Coral Reef Diagnostics

Philippines - Port Barton, Palawan: Alberguin wreck

Reef Check Foundation
⬇ Download this page as a report card
05
Photo: Anderson Mayfield/Coral Reef Diagnostics
Survey date(s)
2017-01-20
Coordinates
10.4954, 119.1447
Coral cover
20%
Claude computer vision (32 edited photos) · other methods below · median 15%
Observations
shipwreckdebris
Heat stress
Most recent heat load record
26 Oct 2026 · Bleaching Warning
5-year thermal stress load
5-year mean max. degree heating weeks (DHW)
2021–2025
NOAA Coral Reef Watch — Western Philippines virtual station
i 5-year mean max. DHW is the mean of the annual maximum DHWs over the five complete years named above, not conditions today.
More infoWestern Philippines (NOAA CRW virtual station)
Photographs
38
25 shown on this page
Site summary
Read this summary in:

The Alberguin wreck lies on silty sand in poor, green-gray visibility, its metal colonized by scroll-like plating corals, bubble coral, soft corals, and small branching colonies; acroporids were scarce (Anderson's note). Several colonies look conspicuously pale, though no lesions or crown-of-thorns starfish (COTS) were seen. A blind Claude computer-vision point count puts coral cover around 20%; on a wreck that indexes hull colonization, not reef decline.

Max. depth dived
23.8 m
Water temp. during survey
27.8°Cii
-1.4°C vs the 2017 mean sea temperature (29.2°C)
ii Logged water temperature of the dive (dive-computer average), 20 January 2017 (dive log); the dive computer's minimum was 27.2°C.

Seven independent survey stations shown with the program’s logo — click one to see how far it is from this site.

Two other CRD dive sites with their own pages within 5 km shown in orange — click a marker to open its page.

22 of the 25 photographs on this page are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.

4512

Photo credit & attribution

Site description

Setting

The wreck is unmistakable: hull spars and pipework on gray silty sand, a bollard-like fitting, a curved painted metal ring, and a thin steel cable arcing off a mast stub (e.g., Image 22).

The water is green-gray and turbid in every wide frame, silt filmed over almost every horizontal surface — visibility was poor (e.g., Image 13).

General benthic features

Colonization of the metal is the story. One frame follows a turf-covered line carrying a small golden branching pocilloporid; another shows an old rope (Anderson's note), long lost and now overgrown with algae, hydroids, several golden-brown branching colonies, and tunicates (e.g., Image 1, Image 20).

A branching colony identified as Pocillopora acuta has taken hold inside a hull opening (e.g., Image 2).

Soft corals are prominent: a fluffy cream colony draped over a fitting, and pale pink trees on rubble (e.g., Image 3, Image 19).

Hard coral highlights: tiered scroll-like plates with pale margins — the best structural coral in the set; massive coral domes with ring-shaped corallites sitting on the wreck debris; Plerogyra sinuosa bubble coral, twice, once as a full-frame macro of pale vesicles against red sponge; a euphylliid hammer coral in close-up, maroon tentacles tipped with white anchor-shaped knobs; a domed flowerpot-type coral whose polyps each show a bright blue oral disc; and a dome of long white-tipped polyps on the superstructure (e.g., Image 6, Image 8, Image 11, Image 14, Image 15, Image 21, Image 24, Image 25).

Corymbose and bushy corals appear only as small colonies — Anderson's note that acroporids are rare here holds up (e.g., Image 9, Image 10, Image 23).

Algae are heavy throughout.

Coral cover

Stressors

Several colonies are conspicuously pale — a cream pocilloporid, a whitish branching colony, a pale massive colony — but no lesions, no tissue-loss margins, and no crown-of-thorns appear anywhere (e.g., Image 7).

Fish and other fauna

A lionfish over a dark whip/black-coral bush, a black headshield slug with electric-violet lines and a forked tail, cardinalfish, blue-green damsels, a Moorish idol, and cup sponges on the silt (e.g., Image 16, Image 17, Image 18).

Comparisons with other data

We found no other surveys at this site as of 2026. Within 5 km, seven Reef Check stations recorded station-year means of 15–34% hard coral cover between 1998 and 2019; the nearest, Reef Check at Paraiso Reef, 0.88 km away, read 31% in 1998.

Dive record

The Alberguin wreck, a hull resting on silty sand off Port Barton, dived 2017-01-20 (23.8 m max, 14.3 m mean, 27.8°C average, dive-computer minimum 27.2°C); 25 of the 38 frames on file were reviewed.

CV model comparison

Mean 20%, median 15% across 32 photos.
More infoA few colony-focused photos raise the mean; the median is the typical photo. No computer-vision method yet estimates coral cover accurately on new images, so treat this as indicative rather than a measurement; it is revised as the methods improve.
Headline: Claude computer vision, a blind point count of this site's own photographs.
More infoDINOv3 and CoralSCOP were run on the site's photographs (see each row's n) and are listed for comparison. Coralscapes v2 is shown as its own row for comparison only: the author does not consider Coralscapes reliable for these photos, so it is low confidence and never enters any average or summary. No diver transect exists for this trip, so agreement between the rows is not accuracy, and no computer-vision method yet estimates coral cover accurately on new images; treat every row as indicative.
MethodHard coral cover (%)Photos (n) ± SE
In-house DINOv319.9n = 23 · SE 2.1
CoralSCOP edited31.5n = 32 · SE 3.7
Claude (edited photos)19.9n = 32 · SE 3.7
Coralscapes v2 (low confidence, never averaged)33.9

The two computer-vision methods disagree by 11.6 pp (19.9–31.5%) and read 11.6 pp above Claude's blind point count (19.9%), except one that matches it; the headline is Claude's blind point count because no transect or manual count exists here.

Independent surveys nearby

Hard coral cover over time — this site and every independent station within 5 km. Programs are shown separately because they use different methods at different stations; the lines are not one comparable series.
0%10%20%30%40%199820082019Reef Check 1998: 15%Reef Check 1998: 31%Reef Check 1998: 33%Reef Check 1998: 34%Reef Check 2018: 22%Reef Check 2019: 16%Reef Check 2019: 33%Coral Reef Diagnostics 2017: 20%Year-averaged across all programs: illustrative only; the programs differ in stations and method, so no trend is claimed (4 years)
Reef Check Coral Reef DiagnosticsYear-average (illustrative only, programs differ)

Within 5 km, 7 independent survey stations recorded hard coral cover in 12 surveys between 1998 and 2019. The most recent nearby survey is from 2019, so these values predate recent heat stress. This site's own estimate (20%) sits 2 points below the range of these station-year means up to 2 km away (22–33%), inside the 7-point method-noise floor (inconclusive); the methods differ, so the comparison is context, not a like-for-like test.

Collected by other programs using different methods (Reef Check uses point-intercept transects), so these are context for the figures above, not a like-for-like comparison. Where a station was surveyed more than once, the cell shows either the range of its values or, as a single value, the mean of surveys made in one year. Station names are not dive-site names.

Independent survey data near this site
AgencySite / locationDateHard coral cover (%)Distance
Reef CheckParaiso Reef199831%0.88 km
Reef CheckAlbaguen Island199833%1.40 km
Reef CheckAlbaguen Island199815%2.59 km
Reef CheckMantaray Reef199834%3.91 km
Reef CheckRiddle Point201822%, mean of 2 surveys (4.8 m and 9 m)1.24 km
Reef CheckExotic Island201933% (29–39%, 4 surveys, Jan–Jun 2019)0.90 km
Reef CheckGerman Island201916% (2 surveys)4.05 km

Data & links

All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from Coral Reef Diagnostics and the organizations named in the data sources above.

© Coral Reef Diagnostics.