Part of the regional summaries: Philippines - Palawan and Philippines

A murky, rough-conditions dive at Nat Nat turned up an Anacropora colony (Anderson's ID) and a large pale Plerogyra bubble coral, but the clearest condition note is a Seriatopora colony photographed and labeled dying. A blind Claude computer-vision point count puts coral cover around 14%.
Sa isang malabo at maalong sisid sa Nat Nat, may natagpuang kolonya ng Anacropora (pagkakakilanlan ni Anderson) at isang malaki at maputlang bubble coral na Plerogyra, ngunit ang pinakamalinaw na tala tungkol sa kalagayan ay isang kolonya ng Seriatopora na kinunan ng larawan at minarkahang namamatay. Ayon sa blind point count ng Claude computer vision, humigit-kumulang 14% ang saklaw ng koral.
Salin ng buod na ito gamit ang AI; ang Ingles ang opisyal na bersyon.
Six independent survey stations shown with the program’s logo — click one to see how far it is from this site.
16 of the 19 photographs on this page are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.
Conditions were poor and Anderson recorded them at the time — poor visibility (e.g., Image 7), dark water at depth (e.g., Image 13), and rough weather — which is worth carrying into any reading of these photographs.
The corals singled out in the log are the interesting part: Anacropora (Anderson's ID); a large pale Plerogyra bubble coral; and Seriatopora photographed twice, the second frame recorded as a dying colony, which stands as a clear condition observation at this site (e.g., Image 1, Image 5, Image 6, Image 11).
Around them are encrusting and massive colonies, foliose plates, and vivid red and pink encrusting sponges (e.g., Image 3, Image 7).
A distinctive lavender-gray cluster of tube sponges standing on open sand rounds out the benthos (e.g., Image 19).
One Seriatopora colony was photographed and recorded as dying (one frame); the cause is not stated.
The fish and invertebrate list is varied for a murky dive: a school of big-eye barracuda with smaller barracuda alongside, a blue-spotted stingray on the sand, a lionfish, a bannerfish, and a very large host anemone with its anemonefish (e.g., Image 8, Image 10, Image 12, Image 13, Image 14, Image 18).
Two frames record chromodorid nudibranchs — blue and white bodies ruled with black lines, with yellow-orange rhinophores and gills (e.g., Image 15, Image 16); a third shows a different, pale white sea slug with black lines on orange substrate (e.g., Image 17).
We found no other surveys at this site as of 2026. Within 5 km, six Reef Check stations recorded station-year means of 4.4–49% hard coral cover between 2013 and 2015; the nearest, Reef Check at Ipil MPA (Inside) Brgy. Buena Suerte, 1.26 km away, read 22–24% between 2013 and 2014.
The first of three Bacuit Archipelago dives on 24 January 2017, in at 09:54 by bangka beneath the limestone karst, 62 minutes to a maximum of 24.1 m (mean 13.1 m) at 27.7°C average (dive-computer minimum 27.2°C); three of the 22 frames are topside.
| Method | Hard coral cover (%) | Photos (n) ± SE |
|---|---|---|
| In-house DINOv3 | 20.4* | n = 12 · SE 3.0 |
| CoralSCOP edited | 31.9* | n = 13 · SE 5.3 |
| Claude (edited photos) | 14.1* | n = 13 · SE 4.0 |
| Coralscapes v2 (low confidence, never averaged) | 20.7* |
The two computer-vision methods disagree by 11.5 pp (20.4–31.9%) and read 6.3–17.8 pp above Claude's blind point count (14.1%); the headline is Claude's blind point count because no transect or manual count exists here.
*Based on only 12 reef-habitat photos; this estimate is less certain. (In-house DINOv3, Coralscapes v2 (low confidence, never averaged))
*Based on only 13 reef-habitat photos; this estimate is less certain. (CoralSCOP edited, Claude (edited photos))
See a more detailed, stand-alone version of this table.
Within 5 km, 6 independent survey stations recorded hard coral cover in 13 surveys between 2013 and 2015. Of the 6 stations surveyed in more than one year, 2 declined (by 4.0–16 points), 3 increased (by 2.0–13 points), and 1 changed by less than 1 point between their first and latest surveys. The longest record, Maitre MPA (Inside) (Reef Check, 4.86 km away), went from 28% in 2013 to 24% in 2015. The most recent nearby survey is from 2015, so these values predate recent heat stress. This site's own estimate (14%) sits within the range of these station-year means up to 2 km away (4.4–49%); the methods differ, so the comparison is context, not a like-for-like test.
Collected by other programs using different methods (Reef Check uses point-intercept transects), so these are context for the figures above, not a like-for-like comparison. Where a station was surveyed more than once, the cell shows either the range of its values or, as a single value, the mean of surveys made in one year. Station names are not dive-site names.
| Agency | Site / location | Date | Hard coral cover (%) | Distance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reef Check | Ipil MPA (Inside) Brgy. Buena Suerte | 2013–2014 | 22–24% (2 surveys) | 1.26 km |
| Reef Check | Caalan MPA B | 2013–2014 | 29–45% (2 surveys) | 1.27 km |
| Reef Check | 7th Comando Outside | 2013–2014 | 4.4–7.5% (2 surveys) | 1.65 km |
| Reef Check | Caalan MPA A | 2013–2014 | 36–49% (2 surveys) | 1.79 km |
| Reef Check | Bukal | 2013–2014 | 34% (2 surveys) | 2.60 km |
| Reef Check | Maitre MPA (Inside) | 2013–2015 | 24–33% (3 surveys) | 4.86 km |
All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from Coral Reef Diagnostics and the organizations named in the data sources above.
© Coral Reef Diagnostics.