Coral Reef Diagnostics

Fiji - Vanua Balavu (FJVB52)

Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation — Global Reef Expedition
⬇ Download this page as a report card
05
Outlier score: 3.89/5 (Vanua Balavu, n = 18 corals with an outlier score). The share of those corals whose molecular stress profile was an outlier, rescaled to 0-5 (5 = no outliers); an island-level measure (Mayfield et al. 2017), not a Coral Health Index.
Photo: Anderson Mayfield/Coral Reef Diagnostics
Country
Survey date(s)
2013-06-21
Coordinates
-17.3028, -179.0309
Coral cover
47%
± 4.3% SE, n = 5 transects · Benthic transects+photo-quadrats
Observations
cyanobacteria
Heat stress
Most recent heat load record
26 Oct 2026 · No heat stress
5-year thermal stress load
5-year mean max. degree heating weeks (DHW)
2021–2025
NOAA Coral Reef Watch — Fiji virtual station
i 5-year mean max. DHW is the mean of the annual maximum DHWs over the five complete years named above, not conditions today.
More infoFiji (NOAA CRW virtual station)
Photographs
26
25 shown on this page
Site summary
Read this summary in:

A steep slope edge off Vanua Balavu whose shoulder is densely built with nearly every Acropora growth form, from pale tables jutting over the drop to staghorn stands and corymbose cushions, mixed with smooth tan massive boulders. Clouds of damselfish, chromis, and anthias hang off the face, and cover is 47%. Surveyed on the Living Oceans Foundation's Global Reef Expedition.

Max. depth dived
30.2 m
dive-log maximum
Water temp. during survey
27.2°Cii
CTD-cast midpoint; the cast read 27.2°C throughout
-0.6°C vs the 2013 mean sea temperature (27.8°C)
ii Station CTD-cast midpoint (LOF station records), not a dive reading: midpoint of the station's maximum and minimum CTD water temperature (Living Oceans Foundation Fiji station records); the cast read 27.20°C throughout.
Bottom time
57 min
in at 09:34

21 of the 25 photographs on this page are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.

17810

Photo credit & attribution

Site description

General benthic features

Nine frames look along and up a steep slope edge dropping into blue water (e.g., Image 21, Image 18, Image 19, Image 26, Image 25, Image 17, Image 23, Image 20, Image 22).

The slope shoulder is densely built: Acropora in most of the growth forms the genus manages, with pale tables cantilevered out over the drop (e.g., Image 26, Image 17, Image 22), corymbose cushions and staghorn stands packed against each other (e.g., Image 21, Image 18, Image 25, Image 23), and smooth tan massive boulders and knobbly mounding heads set among them (e.g., Image 18, Image 26, Image 25, Image 17). Color through this set runs pale lavender, cream, tan, and pink-brown, with green encrusting and plating growth, and maroon and red algal and coralline patches filling gaps (e.g., Image 21, Image 26, Image 25, Image 23). Bare rock is uncommon in the frames shot along the shoulder; the two frames looking across flatter ground (e.g., Image 12, Image 13) show a more open mosaic with rubble and pavement between colonies, so the reef is not uniform across the station.

Coral cover

Stressors

No wide frame shows an obviously bleached or recently dead colony; a few dark, algae-covered dead branch sections are the only visible mortality, and no crown-of-thorns or disease lesion is identifiable; Anderson's sampling sheet records one of the four colonies sampled here (F112) as 5–10% bleached and the other three at 0%. Of the three coral colonies from this site with an outlier score, one (33%) was flagged as a physiological outlier (Mayfield et al. 2017, PLoS ONE). The Living Oceans Foundation transects here recorded 9.4% cyanobacteria and no recently dead coral.

Fish and other fauna

Planktivores — damselfishes, chromis, and anthias — hang off the slope face in almost every wide frame, densest in Image 20 and Image 25. A whitetip reef shark passes low over the reef top (e.g., Image 14) and a shark with a remora attached cruises over open sand in blue water (e.g., Image 16).

Comparisons with other data

Apart from the Living Oceans Foundation survey shown here, we found no other surveys at this site as of 2026. If you would like to share yours, please email us.

Other notes

The complete set contains both the wide survey photography and the close-range colony photography from the physiological sampling on the same dive, and the two are easy to confuse. Six frames are shot at arm's length on individual branching colonies (e.g., Image 6, Image 4, Image 3, Image 9, Image 5, Image 11).

One of them (Image 3) shows a numbered plastic tag on a wire loop fixed into the framework beside a colony, which is the marker for a physiologically sampled colony; the number itself is not meaningful and is not recorded here. The tagged and photographed colonies are branching colonies in cream, pale tan, and gray-white (Anderson's sample sheet lists only Pocillopora here: P. acuta and P. damicornis), several with polyps fully extended (e.g., Image 9, Image 11). The colony in Image 11 is cream-white with tan bases and fills the frame. These are strobe-lit macro-range frames of individually selected colonies, and pale rendering at that distance cannot be separated from paling of the tissue; no wide frame in the set shows white colonies, and nothing here should be read as an extent of bleaching at this station. Their value is as a visual record tying this site to the physiological sampling: of the three colonies here with an outlier score, one was flagged as an outlier. Two frames carry a diver: a photographer on the slope face beside a coral Anderson identified as a mushroom coral (fungiid) (e.g., Image 24), and a diver working over a dark sand-and-rubble floor on a dive Anderson noted for its strong current (e.g., Image 15).

What the frames cannot settle: none of these is a planar downward view and the slope frames are strongly oblique, so nothing in the set supports a cover figure. The set is also weighted toward the best-built part of the slope — the two flatter-ground frames are a useful corrective. Depth is not resolvable from the imagery.

CV model comparison

The LOF Global Reef Expedition in-water transect is THE coral-cover value for this site.
More infoThe photo row below is a methods comparison only: it is never averaged with the transect and never used as the headline. It compares site means only: the photos come from the same survey dive as the transect but not from the same points.
MethodHard coral cover (%)Photos (n) ± SE
Transect mean (all transects)47.4
CoralSCOP edited34.0*n = 11 · SE 2.6
Claude (edited photos)38.6*n = 11 · SE 4.0

The two computer-vision methods agree within 4.6 pp (34.0–38.6%) and read 8.8–13.4 pp below the in-water transect (47.4%); the headline is the in-water transect because a diver transect is independent of the photographs.

*Based on only 11 reef-habitat photos; this estimate is less certain.

Data & links

All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from the Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation Global Reef Expedition and Coral Reef Diagnostics.

© Coral Reef Diagnostics.