Coral Reef Diagnostics

Indonesia - Halmahera: Jerot

⬇ Download this page as a report card
05
Photo: Anderson Mayfield/Coral Reef Diagnostics
Country
Survey date(s)
2026-08-13
Coral cover
23%
Claude computer vision (172 photos) · other methods below · median 19%
Observations
None tagged; see Stressors below
Heat stress
Most recent heat load record
26 Oct 2026 · Bleaching Watch
5-year thermal stress load
5-year mean max. degree heating weeks (DHW)
2021–2025
NOAA Coral Reef Watch — North Maluku, Indonesia virtual station
i 5-year mean max. DHW is the mean of the annual maximum DHWs over the five complete years named above, not conditions today.
More infoNorth Maluku, Indonesia (NOAA CRW virtual station)
Photographs
175
50 shown on this page
Site summary
Read this summary in:

Jerot was dived in unusually cold water that had Anderson wondering in the log whether this is an upwelling site, and the reef runs a clean depth gradient — sparse knolls on a deep sand plain giving way to a high-cover shallow crest of Acropora, Pocillopora, and leather corals. A blind Claude computer-vision point count puts coral cover around 23%.

Max. depth dived
22.1 m
dive-log maximum
Water temp. during survey
22–25°C
range logged on the dive
Bottom time
55 min
in at 15:19

These are unedited originals; edited versions will replace them.

This page shows 50 of the 175 photographs from this site, including every one the text cites.

40 of the 50 photographs on this page are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.

7111218222639404346

Photo credit & attribution

Site description

Setting

Jerot is a single continuous slope worked from a deep sand floor up onto a sunlit reef crest, and the imagery is organized almost perfectly by depth. Anderson's field note for the dive reads “super cold, weird thermoclines. Is this actually an upwelling area?” — the log records 22–25°C on a 22.1 m dive.

General benthic features

The deep base is a pale sand-and-rubble plain over crustose-coralline pavement, carrying isolated knolls with wide bare gaps between them; these supply most of the low-cover frames (e.g., Image 6, Image 13, Image 15, Image 17, Image 23, Image 33, Image 34, Image 41).

Growth there is a mix of broad laminar plates (Turbinaria- and Echinophyllia-type), green and cream tabulate Acropora sitting free on sand, foliose Montipora thickets with pale margins, maroon and violet encrusting sponges, barrel sponges (Xestospongia-type), and orange and lilac gorgonian fans (e.g., Image 1, Image 3, Image 8, Image 10, Image 14, Image 28, Image 31).

The mid-slope lifts into a very different reef: large intact Acropora tables up to a couple of meters across, Pocillopora and digitate Acropora heads, big domed massives, including a large dome with a white meandering wall pattern, and smooth lobate Porites, and dense crimson and salmon Dendronephthya soft coral (e.g., Image 9, Image 27, Image 29, Image 30, Image 37).

The crest and reef flat (the last stretch of the dive) is the high-cover half of the site: near-continuous Acropora, Pocillopora, and Seriatopora thickets over pavement, mixed with Sarcophyton and Lobophytum leather corals, feathery Xenia-type pulsing soft coral, and encrusting Montipora, with anthias, damsels, and anemonefish over almost every frame (e.g., Image 4, Image 5, Image 16, Image 20, Image 21, Image 24, Image 25, Image 32, Image 35, Image 38, Image 42, Image 45, Image 48, Image 49, Image 50, Image 51, Image 52, Image 54, Image 55).

Cover is highest in this shallow band.

Coral cover

Stressors

Several branching Acropora colonies on the crest read conspicuously cream-white beside normally pigmented olive, lavender, and tan neighbors, with tissue intact and no turf algae or exposed skeleton. Whether these are paling colonies or naturally pale cream morphs cannot be resolved from the photographs, and the cold 22–25°C water logged on this dive argues against thermal bleaching, so they are recorded as unresolved, not as a bleaching observation. One rubble patch of broken staghorn-type Acropora fragments lies loose and overgrown by hydroids and coralline algae, consistent with old physical breakage of unknown cause (e.g., Image 2).

Comparisons with other data

We found no other surveys at this site as of 2026. If you would like to share yours, please email us.

CV model comparison

Mean 23%, median 19% across 172 photos.
More infoA few colony-focused photos raise the mean; the median is the typical photo. No computer-vision method yet estimates coral cover accurately on new images, so treat this as indicative rather than a measurement; it is revised as the methods improve.
Headline: Claude computer vision — a blind point count of this site's own photographs.
More infoDINOv3 and CoralSCOP were run on the same photos and are listed for comparison. No diver transect exists for this trip, so agreement between the rows is not accuracy, and no computer-vision method yet estimates coral cover accurately on new images; treat every row as indicative.
MethodHard coral cover (%)Photos (n) ± SE
In-house DINOv327.5n = 172 · SE 0.9
CoralSCOP unedited41.6n = 172 · SE 1.3
Claude22.9n = 172 · SE 1.4

The two computer-vision methods disagree by 14.1 pp (27.5–41.6%) and read 4.6–18.7 pp above Claude's blind point count (22.9%); the headline is Claude's blind point count because no transect or manual count exists here.

Data & links

All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from Coral Reef Diagnostics.

© Coral Reef Diagnostics.