Part of the regional summaries: Indonesia - Halmahera and Indonesia - Maluku

Batu Balong is exactly the underwater hike Anderson's log describes — a foliose-plate-covered pinnacle wall giving way to a broad plateau blanketed edge to edge in mauve and pink corymbose Acropora, then a series of discrete coral knolls on open sand linking back to shore. A blind Claude computer-vision point count puts coral cover around 39%.
Batu Balong persis seperti pendakian bawah laut yang diuraikan catatan Anderson — dinding puncak batu yang tertutup karang lembaran, memberi jalan kepada dataran luas yang berselimut dari tepi ke tepi oleh Acropora korimbosa berwarna ungu muda dan merah muda, lalu serangkaian gundukan karang terpisah di atas pasir terbuka yang menghubungkan kembali ke pantai. Penghitungan titik buta visi komputer Claude memperkirakan tutupan karang sekitar 39%.
Terjemahan ringkasan ini oleh AI; versi bahasa Inggris yang berlaku.
Nine independent survey stations shown with the program’s logo.
These are unedited originals; edited versions will replace them.
This page shows 50 of the 129 photographs from this site, including every one the text cites.
44 of the 50 photographs on this page are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.
Batu Balong was dived to 31.4 m, and Anderson's field note describes its shape better than any summary could: “an underwater hike: seamounts interspersed with blue-water swims. Tons of fish, sharks.” The frame sequence follows that itinerary in four legs. The descent drops through green, particle-loaded surface water with almost nothing resolvable — these are the lowest-cover frames and the dive's minimum.
The deep flank is a steep pinnacle wall in flat blue-gray light, and its dominant cover is not branching coral at all but sheet after sheet of shingled foliose plate coral with bright pale growing margins, stacked into overlapping tiers (a run of ten frames is near-continuous plate) over a groundmass of magenta and scarlet crustose coralline algae, red and orange encrusting sponges, blue tube sponges, and small violet and lilac sea fans (e.g., Image 1, Image 8, Image 11, Image 14, Image 16, Image 17, Image 25, Image 26, Image 37, Image 38, Image 41, Image 42, Image 52, Image 54).
The plateau is the opposite: a broad, gently domed terrace carpeted almost edge to edge in mauve, lilac, and dusty-pink corymbose and bottlebrush Acropora, so uniform that consecutive frames look nearly interchangeable (e.g., Image 3, Image 5, Image 9, Image 12, Image 13, Image 18, Image 19, Image 23, Image 24, Image 29, Image 32, Image 36, Image 44, Image 46, Image 48, Image 51).
Big smooth chocolate-brown Porites domes and one massive colony rise through the carpet, alongside salmon Dendronephthya and an unmissable vermilion soft coral bouquet in two frames (e.g., Image 4, Image 33, Image 34, Image 39, Image 47).
The hike itself closes the dive: discrete coral knolls standing alone on open white sand with clear water between them, divers crossing the gaps, each knoll carrying its own table Acropora, pink gorgonian, or soft-coral cluster (e.g., Image 6, Image 10, Image 15, Image 22, Image 30, Image 40, Image 43, Image 45).
The last frames drop into a dense soft-coral and anemone garden (e.g., Image 35).
Cover spreads widely (Claude: 39% ± 28 SD over 126 frames, 0.0–100%), and the spread tracks those four legs directly.
Two foliose plates on the deep flank carry small old patches of dead skeleton, some already being colonized by pink crustose coralline algae (e.g., Image 14, Image 16); the cause is not known.
We found no other surveys at this site as of 2026. In 2024, WCS Indonesia surveyed nine stations in the Guraici islands (Guraici MPA 2024; data via MERMAID), recording 18–59% hard coral cover. Because this pin's position is approximate (an island-area anchor, not a dive-site fix), no station is compared with this site by distance; station names are not dive-site names.
| Method | Hard coral cover (%) | Photos (n) ± SE |
|---|---|---|
| In-house DINOv3 | 28.0 | n = 126 · SE 1.0 |
| CoralSCOP unedited | 34.1 | n = 126 · SE 1.5 |
| Claude | 39.4 | n = 126 · SE 2.5 |
The two computer-vision methods agree within 6.1 pp (28.0–34.1%) and read 5.3–11.4 pp below Claude's blind point count (39.4%); the headline is Claude's blind point count because no transect or manual count exists here.
See a more detailed, stand-alone version of this table.
The survey table lists 9 independent survey stations, which recorded hard coral cover in 2024. Since 2021, station-year means average 39% (range 18–59%; n = 9 station-years from 9 surveys).
Collected by other programs using different methods (MERMAID is a data platform: each MERMAID row names the organization that did the survey, and its method is in the row's hover text), so these are context for the figures above, not a like-for-like comparison. Where a station was surveyed more than once, the cell shows either the range of its values or, as a single value, the mean of surveys made in one year. Station names are not dive-site names.
All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from Coral Reef Diagnostics and the organizations named in the data sources above.
© Coral Reef Diagnostics.