Part of the regional summary: Triton Bay

Seruanus is a soft-coral-dominated site on the back side of Little Komodo Island, shaped by high flow, turbidity, and nutrient-rich water, with occasional cold (24°C) pulses not confirmed as true upwelling; stony-coral cover was low above 10 m, though healthy Acropora were fairly common at 5-6 m and some massive corals grew 3-4 m across. A blind Claude computer-vision point count puts coral cover around 9.1%.
Seruanus adalah lokasi yang didominasi karang lunak di sisi belakang Pulau Little Komodo, dibentuk oleh arus deras, kekeruhan, dan air kaya nutrien, dengan denyut air dingin (24°C) sesekali yang belum dipastikan sebagai upwelling sejati; tutupan karang batu rendah pada kedalaman lebih dangkal dari 10 m, meskipun Acropora yang sehat cukup umum pada 5-6 m dan beberapa karang masif tumbuh hingga 3-4 m lebarnya. Penghitungan titik buta visi komputer Claude memperkirakan tutupan karang sekitar 9.1%.
Terjemahan ringkasan ini oleh AI; versi bahasa Inggris yang berlaku.
One other CRD dive site with its own page within 5 km shown in orange — click a marker to open its page.
10 of the 21 photographs on this page are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.
Poor visibility: 7-10 m max with medium, variable current, occasionally with upwelling of cold (24°C) water. Whether these cold pulses were true upwelling was not confirmed. Site appears to be more conducive to soft coral growth: high flow, high turbidity, nutrient-rich seawater (e.g., Image 2).
Low cover of stony corals before 10 m (e.g., Image 3).
Soft corals impressive at all locations within site (back side of Little Komodo Island). Corals do not appear to have ever been common here before 7 m, though all substrate from base of island to 20 m was potentially of biological origin. High biodiversity of soft corals: gorgonians, encrusting soft corals (like in Balicasag), essentially every type of soft coral, sea whips (e.g., Image 4).
Acropora colonies healthy and fairly common at 5-6 m, though still not a major reef builder. Some massive corals growing up to 3- to 4-m in diameter. Unsure of species (separated corallites). Only one pocilloporid colony was seen, with very dark pigmentation and a branching form compatible with Pocillopora verrucosa (e.g., Image 20).
Reef strikingly colorful in 1-6 m, with corals growing to just below surface (e.g., Image 5).
Corals evident from dive boat.
Anderson photographed one recently dead plating colony (e.g., Image 22); its cause was not recorded.
One frame shows a dark sponge whose curled lower lip is bleached white (e.g., Image 21).
No crown-of-thorns starfish (COTS) or other corallivores were evident.
Interesting marine life included a white nudibranch with fine black lines and spots (compatible with Chromodoris willani) (e.g., Image 18), an unusual black-and-white mottled sea cucumber (sea cucumbers were relatively common; Image 19), Plerogyra (rare), some encrusting sponges, and fewer barrel sponges; there was evidence of overfishing, though some large snapper and angelfish were seen occasionally.
A small yellow sea cucumber covered in fleshy, conical papillae, which give it a nudibranch-like look (compatible with Colochirus robustus), was common at the site and was new to the observers (e.g., Image 9).
We found no other surveys at this site as of 2026. If you would like to share yours, please email us.
Regional context, not a survey of this site: Bawole et al. (2026) report mean hard coral cover at 24 University of Papua monitoring sites in the Kaimana marine protected area around Triton Bay, surveyed by point-intercept transect at 8–10 m: 17%, 24%, and 32% in the no-take zones (eight sites) and 14%, 18%, and 13% in the use zones (16 sites) in 2012–2013, 2015–2016, and 2019. Cover differed significantly between zones but not over time (p = 0.828); these are zone means, not this site’s cover.
Dive 1: “Seruanus:” The first dive of the Triton Bay-Raja Ampat trip. The dive computer recorded a single water temperature, 23.0°C.
| Method | Hard coral cover (%) | Photos (n) ± SE |
|---|---|---|
| In-house DINOv3 | 18.7 | n = 66 · SE 1.0 |
| CoralSCOP edited | 30.6 | n = 66 · SE 2.2 |
| Claude (edited photos) | 9.1 | n = 66 · SE 2.0 |
The two computer-vision methods disagree by 11.9 pp (18.7–30.6%) and read 9.6–21.5 pp above Claude's blind point count (9.1%); the headline is Claude's blind point count because no transect or manual count exists here.
See a more detailed, stand-alone version of this table.
Images 6–17: Pierre; all other images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from Coral Reef Diagnostics.
© Coral Reef Diagnostics.