Part of the regional summaries: Philippines - Luzon and Philippines

An unusual, substantially man-made house reef — a sunken Volkswagen Beetle, mermaid statue, and a deliberate tableau of bathtubs and toilets, one hosting a large coral colony — with genuine coral settlement tiles and plating corals on the deeper slope (frames noted as 30–40 m, looking down into deep water; computer max 23.5 m). Green turtles were seen foraging over the rubble, and several small fine-branching colonies were bleached.
Isang pambihira at halos gawa ng tao na house reef — isang lubog na Volkswagen Beetle, estatwa ng sirena, at isang sinadyang tanawin ng mga bathtub at inodoro, na ang isa ay tinitirhan ng malaking kolonya ng koral — kasama ang tunay na mga tile para sa pagtira ng koral at mga plating coral sa mas malalim na dalisdis (mga larawang nakatalang 30–40 m, nakatanaw pababa sa malalim na tubig; pinakamalalim sa dive computer ay 23.5 m). May nakitang mga pawikang berde na naghahanap ng pagkain sa ibabaw ng mga durog na koral, at ilang maliliit na kolonyang pino ang sanga ang namuti (bleached).
Salin ng buod na ito gamit ang AI; ang Ingles ang opisyal na bersyon.
Nine independent survey stations shown with the program’s logo — click one to see how far it is from this site.
Four other CRD dive sites with their own pages within 5 km shown in orange — click a marker to open its page.
This page shows 50 of the 84 photographs from this site, including every one the text cites.
25 of the 50 photographs on this page are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.
Anderson's own notes on the frames set the depth structure, from the shallows to the deeper slope, and the site is genuinely zoned, with a field of overlapping pale plating and foliose corals (Turbinaria, Echinopora lamellosa, and the Montipora group) forming near-continuous cover on the deeper slope (frames noted as 30–40 m, looking down into deep water; computer max 23.5 m), a mid-slope of sunken objects, and shallows dominated by rubble and turf with only sparse recruits (e.g., Image 1, Image 2, Image 5, Image 6, Image 7, Image 25).
The artificial reef is the draw: an upright Volkswagen Beetle on sand, a mermaid statue, a large standing cross on a masonry base, and a deliberate tableau of household fixtures — bathtubs and sinks, a television set, a desk with a telephone, and toilets, one with a massive coral colony growing in the bowl (e.g., Image 13, Image 20, Image 21, Image 22, Image 23).
Deployed coral settlement tiles are also present, one carrying crustose coralline algae and small recruits, with Anderson pointing out a marked plate — a recruitment installation, not incidental debris (e.g., Image 8).
Large Euphyllia hammer-coral stands in cream and turquoise are the finest stony corals here (e.g., Image 18).
Bleaching affected several small fine-branching colonies: a Seriatopora (Anderson's ID) noted at the time as dying is stark white across its core with golden-brown branches at the margin (e.g., Image 3), and three more stark-white fine-branching colonies sit on sediment-dusted rubble beside a brown plating recruit (e.g., Image 34).
Two more frames show white areas read as recent mortality, cause not stated: chalk-white tops on many lobes of a lobed massive colony (e.g., Image 51) and a roughly circular patch of stark-white branches inside a brown staghorn thicket (e.g., Image 26).
No crown-of-thorns starfish (COTS) or other corallivores were evident.
Damselfish and anemonefish have colonized all of it. The macrofauna is abundant: Phyllidia and Phyllidiella nudibranchs, several blue Chromodoris including an apparent mating pair, a tiger cowrie, cleaner shrimp in the crevices, and a granulated sea star (Choriaster) (e.g., Image 9, Image 10, Image 11, Image 12, Image 16, Image 17).
A run of five consecutive frames records green turtles foraging over the rubble (e.g., Image 14, Image 15); the sequence cannot establish how many individuals it shows.
We found no other surveys at this site as of 2026. Within 5 km, nine Reef Check stations recorded station-year means of 19–89% hard coral cover between 2010 and 2017; the nearest, Reef Check at San Teodoro, 1.76 km away, read 27% in 2010.
The third dive of 30 September 2016: a house reef that is substantially man-made. All 82 frames in Anderson's Monte Carlo Hotel dive folder were reviewed (two more frames from the dive are filed in the marine-life folders).
| Method | Hard coral cover (%) | Photos (n) ± SE |
|---|---|---|
| In-house DINOv3 | 24.5 | n = 52 · SE 1.8 |
| CoralSCOP edited | 20.3 | n = 57 · SE 2.3 |
| Claude (edited photos) | 28.5 | n = 57 · SE 3.7 |
| Coralscapes v2 (low confidence, never averaged) | 34.3 |
The two computer-vision methods agree within 4.2 pp (20.3–24.5%) and read 4.0–8.2 pp below Claude's blind point count (28.5%); the headline is Claude's blind point count because no transect or manual count exists here.
See a more detailed, stand-alone version of this table.
Within 5 km, 9 independent survey stations recorded hard coral cover in 23 surveys between 2010 and 2017. Of the 3 stations surveyed in more than one year, 3 declined (by 1.0–33 points) between their first and latest surveys. Two stations share the longest span (2010–2017); one, Twin Rocks (Reef Check, 3.31 km away), went from 20% in 2010 to 19% in 2017. The most recent nearby survey is from 2017, so these values predate recent heat stress. This site's own estimate (29%) sits within the range of these station-year means up to 2 km away (27–36%); the methods differ, so the comparison is context, not a like-for-like test.
Collected by other programs using different methods (Reef Check uses point-intercept transects), so these are context for the figures above, not a like-for-like comparison. Where a station was surveyed more than once, the cell shows either the range of its values or, as a single value, the mean of surveys made in one year. Station names are not dive-site names. Values above 70% are marked “best patch”: surveys often target the densest coral on a reef, so these may overstate the site as a whole.
| Agency | Site / location | Date | Hard coral cover (%) | Distance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reef Check | San Teodoro | 2010 | 27% | 1.76 km |
| Reef Check | Bagalangit Koala | 2010 | 70% | 2.02 km |
| Reef Check | Twin Rocks | 2010–2017 | 19–34% (4 surveys) | 3.31 km |
| Reef Check | Acacia Resort and Dive Center | 2010–2017 | 49–58% (4 surveys) | 4.05 km |
| Reef Check | Koala, Bagalangit | 2011–2017 | 39–72% (range of yearly means; 8 surveys) best patch | 2.40 km |
| Reef Check | Arthur's Rock | 2013 | 36%, mean of 2 surveys (5 m and 8 m) | 1.78 km |
| Reef Check | Inner Layag Layag Reef | 2014 | 64% | 2.41 km |
| Reef Check | Tingloy - Poblacion Reef | 2014 | 89% best patch | 4.09 km |
| Reef Check | Ligaya Bantong Buhay MPA | 2017 | 56% | 3.50 km |
All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from Coral Reef Diagnostics and the organizations named in the data sources above.
© Coral Reef Diagnostics.