Coral Reef Diagnostics

Philippines - Anilao: Monte Carlo Hotel

Reef Check Foundation
⬇ Download this page as a report card
05
Photo: Anderson Mayfield/Coral Reef Diagnostics
Survey date(s)
2016-09-30
Coordinates
13.7000, 120.8600
Approximate position.
Coral cover
29%
Claude computer vision (57 edited photos) · other methods below · median 18%
Observations
artificial structurepossible bleachingrecent mortality
Heat stress
Most recent heat load record
26 Oct 2026 · Bleaching Watch
5-year thermal stress load
5-year mean max. degree heating weeks (DHW)
2021–2025
NOAA Coral Reef Watch — Central Philippines virtual station
i 5-year mean max. DHW is the mean of the annual maximum DHWs over the five complete years named above, not conditions today.
More infoCentral Philippines (NOAA CRW virtual station)
Photographs
84
50 shown on this page
Site summary
Read this summary in:

An unusual, substantially man-made house reef — a sunken Volkswagen Beetle, mermaid statue, and a deliberate tableau of bathtubs and toilets, one hosting a large coral colony — with genuine coral settlement tiles and plating corals on the deeper slope (frames noted as 30–40 m, looking down into deep water; computer max 23.5 m). Green turtles were seen foraging over the rubble, and several small fine-branching colonies were bleached.

Max. depth dived
23.5 m
Water temp. during survey
29.4°Cii
+1.0°C vs the 2016 mean sea temperature (28.4°C)
ii Logged water temperature of the dive, September 2016 (dive log); the dive computer's minimum was 28.3°C.
Bottom time
56 min
in at 15:44

Nine independent survey stations shown with the program’s logo — click one to see how far it is from this site.

Four other CRD dive sites with their own pages within 5 km shown in orange — click a marker to open its page.

This page shows 50 of the 84 photographs from this site, including every one the text cites.

25 of the 50 photographs on this page are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.

4192427282930313233353637383940414243444546474849

Photo credit & attribution

Site description

General benthic features

Anderson's own notes on the frames set the depth structure, from the shallows to the deeper slope, and the site is genuinely zoned, with a field of overlapping pale plating and foliose corals (Turbinaria, Echinopora lamellosa, and the Montipora group) forming near-continuous cover on the deeper slope (frames noted as 30–40 m, looking down into deep water; computer max 23.5 m), a mid-slope of sunken objects, and shallows dominated by rubble and turf with only sparse recruits (e.g., Image 1, Image 2, Image 5, Image 6, Image 7, Image 25).

The artificial reef is the draw: an upright Volkswagen Beetle on sand, a mermaid statue, a large standing cross on a masonry base, and a deliberate tableau of household fixtures — bathtubs and sinks, a television set, a desk with a telephone, and toilets, one with a massive coral colony growing in the bowl (e.g., Image 13, Image 20, Image 21, Image 22, Image 23).

Deployed coral settlement tiles are also present, one carrying crustose coralline algae and small recruits, with Anderson pointing out a marked plate — a recruitment installation, not incidental debris (e.g., Image 8).

Large Euphyllia hammer-coral stands in cream and turquoise are the finest stony corals here (e.g., Image 18).

Coral cover

Stressors

Bleaching affected several small fine-branching colonies: a Seriatopora (Anderson's ID) noted at the time as dying is stark white across its core with golden-brown branches at the margin (e.g., Image 3), and three more stark-white fine-branching colonies sit on sediment-dusted rubble beside a brown plating recruit (e.g., Image 34).

Two more frames show white areas read as recent mortality, cause not stated: chalk-white tops on many lobes of a lobed massive colony (e.g., Image 51) and a roughly circular patch of stark-white branches inside a brown staghorn thicket (e.g., Image 26).

No crown-of-thorns starfish (COTS) or other corallivores were evident.

Fish and other fauna

Damselfish and anemonefish have colonized all of it. The macrofauna is abundant: Phyllidia and Phyllidiella nudibranchs, several blue Chromodoris including an apparent mating pair, a tiger cowrie, cleaner shrimp in the crevices, and a granulated sea star (Choriaster) (e.g., Image 9, Image 10, Image 11, Image 12, Image 16, Image 17).

A run of five consecutive frames records green turtles foraging over the rubble (e.g., Image 14, Image 15); the sequence cannot establish how many individuals it shows.

Comparisons with other data

We found no other surveys at this site as of 2026. Within 5 km, nine Reef Check stations recorded station-year means of 19–89% hard coral cover between 2010 and 2017; the nearest, Reef Check at San Teodoro, 1.76 km away, read 27% in 2010.

Dive record

The third dive of 30 September 2016: a house reef that is substantially man-made. All 82 frames in Anderson's Monte Carlo Hotel dive folder were reviewed (two more frames from the dive are filed in the marine-life folders).

CV model comparison

Mean 29%, median 18% across 57 photos.
More infoA few colony-focused photos raise the mean; the median is the typical photo. No computer-vision method yet estimates coral cover accurately on new images, so treat this as indicative rather than a measurement; it is revised as the methods improve.
Headline: Claude computer vision, a blind point count of this site's own photographs.
More infoDINOv3 and CoralSCOP were run on the site's photographs (see each row's n) and are listed for comparison. Coralscapes v2 is shown as its own row for comparison only: the author does not consider Coralscapes reliable for these photos, so it is low confidence and never enters any average or summary. No diver transect exists for this trip, so agreement between the rows is not accuracy, and no computer-vision method yet estimates coral cover accurately on new images; treat every row as indicative.
MethodHard coral cover (%)Photos (n) ± SE
In-house DINOv324.5n = 52 · SE 1.8
CoralSCOP edited20.3n = 57 · SE 2.3
Claude (edited photos)28.5n = 57 · SE 3.7
Coralscapes v2 (low confidence, never averaged)34.3

The two computer-vision methods agree within 4.2 pp (20.3–24.5%) and read 4.0–8.2 pp below Claude's blind point count (28.5%); the headline is Claude's blind point count because no transect or manual count exists here.

Independent surveys nearby

Hard coral cover over time — this site and every independent station within 5 km. Programs are shown separately because they use different methods at different stations; the lines are not one comparable series.
0%22%44%66%88%201020132017Reef Check 2010: 20%Reef Check 2010: 27%Reef Check 2010: 58%Reef Check 2010: 70%Reef Check 2011: 34%Reef Check 2011: 72%Reef Check 2012: 56%Reef Check 2013: 36%Reef Check 2013: 60%Reef Check 2014: 30%Reef Check 2014: 56%Reef Check 2014: 64%Reef Check 2014: 89%Reef Check 2017: 19%Reef Check 2017: 39%Reef Check 2017: 49%Reef Check 2017: 56%Coral Reef Diagnostics 2016: 29%Year-averaged across all programs: illustrative only; the programs differ in stations and method, so no trend is claimed (7 years)
Reef Check Coral Reef DiagnosticsYear-average (illustrative only, programs differ)

Within 5 km, 9 independent survey stations recorded hard coral cover in 23 surveys between 2010 and 2017. Of the 3 stations surveyed in more than one year, 3 declined (by 1.0–33 points) between their first and latest surveys. Two stations share the longest span (2010–2017); one, Twin Rocks (Reef Check, 3.31 km away), went from 20% in 2010 to 19% in 2017. The most recent nearby survey is from 2017, so these values predate recent heat stress. This site's own estimate (29%) sits within the range of these station-year means up to 2 km away (27–36%); the methods differ, so the comparison is context, not a like-for-like test.

Collected by other programs using different methods (Reef Check uses point-intercept transects), so these are context for the figures above, not a like-for-like comparison. Where a station was surveyed more than once, the cell shows either the range of its values or, as a single value, the mean of surveys made in one year. Station names are not dive-site names. Values above 70% are marked “best patch”: surveys often target the densest coral on a reef, so these may overstate the site as a whole.

Independent survey data near this site
AgencySite / locationDateHard coral cover (%)Distance
Reef CheckSan Teodoro201027%1.76 km
Reef CheckBagalangit Koala201070%2.02 km
Reef CheckTwin Rocks2010–201719–34% (4 surveys)3.31 km
Reef CheckAcacia Resort and Dive Center2010–201749–58% (4 surveys)4.05 km
Reef CheckKoala, Bagalangit2011–201739–72% (range of yearly means; 8 surveys) best patch2.40 km
Reef CheckArthur's Rock201336%, mean of 2 surveys (5 m and 8 m)1.78 km
Reef CheckInner Layag Layag Reef201464%2.41 km
Reef CheckTingloy - Poblacion Reef201489% best patch4.09 km
Reef CheckLigaya Bantong Buhay MPA201756%3.50 km

Data & links

All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from Coral Reef Diagnostics and the organizations named in the data sources above.

© Coral Reef Diagnostics.