Coral Reef Diagnostics

Philippines - El Nido: Paglugaban Rocks (Bacuit Archipelago)

Reef Check Foundation
⬇ Download this page as a report card
05
Photo: Anderson Mayfield/Coral Reef Diagnostics
Survey date(s)
2017-01-24
Coordinates
11.1420, 119.2760
Coral cover
29%
Computer vision · details below
Observations
not yet tagged for this site
Heat stress
Today’s heat load
16 Sep 2026 · Bleaching Warning
5-year thermal stress load
5-year mean max. degree heating weeks (DHW)
2021–2025
NOAA Coral Reef Watch — Western Philippines virtual station
i 5-year mean max. DHW is the mean of the annual maximum DHWs over the five complete years named above, not conditions today.
More infoWestern Philippines (NOAA CRW virtual station) · Palawan/North Borneo ecoregion mean=4.0°C-heating weeks
Photographs
25
Site summary

One of Anderson's favorite Philippine dives, a structurally varied rocky fore-reef with striking genus diversity - branching and tabular Acropora, Seriatopora, Pocillopora, Montipora, Porites, brain corals, even cuttlefish, and a giant clam. Condition reads good, with isolated mortality spots and physical breakage rather than disease or bleaching. Cover estimate is around 27-31%.

Max. depth dived
20.12 m
Water temp. during survey
26.7°Cii
-2.5°C vs the 2017 mean sea temperature (29.2°C)
ii Dive-computer reading of 80°F, converted; reported to one decimal because the instrument resolved whole degrees Fahrenheit.

One independent survey station shown with the program’s logo — click one to see how far it is from this site.

22 of these 25 photographs are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.

192021

Photo credit & attribution

Site description

Setting

It is a gently rolling fore-reef around an offshore rock outcrop, low to moderate relief, with sand and rubble channels at the deeper margins; the water is hazy and several frames are soft from a fogged housing, which he flags himself ("before fogging up", "finally unfogged") (e.g., Image 7, Image 14, Image 15).

General benthic features

Dense foliose, ruffled brown Turbinaria-type coral dominates one section with reef fish moving through it, and nearby a large plate coral with a pale growing margin sits amid purple encrusting sponge and yellow coralline algae - a structurally varied rocky reef (e.g., Image 2, Image 5).

Genus diversity is the site's signature: mixed branching and corymbose Acropora, tabular and shelf-like plates with clean pale margins, pink-to-mauve fine-branched stands he identifies as Seriatopora hystrix, his Pocillopora verrucosa and Pocillopora acuta, gold-tan digitate Acropora, tiered Montipora / Echinopora / Turbinaria whorls, his own Pavona meadow, massive and columnar Porites, Platygyra and Goniastrea maze colonies, fungiids, and a giant clam (e.g., Image 1, Image 3, Image 6, Image 9, Image 10, Image 11, Image 12, Image 13, Image 16, Image 17, Image 18, Image 22, Image 24, Image 25).

Coral cover

Cover was recovered by splitting the pooled 305-frame "bacuit_archipelago" computer vision collection back into its source folders - it merges all three El Nido dives with a separate 23 January island-hopping day, so its published row belongs to no pin. The 98 frames that are this dive give DINOv3 27.2 percent hard coral (1,960 points, 95 percent CI 25.3-29.0, frame range=8.4–58%) and CoralSCOP computer vision 31.3 percent over all 98 frames now scored (median=31.5, range=4.5–64%) - higher than the 28.6 percent its earlier six-frame sample gave. The two methods are also a check on the eye: an earlier visual read put this reef at 60-80 percent live cover, the models put it at 27 and 31, and the wide-angle frames show substantial turf, rubble, and standing dead framework between live colonies. They still fail differently - CoralSCOP computer vision reads high on low-cover reefs (median=1.68x a co-located diver survey, 4.6x at worst); DINOv3 is strong in-domain (6-class macro-F1 0.62) but degrades on unseen reefs to 0.17-0.25 cross-domain point accuracy. Neither is a diver survey; both are provisional. Coral cover: 29% — photo-derived, the mean of two computer vision methods. This site's figure is the mean of the DINOv3 calibrated point classifier reading over the 98 frames of this dive (27%) and the CoralSCOP computer vision figure over the same 98 frames (31%), a spread of 4.1 percentage points. The two products have different denominators and should not be treated as one measurement; the honest statement of what is known here is the 27–31% range, from the DINOv3 reading to the CoralSCOP run. Both are provisional photo-derived indices, not a diver survey;

Stressors

Condition reads good with no bleaching front: the scattered stark-white patches on single colonies are isolated recent-mortality spots, and "brittle reef" is his own note on broken branching framework and rubble in the shallows - physical breakage, not disease (e.g., Image 4, Image 8).

No crown-of-thorns, no disease lesions.

Fish and other fauna

Cuttlefish appear in five frames and at least two individuals, a crocodile flathead twice, plus anemonefish, butterflyfish, schooling yellow fusiliers, and crinoids (e.g., Image 23).

Comparisons with other data

No independent survey was made at this exact site; the nearest ones are listed in the table below.

Dive record

Paglugaban Rocks - the second Bacuit Archipelago dive of 24 January 2017, in at 12:29 for 58 minutes to a maximum of 20.1 m (mean 13.4 m) at 26.7 C, and the one Anderson called one of his favorite dives in the country.

Other notes

All 98 frames were reviewed, every one of them underwater.

CV model comparison

DINOv3 27%, CoralSCOP 31%; the headline is their mean.
More infoAs of September 2026 no computer-vision method estimates coral cover accurately on new images, so treat this as indicative rather than a measurement; it is revised as the methods improve.
The two methods broadly agree (spread 4.1 pp).
More infoThe published figure is the mean of the two methods.
MethodHard-coral cover (%)
In-house DINOv327.2
CoralSCOP31.3
Mean (± SD)29.2 ± 2.9
Range27.2–31.3

Mean ± SD and range are across the computer-vision methods shown.

Independent surveys nearby

Hard coral cover over time — this site and every independent station within 5 km. Programs are shown separately because they use different methods at different stations; the lines are not one comparable series.
0%17%34%51%68%201320152017Reef Check 2013: 42%Reef Check 2014: 61%Dr. Coral (CRD) 2017: 29%Year-averaged across all programs: no detectable trend (-4.80 pp per year, not separable from zero; 3 years)
Reef Check Dr. Coral (CRD)Year-average (no detectable trend)

Within 5 km, 1 independent survey station recorded hard coral cover in 4 surveys between 2013 and 2014. Of the 1 station surveyed in more than one year, 1 increased between their first and latest surveys. The longest record, Abdeen's Rock (Reef Check, 3.57 km away), went from 42% in 2013 to 61% in 2014. The most recent nearby survey is from 2014, so these values predate recent heat stress. This site's own estimate (29%) sits 12.3 points below the range of these surveys (42–61%); the methods differ, so the comparison is context, not a like-for-like test.

Collected by other programs using different methods (Reef Check uses point-intercept transects), so these are context for the figures above, not a like-for-like comparison. Where a station was surveyed more than once the range is shown. Station names are not dive-site names.

Independent survey data near this site
AgencySite / locationDateHard coral cover (%)DistanceLink
Reef CheckAbdeen's Rock2013–201442–61% (4 surveys)3.57 km—

Data & links

All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from Coral Reef Diagnostics and the organizations named in the data-sources table above.

© Coral Reef Diagnostics.