Coral Reef Diagnostics

Philippines - Verde Island Passage: Kirby's Rock

Reef Check Foundation
⬇ Download this page as a report card
05
Photo: Anderson Mayfield/Coral Reef Diagnostics
Survey date(s)
2016-10-01
Coordinates
13.6908, 120.8436
Approximate position.
Coral cover
8.6%
Claude computer vision (39 edited photos) · other methods below · median 0.0%
Observations
None tagged; see Stressors below
Heat stress
Most recent heat load record
26 Oct 2026 · Bleaching Watch
5-year thermal stress load
5-year mean max. degree heating weeks (DHW)
2021–2025
NOAA Coral Reef Watch — Central Philippines virtual station
i 5-year mean max. DHW is the mean of the annual maximum DHWs over the five complete years named above, not conditions today.
More infoCentral Philippines (NOAA CRW virtual station)
Photographs
67
48 shown on this page
Site summary
Read this summary in:

Kirby's Rock is a true pinnacle with dense anthias clouds and tight snapper/fusilier schools over a top and upper flanks with tabular Acropora, Porites domes, and abundant crinoids. The reef reads healthy with no site-wide bleaching. A blind Claude computer-vision point count puts coral cover around 8.6%.

Max. depth dived
28 m
Water temp. during survey
28.6°Cii
+0.2°C vs the 2016 mean sea temperature (28.4°C)
ii Logged water temperature of the dive (dive-computer average 28.59°C), 1 October 2016 (dive log); the dive computer's minimum was 27.8°C.
Bottom time
58 min
in at 08:20

Seven independent survey stations shown with the program’s logo — click one to see how far it is from this site.

Four other CRD dive sites with their own pages within 5 km shown in orange — click a marker to open its page.

5 of the 48 photographs on this page are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.

25678911121314151718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748

Photo credit & attribution

Site description

Setting

Kirby's Rock is a true pinnacle, and Anderson's frames resolve it cleanly into a shallow top at 2-3 m (e.g., Image 1) and steep current-exposed flanks dropping into blue water (e.g., Image 4).

General benthic features

Hard coral on the pinnacle top and upper flanks includes tabular and plating Acropora, large massive Porites domes, brain corals, branching Acropora, and Pocillopora thickets, foliose plates, and one big massive colony photographed with polyps fully extended (e.g., Image 1). Lavender, white, and cream Dendronephthya, gray-green colonial ascidians, Tubastraea cups, and abundant crinoids, including a striking white feather star, fill the remaining space (e.g., Image 3).

Coral cover

Stressors

There is no site-wide bleaching signal; the reef reads healthy and structurally complex, with the usual background of turf, rubble pockets, and old mortality on the deeper flanks. One large massive colony carries a pale, sharply bordered patch (possibly disease or partial bleaching, per Anderson) whose cause cannot be resolved from the frame (e.g., Image 16).

Fish and other fauna

Its fish life includes dense clouds of anthias streaming over the wall, and tight formations of blue-striped snapper and yellow fusiliers. A vivid red encrusting sponge hosts a scatter of brilliant yellow sea cucumbers (Colochirus robustus) — Anderson's own identification, and worth flagging because at a glance they read as nudibranchs (e.g., Image 10).

Anderson also photographed a frogfish and a large white dorid nudibranch on ascidian stalks.

Comparisons with other data

Reef Check surveyed a nearby station (Inner Layag Layag Reef), 0.37 km from the pin; we could not confirm that it is the same reef. Within 5 km, seven Reef Check stations recorded station-year means of 19–89% hard coral cover between 2010 and 2017; the nearest, Reef Check at Inner Layag Layag Reef, 0.37 km away, read 64% in 2014.

Dive record

The first dive of the three-tank Verde Island Passage day on 1 October 2016, in at 08:20 for 58 minutes to a maximum of 28 m (mean 14.9 m) at 28.6°C average (dive-computer minimum 27.8°C); all 67 frames on file were reviewed, one of them a topside boat shot.

Other notes

The deeper slope around the pinnacle is documented only in the underwater frames of the dive.

CV model comparison

Mean 8.6%, median 0.0% across 39 photos.
More infoA few colony-focused photos raise the mean; the median is the typical photo. No computer-vision method yet estimates coral cover accurately on new images, so treat this as indicative rather than a measurement; it is revised as the methods improve.
Headline: Claude computer vision, a blind point count of this site's own photographs.
More infoDINOv3 and CoralSCOP were run on the site's photographs (see each row's n) and are listed for comparison. Coralscapes v2 is shown as its own row for comparison only: the author does not consider Coralscapes reliable for these photos, so it is low confidence and never enters any average or summary. No diver transect exists for this trip, so agreement between the rows is not accuracy, and no computer-vision method yet estimates coral cover accurately on new images; treat every row as indicative.
MethodHard coral cover (%)Photos (n) ± SE
In-house DINOv322.4n = 37 · SE 1.3
CoralSCOP edited26.5n = 39 · SE 2.7
Claude (edited photos)8.6n = 39 · SE 2.0
Coralscapes v2 (low confidence, never averaged)40.3

The two computer-vision methods agree within 4.1 pp (22.4–26.5%) and read 13.8–17.9 pp above Claude's blind point count (8.6%); the headline is Claude's blind point count because no transect or manual count exists here.

Independent surveys nearby

Hard coral cover over time — this site and every independent station within 5 km. Programs are shown separately because they use different methods at different stations; the lines are not one comparable series.
0%22%44%66%88%201020132017Reef Check 2010: 20%Reef Check 2010: 27%Reef Check 2010: 70%Reef Check 2011: 34%Reef Check 2011: 72%Reef Check 2013: 36%Reef Check 2013: 60%Reef Check 2014: 30%Reef Check 2014: 64%Reef Check 2014: 89%Reef Check 2017: 19%Reef Check 2017: 39%Coral Reef Diagnostics 2016: 8.6%Year-averaged across all programs: illustrative only; the programs differ in stations and method, so no trend is claimed (6 years)
Reef Check Coral Reef DiagnosticsYear-average (illustrative only, programs differ)

Within 5 km, 7 independent survey stations recorded hard coral cover in 18 surveys between 2010 and 2017. Of the 2 stations surveyed in more than one year, 2 declined (by 1.0–33 points) between their first and latest surveys. The longest record, Twin Rocks (Reef Check, 4.92 km away), went from 20% in 2010 to 19% in 2017. The most recent nearby survey is from 2017, so these values predate recent heat stress. This site's own estimate (8.6%) sits 55.4 points below the one survey station up to 2 km away (64%); the methods differ, so the comparison is context, not a like-for-like test.

Collected by other programs using different methods (Reef Check uses point-intercept transects), so these are context for the figures above, not a like-for-like comparison. Where a station was surveyed more than once, the cell shows either the range of its values or, as a single value, the mean of surveys made in one year. Station names are not dive-site names. Values above 70% are marked “best patch”: surveys often target the densest coral on a reef, so these may overstate the site as a whole.

Independent survey data near this site
AgencySite / locationDateHard coral cover (%)Distance
Reef CheckSan Teodoro201027%3.78 km
Reef CheckBagalangit Koala201070%4.00 km
Reef CheckTwin Rocks2010–201719–34% (4 surveys)4.92 km
Reef CheckKoala, Bagalangit2011–201739–72% (range of yearly means; 8 surveys) best patch4.34 km
Reef CheckArthur's Rock201336%, mean of 2 surveys (5 m and 8 m)3.83 km
Reef CheckInner Layag Layag Reef201464%0.37 km
Reef CheckTingloy - Poblacion Reef201489% best patch4.00 km

Data & links

All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from Coral Reef Diagnostics and the organizations named in the data sources above.

© Coral Reef Diagnostics.