Coral Reef Diagnostics

Philippines - Verde Island Passage: Kirby's Rock

Reef Check Foundation
⬇ Download this page as a report card
05
Photo: Anderson Mayfield/Coral Reef Diagnostics
Survey date(s)
2016-10-01
Coordinates
13.6700, 120.8450
Coral cover
26%
Computer vision (73 photos) · details below
Observations
not yet tagged for this site
Heat stress
Today’s heat load
16 Sep 2026 · Bleaching Warning
5-year thermal stress load
5-year mean max. degree heating weeks (DHW)
2021–2025
NOAA Coral Reef Watch — Western Philippines virtual station
i 5-year mean max. DHW is the mean of the annual maximum DHWs over the five complete years named above, not conditions today.
More infoWestern Philippines (NOAA CRW virtual station) · Eastern Philippines ecoregion mean=7.5°C-heating weeks
Photographs
50
Site summary
Read this summary in:

Kirby's Rock is a true pinnacle with the strongest fish showing of the trip - dense anthias clouds and tight snapper/fusilier schools - over high hard coral cover on its top and upper flanks, including tabular Acropora, Porites domes, and abundant crinoids. The reef reads healthy with no site-wide bleaching. Cover estimate is roughly 23-28%, averaging 25.5%.

Two independent survey stations shown with the program’s logo — click one to see how far it is from this site.

Four other CRD dive sites within 5 km shown in orange — click a marker to open its page.

4 of these 50 photographs are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.

567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041424344454647484950

Photo credit & attribution

Site description

Setting

Kirby's Rock is a true pinnacle, and Anderson's frames resolve it cleanly into a shallow top at 2-3 m and steep current-exposed flanks dropping into blue water (e.g., Image 4).

General benthic features

Hard coral cover is high on the pinnacle top and upper flanks - tabular and plating Acropora, large massive Porites domes, brain corals, branching Acropora, and Pocillopora thickets, foliose plates, and one big massive colony photographed with polyps fully extended (e.g., Image 1).

Lavender, white, and cream Dendronephthya, gray-green colonial ascidians, Tubastraea cups, and abundant crinoids, including a striking white feather star, fill the remaining space (e.g., Image 3).

Coral cover

The frames Anderson labeled by zone quantify the gradient: the pinnacle top scores 60.5% by CoralSCOP computer vision from 95 separate colony masks and 38.1% by DINOv3, the 2-3 m shallow top 43.1% and 15.8%. Cover comes from two computer vision methods, neither preferred. DINOv3 point classification gives 23.3% hard coral (95% CI 21.2-25.8) from all 73 frames and 1,460 points. CoralSCOP computer vision, its full run now finished, gives 27.7% across all 73 frames (median=24.4%, bootstrap 95% CI 24.1-31.6), against the 28.4% from the 20-frame subset the map's 25.8% was built on. The published spread is 5.0 points and the completed run narrows it to 4.4, but CoralSCOP still sits above the DINOv3 confidence interval, so the two methods disagree here. The frames show why: CoralSCOP's highest image, PA011176 at 78.2%, is a field of white and lavender soft coral where DINOv3 reads 18.6%, a 60-point gap on a single frame. The two models fail differently. CoralSCOP computer vision reads high on low-cover reefs - a median=1.68x a co-located Reef Check diver survey, 4.6x at worst - and it masks soft coral as readily as stony coral. DINOv3 is strong in-domain (6-class macro-F1 0.62, hard coral recall 0.82) but collapses off-domain: cross-domain point accuracy 0.17-0.25, ceiling near 35-50%; on the two topside frames in this set it still returned 10.2% and 20.1% hard coral for photographs of a boat and the sky. Neither is a diver survey or a transect; both are provisional and a better model will supersede them. Coral cover: 26% — photo-derived, and the two methods broadly agree (23% vs 28%). Two independent computer vision passes over all 73 of Anderson's frames from this dive give a DINOv3 calibrated point classifier reading of 23.3% (95% CI 21–26%, block bootstrap) and a CoralSCOP computer vision of 27.7%, a spread of 4.4 percentage points. The map publishes their mean so sites can be ranked against one another, but the 23–28% range is the honest statement of what is known here: the two products have different denominators and should not be collapsed into one measurement. This number comes from CoralSCOP and DINOv3, which Anderson considers a stopgap; he is evaluating other models and will regenerate the figure once a better one is identified.

Stressors

There is no site-wide bleaching signal; the reef reads healthy and structurally complex, with the usual background of turf, rubble pockets, and old mortality on the deeper flanks.

Fish and other fauna

It carries the strongest fish showing of the Anilao and Verde group: dense clouds of anthias streaming over the wall, and tight formations of blue-striped snapper and yellow fusiliers (e.g., Image 2).

A vivid red encrusting sponge hosts a scatter of brilliant yellow sea cucumbers (Colochirus robustus) - identified from Anderson's own filename, and worth flagging because at a glance they read as nudibranchs. He also photographed a frogfish and a large white dorid nudibranch on ascidian stalks.

Comparisons with other data

No independent survey was made at this exact site; the nearest ones are listed in the table below.

Dive record

The first dive of the three-tank Verde Island Passage day on 1 October 2016; all 73 available frames were reviewed, two of them topside boat shots.

Other notes

The frame named "outside Kirby's Rock" is in fact a surface boat shot, so the deeper surrounding slope is documented only within the numbered sequence.

CV model comparison

DINOv3 23%, CoralSCOP 28%; the headline is their mean.
More infoAs of September 2026 no computer-vision method estimates coral cover accurately on new images, so treat this as indicative rather than a measurement; it is revised as the methods improve.
The two methods broadly agree (spread 4.4 pp).
More infoThe published figure is the mean of the two methods.
MethodHard-coral cover (%)
In-house DINOv323.3
CoralSCOP27.7
Mean (± SD)25.5 ± 3.1
Range23.3–27.7

Mean ± SD and range are across the computer-vision methods shown.

Independent surveys nearby

Within 5 km, 2 independent survey stations recorded hard coral cover in 2014. The most recent nearby survey is from 2014, so these values predate recent heat stress. This site's own estimate (26%) sits 38.2 points below the range of these surveys (64%, excluding 1 best-patch value above 70% that is not a site mean); the methods differ, so the comparison is context, not a like-for-like test.

Collected by other programs using different methods (Reef Check uses point-intercept transects), so these are context for the figures above, not a like-for-like comparison. Where a station was surveyed more than once the range is shown. Station names are not dive-site names. Values marked best patch exceed 70%: surveyors usually chose the richest area, so they are not site means.

Independent survey data near this site
AgencySite / locationDateHard coral cover (%)DistanceLink
Reef CheckInner Layag Layag Reef201464%2.07 km—
Reef CheckTingloy - Poblacion Reef201489% best patch2.63 km—

Data & links

All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from Coral Reef Diagnostics and the organizations named in the data-sources table above.

© Coral Reef Diagnostics.