Coral Reef Diagnostics

BVI - Necker Island snorkel

Virgin Limited Edition — Necker Island
⬇ Download this page as a report card
05
Coral Reef Diagnostics
Photo: Anderson Mayfield/Coral Reef Diagnostics
Survey date(s)
2026-07-01
2026-07-02
Coordinates
18.5417, -64.3567
Approximate position.
Coral cover
4.0%
Claude computer vision (310 photos) · other methods below · median 2.8%
Frames analyzed
310
4 areas, Claude point count
Observations
dead coralrecent mortality
Heat stress
Most recent heat load record
26 Oct 2026 · Alert Level 2
5-year thermal stress load
5-year mean max. degree heating weeks (DHW)
2021–2025
NOAA Coral Reef Watch — Virgin Islands virtual station
i 5-year mean max. DHW is the mean of the annual maximum DHWs over the five complete years named above, not conditions today.
More infoVirgin Islands (NOAA CRW virtual station)
Photographs
324
48 shown on this page
Site summary

A shallow fringing reef snorkeled around Necker Island, where elkhorn coral still forms living stands at Red Dock and Turtle Beach but standing dead elkhorn and staghorn rubble are just as common. Fire coral, brain corals, and gorgonians fill in, and spiny lobsters and a shark resting on sand were seen.

Water temp. during survey
30.2°Cii
+2.1°C vs the 12 months to 2026-08 mean sea temperature (28.1°C)
ii median of 305 in-water frames of 326 scanned (excludes >32.0 C and <0.3 m, i.e. out-of-water frames); snorkel site, no housing, so the sensor read the water.

Four sites at this location are mapped in teal — click a pin to open that site’s page.

Four other CRD dive sites with their own pages within 5 km shown in orange — click a marker to open its page.

These are unedited originals; edited versions will replace them.

28 of the 48 photographs on this page are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.

458914151920283236374041454647484950

Photo credit & attribution

Site description

Setting

These were shallow snorkels: the surface is in shot repeatedly, so most of the photographs were taken at roughly 1-5 m (e.g., Image 7).

General benthic features

The dominant impression is structure without much live tissue. Frame after frame shows standing dead acroporid framework: whole elkhorn (Acropora palmata) thickets and staghorn (A. cervicornis) rubble fields, gray and algae-filmed, over pavement coated in red turf, crustose coralline algae, and Dictyota-type brown macroalgae (e.g., Image 10, Image 17, Image 23, Image 24, Image 27).

Several wide shots hold no live stony coral at all (e.g., Image 22, Image 44).

Live cover is real but patchy and small-bodied. Live elkhorn (A. palmata) still forms multi-colony stands at Red Dock and Turtle Beach (e.g., Image 25), and a golden A. cervicornis thicket with white growing tips also appears.

Fire coral is the most conspicuous live element — bladed Millepora complanata with white margins, and encrusting M. alcicornis sheeting over dead framework (e.g., Image 29, Image 33, Image 38, Image 42).

Pale cream Porites porites finger clumps sprout from turf-covered massive mounds; mustard-yellow Porites astreoides lobes recur, repeatedly with pink coralline algae overgrowing dead margins (e.g., Image 13, Image 16, Image 26, Image 34).

Symmetrical brain corals (Pseudodiploria strigosa) appear in five frames, mostly intact — but one has half the colony dead and red-turfed, and one pale massive colony has a central patch of old dead skeleton crusted with pink crustose coralline algae (e.g., Image 2, Image 18, Image 30, Image 43).

Gorgonians carry the relief where coral does not: sea rods, sea plumes, and purple Gorgonia sea fans (e.g., Image 6, Image 31, Image 35, Image 39).

Coral cover

Stressors

No tissue-loss lesions of the SCTLD kind were identifiable in any frame. One live elkhorn-type colony at Red Dock has a sharply bordered patch of recently exposed white skeleton at its center, between pigmented branches: recent partial mortality, cause not stated (e.g., Image 51).

Fish and other fauna

A nurse-shark-type shark resting on sand, two Caribbean spiny lobsters under ledges, a dark long-spined urchin, blue tangs, sergeant majors, bar jacks, brown chromis, and a maroon ball sponge (e.g., Image 3, Image 11, Image 17).

Comparisons with other data

We found no other surveys at this site as of 2026. If you would like to share yours, please email us.

Other notes

Anderson's five Necker snorkel folders hold 324 photographs. Some are topside or at the surface: the Red Dock pergola and pink jetty, the catamaran beach under a thick sargassum wrack line, Turtle Beach, and sand spits looking across to Virgin Gorda. Necker Island, BVI — circumnavigated over six dives/swims, 1-2 Jul 2026: Red Dock, Turtle Beach (×3 visits), Bali Hai-to-Turtle-Beach and Watersport-Beach-to-Bali-Hai transects. Positions of the individual areas are approximate.

% coral cover by site/region

Claude = blind Claude computer-vision point count (30 points per photo; the headline). CoralSCOP = mask-sum area index on the same areas, for comparison. All sites = unweighted mean of the area values, ± SD across areas.

AreaClaude % coral coverClaude std. dev.Claude photosCoralSCOP % coral coverCoralSCOP std. dev.CoralSCOP frames usedFrames available
Red Dock8.0%±128720.8%±179393
Turtle Beach
2026-07-01, 2026-07-02
3.1%±5.68316.9%±139191
Bali Hai (turtle)2.5%±6.38912.1%±8.18989
Watersports / Bali Hai2.4%±4.95112.3%±9.75151
All sites (n=4)4.0%±2.731016%±4.2324324

CV model comparison

Mean 4.0% and median 2.8% of the four snorkel-area means (310 photos in all).
More infoRed Dock's higher value raises the mean; the median is the typical area. No computer-vision method yet estimates coral cover accurately on new images, so treat this as indicative rather than a measurement; it is revised as the methods improve.
Headline: Claude computer vision — a blind point count of this site's own photographs.
More infoDINOv3 and CoralSCOP were run on the same snorkel areas and are listed for comparison. No diver transect exists for this trip, so agreement between the rows is not accuracy, and no computer-vision method yet estimates coral cover accurately on new images; treat every row as indicative.
MethodHard coral cover (%)Photos (n) ± SE
In-house DINOv315.5n = 324 · SE 0.2
CoralSCOP unedited15.5n = 324 · SE 0.2
Claude4.0n = 310 · SE 0.2

The two computer-vision methods agree within 0.0 pp (15.5%) and read 11.5–11.5 pp above Claude's blind point count (4.0%); the headline is Claude's blind point count because no transect or manual count exists here.

Data & links

All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from Coral Reef Diagnostics.

© Coral Reef Diagnostics.