Coral Reef Diagnostics

N. GBR - Pink (AUYD109)

Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation — Global Reef Expedition
⬇ Download this page as a report card
05
Photo: Anderson Mayfield/Coral Reef Diagnostics
Country
Survey date(s)
2014-09-22
Coordinates
-11.9510, 143.9761
Coral cover
37%
Benthic transects+photo-quadrats
Observations
Heat stress
Today’s heat load
3 Oct 2026 · No heat stress
5-year thermal stress load
5-year mean max. degree heating weeks (DHW)
2021–2025
NOAA Coral Reef Watch — Far Northern GBR virtual station
i 5-year mean max. DHW is the mean of the annual maximum DHWs over the five complete years named above, not conditions today.
More infoFar Northern GBR (NOAA CRW virtual station)
Photographs
55
50 shown on this page
Site summary

AUYD109 is a near-vertical wall on Yule Detached Reef plunging past 50 m, with the best coral (30-40% by eye) on the 10 m transects, among bottlebrush Acropora, Stylophora, and finger Porites. His notes record dying Seriatopora hystrix on his 15.5 m transect. Surveyed on the Living Oceans Foundation's Global Reef Expedition.

Max. depth dived
21.9 m
dive-log maximum
Sea surface temp. (satellite)
25.7°C
satellite sea surface temperature (SST) on the survey date (NOAA Coral Reef Watch, Far Northern GBR), not an in-water reading; it is the warmest-pixel (90th percentile) reading in the station area and can run 1–1.5°C above the reef
Bottom time
60 min
in at 11:50

Three other CRD dive sites within 5 km shown in orange — click a marker to open its page.

This page shows 50 of the 55 photographs from this site, including every one the text cites.

44 of the 50 photographs on this page are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.

1611123040

Photo credit & attribution

Site description

Setting

The wide frames show a steep reef with a defined crest and a drop into blue — Image 24, Image 43, Image 48, and Image 51 all look out or down into open water off the structure.

General benthic features

The set splits cleanly into survey work and reef structure. Twenty frames are downward photoquadrats shot through a black PVC frame with a chain diagonal and small tag (e.g., Image 2, Image 4, Image 5, Image 8, Image 9, Image 10, Image 13, Image 17, Image 18, Image 19, Image 28, Image 31, Image 32, Image 35, Image 39, Image 44, Image 45, Image 46, Image 49, Image 50), several with a gloved hand steadying the frame (e.g., Image 17, Image 18, Image 50).

What sits inside them varies as much as the notes imply: Image 10, Image 19, and Image 44 are dominated by open sand and silt with almost nothing living in frame; Image 2, Image 17, Image 31, Image 45, and Image 46 are coralline-encrusted pavement and rubble carrying turf, sponge, and small encrusting patches; and others enclose real colonies — Image 8 a pale branching thicket, Image 13 tan lobed massive colonies packed against branching neighbors, Image 32 a red-brown branching colony over rubble, Image 35 a smooth purple-mauve massive surface with a yellow arrow marker on it, and Image 49 a yellow-tan digitate colony. Massive corals are the backbone: Image 7 is a meter-scale rounded colony with fine meandering wall-and-valley relief carrying a small bushy branching colony on its summit, Image 22 and Image 36 show further large smooth-to-mounded massives, and Image 34 a rounded colony with a pale honeycombed cerioid coral beside it.

Plating and foliose growth is prominent and locally spectacular: Image 15 is a broad horizontal table, Image 43 a tiered stack of overlapping tan plates a meter or more across, with sharply bordered gray-white bare patches on several plates, Image 37 a large golden-orange whorled foliose colony filling the frame, and Image 16 a stand of upright tan blades rising off the crest into blue water.

Branching corals occur as discrete bushes and small thickets rather than continuous stands (e.g., Image 3, Image 23, Image 25, Image 27, Image 33, Image 38, Image 42, Image 48), and several frames (e.g., Image 14, Image 27, Image 38) show mauve-to-pink pigmented branching and corymbose colonies mixed with encrusting pinks.

Image 20 and Image 29 are stretches of low pale corymbose and encrusting cover over pavement, and Image 21 a dark, silt- and algal-filmed pavement panel.

Image 41 is a critter frame: a red-pink feather star (crinoid) spread over rubble.

What the frames cannot settle: the notes' finger coral (Porites cylindrica), the Napoleon wrasse at 25 m and the zebra-striped sea cucumber are not identifiable in this set, and the depth of each frame is unknown, so the notes' depth-banded structure (the 5-7 m Porites-and-Acropora ground versus the better 10 m transects) cannot be tied to individual frames. No colony here is identified below growth-form level, and the quadrats are individually far too small to speak to areal cover. The most interesting ground lay between 5 and 7 m, where massive Porites boulders were threaded with Acropora, Stylophora, and Porites cylindrica, though large rubble patches kept eye-estimated cover there to 15-20%; the 10 m transects were the reef's best at 30-40%, taking in bottlebrush Acropora, octocorals and a Montastrea-like brain coral.

Coral cover

Stressors

Two frames record coral condition. Image 26 is a close frame of a fine-branched colony that is cream-white over most of its extent, beside pigmented branching and massive neighbors: bleached, or very recently dead with no algae yet; Image 28 holds similar white branching fragments inside the quadrat.

The white colony in Image 26 is the frame that most plausibly corresponds to the dying Seriatopora hystrix Anderson logged on his 15.5 m transect. Image 43 shows partial mortality on the tiered foliose plates: several sharply bordered gray-white bare patches, the largest on the bottom plate with green algal tufts; the cause is not stated. No crown-of-thorns starfish (COTS) or other corallivores evident.

Comparisons with other data

No prior survey data from this site. If you would like to share yours, please email us.

Dive record

Yule Detached Reef's second dive is well photographed, with 51 frames in the gallery.

CV model comparison

The LOF Global Reef Expedition in-water transect is THE coral-cover value for this site.
More infoThe photo row below is a methods comparison only: it is never averaged with the transect and never used as the headline. It compares site means only: the photos come from the same survey dive as the transect but not from the same points.
MethodHard-coral cover (%)Photos (n) ± SE
Transect (published)36.5
CoralSCOP unedited28.6n = 25 · SE 2.8
Claude31.0n = 25 · SE 4.2

The two computer-vision methods agree within 2.4 pp (29–31%) and read 5.5–7.9 pp below the in-water transect (37%); the headline is the in-water transect because a diver transect is independent of the photographs.

Data & links

All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from the Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation Global Reef Expedition and Coral Reef Diagnostics.

© Coral Reef Diagnostics.