Coral Reef Diagnostics

N. GBR - Blue (AU122135)

Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation — Global Reef Expedition
⬇ Download this page as a report card
05
Photo: Anderson Mayfield/Coral Reef Diagnostics
Country
Survey date(s)
2014-09-27
Coordinates
-11.2006, 144.0388
Coral cover
18%
Benthic transects+photo-quadrats
Heat stress
Today’s heat load
3 Oct 2026 · No heat stress
5-year thermal stress load
5-year mean max. degree heating weeks (DHW)
2021–2025
NOAA Coral Reef Watch — Far Northern GBR virtual station
i 5-year mean max. DHW is the mean of the annual maximum DHWs over the five complete years named above, not conditions today.
More infoFar Northern GBR (NOAA CRW virtual station)
Photographs
67
41 shown on this page
Site summary

A crystal-clear dive on Unnamed Reef 122 past dozens of dense staghorn thickets running to 20 m and a huge bommie 15-20 m across with 60-70% live cover, at 18% cover overall. A turtle and a lobster were seen; Anderson recorded bleached needle corals, "extremely pale" Pocillopora, and crown-of-thorns damage at 5 m. Surveyed on the Living Oceans Foundation's Global Reef Expedition.

Max. depth dived
21.1 m
dive-log maximum
Sea surface temp. (satellite)
25.2°C
satellite sea surface temperature (SST) on the survey date (NOAA Coral Reef Watch, Far Northern GBR), not an in-water reading; it is the warmest-pixel (90th percentile) reading in the station area and can run 1–1.5°C above the reef
Bottom time
56 min
in at 09:19

Three other CRD dive sites within 5 km shown in orange — click a marker to open its page.

8 of the 41 photographs on this page are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.

689101112141517181920212223242526272930313233343538394041434445

Photo credit & attribution

Site description

Setting

The day's first dive at Unnamed Reef 122 opens in crystal-clear water with a gentle 1-knot current, sweeping past dozens of dense staghorn Acropora thickets that run down to about 20 m.

General benthic features

Of the frames described here, two are wide shots of thin, patchy pavement, scattered small colonies, and open sand corridors, with a turtle gliding over the top in each (e.g., Image 1, Image 3).

A third is a low, open thicket of brown, pigmented staghorn branches spread across clean white sand (e.g., Image 2), the kind of thicket Anderson logged as common at 15 m.

A fourth is a single isolated bommie carrying most of the coral in the frame, butterflyfish and surgeonfish working around it (e.g., Image 4).

Then the fifth shows the other extreme: a dense sheet of pink and tan branching Acropora under a wall of fusiliers (e.g., Image 5).

A large bommie at 10.5 m, some 15-20 m across and thick with Platygyra, Sinularia, and Lobophyllia, carried an estimated 60-70% live cover. Acropora was the most common coral genus on this station's transects (9.0% of the benthos), followed by Millepora (7.0%) and Pocillopora (2.0%); bare substrate covered 44%, the largest non-coral class. Among the algal classes on this station's transects, turf (17%) led, followed by crustose coralline algae (12%) and erect coralline algae (5.0%).

Coral cover

Stressors

Anderson's notes record bleached Seriatopora hystrix and S. caliendrum among the corals at 6-7 m and bleached S. caliendrum on the 10.5 m bommie transect, and many Pocillopora damicornis and P. acuta colonies he called "extremely pale" (much like the Seriatopora). Three gallery frames show bleached or very pale branching colonies beside pigmented neighbors (e.g., Image 7, Image 28, Image 36).

He also noted signs of crown-of-thorns starfish damage at 5 m. The reef lies in a Habitat Protection (Blue) Zone, where line fishing is permitted.

Fish and other fauna

A turtle, only the second of the entire expedition, and a lobster rounded out the sightings.

Comparisons with other data

No prior survey data from this site. If you would like to share yours, please email us.

CV model comparison

The LOF Global Reef Expedition in-water transect is THE coral-cover value for this site.
More infoThe photo row below is a methods comparison only: it is never averaged with the transect and never used as the headline. It compares site means only: the photos come from the same survey dive as the transect but not from the same points.
MethodHard-coral cover (%)Photos (n) ± SE
Transect (published)18.0
CoralSCOP edited25.0n = 41 · SE 2.8
Claude (edited photos)44.0n = 41 · SE 4.5

The two computer-vision methods disagree by 19.0 pp (25–44%) and read 7.0–26.0 pp above the in-water transect (18%); the headline is the in-water transect because a diver transect is independent of the photographs.

Data & links

All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from the Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation Global Reef Expedition and Coral Reef Diagnostics.

© Coral Reef Diagnostics.