Part of the regional summaries: Australia (GBR) - Far North: Green stations (no-take reefs) and Australia (GBR)

A northern Great Barrier Reef station with 79% coral cover and just 7.8% algae: a shallow slope covered almost wall to wall in tan, lavender, purple, and yellow branching, laminar, and massive corals and leathery soft corals, running to a reef edge that drops into blue water. Anderson's dive notes record most needle corals looking bad, with sickly Seriatopora hystrix on three transects, and crown-of-thorns damage on Acropora along one transect at about 15 m. Surveyed on the Living Oceans Foundation's Global Reef Expedition.
Three independent survey stations shown with the program’s logo — click one to see how far it is from this site.
Eight other CRD dive sites within 5 km shown in orange — click a marker to open its page.
🗺 Detailed map of the Global Reef Expedition dive sites, Five Reefs and unnamed reef 11-238, northern Great Barrier Reef (Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation; opens in a new window)
10 of the 11 photographs on this page are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.
This Global Reef Expedition station (AU74147) lies on the northern Great Barrier Reef, Australia, and was surveyed on 29 September 2014 on a dive to 22.2 m. The eleven frames in the set show a shallow reef framework built into a continuous slope of mixed coral that ran out to a reef edge and dropped into open blue water. At the foot of the slope, bommies crowned with pale lilac soft corals and small massive mounds stood on clean sand, one flank carpeted in a dark brown encrusting growth (e.g., Image 8).
Coral covered the framework almost wall to wall, with very little bare rock showing between colonies (e.g., Image 2).
Growth forms were mixed: corymbose and bushy branching colonies in tan, cream, lavender-pink, and purple, a bright yellow knobby branching colony, blue-tipped branching colonies, an orange-brown laminar colony, and lobed massive mounds, interleaved with leathery soft corals with lobed crowns (e.g., Image 1).
Large lobed massive mounds rose among the branching colonies, with a pink knobby colony, a yellow-green corymbose colony, and tabular colonies against the skyline (e.g., Image 7).
In front of one such mound, a brown-purple arborescent Acropora thicket with white growing tips sheltered small orange fish (e.g., Image 10).
Farther down the slope, a bright yellow foliose colony of scrolled, overlapping plates spread across the reef among tabular, corymbose, and small massive colonies (e.g., Image 9).
At the reef edge, a large corymbose colony with white growing tips stood beside a meandroid brain colony and a massive mound, with turf and red-brown algae confined to the dead rock at its base (e.g., Image 4).
Close in, a stark-white, bleached branching colony grew against a mound of long, tube-like polyps, with a tree-like soft coral behind and dark sponges on the rock below (e.g., Image 6).
Just above the drop, a large brown arborescent soft coral shared the rock with orange and purple encrusting growths and a brown-and-white honeycomb-patterned sponge-like growth (e.g., Image 5).
The 2014 dive notes for this site record most needle corals looking bad, with sickly Seriatopora hystrix on transects at 14.7, 10, and 10.5 m, and crown-of-thorns-damaged Acropora on one transect at about 15 m (Anderson's GBR field notes, 2014). One branching colony in the photographs is bleached: stark white with its tissue intact, beside tan-to-purple branching colonies of the same growth form (e.g., Image 6).
Small orange fish sheltered among the branching colonies (e.g., Image 3).
Two black polyclad flatworms with orange-and-white margins crept over a rock face beside a small meandroid coral and a gray sponge. A dark-bodied fish and a yellow-and-silver damselfish worked the reef edge, with small planktivorous fish in the blue water beyond (e.g., Image 7, Image 10).
No other surveys have been conducted at this site to date. Within 5 km, three XL Catlin Seaview Survey stations recorded 16–32% hard coral cover between 2012 and 2016; the nearest, XL Catlin Seaview Survey at transect 15022, 2.79 km away, read 17–32% between 2012 and 2016.
Nearby citizen-science imagery within 2 km (not a survey of this site, and not total coral cover):
The Great Reef Census scores three coral shapes only, so every other coral is left out, and its denominator is colonizable substrate (sand, water, and shadow excluded): these values are not hard coral cover and should not be added together or compared with the cover figures on this page. The photographs are taken by volunteer snorkelers 3–5 m above the reef. In the program's own validation (Lawson et al. 2025, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 197:814, doi:10.1007/s10661-025-14261-6, open access), each analysis method on its own differed from expert estimates by up to about 9.5 percentage points on average for these coral types (AI alone: plating Acropora −9.1 points; AI plus volunteers: branching Acropora +9.5 points); the program's “~99% accurate” figure is the average over about 8,000 images after choosing the better method for each coral type, and site values from fewer images carry more error. Sites with fewer than 40 images have fewer images than the 40–80 the method needs to estimate site-level values to within 5 percentage points. Source: Great Reef Census / Citizens of the Great Barrier Reef; Lawson et al. 2026, Limnology & Oceanography Letters, doi:10.1002/lol2.70168 (data CC BY-NC 4.0, doi:10.7910/DVN/KCULSD).
The dive began at 08:54 and lasted 61 minutes, per the LOF fellowship 2016 workbook.
LOF Global Reef ExpeditionYear-average (illustrative only, programs differ)Within 5 km, 3 independent survey stations recorded hard coral cover in 6 surveys between 2012 and 2016. Of the 3 stations surveyed in more than one year, 1 declined by more than 7 points between their first and latest surveys; 2 changed by 7 points or less, inside the 7-point method-noise floor (inconclusive). Three stations share the longest span (2012–2016); one, transect 15022 (XL Catlin Seaview Survey, 2.79 km away), went from 32% in 2012 to 17% in 2016. The most recent nearby survey is from 2016, so these values predate recent heat stress. This site's own estimate (79%) is not compared with these surveys: none lies within 2 km.
Collected by other programs using different methods (the XL Catlin Seaview Survey uses photo-transects with automated image annotation), so these are context for the figures above, not a like-for-like comparison. Where a station was surveyed more than once, the cell shows either the range of its values or, as a single value, the mean of surveys made in one year. Station names are not dive-site names.
| Agency | Site / location | Date | Hard coral cover (%) | Distance | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XL Catlin Seaview Survey | transect 15022 | 2012–2016 | 17–32% (2 surveys) | 2.79 km | doi:10.14264/uql.2019.930 |
| XL Catlin Seaview Survey | transect 15023 | 2012–2016 | 26–32% (2 surveys) | 4.20 km | doi:10.14264/uql.2019.930 |
| XL Catlin Seaview Survey | transect 15024 | 2012–2016 | 16% (2 surveys) | 4.60 km | doi:10.14264/uql.2019.930 |
All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from the Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation Global Reef Expedition, Coral Reef Diagnostics, and the organizations named in the data sources above.
© Coral Reef Diagnostics.