Part of the regional summary: Saba
More about this place: Saba on Wikipedia

A true labyrinth of low volcanic walls separated by winding sand alleys where several nurse sharks rest, with a spiny lobster under a ledge and an old fish trap wedged in the sand. The wall tops hold the busiest coral ground of the Saba dives, dense fields of small brain, star, and mustard hill corals, though almost all colonies are small.
Three independent survey stations shown with the program’s logo — click one to see how far it is from this site.
Three other CRD dive sites within 5 km shown in orange — click a marker to open its page.
17 of these 54 photographs are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.
A maze of boulder-strewn rock ridges separated by narrow sand channels, matching the site's "Labyrinth" name directly: one frame looks straight down a sandy corridor flanked by two rock walls, a whitetip/nurse shark's silhouette visible resting on the sand ahead, and a second frame shows the same or a similar nurse shark (Ginglymostoma cirratum, confirmed by its rounded snout and barbels) resting tucked under a rock ledge (e.g., Image 14, Image 20, Image 45).
Visibility is good to excellent throughout, with strong ambient blue light in the open-water frames.
Coral cover on the ridges is real but patchy and small-colony: scattered knobby/lobed star-coral heads (olive-green, several photographed in clusters of three to five small colonies on a single boulder), a scoop-shaped mustard-hill or star coral, and one notably large, pale, evenly-ridged meandroid/star coral colony photographed close-up under blue ambient light -- its tissue reads unusually pale/whitish, which may reflect a lighting/white-balance effect from strobe-free blue water rather than true bleaching, but is different enough from the other, clearly healthy olive-brown colonies in this sample to flag (e.g., Image 26, Image 27, Image 28, Image 34, Image 43).
Sponges and octocorals recur throughout: mustard-yellow tube sponges, orange encrusting sponges, a purple sea fan, black sea rods, and a delicate pale gorgonian branching from a crevice (e.g., Image 4, Image 44, Image 50).
Coral cover: 8.9% — a blind Claude computer-vision point count of 82 of Anderson's unedited photographs (20 points per photo; water, fish, and obstructions excluded). Other computer-vision methods are listed in the method table. Frames were screened before scoring: open sand, mid-water, blown-out, and burst-duplicate frames, dive computers, topside, and diver shots, blue-light fluorescence, and macros were all removed.
No disease or physical damage is visible on any of the small star-coral colonies reviewed. No corallivores evident.
Reef fish include blue and brown chromis, sergeant majors, and a school of two crevalle/horse-eye jacks cruising in open blue water off the structure (e.g., Image 9, Image 19).
Also on record for this site: Boulder and brain corals (some fluorescing bright blue/green under lights) top the boulders alongside barrel sponges and sea fans, with an old fish trap wedged in the sand (e.g., Image 30, Image 41, Image 49).
Multiple nurse sharks rested in the sandy alleys, plus a spiny lobster under a ledge, schools of blue chromis/creole wrasse, and jacks in the blue (e.g., Image 23).
| Method | Hard-coral cover (%) |
|---|---|
| In-house DINOv3 | 18.3 |
| CoralSCOP unedited | 22.3 |
| Claude | 8.9 |
Within 5 km, 3 independent survey stations recorded hard coral cover in 7 surveys between 2024 and 2025. Of the 1 station surveyed in more than one year, 1 increased between their first and latest surveys. The longest record, Black_Rock_Donor (MERMAID project “Saba_Marina_Relocation”*, 2.44 km away), went from 1.7% in 2024 to 10% in 2025. Surveys since 2021 average 6.0% (range 1.7–10%, n=4). This site's own estimate (8.9%) sits within the recent range (1.7–10%); the methods differ, so the comparison is context, not a like-for-like test.
Collected by other programs using different methods (MERMAID is a data platform: each MERMAID row names the organization that did the survey, and its method is in the row's hover text. *Conducted by citizen scientists), so these are context for the figures above, not a like-for-like comparison. Where a station was surveyed more than once the range is shown. Station names are not dive-site names.
| Agency | Site / location | Date | Hard coral cover (%) | Distance | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MERMAID project “Saba_Marina_Relocation”* | Black_Rock_Donor | 2024–2025 | 1.7–10% (2 surveys) | 2.44 km | Bean T, Gould K, Re E. 2025. Saba_Marina_Relocation. MERMAID |
| MERMAID project “Saba_Marina_Relocation”* | Hole_in_the_Corner_(HITC)_Recipient | 2024 | 6.5% | 3.80 km | Bean T, Gould K, Re E. 2025. Saba_Marina_Relocation. MERMAID |
| MERMAID project “Saba_Marina_Relocation”* | Black_Rock_Donor (mean of 2 surveys, 2024–2025) | 2025 | 5.8% (4 surveys) | 2.44 km | Bean T, Gould K, Re E. 2025. Saba_Marina_Relocation. MERMAID |
All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from Coral Reef Diagnostics and the organizations named in the data-sources table above.
© Coral Reef Diagnostics.