Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation — Global Reef Expedition
Coral Reef Diagnostics

Tonga - Ha'apai (TOHA03)

Reef Check Foundation
⬇ Download this page as a report card
05
Photo: Anderson Mayfield/Coral Reef Diagnostics
Country
Survey date(s)
2013-09-12
Coordinates
-19.8561, -174.4268
Coral cover
20%
± 4.0% SE, n = 5 transects · Benthic transects+photo-quadrats
Observations
None tagged; see Stressors below
Heat stress
Most recent heat load record
26 Oct 2026 · No heat stress
5-year thermal stress load
5-year mean max. degree heating weeks (DHW)
2021–2025
NOAA Coral Reef Watch — Southern Tonga virtual station
i 5-year mean max. DHW is the mean of the annual maximum DHWs over the five complete years named above, not conditions today.
More infoSouthern Tonga (NOAA CRW virtual station)
Photographs
17
Site summary
Read this summary in:

TOHA03 is not uniformly low-relief: alongside sparse mound-top mosaics, the photos reveal an 'Acropora mountain,' Anderson's own name for an enormous mound blanketed in branching and staghorn coral reaching almost to the surface, and a soft coral garden of mustard-yellow and gray-green lobed colonies. A banded sea snake tracks across coralline rubble and sand in two frames; cover measured 20%, and no bleaching, disease lesion, or crown-of-thorns feeding scar is visible in any of the 17 frames. Surveyed on the Living Oceans Foundation's Global Reef Expedition.

Max. depth dived
14.6 m
expedition dive-log maximum
Water temp. during survey
23.9°Cii
CTD-cast midpoint of 23.9–24.0°C
-2.7°C vs the 2013 mean sea temperature (26.6°C)
ii Station CTD-cast midpoint (LOF metadata), not a dive reading: the Living Oceans Foundation station metadata for Tonga give the CTD cast at TOHA03 on 12 September 2013 (to 22.3 m) a maximum of 23.99°C and a minimum of 23.90°C; the value shown, 23.9°C, is their midpoint.
Bottom time
64 min
in at 09:09

One independent survey station shown with the program’s logo — click one to see how far it is from this site.

One other CRD dive site with its own page within 5 km shown in orange — click a marker to open its page.

14 of the 17 photographs on this page are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.

123

Photo credit & attribution

Site description

Setting

The site is not uniformly low-relief: it has locally dense, high-relief Acropora stands as well as the sparse ground. The undercut structure recorded in the survey notes shows up directly: Image 13 and Image 11 look along a ledge with a dark overhung recess beneath a coral-crowned lip, and Image 5 looks up the flank of a mound built of stacked plating and branching colonies from the channel below.

Image 4 is the poor-visibility frame — a diver hanging in green-gray water over a steep, dimly resolved wall — and stands as the honest counterweight to the clear frames.

General benthic features

Two frames are given over to a single enormous mound blanketed in branching and staghorn Acropora, branch tips reaching almost to the surface, so completely covered that no substrate shows — a structure Anderson described as an Acropora mountain and photographed a second time from further back with the whole mound rising out of a rubble apron (e.g., Image 8, Image 9).

A third frame Anderson calls an Acropora garden: open, well-spaced arborescent colonies across the mound top with a thick cloud of small planktivores hanging over them against blue water (e.g., Image 10).

A fourth frame centers on a broad pale table Acropora on a dark mound flank with staghorn stands behind it (e.g., Image 17).

The mound tops themselves are a crowded low-relief mosaic — small mauve and pink corymbose Acropora and Pocillopora, tan corymbose and digitate colonies, encrusting and submassive Porites-type mounds, mauve plating colonies, and coralline-crusted pavement between them, with sand pockets and loose rubble threading through (e.g., Image 6, Image 7, Image 11, Image 14, Image 15, Image 16).

Fleshy soft corals are a genuine component and not an incidental one: mustard-yellow and gray-green lobed and digitate colonies (Sinularia/Lobophytum-type) run through the foreground of the frame Anderson simply calls a soft coral garden (e.g., Image 12) and recur in Image 15, Image 7, and Image 16.

Coral cover

Stressors

Standing dead branching skeletons and bare rubble appear in several mound-top frames, but no bleaching, disease lesion, or crown-of-thorns feeding scar is visible in any of the 17 frames. The Living Oceans Foundation transects here recorded 0.4% cyanobacteria and no recently dead coral.

Fish and other fauna

Two frames are a banded sea snake, which Anderson identified, one photographed alone as it tracks across coralline rubble and sand and one with a diver in the frame; that field identification is used here.

Comparisons with other data

Apart from the Living Oceans Foundation survey shown here, we found no other surveys at this site as of 2026. Within 5 km, one independent station, Reef Check at Kito si'I, 2.11 km away, read 18% in 2002.

Other notes

The site's photographs show shallow mound tops and rubble, and also the site's most striking structure. What the set still cannot show is the deeper channel slope and the 18 m sand base in the survey notes — the frames stop on the mounds and their immediate flanks.

Survey team's site notes: Shallow, 1-3 m flattopped mounds separated by sand channels up to 3 m below top. They are undercut with small caves and ledges and high abundance of Tubastraea and smaller plating corals under overhangs. Sides of channel slope steeply to 18 m, ending in sand. Sand continuous out getting progressively deeper; soft bottom has large ripples and depressions from waves and currents and low cover of Halophila sea grass.

CV model comparison

The LOF Global Reef Expedition in-water transect is THE coral-cover value for this site.
More infoThe photo row below is a methods comparison only: it is never averaged with the transect and never used as the headline. It compares site means only: the photos come from the same survey dive as the transect but not from the same points.
MethodHard coral cover (%)Photos (n) ± SE
Transect mean (all transects)20.1
CoralSCOP unedited32.0*n = 16 · SE 4.4
Claude (edited photos)20.4*n = 16 · SE 3.7

The two computer-vision methods disagree by 11.6 pp (20.4–32.0%) and read 0.3–11.9 pp above the in-water transect (20.1%); the headline is the in-water transect because a diver transect is independent of the photographs.

*Based on only 16 reef-habitat photos; this estimate is less certain.

Independent surveys nearby

Within 5 km, 1 independent survey station recorded hard coral cover in 2002. The most recent nearby survey is from 2002, so these values predate recent heat stress. This site's own estimate (20%) is not compared with these surveys: none lies within 2 km.

Collected by other programs using different methods (Reef Check uses point-intercept transects), so these are context for the figures above, not a like-for-like comparison. Where a station was surveyed more than once, the cell shows either the range of its values or, as a single value, the mean of surveys made in one year. Station names are not dive-site names.

Independent survey data near this site
AgencySite / locationDateHard coral cover (%)Distance
Reef CheckKito si'I200218%, mean of 2 surveys (3 m and 10 m)2.11 km

Data & links

All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from the Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation Global Reef Expedition, Coral Reef Diagnostics, and the organizations named in the data sources above.

© Coral Reef Diagnostics.