Part of the regional summary: Saba
More about this place: Saba on Wikipedia

A shallow volcanic sand plain (about 6 m) with a garden-eel colony of hundreds, broken by isolated rocky knolls covered mainly in tube and barrel sponges, sea rods, and sea fans. Hard coral is only a minor part of this sand-and-soft-coral habitat, and an invasive lionfish was spotted on one outcrop.
Three independent survey stations shown with the program’s logo — click one to see how far it is from this site.
Three other CRD dive sites within 5 km shown in orange — click a marker to open its page.
12 of these 51 photographs are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.
A shallow (dive-computer readout confirms 5.6 m at the safety stop), volcanic sand-and-rock habitat rather than a continuous reef, consistent with the name "Tent Shallow."
Rocky outcrops rising from the sand are thickly colonized by sponges and turf rather than by hard coral: dense clusters of mustard-yellow tube sponges, orange and salmon encrusting/barrel sponges (one large pair flanking a school of reef fish and a striped fish sheltering in a barrel-sponge mouth), pale blue-gray vase sponges, and a black bushy growth consistent with black coral (e.g., Image 5, Image 8, Image 9, Image 18, Image 27).
Hard coral is present but a minor component: one small honeycomb/star-coral head (tan, evenly pored, healthy) sits beside an orange sponge cluster; a separate frame shows two adjacent grooved brain/star corals (dark, ridged) flanked by orange tube sponges and a mustard hill-type coral fragment; and a low mounding brain coral appears at the base of a rock covered in black sea rods and a purple sea fan (e.g., Image 6, Image 12, Image 22, Image 24).
Coral cover: 3.0% — a blind Claude computer-vision point count of 85 of Anderson's unedited photographs (20 points per photo; water, fish, and obstructions excluded). Other computer-vision methods are listed in the method table. Frames were screened before scoring: open sand, mid-water, blown-out, and burst-duplicate frames, dive computers, topside, and diver shots, blue-light fluorescence, and macros were all removed.
No bleaching, disease, or physical damage is visible on any of the small number of coral colonies photographed; the habitat's low hard coral component is a feature of the site type (sand/rubble with sponge-colonized outcrops), not a health signal. No corallivores evident.
The opening and closing frames show a large garden-eel colony: dozens of pale eels with heads raised from burrows across an open gray sand plain, visible in two separate wide shots (e.g., Image 7, Image 33).
A lionfish (invasive, Pterois volitans/miles) is visible tucked into a crevice on one outcrop, camouflaged against the gray rock. Reef fish (blue and brown chromis, a parrotfish, sergeant majors) move over the structure, and one frame shows a diver examining a barrel-sponge-and-coral outcrop in clear blue water (e.g., Image 49).
No independent survey was made at this exact site; the nearest ones are listed in the table below.
| Method | Hard-coral cover (%) |
|---|---|
| In-house DINOv3 | 15.0 |
| CoralSCOP unedited | 21.3 |
| Claude | 3.0 |
Within 5 km, 3 independent survey stations recorded hard coral cover in 7 surveys between 2024 and 2025. Of the 1 station surveyed in more than one year, 1 increased between their first and latest surveys. The longest record, Black_Rock_Donor (MERMAID project “Saba_Marina_Relocation”*, 1.45 km away), went from 1.7% in 2024 to 10% in 2025. Surveys since 2021 average 6.0% (range 1.7–10%, n=4). This site's own estimate (3.0%) sits within the recent range (1.7–10%); the methods differ, so the comparison is context, not a like-for-like test.
Collected by other programs using different methods (MERMAID is a data platform: each MERMAID row names the organization that did the survey, and its method is in the row's hover text. *Conducted by citizen scientists), so these are context for the figures above, not a like-for-like comparison. Where a station was surveyed more than once the range is shown. Station names are not dive-site names.
| Agency | Site / location | Date | Hard coral cover (%) | Distance | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MERMAID project “Saba_Marina_Relocation”* | Black_Rock_Donor | 2024–2025 | 1.7–10% (2 surveys) | 1.45 km | Bean T, Gould K, Re E. 2025. Saba_Marina_Relocation. MERMAID |
| MERMAID project “Saba_Marina_Relocation”* | Hole_in_the_Corner_(HITC)_Recipient | 2024 | 6.5% | 3.15 km | Bean T, Gould K, Re E. 2025. Saba_Marina_Relocation. MERMAID |
| MERMAID project “Saba_Marina_Relocation”* | Black_Rock_Donor (mean of 2 surveys, 2024–2025) | 2025 | 5.8% (4 surveys) | 1.45 km | Bean T, Gould K, Re E. 2025. Saba_Marina_Relocation. MERMAID |
All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from Coral Reef Diagnostics and the organizations named in the data-sources table above.
© Coral Reef Diagnostics.