Australian Institute of Marine Science
Coral Reef Diagnostics

N. GBR - Pink (AUR611)

Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation — Global Reef Expedition
⬇ Download this page as a report card
05
Photo: Anderson Mayfield/Coral Reef Diagnostics
Country
Survey date(s)
2014-09-04
Coordinates
-15.2813, 145.7423
Coral cover
37%
Benthic transects+photo-quadrats
Observations
Heat stress
Today’s heat load
3 Oct 2026 · No heat stress
5-year thermal stress load
5-year mean max. degree heating weeks (DHW)
2021–2025
NOAA Coral Reef Watch — Northern GBR virtual station
i 5-year mean max. DHW is the mean of the annual maximum DHWs over the five complete years named above, not conditions today.
More infoNorthern GBR (NOAA CRW virtual station)
Photographs
55
32 shown on this page
Site summary

Anderson's notes call this Ribbon Reef 6 pinnacle "beautiful" and "interesting", and its top shows why: branching Acropora in rust-orange, cream, and blue-tipped forms grows shoulder to shoulder beneath clouds of chromis and fusiliers, with gray reef sharks cruising above. Off the crown the pinnacle becomes a sparser reef of rock, rubble, and scattered colonies, and his field note records some Pocillopora colonies mostly bleached and covered in mucus; to him the mucus looked exogenous in origin ("Very strange"). Surveyed on the Living Oceans Foundation's Global Reef Expedition.

Max. depth dived
22.1 m
dive-log maximum
Sea surface temp. (satellite)
24.7°C
satellite sea surface temperature (SST) on the survey date (NOAA Coral Reef Watch, Northern GBR), not an in-water reading; it is the warmest-pixel (90th percentile) reading in the station area and can run 1–1.5°C above the reef
Bottom time
66 min
in at 15:50

Two independent survey stations shown with the program’s logo — click one to see how far it is from this site.

Five other CRD dive sites within 5 km shown in orange — click a marker to open its page.

Site description

Setting

Anderson's notes call this leeward coral pinnacle on Ribbon Reef No. 6 "beautiful" and "interesting", and the photographs make clear why — and also that the site has two very different halves. This Preservation Zone site carries the Marine Park's tightest protection, with entry itself restricted.

General benthic features

Eight frames (e.g., Image 26, Image 27, Image 28, Image 29, Image 30, Image 31, Image 32, Image 21) are shot across the top of the pinnacle in bright blue water and show a near-continuous branching-coral pavement running to the limit of visibility.

Antler- and staghorn-form Acropora dominate in rust-orange, tan, cream, and blue-gray, growing shoulder to shoulder with almost no bare substrate between colonies (e.g., Image 27, Image 28, Image 30, Image 31); blue-tipped digitate colonies are mixed through the orange thickets (e.g., Image 26, Image 28, Image 31), and stacked pale tables sit on the crest behind them (e.g., Image 27, Image 31). Two frames are given to single large tabulate Acropora plates, one roughly a meter and a half across with a clean growing rim and a shaded undercut (e.g., Image 24, Image 32).

A separate frame is a carpet of pink-mauve corymbose Acropora and Pocillopora piled over one another (e.g., Image 21). A second group of frames turns down and off the pinnacle, and the character changes completely: hazier green-tinged water, mound-and-groove rock with low knobby olive-green massives and scattered small colonies (e.g., Image 7, Image 16, Image 20), sponge- and encrusting-covered rock walls dropping into blue (e.g., Image 19), and rubble-and-sand floor with isolated colonies — among them a large dark foliose colony standing alone on coarse sand (e.g., Image 2).

A last close-up shows a salmon-pink knobby encrusting colony with pale patches (e.g., Image 33).

Coral cover

Stressors

Five close-range frames are devoted to pale and stark-white branching colonies with polyps extended and a slack, mucus-like sheen on the tissue (e.g., Image 3, Image 5, Image 8, Image 9, Image 10).

Image 8 is the clearest: a completely white branching colony ringed by scarlet and pink encrusting sponge and coralline. Image 5 shows a tan colony with a white branch group, and Image 4 shows a bright white branching colony on the reef top among darker rubble.

Anderson's field note for this site records that some Pocillopora colonies were mostly bleached and covered in mucus; the mucus, he noted, looked to be of exogenous, rather than endogenous, origin ("Very strange"), and the photographs are consistent with that. Two of the close-ups are soft-focus at that working distance (e.g., Image 9, Image 10), and the affected colonies cannot be identified to genus from the imagery. No count or extent is given here: these are targeted close-ups of the colonies that caught his eye, not a survey of how much of the reef looked like this, and the wide crown frames show no obviously bleached colonies at all. No crown-of-thorns starfish (COTS) or other corallivores evident.

Fish and other fauna

Fish are heavy over this half: clouds of chromis and small planktivores in nearly every crown frame, dense fusilier schools filling the water column (e.g., Image 17, Image 22, Image 12), and a tight shoal of sergeant-major-type damselfish over the reef top (e.g., Image 13).



The remaining frames record the fauna. Two gray reef sharks cruise over the reef in open blue water in the opening frame (e.g., Image 1), and a slender banded shark — his "cat shark" — lies tucked under a coralline-crusted ledge (e.g., Image 23).

Two frames are close-ups of a single large gastropod shell on the rubble floor, one of the whole animal and one of its glossy cream aperture (e.g., Image 14, Image 15).

His notes also record a huge Alveopora colony, a large grouper (about 1 m), and a gray reef shark approaching 2.5 m.

Comparisons with other data

No other surveys have been conducted at this site to date. Within 5 km, two AIMS manta tow stations recorded 11–36% hard coral cover between 1994 and 2021; the nearest, AIMS manta tow at RIBBON NO 6 REEF, 0.86 km away, read 11–35% between 1994 and 2017.

Other notes

Two frames contain a diver (e.g., Image 6, Image 18), and Image 12 is almost entirely green midwater with fish and heavy backscatter.

A pale angular object intrudes at the left edge of one crown frame (e.g., Image 25) and may be survey gear rather than reef.

Depth is not resolvable from the imagery.

CV model comparison

The LOF Global Reef Expedition in-water transect is THE coral-cover value for this site.
More infoThe photo row below is a methods comparison only: it is never averaged with the transect and never used as the headline. It compares site means only: the photos come from the same survey dive as the transect but not from the same points.
MethodHard-coral cover (%)Photos (n) ± SE
Transect (published)37.0
CoralSCOP edited29.3n = 20 · SE 4.1
Claude (edited photos)39.6n = 20 · SE 6.2

The two computer-vision methods disagree by 10.3 pp (29–40%) and read on both sides of the in-water transect (37%); the headline is the in-water transect because a diver transect is independent of the photographs.

Independent surveys nearby

Hard coral cover over time — this site and every independent station within 5 km. Programs are shown separately because they use different methods at different stations; the lines are not one comparable series.
0%10%20%30%40%199420072021AIMS manta tow 1994: 35%AIMS manta tow 1996: 26%AIMS manta tow 1999: 36%AIMS manta tow 2000: 35%AIMS manta tow 2002: 25%AIMS manta tow 2003: 23%AIMS manta tow 2005: 26%AIMS manta tow 2010: 22%AIMS manta tow 2013: 16%AIMS manta tow 2013: 24%AIMS manta tow 2015: 22%AIMS manta tow 2017: 11%AIMS manta tow 2017: 14%AIMS manta tow 2021: 35%LOF Global Reef Expedition 2014: 37%Year-averaged across all programs: illustrative only; the programs differ in stations and method, so no trend is claimed (13 years)
AIMS manta tow LOF Global Reef ExpeditionYear-average (illustrative only, programs differ)

Within 5 km, 2 independent survey stations recorded hard coral cover in 14 surveys between 1994 and 2021. Of the 2 stations surveyed in more than one year, 1 declined (by 23.8 points) and 1 increased (by 9.1 points) between their first and latest surveys. The longest record, 15034S (AIMS manta tow, 4.73 km away), went from 26% in 1996 to 35% in 2021. One survey since 2021 recorded 35%. This site's own estimate (37%) sits 2 points above the range of these surveys up to 2 km away (11–35%); the methods differ, so the comparison is context, not a like-for-like test.

Collected by other programs using different methods (AIMS manta tow is a towed visual estimate in categorical bins), so these are context for the figures above, not a like-for-like comparison. Where a station was surveyed more than once, the cell shows either the range of its values or, as a single value, the mean of surveys made in one year. Station names are not dive-site names.

Independent survey data near this site
AgencySite / locationDateHard coral cover (%)DistanceLink
AIMS manta towRIBBON NO 6 REEF1994–201711–35% (6 surveys)0.86 kmdoi:10.25845/5c09b0abf315a
AIMS manta tow15034S1996–202114–36% (8 surveys)4.73 kmdoi:10.25845/5c09b0abf315a

Data & links

All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from the Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation Global Reef Expedition, Coral Reef Diagnostics, and the organizations named in the data sources above.

© Coral Reef Diagnostics.