ Download this page as a report card
05
Photo: Anderson Mayfield/Coral Reef Diagnostics
Survey date(s)
2016-10-01
Coordinates
13.6983, 120.8292
Approximate placement at the published coordinate for Sombrero Island; the dive was on the island's reef, and the exact entry point was not recorded.
Coral cover
17%
Claude computer vision (43 photos) · other methods below · median 13%
Observations
Heat stress
Most recent heat load record
26 Oct 2026 · Bleaching Watch
5-year thermal stress load
5-year mean max. degree heating weeks (DHW)
2021–2025
NOAA Coral Reef Watch — Central Philippines virtual station
i 5-year mean max. DHW is the mean of the annual maximum DHWs over the five complete years named above, not conditions today.
More infoCentral Philippines (NOAA CRW virtual station)
Photographs
44
Site summary
Read this summary in:

Sombrero Island has enormous tabular Acropora plates meters across, columnar massive corals, and walls draped in soft coral and crinoids. One big table and two massive colonies were partly bleached, and one large table was long dead. A blind Claude computer-vision point count puts coral cover around 17%.

Max. depth dived
20.7 m
Water temp. during survey
29.3°Cii
+0.9°C vs the 2016 mean sea temperature (28.4°C)
ii Logged water temperature of the dive, October 2016 (dive log); the dive computer's minimum was 28.3°C.

Three independent survey stations shown with the program’s logo — click one to see how far it is from this site.

Four other CRD dive sites with their own pages within 5 km shown in orange — click a marker to open its page.

8 of the 44 photographs on this page are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.

356789101112141516171819202122232425262728293032333435383940414344

Photo credit & attribution

Site description

General benthic features

Sombrero Island's wide-angle frames show dense coral over the ridge tops (e.g., Image 1).

Enormous tabular Acropora dominate — several plates meters across with clean pale growing margins, and one very large pyramidal plate structure standing clear of the slope (e.g., Image 31, Image 36, Image 42).

Not all of them are healthy: the far half of the big table in Image 42 is pale, and another large tiered table is long dead, overgrown by turf and a bead-like green growth (e.g., Image 37).

Around them are extensive columnar and massive Porites, corymbose and branching Acropora, Pocillopora, and Stylophora, foliose and encrusting plates, brain corals, fungiids, and Euphyllia (e.g., Image 2).

Crinoids in green, yellow, and black are abundant, and whole walls are draped in red, pink, and orange soft corals and encrusting sponges; a barrel sponge, blue and orange encrusting sponges, yellow Polycarpa-type tunicates on massive Porites, and a giant clam with a mottled white mantle round out the benthos (e.g., Image 4).

Coral cover

Stressors

There is no site-wide bleaching signal, but bleaching shows colony by colony: the far half of one big table is pale, partial bleaching (e.g., Image 42), and a lobed massive colony and its neighbor carry stark-white patches on the tops of the majority of knobs (e.g., Image 13).

A large tiered table is long dead and overgrown (e.g., Image 37); the pale margins on the other big tables are growing edge.

Fish and other fauna

Dense silverside and glassfish shoals shelter against the framework, with anthias, damselfish, butterflyfishes, moorish idols, and a large grouper or sweetlips at an overhang.

Comparisons with other data

Pinheiro et al. (2019) surveyed a nearby station (Sombrero Island, Tingloy), 0.31 km from the pin. Within 5 km, three Reef Check stations recorded station-year means of 36–70% hard coral cover between 2010 and 2014; the nearest of these, Reef Check at Inner Layag Layag Reef, 1.72 km away, read 64% in 2014.

Dive record

The final dive of the 2016 Philippines trip, on 1 October.

CV model comparison

Mean 17%, median 13% across 43 photos.
More infoA few colony-focused photos raise the mean; the median is the typical photo. No computer-vision method yet estimates coral cover accurately on new images, so treat this as indicative rather than a measurement; it is revised as the methods improve.
Headline: Claude computer vision, a blind point count of this site's own photographs.
More infoDINOv3 and CoralSCOP were run on the site's photographs (see each row's n) and are listed for comparison. Coralscapes v2 is shown as its own row for comparison only: the author does not consider Coralscapes reliable for these photos, so it is low confidence and never enters any average or summary. No diver transect exists for this trip, so agreement between the rows is not accuracy, and no computer-vision method yet estimates coral cover accurately on new images; treat every row as indicative.
MethodHard coral cover (%)Photos (n) ± SE
In-house DINOv323.9n = 37 · SE 1.5
CoralSCOP unedited27.2n = 43 · SE 2.1
Claude17.2n = 43 · SE 2.4
Coralscapes v2 (low confidence, never averaged)46.1

The two computer-vision methods agree within 3.3 pp (23.9–27.2%) and read 6.7–10.0 pp above Claude's blind point count (17.2%); the headline is Claude's blind point count because no transect or manual count exists here.

Independent surveys nearby

Hard coral cover over time — this site and every independent station within 5 km. Programs are shown separately because they use different methods at different stations; the lines are not one comparable series.
0%17%34%51%68%201020132016Reef Check 2010: 70%Reef Check 2013: 36%Reef Check 2014: 64%Coral Reef Diagnostics 2016: 17%Year-averaged across all programs: illustrative only; the programs differ in stations and method, so no trend is claimed (4 years)
Reef Check Coral Reef DiagnosticsYear-average (illustrative only, programs differ)

Within 5 km, 3 independent survey stations recorded hard coral cover in 4 surveys between 2010 and 2014. The most recent nearby survey is from 2014, so these values predate recent heat stress. This site's own estimate (17%) sits 47 points below the one survey station up to 2 km away (64%); the methods differ, so the comparison is context, not a like-for-like test.

Collected by other programs using different methods (Reef Check uses point-intercept transects), so these are context for the figures above, not a like-for-like comparison. Where a station was surveyed more than once, the cell shows either the range of its values or, as a single value, the mean of surveys made in one year. Station names are not dive-site names.

Independent survey data near this site
AgencySite / locationDateHard coral cover (%)Distance
Reef CheckBagalangit Koala201070%4.91 km
Reef CheckArthur's Rock201336%, mean of 2 surveys (5 m and 8 m)4.99 km
Reef CheckInner Layag Layag Reef201464%1.72 km

Data & links

All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from Coral Reef Diagnostics and the organizations named in the data sources above.

© Coral Reef Diagnostics.

References

  1. Pinheiro HT, Shepherd B, Castillo C, Abesamis RA, Copus JM, Pyle RL, et al. (2019). Deep reef fishes in the world's epicenter of marine biodiversity. Coral Reefs 38:985-995. DOI