Coral Reef Diagnostics

Indonesia - Halmahera: Tower Corner

⬇ Download this page as a report card
05
Photo: Anderson Mayfield/Coral Reef Diagnostics
Country
Survey date(s)
2026-08-11
Coordinates
-0.4547, 127.7060
Coral cover
34%
Claude computer vision (242 photos) · other methods below
Observations
not yet tagged for this site
Heat stress
Today’s heat load
16 Sep 2026 · No heat stress
5-year thermal stress load
5-year mean max. degree heating weeks (DHW)
2021–2025
NOAA Coral Reef Watch — North Maluku virtual station
i 5-year mean max. DHW is the mean of the annual maximum DHWs over the five complete years named above, not conditions today.
More infoNorth Maluku (NOAA CRW virtual station)
Photographs
55
Site summary
Read this summary in:

Tower Corner gets steadily better with depth, exactly as Anderson's log notes - amazing corals from 2-7 m - where near-continuous staghorn and corymbose Acropora thickets and tabulate plates cantilever over the drop-off, above a deeper, current-scoured wall of sparse coral recruits on coralline rock. A blind Claude computer-vision point count puts coral cover around 34%.

Max. depth dived
28.7 m
dive-log maximum

Eight other CRD dive sites within 5 km shown in orange — click a marker to open its page.

39 of these 55 photographs are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.

242223253033344044454749515254

Photo credit & attribution

Site description

Setting

A current-exposed corner dive on 2026-08-11 worked to 28.7 m at 25–26°C, with the reef getting steadily better the shallower it goes. Anderson's field note is unambiguous about where the dive peaked: "very strong currents at depth, used hook, amazing corals from 2–7 m."

General benthic features

The deep, scoured faces are the low end of that range: bare rock plastered in pink and red crustose coralline algae with blue, violet, and scarlet encrusting sponges, carrying only scattered thumbnail-sized cream coral recruits (e.g., Image 13, Image 28, Image 32, Image 48).

The mid-slope (roughly 15–25 m) is a mixed garden — brown arborescent and leathery soft corals, gray and blue-gray massive Porites, laminar Turbinaria- and Echinophyllia-type plates set on white sand-and-rubble aprons, purple Sarcophyton and Sinularia leathers, gray sea fans and wire coral off the lip, and one broad whorled foliose colony (Turbinaria/Merulina-type) close to a meter across (e.g., Image 7, Image 10, Image 11, Image 14, Image 24, Image 26, Image 27, Image 29, Image 37, Image 46, Image 53).

The 2–7 m crest is the site's signature and matches the field note exactly: near-continuous pink, mauve, and olive staghorn and corymbose Acropora thickets running frame to frame, with tabulate Acropora plates cantilevered over the drop-off, digitate Porites cylindrica-type stands, Pocillopora, Seriatopora, Platygyra brains, and shingled foliose plating packed in between (e.g., Image 1, Image 5, Image 6, Image 8, Image 9, Image 12, Image 16, Image 17, Image 18, Image 19, Image 20, Image 21, Image 31, Image 35, Image 36, Image 38, Image 39, Image 41, Image 42, Image 43, Image 50, Image 55).

Coral cover

Coral cover: 34% — a blind Claude computer-vision point count of 242 of Anderson's unedited photographs (20 points per photo; water, fish, and obstructions excluded). Other computer-vision methods are listed in the method table.

Fish and other fauna

Fish are dense throughout: clouds of anthias and chromis over every coral-covered surface, fusiliers off the wall, an anemonefish on the crest, and crinoids on the exposed rock (e.g., Image 3, Image 15).

Comparisons with other data

No prior survey data from this site. If you would like to share yours, please email us.

CV model comparison

As of September 2026 no computer-vision method estimates coral cover accurately on new images, so treat this as indicative rather than a measurement; it is revised as the methods improve.
Headline: Claude computer vision — a blind point count of this site's own photographs (Anderson, 2026-09-27: Claude CV is the main coral-cover value).
More infoDINOv3 and CoralSCOP were run on the same photos and are listed for comparison. Coralscapes v2 and v1 were also run but are not shown: Anderson does not consider Coralscapes reliable for these photos. No diver transect exists for this trip, so agreement between the rows is not accuracy, and as of September 2026 no computer-vision method estimates coral cover accurately on new images; treat every row as indicative.
MethodHard-coral cover (%)
In-house DINOv335.4
CoralSCOP unedited34.4
Claude34.0

Data & links

All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from Coral Reef Diagnostics.

© Coral Reef Diagnostics.