Coral Reef Diagnostics

St. Eustatius - Double Wreck

Reef Check Foundation
⬇ Download this page as a report card
05
Photo: Anderson Mayfield/Coral Reef Diagnostics
Survey date(s)
2026-02-25
Coordinates
17.4793, -62.9945
Coral cover
5.6%
Claude computer vision (46 photos) · other methods below
Observations
shipwreck
Heat stress
Today’s heat load
16 Sep 2026 · Alert Level 1
5-year thermal stress load
5-year mean max. degree heating weeks (DHW)
2021–2025
NOAA Coral Reef Watch — Leeward Caribbean Islands virtual station
i 5-year mean max. DHW is the mean of the annual maximum DHWs over the five complete years named above, not conditions today.
More infoLeeward Caribbean Islands (NOAA CRW virtual station) · Eastern Caribbean ecoregion mean=13.1°C-heating weeks
Photographs
49
Site summary

A turtle-grass meadow broken by low ballast-and-rubble mounds, all that is left of the wrecks, plus an upright anchor crusted in coral and sponge. The mounds hold large brain corals and barrel sponges, and giant anemones hosting arrow crabs and cleaner shrimp are the highlight, along with a green turtle, a nurse shark, and a barracuda. Wreck and artificial-structure site: this cover value counts coral growing on man-made structure (steel, concrete, wreck debris) and the bottom around it, so it isn't comparable with natural-reef cover or with regional averages.

Max. depth dived
19.1 m
dive-log maximum

Seven independent survey stations shown with the program’s logo — click one to see how far it is from this site.

Three other CRD dive sites within 5 km shown in orange — click a marker to open its page.

11 of these 49 photographs are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.

24569101112131415181920212224252829303233343537384041424344454647484950

Photo credit & attribution

Site description

Setting

A mixed seagrass, patch-reef, and sponge-garden habitat; no wreck structure appears in this 12-frame sample despite the site name, which may reflect the sample missing the wreck itself or the wreck lying in a separate part of the dive. Visibility is workable but hazy/particulate throughout, consistent with a site with fine sediment and seagrass nearby (e.g., Image 7).

General benthic features

Elsewhere, low coral/rock outcrops rising from the seagrass are thickly colonized by sponges: a prominent cluster of bright yellow tube sponges, red and orange encrusting sponges, pale blue-gray vase-type sponges, and a green branching gorgonian/sea rod, with a small mustard-hill-type coral head (olive-green encrusting mounds) and a khaki brain/star coral head nearby (e.g., Image 3, Image 26).

A separate pair of large barrel sponges (one with a striped fish sheltering in its mouth, plus sergeant majors and a spotted trunkfish/boxfish visible) frames a cleaning-station-like scene with schooling reef fish; black wire coral and a small round dark sponge sit at their base (e.g., Image 36, Image 39).

One frame shows a solitary massive star-coral colony (tan, evenly pored, healthy-looking) on the seabed among rubble and low-growing sponges (e.g., Image 31).

Coral cover

Coral cover: 5.6% — a blind Claude computer-vision point count of 46 of Anderson's unedited photographs (20 points per photo; water, fish, and obstructions excluded). Other computer-vision methods are listed in the method table. Wreck and artificial-structure site: this cover value counts coral growing on man-made structure (steel, concrete, wreck debris) and the bottom around it, so it isn't comparable with natural-reef cover or with regional averages.

Stressors

No bleaching, disease, or physical damage is visible on any of the coral colonies photographed.

Fish and other fauna

A green sea turtle is visible cruising over a seagrass meadow in hazy blue-green water in the opening frame (e.g., Image 27).

Macro frames show a yellowline arrow crab (Stenorhynchus seticornis) with long banded legs sheltering under an orange encrusting sponge, an aggregation of long-spined black brittle stars densely packed together in a crevice, and a Pederson/spotted cleaner shrimp (cf. Periclimenes) perched on the pale lavender-tipped tentacles of a corkscrew or giant anemone (e.g., Image 1, Image 17, Image 23).

A great barracuda swims low over the seagrass in a separate frame, with a diver's fin visible at the frame edge (e.g., Image 8).

Comparisons with other data

No independent survey was made at this exact site; the nearest ones are listed in the table below.

CV model comparison

As of September 2026 no computer-vision method estimates coral cover accurately on new images, so treat this as indicative rather than a measurement; it is revised as the methods improve.
Headline: Claude computer vision — a blind point count of this site's own photographs (Anderson, 2026-09-27: Claude CV is the main coral-cover value).
More infoDINOv3 and CoralSCOP were run on the same photos and are listed for comparison. Coralscapes v2 and v1 were also run but are not shown: Anderson does not consider Coralscapes reliable for these photos. No diver transect exists for this trip, so agreement between the rows is not accuracy, and as of September 2026 no computer-vision method estimates coral cover accurately on new images; treat every row as indicative.
MethodHard-coral cover (%)
In-house DINOv315.6
CoralSCOP unedited26.5
Claude5.6

Independent surveys nearby

Data availability near this site
Agency / programYear(s)Stations / distanceLink
Reef Check2005–20105 stations, 1.43–4.35 kmRecords ↓
XL Catlin Seaview Survey20132 stations, 1.02–1.06 kmRecords ↓
Hard coral cover over time — this site and every independent station within 5 km. Programs are shown separately because they use different methods at different stations; the lines are not one comparable series.
0%10%20%30%40%200520152026Reef Check 2005: 24%Reef Check 2005: 25%Reef Check 2005: 28%Reef Check 2005: 29%Reef Check 2007: 11%Reef Check 2007: 24%Reef Check 2007: 33%Reef Check 2007: 38%Reef Check 2008: 11%Reef Check 2008: 16%Reef Check 2009: 9.4%Reef Check 2009: 16%Reef Check 2009: 22%Reef Check 2010: 26%XL Catlin Seaview Survey 2013: 0.7%XL Catlin Seaview Survey 2013: 2.0%Dr. Coral (CRD) 2026: 5.6%Year-averaged across all programs: no detectable trend (-0.99 pp per year, not separable from zero; 7 years)
Reef Check XL Catlin Seaview Survey Dr. Coral (CRD)Year-average (no detectable trend)

Within 5 km, 7 independent survey stations recorded hard coral cover in 17 records between 2005 and 2013. Of the 4 stations surveyed in more than one year, 1 declined, 1 increased, and 2 changed by less than 5 percentage points between their first and latest surveys. The longest record, Barracuda Reef Line 1 (Reef Check, 1.43 km away), went from 28% in 2005 to 26% in 2010. The most recent nearby survey is from 2013, so these values predate recent heat stress. This site's own estimate (5.6%) sits within the range of these surveys (0.7–38%); the methods differ, so the comparison is context, not a like-for-like test.

Collected by other programs using different methods (Reef Check uses point-intercept transects; the XL Catlin Seaview Survey uses photo-transects with automated image annotation), so these are context for the figures above, not a like-for-like comparison. Where a station was surveyed more than once the range is shown. Station names are not dive-site names.

Independent survey data near this site
AgencySite / locationDateHard coral cover (%)DistanceLink
Reef CheckBarracuda Reef Line 12005–201011–28% (6 surveys)1.43 km—
Reef CheckBarracuda Reef Line 22005–200724–25% (2 surveys)1.43 km—
Reef CheckMushroom Garden Line 12005–20099.4–33% (4 surveys)2.58 km—
Reef CheckMushroom Garden Line 22005–200724–38% (2 surveys)2.58 km—
Reef CheckTwin Sisters200916%4.35 km—
XL Catlin Seaview Surveytransect 2501520132.0%1.02 km—
XL Catlin Seaview Surveytransect 2501620130.7%1.06 km—

Data & links

All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from Coral Reef Diagnostics and the organizations named in the data-sources table above.

© Coral Reef Diagnostics.