Coral Reef Diagnostics

N. GBR - Green (AU3479)

Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation — Global Reef Expedition
⬇ Download this page as a report card
05
Photo: Anderson Mayfield/Coral Reef Diagnostics
Country
Survey date(s)
2014-09-17
Coordinates
-11.1548, 143.0872
Coral cover
46%
Benthic transects+photo-quadrats
Observations
algal overgrowth
Heat stress
Today’s heat load
3 Oct 2026 · No heat stress
5-year thermal stress load
5-year mean max. degree heating weeks (DHW)
2021–2025
NOAA Coral Reef Watch — Far Northern GBR virtual station
i 5-year mean max. DHW is the mean of the annual maximum DHWs over the five complete years named above, not conditions today.
More infoFar Northern GBR (NOAA CRW virtual station)
Photographs
58
21 shown on this page
Site summary

A silt-laden reef in 4-5 m visibility, with dense coral only in the shallows, where fire coral and Porites thickets reached an estimated 60-70% cover; by 10 m the bottom was mostly rubble under clay silt and fleshy algae. A notably aggressive gray reef shark was logged, and the recorded problems were sediment and partial die-off on staghorn rather than bleaching. Surveyed on the Living Oceans Foundation's Global Reef Expedition.

Max. depth dived
14.1 m
dive-log maximum
Sea surface temp. (satellite)
25.2°C
satellite sea surface temperature (SST) on the survey date (NOAA Coral Reef Watch, Far Northern GBR), not an in-water reading; it is the warmest-pixel (90th percentile) reading in the station area and can run 1–1.5°C above the reef
Bottom time
64 min
in at 08:45

Four other CRD dive sites within 5 km shown in orange — click a marker to open its page.

Site description

Setting

Global Reef Expedition station AU3479 on Unnamed Reef 34, far northern Great Barrier Reef (-11.1548, 143.0872), the first of Anderson's three dives there on 17 September 2014, in a no-take Marine National Park (Green) Zone. His notes describe a very murky site (4-5 m visibility, "possibly less") on a gently sloping sand slope; corals appeared to be absent below 12 m, so he ran his five transects at 8.5-10 m.

General benthic features

His notes describe shallows characterized by huge thickets of Millepora fire coral, Porites cylindrica, and P. lobata or other massive poritids, with live coral cover reaching 60-70% in many areas but only four or five species. On his transects he listed soft corals, fungiids, Lobophyllia, Caulastrea, large Pachyseris, Pocillopora acuta, large massive Porites, Acropora, Isopora, several favid species, blue coral, and encrusting sponges; a well-developed patch, at the base of the reef system (9.7 m), held 10-15 species. The 21 posted frames are from the shallow reef. Dense thickets of upright branching colonies, brown with pale tips, fill the first eight and rise toward the surface under schools of damselfish (e.g., Image 1, Image 2, Image 3, Image 4, Image 5, Image 6, Image 7, Image 8), and in two more a thicket runs in front of a very large, evenly pale massive dome (e.g., Image 9, Image 10).

Other frames show large massive and encrusting colony mounds and a steep face of massive colonies pocked with boring holes (e.g., Image 11, Image 12, Image 13), a big brown dome (e.g., Image 14), a mix of massive and branching colonies (e.g., Image 15), a rounded knobby massive colony beside a long-spined sea urchin (e.g., Image 16), pink-orange lobed colonies (e.g., Image 17), and a branching colony over a brown massive colony (e.g., Image 18).

Porites was the most common coral genus on this station's transects (18% of the benthos), followed by Montipora (7.3%), Favites (2.7%), Goniopora (2.3%), Pavona (1.7%), and Lobophyllia, Pectinia, and Platygyra (1.3% each); bare substrate covered 30%, the largest non-coral class. Among the algal classes on this station's transects, sediment-laden turf (17%) led, followed by turf (3.3%) and macroalgae (0.7%).

Coral cover

Stressors

At 10 m much of the hard bottom was coral rubble blanketed in clay silt and overgrown by fleshy macroalgae; his notes describe it as "coral rubble covered by clay silt and fleshy macroalgae," with some living hard coral still present at 10 m and much more at 8-9 m. On his 9 m transect the rubble was poorly cemented and silt-covered, and staghorn strands showed partial mortality. His notes for this dive do not mention bleaching, disease, or crown-of-thorns starfish.

Fish and other fauna

His notes log an aggressive, large (2 m) gray reef shark and one cushion star (Culcita) as a sighting, with feeding not recorded; neither is in the posted frames. Giant clams sit among the corals in one frame (e.g., Image 19), and two close views show a clam's folded, patterned mantle (e.g., Image 20, Image 21).

Comparisons with other data

No prior survey data from this site. If you would like to share yours, please email us.

Nearby citizen-science imagery within 2 km (not a survey of this site, and not total coral cover):

  • Great Reef Census (citizen science, AI + volunteer image analysis): branching Acropora 4.4%, plating Acropora 3.2%, massive corals 29% of colonizable substrate, 23 images, 2022-11-19, 1.27 km.

The Great Reef Census scores three coral shapes only, so every other coral is left out, and its denominator is colonizable substrate (sand, water, and shadow excluded): these values are not hard coral cover and should not be added together or compared with the cover figures on this page. The photographs are taken by volunteer snorkelers 3–5 m above the reef. In the program's own validation (Lawson et al. 2025, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 197:814, doi:10.1007/s10661-025-14261-6, open access), each analysis method on its own differed from expert estimates by up to about 9.5 percentage points on average for these coral types (AI alone: plating Acropora −9.1 points; AI plus volunteers: branching Acropora +9.5 points); the program's “~99% accurate” figure is the average over about 8,000 images after choosing the better method for each coral type, and site values from fewer images carry more error. Sites with fewer than 40 images have fewer images than the 40–80 the method needs to estimate site-level values to within 5 percentage points. Source: Great Reef Census / Citizens of the Great Barrier Reef; Lawson et al. 2026, Limnology & Oceanography Letters, doi:10.1002/lol2.70168 (data CC BY-NC 4.0, doi:10.7910/DVN/KCULSD).

Other notes

By their capture times, the 21 downward photo-quadrats matched to this reef by boat GPS position and date were taken on the second dive here (AU3481), and that page shows them.

Data & links

All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from the Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation Global Reef Expedition and Coral Reef Diagnostics.

© Coral Reef Diagnostics.