University of Mauritius
Coral Reef Diagnostics

Mauritius - Lost Anchor

Reef Check Foundation
⬇ Download this page as a report card
05
Photo: Anderson Mayfield/Coral Reef Diagnostics
Country
Survey date(s)
2025-02-09
Coordinates
-19.9477, 57.6221
Coral cover
10%
Site cover estimate: manual point count and CoralNet, weighted equally (55 photos) · other methods below
→ 0%, 2019–2025
Observations
not yet tagged for this site
Heat stress
Today’s heat load
16 Sep 2026 · No heat stress
5-year thermal stress load
5-year mean max. degree heating weeks (DHW)
2021–2025
NOAA Coral Reef Watch — Southern Mauritius virtual station
i 5-year mean max. DHW is the mean of the annual maximum DHWs over the five complete years named above, not conditions today.
More infoSouthern Mauritius (NOAA CRW virtual station)
Photographs
50
Site summary
Read this summary in:

A low-relief boulder field off Coin de Mire in northern Mauritius, where most surfaces are turf and coralline crust rather than living coral. It is punctuated by a stand of large sea fans and a lone healthy staghorn thicket on sand, with a whitemouth moray and a camouflaged octopus among the sightings.

Max. depth dived
24.8 m
dive-log maximum
Water temp. during survey
29.0°C
+2.6°C vs the 2025 mean sea temperature (26.4°C)
Bottom time
49 min
in at 10:57

Five independent survey stations shown with the program’s logo — click one to see how far it is from this site.

One other CRD dive site within 5 km shown in orange — click a marker to open its page.

10 of these 50 photographs are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.

7810141820212223242526272829303132333435363738394041424344454647484950

Photo credit & attribution

Site description

General benthic features

Lost Anchor (Coin de Mire) is a low-relief boulder field: turf- and coralline-encrusted boulders and dead reef framework cut by sand and rubble channels, with manually scored point-count cover of 11% hard coral (e.g., Image 4, Image 5, Image 9, Image 17).

Live colonies are mostly small lavender Pocillopora and massive Porites, punctuated by a stand of large gorgonian sea fans and a lone healthy staghorn Acropora thicket on sand (e.g., Image 1, Image 2, Image 3, Image 13).

Coral cover

Coral cover: 10% — the site cover estimate from Anderson Mayfield's Mauritius manuscript (his manual point count and CoralNet, weighted equally); the manual point count alone is 10%. The earlier four-method average for this site was 15.3%; every method is compared in the table below. The methods have different denominators and sampling footprints, so this is a provisional photo-derived index rather than a diver survey, and the agreement between the four is the real measure of confidence at this site. Anderson keeps an eye out for newer CV models and will refresh this CoralSCOP and DINOv3 figure once a more trustworthy option is available.

Stressors

No crown-of-thorns starfish (COTS) or other corallivores evident.

Fish and other fauna

Notable sightings included a whitemouth moray, a probable camouflaged octopus, Diadema-type urchins, and dense clouds of chromis and damselfish; no widespread bleaching was evident (e.g., Image 12, Image 16).

Comparisons with other data

No independent survey was made at this exact site; the nearest ones are listed in the table below.

CV model comparison

Computer vision on this site's own photographs gives CoralSCOP 21%; In-house DINOv3 point classifier 20% — reported alongside rather than merged, because as of September 2026 no computer-vision method estimates coral cover accurately on new images.
Headline is the reference value; every other row is listed beside it for comparison and none is averaged in. ⚠ This region's values are on the ALL-30 denominator (water and fish left in), not the settled Mayfield-2025 rule used at Oman, Kenya and the Red Sea.
More infoThe settled rule would raise every Mauritius site by 0–3.7 pp. Awaiting Anderson's ruling. The Claude row is the manuscript's Claude (with image context) value, scored on the same manual-reference frames as the manual count (v42 Table 3); the last of its five context batches had been seen before, so it is not fully blind. Anemone Garden is flagged non-reef in the source (anemone habitat); its manual value stands but carries no error term. CoralSCOP (SAM-based mask-sum), edited photos: n/a — no edited copies exist; EDITED_UNEDITED_RULES.md records Mauritius as verified 347/347 unedited
MethodHard-coral cover (%)
Site cover estimate10.2
Manual (draft manuscript)10.5
CoralNet10.0
In-house DINOv320.3
CoralSCOP unedited20.5
Claude9.2

Independent surveys nearby

Data availability near this site
Agency / programYear(s)Stations / distanceLink
Original collectors (compiled by McClanahan et al. 2016)20162 stations, 3.59–3.64 kmRecords ↓
Reef Check19991 station, 3.06 kmRecords ↓
WCS Kenya / University of Mauritius via MERMAID20191 station, 0.27 kmRecords ↓
WCS via MERMAID20161 station, 4.86 kmRecords ↓
Hard coral cover over time — this site and every independent station within 5 km. Programs are shown separately because they use different methods at different stations; the lines are not one comparable series.
0%25%50%75%100%199920122025Reef Check 1999: 46%Original collectors (compiled by McClanahan et al. 2016) 2016: 89%Original collectors (compiled by McClanahan et al. 2016) 2016: 98%WCS via MERMAID 2016: 71%WCS Kenya / University of Mauritius via MERMAID 2019: 10%Dr. Coral (CRD) 2025: 10%Year-averaged across all programs: no detectable trend (-1.24 pp per year, not separable from zero; 4 years)
Reef Check Original collectors (compiled by McClanahan et al. 2016) WCS via MERMAID WCS Kenya / University of Mauritius via MERMAID Dr. Coral (CRD)Year-average (no detectable trend)

Within 5 km, 5 independent survey stations recorded hard coral cover in 7 records between 1999 and 2019. The most recent nearby survey is from 2019, so these values predate recent heat stress. This site's own estimate (10%) sits within the range of these surveys (10–46%, excluding 3 best-patch values above 70% that are not a site mean); the methods differ, so the comparison is context, not a like-for-like test.

Collected by other programs using different methods (Reef Check uses point-intercept transects; MERMAID is a data platform: each MERMAID row names the organization that did the survey, and its method is in the row's hover text), so these are context for the figures above, not a like-for-like comparison. Where a station was surveyed more than once the range is shown. Station names are not dive-site names. Values marked best patch exceed 70%: surveyors usually chose the richest area, so they are not site means.

Independent survey data near this site
AgencySite / locationDateHard coral cover (%)DistanceLink
Reef CheckIsland Reef, Anse La Raie199946%3.06 km—
Original collectors (compiled by McClanahan et al. 2016)ALR/ALBC (Mauritius)201689% best patch3.59 km—
Original collectors (compiled by McClanahan et al. 2016)ALR/ALLC (Mauritius)201698% best patch3.64 km—
WCS via MERMAIDBain Boeuf201671% (2 images) best patch4.86 kmBriand J, Darling E. 2016. 2016 bleaching surveys. MERMAID
WCS Kenya / University of Mauritius via MERMAIDCoin de Mire201910% (2 images)0.27 kmDarling E, McClanahan T, Muthiga N. 2019. Mauritius 2019-2020. MERMAID

Data & links

All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from Coral Reef Diagnostics and the organizations named in the data-sources table above.

© Coral Reef Diagnostics.