Coral Reef Diagnostics

Philippines - Verde Island Passage: Beatriz Island (Beatrice Rock)

Reef Check Foundation
⬇ Download this page as a report card
05
Photo: Anderson Mayfield/Coral Reef Diagnostics
Survey date(s)
2016-10-01
Coordinates
13.7049, 120.8288
Approximate position.
Coral cover
4.6%
Claude computer vision (65 photos) · other methods below · median 0.0%
Observations
None tagged; see Stressors below
Heat stress
Most recent heat load record
26 Oct 2026 · Bleaching Watch
5-year thermal stress load
5-year mean max. degree heating weeks (DHW)
2021–2025
NOAA Coral Reef Watch — Central Philippines virtual station
i 5-year mean max. DHW is the mean of the annual maximum DHWs over the five complete years named above, not conditions today.
More infoCentral Philippines (NOAA CRW virtual station)
Photographs
72
4 shown on this page
Site summary
Read this summary in:

Beatriz (Beatrice Rock) is a submerged boulder complex defined by very large barrel sponges, black coral bushes, and gorgonian fans rather than hard coral, though tabular and massive corals are present. Anderson photographed a Bargibant's pygmy seahorse (field ID) on a matching gorgonian. A blind Claude computer-vision point count puts coral cover around 4.6%.

Max. depth dived
23.2 m
Water temp. during survey
29.0°Cii
+0.6°C vs the 2016 mean sea temperature (28.4°C)
ii Logged water temperature of the dive (dive-computer average 28.95°C), 1 October 2016 (dive log); the dive computer's minimum was 27.8°C.
Bottom time
45 min
in at 10:53

Four independent survey stations shown with the program’s logo — click one to see how far it is from this site.

Four other CRD dive sites with their own pages within 5 km shown in orange — click a marker to open its page.

Site description

Setting

Beatriz — Beatrice Rock — is a submerged boulder complex of massive rounded outcrops with steep faces, overhangs, and swim-through gaps, photographed in noticeably poorer visibility than Kirby's Rock, with many hazy blue-green frames on the deeper flanks (e.g., Image 3, Image 4).

General benthic features

Barrel sponges define the site: Xestospongia testudinaria recurs through the wide-angle frames as very large individuals, several of them taller than a diver. Hard coral is present but subordinate — tabular Acropora, massive Porites, and foliose plates — while the visible biomass is sponge, soft coral, and crinoid. Black coral bushes, large gorgonian sea fans, a big orange elephant-ear sponge, brilliant red and magenta encrusting sponges and coralline, a large yellow soft-coral mass, blue Linckia sea stars, and crinoids in yellow, green, and black fill the rock.

Coral cover

Stressors

There is no site-wide bleaching signal. Anderson also photographed a white barrel sponge beside a tan one for contrast; the white one is possibly bleached, though that cannot be confirmed from the frame.

Fish and other fauna

Anthias cloud every high point (e.g., Image 1), a tight writhing school of striped eel catfish (Plotosus lineatus) crosses the sand (e.g., Image 2), and lionfish and scorpionfish rest on the rubble.

A small heavily tuberculate animal was seen matched in color and texture to the knobbly pink-and-white gorgonian it sits on — the classic presentation of a Bargibant's pygmy seahorse, and Anilao is a known locality for it. The identification is Anderson's own: three of the photographs are named for pygmy seahorses.

Comparisons with other data

Pinheiro et al. (2019) surveyed a nearby station (Sombrero Island, Tingloy), 0.42 km from the pin; we could not confirm that it is the same reef. Cover values from that work are not among the survey records shown on this page. Within 5 km, four Reef Check stations recorded station-year means of 36–72% hard coral cover between 2010 and 2017; the nearest of these, Reef Check at Inner Layag Layag Reef, 2.29 km away, read 64% in 2014.

Dive record

The second dive of the Verde Island Passage day, 1 October 2016, in at 10:53 for 45 minutes to a maximum of 23.2 m (mean 13.7 m) at 29.0°C average (dive-computer minimum 27.8°C); all 72 frames on file were reviewed.

CV model comparison

Mean 4.6%, median 0.0% across 65 photos.
More infoA few colony-focused photos raise the mean; the median is the typical photo. No computer-vision method yet estimates coral cover accurately on new images, so treat this as indicative rather than a measurement; it is revised as the methods improve.
Headline: Claude computer vision, a blind point count of this site's own photographs.
More infoDINOv3 and CoralSCOP were run on the site's photographs (see each row's n) and are listed for comparison. Coralscapes v2 is shown as its own row for comparison only: the author does not consider Coralscapes reliable for these photos, so it is low confidence and never enters any average or summary. No diver transect exists for this trip, so agreement between the rows is not accuracy, and no computer-vision method yet estimates coral cover accurately on new images; treat every row as indicative.
MethodHard coral cover (%)Photos (n) ± SE
In-house DINOv316.6n = 63 · SE 1.2
CoralSCOP unedited19.3n = 65 · SE 1.6
Claude4.6n = 65 · SE 1.1
Coralscapes v2 (low confidence, never averaged)47.6

The two computer-vision methods agree within 2.7 pp (16.6–19.3%) and read 12.0–14.7 pp above Claude's blind point count (4.6%); the headline is Claude's blind point count because no transect or manual count exists here.

Independent surveys nearby

Hard coral cover over time — this site and every independent station within 5 km. Programs are shown separately because they use different methods at different stations; the lines are not one comparable series.
0%20%40%60%80%201020132017Reef Check 2010: 70%Reef Check 2011: 72%Reef Check 2013: 36%Reef Check 2013: 60%Reef Check 2014: 64%Reef Check 2017: 39%Coral Reef Diagnostics 2016: 4.6%Year-averaged across all programs: illustrative only; the programs differ in stations and method, so no trend is claimed (6 years)
Reef Check Coral Reef DiagnosticsYear-average (illustrative only, programs differ)

Within 5 km, 4 independent survey stations recorded hard coral cover in 12 surveys between 2010 and 2017. The one station surveyed in more than one year declined by 33 points between its first and latest surveys. The longest record, Koala, Bagalangit (Reef Check, 4.94 km away), went from 72% (best patch) in 2011 (mean of 3 surveys) to 39% in 2017. The most recent nearby survey is from 2017, so these values predate recent heat stress. This site's own estimate (4.6%) is not compared with these surveys: none lies within 2 km.

Collected by other programs using different methods (Reef Check uses point-intercept transects), so these are context for the figures above, not a like-for-like comparison. Where a station was surveyed more than once, the cell shows either the range of its values or, as a single value, the mean of surveys made in one year. Station names are not dive-site names. Values above 70% are marked “best patch”: surveys often target the densest coral on a reef, so these may overstate the site as a whole.

Independent survey data near this site
AgencySite / locationDateHard coral cover (%)Distance
Reef CheckBagalangit Koala201070%4.74 km
Reef CheckKoala, Bagalangit2011–201739–72% (range of yearly means; 8 surveys) best patch4.94 km
Reef CheckArthur's Rock201336%, mean of 2 surveys (5 m and 8 m)4.92 km
Reef CheckInner Layag Layag Reef201464%2.29 km

Data & links

All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from Coral Reef Diagnostics and the organizations named in the data sources above.

© Coral Reef Diagnostics.

References

  1. Pinheiro HT, Shepherd B, Castillo C, Abesamis RA, Copus JM, Pyle RL, et al. (2019). Deep reef fishes in the world's epicenter of marine biodiversity. Coral Reefs 38:985-995. DOI