Coral Reef Diagnostics

Indonesia - Halmahera: Tanjung Naraka

⬇ Download this page as a report card
05
Photo: Anderson Mayfield/Coral Reef Diagnostics
Country
Survey date(s)
2026-08-12
Coral cover
30%
Claude computer vision (136 photos) · other methods below · median 25%
Observations
None tagged; see Stressors below
Heat stress
Most recent heat load record
26 Oct 2026 · Bleaching Watch
5-year thermal stress load
5-year mean max. degree heating weeks (DHW)
2021–2025
NOAA Coral Reef Watch — North Maluku, Indonesia virtual station
i 5-year mean max. DHW is the mean of the annual maximum DHWs over the five complete years named above, not conditions today.
More infoNorth Maluku, Indonesia (NOAA CRW virtual station)
Photographs
137
50 shown on this page
Site summary
Read this summary in:

Tanjung Naraka's headline was in the water column — a large school of devil rays, plus bumphead parrotfish and blacktips — over a reef mixing bright Acropora thickets, a heavy soft-coral component, and broad aprons of old, colonized coral rubble reflecting past rather than recent damage. A blind Claude computer-vision point count puts coral cover around 30%.

Max. depth dived
24.2 m
dive-log maximum
Water temp. during survey
24–25°C
range logged on the dive
Bottom time
57 min
in at 15:14

These are unedited originals; edited versions will replace them.

This page shows 50 of the 137 photographs from this site, including every one the text cites.

22 of the 50 photographs on this page are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.

17810111213141617192022232425273031323438424548495051

Photo credit & attribution

Site description

General benthic features

The deep end is a broad, pale sand-and-rubble apron in dim blue light, with isolated table Acropora plates standing clear of the substrate, scattered massive Porites and green-brown foliose plating bommies (Turbinaria/Pachyseris-type) marking the transition upslope; these are the low-cover frames (e.g., Image 6, Image 18, Image 21, Image 26).

A steep section drops away into blue with CCA- and sponge-crusted rock and tabulate Acropora perched on the lip (e.g., Image 29, Image 37).

The mid-slope and crest carry the coral: bright yellow-green branching Acropora thickets standing over open sand, tabulate plates, finger-like Porites, Pocillopora, Platygyra, and Diploastrea-type massives, foliose Montipora and Turbinaria, and a heavy soft-coral component — mauve, pink, and orange Dendronephthya bushes with tan Sarcophyton and Sinularia leathers — that fills the coral-packed frames (e.g., Image 2, Image 4, Image 9, Image 33, Image 35, Image 3, Image 41, Image 44, Image 46).

A conspicuous feature of the site is the extent of consolidated coral rubble: several frames show broad aprons of broken, well-settled branching-coral fragments with only sparse small colonies re-establishing across them, and one frame is almost entirely rubble (e.g., Image 5, Image 15, Image 40).

Coral cover

Stressors

The rubble is old, colonized damage rather than anything fresh. No bleaching, crown-of-thorns, or disease lesions were seen in the 32 of 137 frames examined (a randomized subset), although a computer-vision point count called 0.6% of coral points bleached (4 of 136 photos).

Fish and other fauna

Anderson's field note is all about what was in the water column rather than on the bottom: a large school of devil rays, bumphead parrotfish, and blacktip sharks. Fish were dense — anthias, chromis, damselfishes, surgeonfish, and moorish idols over the coral, with schooling fish off the headland in the murkier deep frames — but the devil rays, bumphead parrotfish, and blacktips from the dive log are not resolved in the frames examined (e.g., Image 36, Image 43, Image 47, Image 52).

Comparisons with other data

We found no other surveys at this site as of 2026. If you would like to share yours, please email us.

Dive record

A headland dive on 12 August 2026 worked to 24.2 m in 24–25°C water.

CV model comparison

Mean 30%, median 25% across 136 photos.
More infoA few colony-focused photos raise the mean; the median is the typical photo. No computer-vision method yet estimates coral cover accurately on new images, so treat this as indicative rather than a measurement; it is revised as the methods improve.
Headline: Claude computer vision — a blind point count of this site's own photographs.
More infoDINOv3 and CoralSCOP were run on the same photos and are listed for comparison. No diver transect exists for this trip, so agreement between the rows is not accuracy, and no computer-vision method yet estimates coral cover accurately on new images; treat every row as indicative.
MethodHard coral cover (%)Photos (n) ± SE
In-house DINOv330.1n = 136 · SE 1.0
CoralSCOP unedited35.3n = 136 · SE 1.3
Claude29.6n = 136 · SE 1.7

The two computer-vision methods agree within 5.2 pp (30.1–35.3%) and read within 5.7 pp of Claude's blind point count (29.6%).

Data & links

All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from Coral Reef Diagnostics.

© Coral Reef Diagnostics.