Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation — Global Reef Expedition
Coral Reef Diagnostics

N. GBR - Blue (AUR513)

Reef Check Foundation
⬇ Download this page as a report card
05
Country
Survey date(s)
2014-09-05
Coordinates
-15.3836, 145.7740
Coral cover
50%
Benthic transects+photo-quadrats
Observations
not yet tagged for this site
Heat stress
Today’s heat load
3 Oct 2026 · No heat stress
5-year thermal stress load
5-year mean max. degree heating weeks (DHW)
2021–2025
NOAA Coral Reef Watch — Northern GBR virtual station
i 5-year mean max. DHW is the mean of the annual maximum DHWs over the five complete years named above, not conditions today.
More infoNorthern GBR (NOAA CRW virtual station)
Max. depth dived
23.6 m
dive-log maximum
Sea surface temp. (satellite)
24.7°C
satellite sea surface temperature (SST) on the survey date (NOAA Coral Reef Watch, Northern GBR), not an in-water reading; it is the warmest-pixel (90th percentile) reading in the station area and can run 1–1.5°C above the reef
Bottom time
54 min
in at 09:09

Seven independent survey stations shown with the program’s logo — click one to see how far it is from this site.

Four other CRD dive sites within 5 km shown in orange — click a marker to open its page.

Site description

Setting

This windward stretch of Ribbon Reef 5 drops away as an almost sheer wall — close to 90 degrees — where Anderson judged that the coral likely stops around 30 m, with only rubble and sand at 40-50 m; the survey transects recorded 50% coral cover. The site sits in a Habitat Protection (Blue) Zone, where line fishing is permitted.

Coral cover

Stressors

Anderson's notes for this dive do not mention bleaching, disease, or crown-of-thorns starfish, and its photographs were lost.

Fish and other fauna

A small Napoleon wrasse cruised the wall and a huge school of 70 to 80 parrotfish swept past during the dive, though the site's photos were unfortunately lost to a software glitch back on the boat.

Comparisons with other data

No other surveys have been conducted at this site to date. Within 5 km, seven independent stations (Reef Check and XL Catlin Seaview Survey) recorded 7.0–53% hard coral cover between 1999 and 2017; the nearest, XL Catlin Seaview Survey at transect 12036, 1.15 km away, read 11–17% between 2012 and 2017.

Nearby citizen-science imagery within 2 km (not a survey of this site, and not total coral cover):

  • Great Reef Census (citizen science, AI + volunteer image analysis): branching Acropora 15%, plating Acropora 1.8%, massive corals 2.9% of colonizable substrate, 105 images, 2023-10-18, 1.99 km.

The Great Reef Census scores three coral shapes only, so every other coral is left out, and its denominator is colonizable substrate (sand, water, and shadow excluded): these values are not hard coral cover and should not be added together or compared with the cover figures on this page. The photographs are taken by volunteer snorkelers 3–5 m above the reef. In the program's own validation (Lawson et al. 2025, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 197:814, doi:10.1007/s10661-025-14261-6, open access), each analysis method on its own differed from expert estimates by up to about 9.5 percentage points on average for these coral types (AI alone: plating Acropora −9.1 points; AI plus volunteers: branching Acropora +9.5 points); the program's “~99% accurate” figure is the average over about 8,000 images after choosing the better method for each coral type, and site values from fewer images carry more error. Source: Great Reef Census / Citizens of the Great Barrier Reef; Lawson et al. 2026, Limnology & Oceanography Letters, doi:10.1002/lol2.70168 (data CC BY-NC 4.0, doi:10.7910/DVN/KCULSD).

Other notes

Structural complexity readings here need to be read with some caution, since the near-vertical wall made standard measurements tricky.

Independent surveys nearby

Data availability near this site
Agency / programYear(s)Stations / distanceLink
Reef Check1999–20083 stations, 1.69–1.87 kmRecords ↓
XL Catlin Seaview Survey2012–20174 stations, 1.15–4.74 kmRecords ↓
Hard coral cover over time — this site and every independent station within 5 km. Programs are shown separately because they use different methods at different stations; the lines are not one comparable series.
0%15%30%45%60%199920082017Reef Check 1999: 53%Reef Check 2004: 43%Reef Check 2005: 47%Reef Check 2006: 44%Reef Check 2007: 41%Reef Check 2008: 49%XL Catlin Seaview Survey 2012: 15%XL Catlin Seaview Survey 2012: 18%XL Catlin Seaview Survey 2012: 38%XL Catlin Seaview Survey 2014: 17%XL Catlin Seaview Survey 2014: 27%XL Catlin Seaview Survey 2016: 7.0%XL Catlin Seaview Survey 2016: 8.0%XL Catlin Seaview Survey 2016: 12%XL Catlin Seaview Survey 2017: 9.5%XL Catlin Seaview Survey 2017: 10%XL Catlin Seaview Survey 2017: 11%LOF Global Reef Expedition 2014: 50%Year-averaged across all programs: illustrative only; the programs differ in stations and method, so no trend is claimed (10 years)
Reef Check XL Catlin Seaview Survey LOF Global Reef ExpeditionYear-average (illustrative only, programs differ)

Within 5 km, 7 independent survey stations recorded hard coral cover in 17 surveys between 1999 and 2017. Of the 4 stations surveyed in more than one year, 1 was scored by divers or by people annotating photographs: increased by 1.9 points between its first and latest surveys. The other 3 were scored by automated image analysis: 2 declined by more than 7 points; 1 changed by 7 points or less, inside the 7-point method-noise floor (inconclusive). Two stations share the longest span (2012–2017); one, transect 12036 (XL Catlin Seaview Survey, 1.15 km away), went from 15% in 2012 to 11% in 2017. The most recent nearby survey is from 2017, so these values predate recent heat stress. This site's own estimate (50%) sits within the range of these surveys up to 2 km away (7.0–53%); the methods differ, so the comparison is context, not a like-for-like test.

Collected by other programs using different methods (Reef Check uses point-intercept transects; the XL Catlin Seaview Survey uses photo-transects with automated image annotation), so these are context for the figures above, not a like-for-like comparison. Where a station was surveyed more than once, the cell shows either the range of its values or, as a single value, the mean of surveys made in one year. Station names are not dive-site names.

Independent survey data near this site
AgencySite / locationDateHard coral cover (%)DistanceLink
Reef CheckRibbon Reef #5 southern patch199953%1.69 km—
Reef CheckRibbon Reef 3 - Clam Beds (Back reef slope) Site 1200443%1.87 km—
Reef CheckRibbon Reef 3 - Clam Beds (Back reef slope) Site 12005–200841–49% (4 surveys)1.70 km—
XL Catlin Seaview Surveytransect 120362012–201711–17% (4 surveys)1.15 kmdoi:10.14264/uql.2019.930
XL Catlin Seaview Surveytransect 120372012–20177.0–18% (3 surveys)1.62 kmdoi:10.14264/uql.2019.930
XL Catlin Seaview Surveytransect 12003201238%1.72 kmdoi:10.14264/uql.2019.930
XL Catlin Seaview Surveytransect 120382014–20178.0–27% (3 surveys)4.74 kmdoi:10.14264/uql.2019.930

Data & links

Data are from the Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation Global Reef Expedition, Coral Reef Diagnostics, and the organizations named in the data sources above.

© Coral Reef Diagnostics.