Coral Reef Diagnostics

Indonesia - Halmahera: Siko Pinnacle

⬇ Download this page as a report card
05
Photo: Anderson Mayfield/Coral Reef Diagnostics
Country
Survey date(s)
2026-08-15
Coral cover
12%
Claude computer vision (48 photos) · other methods below · median 0.0%
Observations
None noted in the photographs reviewed.
Heat stress
Most recent heat load record
26 Oct 2026 · Bleaching Watch
5-year thermal stress load
5-year mean max. degree heating weeks (DHW)
2021–2025
NOAA Coral Reef Watch — North Maluku, Indonesia virtual station
i 5-year mean max. DHW is the mean of the annual maximum DHWs over the five complete years named above, not conditions today.
More infoNorth Maluku, Indonesia (NOAA CRW virtual station)
Photographs
60
47 shown on this page
Site summary
Read this summary in:

Siko Pinnacle is a mid-water seamount rising from open blue water, opening on small tuna and jacks in silhouette before closing in on a sponge- and coral-encrusted flank where large plate and table corals stand out. The dive's real strength is macro life — a honeycomb-patterned nudibranch and an emerald-green Nembrotha-type species both photographed repeatedly. No bleaching, disease, or crown-of-thorns starfish (COTS) observed. A blind Claude computer-vision point count puts coral cover around 12%.

Max. depth dived
34.3 m
dive-log maximum
Water temp. during survey
26–27°C
range logged on the dive
Bottom time
55 min
in at 11:24

Two independent survey stations shown with the program’s logo.

These are unedited originals; edited versions will replace them.

29 of the 47 photographs on this page are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.

7814212327282936383942444546505153

Photo credit & attribution

Site description

Setting

Siko Pinnacle (Halmahera dive 25) is a mid-water seamount rising from open blue water, dived to a maximum of 34.3 m in 26-27°C water.

General benthic features

The opening frames confirm the log note directly — small tuna and jacks in silhouette over blue water and a diver signaling with a dive computer against open water — before the pinnacle's flank closes in: a crowded, coralline-pink and maroon encrusting wall dense with sponges, small gorgonians, and scattered coral (e.g., Image 2, Image 6, Image 12, Image 15, Image 17).

Prominent among the stony corals here are large plate and table corals, gray, tan, and olive-green foliose discs up to a meter or more across, recurrent through the dive and often the main subject in frame; several show visible bite/graze marks or thin margins consistent with normal turnover rather than damage (e.g., Image 1, Image 5, Image 13, Image 20, Image 26, Image 30, Image 40, Image 43, Image 49, Image 52).

Massive smooth colonies, olive-green to gray-brown domes consistent with Porites/Diploastrea-type, recur through the mid-dive stretch (e.g., Image 3, Image 35, Image 41).

A pair of white sea whips or wire corals stands up from the substrate in two frames, alongside a banded shrimp with long white antennae, and a chain of pale yellow encrusting ascidians/polyps is shot in close-up against green water (e.g., Image 10, Image 25, Image 32).

Extensive stretches of the pinnacle's flank carry a dense, fuzzy brown-olive turf that reads as either a soft-coral/zoanthid mat or dense fine-branching coral seen at range — not resolvable to genus at this distance — interspersed with small cream and pink coral colonies and crustose coralline patches (e.g., Image 19, Image 22, Image 34, Image 54).

Coral cover

Stressors

No bleaching, disease, crown-of-thorns, or predation was seen in any of the 60 frames reviewed; growth forms and pigmentation throughout are normal for the depth and light.

Fish and other fauna

Fauna is the strongest part of this dive, exactly as logged: a striking cream-and-black honeycomb-patterned nudibranch, consistent with a Phyllidia/Jorunna-type species, across four consecutive frames; an emerald-green, black-spotted nudibranch consistent with Nembrotha/Tambja-type across four frames; a small orange dorid shot close against pink substrate; and a pair of slender fish with vertical white-and-orange banding tucked in orange sponge, consistent with juvenile sweetlips or a shrimpfish/pipefish pair, not settled from the frame (e.g., Image 9, Image 11, Image 33).

Comparisons with other data

In 2024, WCS Indonesia surveyed two stations, Inti Siko and Inti Gafi, for its Guraici MPA project (data via MERMAID), recording 25–50% hard coral cover. This pin's position is approximate (an island-level placement on the Inti Siko station, not a dive-site fix), so no station is compared with this site by distance or treated as this site; station names are not dive-site names.

Dive record

Anderson's field note: “switched to larger tank; small tuna, small jacks, plentiful reef fish, tons of nudibranchs”

Other notes

Divers with bubble trails and gorgonian fans recur on the outer wall in the closing stretch (e.g., Image 4).

CV model comparison

Mean 12%, median 0.0% across 48 photos.
More infoA few colony-focused photos raise the mean; the median is the typical photo. No computer-vision method yet estimates coral cover accurately on new images, so treat this as indicative rather than a measurement; it is revised as the methods improve.
Headline: Claude computer vision — a blind point count of this site's own photographs.
More infoDINOv3 and CoralSCOP were run on the same photos and are listed for comparison. No diver transect exists for this trip, so agreement between the rows is not accuracy, and no computer-vision method yet estimates coral cover accurately on new images; treat every row as indicative.
MethodHard coral cover (%)Photos (n) ± SE
In-house DINOv318.8n = 48 · SE 1.3
CoralSCOP unedited26.6n = 48 · SE 2.5
Claude11.6n = 48 · SE 2.6

The two computer-vision methods differ by 7.8 pp (18.8–26.6%) and read 7.2–15.0 pp above Claude's blind point count (11.6%); the headline is Claude's blind point count because no transect or manual count exists here.

Independent surveys nearby

The survey table lists 2 independent survey stations, which recorded hard coral cover in 2024. Since 2021, station-year means average 37% (range 25–50%; n = 2 station-years from 2 surveys).

Collected by other programs using different methods (MERMAID is a data platform: each MERMAID row names the organization that did the survey, and its method is in the row's hover text), so these are context for the figures above, not a like-for-like comparison. Where a station was surveyed more than once, the cell shows either the range of its values or, as a single value, the mean of surveys made in one year. Station names are not dive-site names.

Independent survey data near this site
AgencySite / locationDateHard coral cover (%)DistanceLink
WCS Indonesia via MERMAIDInti Siko202425%—Adiyoga D, Cholic O, Gunawan I, Rayhan A, Sutanto S, Syah L, Zulfikri M. 2024. Guraici MPA 2024. MERMAID
WCS Indonesia via MERMAIDInti Gafi202450%—Adiyoga D, Cholic O, Gunawan I, Rayhan A, Sutanto S, Syah L, Zulfikri M. 2024. Guraici MPA 2024. MERMAID

Data & links

All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from Coral Reef Diagnostics and the organizations named in the data sources above.

© Coral Reef Diagnostics.