Coral Reef Diagnostics

St. Eustatius - Chien Tong wreck

Reef Check Foundation
⬇ Download this page as a report card
05
Photo: Anderson Mayfield/Coral Reef Diagnostics
Survey date(s)
2026-02-25
Coordinates
17.4835, -62.9979
Coral cover
3.8%
Claude computer vision (62 photos) · other methods below
Observations
shipwreck
Heat stress
Today’s heat load
16 Sep 2026 · Alert Level 1
5-year thermal stress load
5-year mean max. degree heating weeks (DHW)
2021–2025
NOAA Coral Reef Watch — Leeward Caribbean Islands virtual station
i 5-year mean max. DHW is the mean of the annual maximum DHWs over the five complete years named above, not conditions today.
More infoLeeward Caribbean Islands (NOAA CRW virtual station) · Eastern Caribbean ecoregion mean=13.1°C-heating weeks
Photographs
50
Site summary

An intact steel cargo ship sitting upright on sand, its railings, masts, winch, and cargo hatches still in place and patrolled by a great barracuda. The vertical steel is crusted with sponges and hydroids while the flat decks stay bare, and young brain, maze, and star coral colonies are just beginning to settle on the hull. Wreck and artificial-structure site: this cover value counts coral growing on man-made structure (steel, concrete, wreck debris) and the bottom around it, so it isn't comparable with natural-reef cover or with regional averages.

Max. depth dived
25.1 m
dive-log maximum

Eight independent survey stations shown with the program’s logo — click one to see how far it is from this site.

Three other CRD dive sites within 5 km shown in orange — click a marker to open its page.

32 of these 50 photographs are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.

1710111416192023242728293134364144

Photo credit & attribution

Site description

Setting

The Chien Tong, St. Eustatius, dived 25 February 2026 as the first dive of the day. The wreck is a steel cargo vessel sitting upright and essentially intact on sand, and the frames read as a tour of a ship rather than of a reef: pipe railings running the full length of the bulwarks, a flat expanse of deck plating with rectangular cargo hatches still square-edged, a horizontal winch drum on its bed, an upright derrick or mast frame with a diver silhouetted through it, and a clean sweep of bow rail shot from below against the surface light (e.g., Image 3, Image 12, Image 13, Image 21, Image 25, Image 26, Image 32, Image 33, Image 39, Image 42, Image 43).

Depth and structure are legible throughout — the hull sides drop straight into dark blue and one frame looks along the sheer line with two divers finning off the plating (e.g., Image 8, Image 9, Image 45).

General benthic features

Colonization is strongly patterned by orientation. The horizontal deck plates are only thinly filmed, still gray and bare-looking, while the vertical hull sides, bulwark edges, railings, and ironwork carry a dense encrusting community: lime-green branching rope sponge, yellow tube sponges (Aplysina-type), a scarlet strawberry-textured sponge, maroon and vermilion encrusting sheets, purple and blue films, filamentous turf, and pink coralline algae (e.g., Image 2, Image 5, Image 17, Image 38, Image 46, Image 49).

Cream-yellow button-like cup corals (Tubastraea-type, likely the introduced orange cup coral so common on Caribbean wrecks — not confirmable from the frame) crust the winch and its bed (e.g., Image 30).

Stony-coral recruitment onto the hull is the interesting part. One frame catches a clean pairing on bare plating: a yellow-green maze coral (Meandrina meandrites-type) roughly the size of a coaster beside a tan colony with large, deeply cupped, well-separated corallites consistent with Montastraea cavernosa (e.g., Image 48).

Elsewhere a small fleshy-polyped mussid (Isophyllia/Mussa-type) sits in a turf-and-coralline mosaic, and a low domed brain-type colony perches on a bulwark rail (e.g., Image 4).

All are small, young colonies — the wreck is being colonized rather than overgrown (e.g., Image 15, Image 22, Image 37, Image 40, Image 50).

A small red anemone or corallimorph with white tentacles occupies a hole in the encrusted plating (e.g., Image 47).

Coral cover

Coral cover: 3.8% — a blind Claude computer-vision point count of 62 of Anderson's unedited photographs (20 points per photo; water, fish, and obstructions excluded). Other computer-vision methods are listed in the method table. Wreck and artificial-structure site: this cover value counts coral growing on man-made structure (steel, concrete, wreck debris) and the bottom around it, so it isn't comparable with natural-reef cover or with regional averages.

Fish and other fauna

Fauna: a great barracuda hangs behind the winch, a bar jack cruises the open water off the hull, sergeant majors and small baitfish work the superstructure, and a lone schooling fish shelters in the winch housing (e.g., Image 6, Image 18, Image 35).

Comparisons with other data

No independent survey was made at this exact site; the nearest ones are listed in the table below.

CV model comparison

As of September 2026 no computer-vision method estimates coral cover accurately on new images, so treat this as indicative rather than a measurement; it is revised as the methods improve.
Headline: Claude computer vision — a blind point count of this site's own photographs (Anderson, 2026-09-27: Claude CV is the main coral-cover value).
More infoDINOv3 and CoralSCOP were run on the same photos and are listed for comparison. Coralscapes v2 and v1 were also run but are not shown: Anderson does not consider Coralscapes reliable for these photos. No diver transect exists for this trip, so agreement between the rows is not accuracy, and as of September 2026 no computer-vision method estimates coral cover accurately on new images; treat every row as indicative.
MethodHard-coral cover (%)
In-house DINOv316.6
CoralSCOP unedited13.3
Claude3.8

Independent surveys nearby

Data availability near this site
Agency / programYear(s)Stations / distanceLink
Reef Check2005–20105 stations, 1.99–3.81 kmRecords ↓
XL Catlin Seaview Survey20133 stations, 1.58–4.75 kmRecords ↓
Hard coral cover over time — this site and every independent station within 5 km. Programs are shown separately because they use different methods at different stations; the lines are not one comparable series.
0%10%20%30%40%200520152026Reef Check 2005: 24%Reef Check 2005: 25%Reef Check 2005: 28%Reef Check 2005: 29%Reef Check 2007: 11%Reef Check 2007: 24%Reef Check 2007: 33%Reef Check 2007: 38%Reef Check 2008: 11%Reef Check 2008: 16%Reef Check 2009: 9.4%Reef Check 2009: 16%Reef Check 2009: 22%Reef Check 2010: 26%XL Catlin Seaview Survey 2013: 0.6%XL Catlin Seaview Survey 2013: 0.7%XL Catlin Seaview Survey 2013: 2.0%XL Catlin Seaview Survey 2013: 4.4%Dr. Coral (CRD) 2026: 3.8%Year-averaged across all programs: no detectable trend (-1.08 pp per year, not separable from zero; 7 years)
Reef Check XL Catlin Seaview Survey Dr. Coral (CRD)Year-average (no detectable trend)

Within 5 km, 8 independent survey stations recorded hard coral cover in 18 records between 2005 and 2013. Of the 4 stations surveyed in more than one year, 1 declined, 1 increased, and 2 changed by less than 5 percentage points between their first and latest surveys. The longest record, Barracuda Reef Line 1 (Reef Check, 1.99 km away), went from 28% in 2005 to 26% in 2010. The most recent nearby survey is from 2013, so these values predate recent heat stress. This site's own estimate (3.8%) sits within the range of these surveys (0.7–38%); the methods differ, so the comparison is context, not a like-for-like test.

Collected by other programs using different methods (Reef Check uses point-intercept transects; the XL Catlin Seaview Survey uses photo-transects with automated image annotation), so these are context for the figures above, not a like-for-like comparison. Where a station was surveyed more than once the range is shown. Station names are not dive-site names.

Independent survey data near this site
AgencySite / locationDateHard coral cover (%)DistanceLink
Reef CheckBarracuda Reef Line 12005–201011–28% (6 surveys)1.99 km—
Reef CheckBarracuda Reef Line 22005–200724–25% (2 surveys)1.99 km—
Reef CheckMushroom Garden Line 12005–20099.4–33% (4 surveys)3.16 km—
Reef CheckMushroom Garden Line 22005–200724–38% (2 surveys)3.16 km—
Reef CheckTwin Sisters200916%3.81 km—
XL Catlin Seaview Surveytransect 2501520132.0%1.58 km—
XL Catlin Seaview Surveytransect 2501620130.7%1.65 km—
XL Catlin Seaview Surveytransect 2501720134.4%4.75 km—

Data & links

All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from Coral Reef Diagnostics and the organizations named in the data-sources table above.

© Coral Reef Diagnostics.