Coral Reef Diagnostics

Mauritius - Bamboo

University of Mauritius
⬇ Download this page as a report card
05
Photo: Anderson Mayfield/Coral Reef Diagnostics
Country
Survey date(s)
2025-02-04
Coordinates
-20.2973, 57.3531
Coral cover
17%
Site cover estimate: manual point count and CoralNet, weighted equally (50 photos) · other methods below
Observations
not yet tagged for this site
Heat stress
Today’s heat load
16 Sep 2026 · No heat stress
5-year thermal stress load
5-year mean max. degree heating weeks (DHW)
2021–2025
NOAA Coral Reef Watch — Southern Mauritius virtual station
i 5-year mean max. DHW is the mean of the annual maximum DHWs over the five complete years named above, not conditions today.
More infoSouthern Mauritius (NOAA CRW virtual station)
Photographs
50
Site summary
Read this summary in:

A Mauritius site where a low-relief base of rubble and pavement meets sections of near-vertical wall dropping into open blue, with patchy coral mostly massive Porites. Dense clusters of long-spined Diadema urchins graze the open pavement, and a moray, a scorpionfish, a resting stingray, and bannerfish were seen.

Max. depth dived
35.3 m
dive-log maximum
Water temp. during survey
28.0°C
+1.4°C vs the 2025 mean sea temperature (26.6°C)
Bottom time
48 min
in at 09:25

Twenty independent survey stations shown with the program’s logo — click one to see how far it is from this site.

One other CRD dive site within 5 km shown in orange — click a marker to open its page.

15 of these 50 photographs are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.

211131420212223242526272829303132333435363738394041424344454647484950

Photo credit & attribution

Site description

Setting

Bamboo's reef structure combines a low-relief base of sand-veneered rubble and pavement with sections of steep, near-vertical wall dropping into open blue water (e.g., Image 1, Image 8, Image 9).

General benthic features

Coral cover was patchy and scattered, with live colonies interspersed among bare, turf- and coralline-algae-covered rock and rubble (e.g., Image 17).

Massive Porites colonies were the most frequently encountered growth form, accompanied by foliose or plating corals compatible with Montipora or Pachyseris, scattered branching Acropora, massive brain coral forms consistent with Platygyra and Dipsastraea/Favites, and at least one free-living, elongate fungiid compatible with Herpolitha or Polyphyllia (e.g., Image 3, Image 5, Image 7, Image 12, Image 15, Image 16, Image 19).

Non-coral life was conspicuous: red, orange, and pink encrusting sponges colored patches of bare rock, and dense clusters of long-spined, black Diadema-type sea urchins occupied open pavement, consistent with a heavily grazed bottom (e.g., Image 4, Image 6, Image 18).

Coral cover

Coral cover: 17% — the site cover estimate from Anderson Mayfield's Mauritius manuscript (his manual point count and CoralNet, weighted equally); the manual point count alone is 17%. The earlier four-method average for this site was 16.4%; every method is compared in the table below. The methods have different denominators and sampling footprints, so this is a provisional photo-derived index rather than a diver survey, and the agreement between the four is the real measure of confidence at this site. Anderson keeps an eye out for newer CV models and will refresh this CoralSCOP and DINOv3 figure once a more trustworthy option is available.

Stressors

No widespread bleaching was evident across the reef as a whole. No crown-of-thorns starfish (COTS) or other corallivores evident.

Fish and other fauna

Fish observed included damselfishes, butterflyfishes, a cleaner-wrasse pair, a schooling snapper/fusilier-type group, a pair of black-and-white bannerfish (Heniochus), a moray eel, a scorpionfish, a resting stingray, and a pipefish (e.g., Image 10).

Comparisons with other data

No independent survey was made at this exact site; the nearest ones are listed in the table below.

CV model comparison

Computer vision on this site's own photographs gives In-house DINOv3 point classifier 20%; CoralSCOP 17% — reported alongside rather than merged, because as of September 2026 no computer-vision method estimates coral cover accurately on new images.
Headline is the reference value; every other row is listed beside it for comparison and none is averaged in. ⚠ This region's values are on the ALL-30 denominator (water and fish left in), not the settled Mayfield-2025 rule used at Oman, Kenya and the Red Sea.
More infoThe settled rule would raise every Mauritius site by 0–3.7 pp. Awaiting Anderson's ruling. The Claude row is the manuscript's Claude (with image context) value, scored on the same manual-reference frames as the manual count (v42 Table 3); the last of its five context batches had been seen before, so it is not fully blind. Anemone Garden is flagged non-reef in the source (anemone habitat); its manual value stands but carries no error term. CoralSCOP (SAM-based mask-sum), edited photos: n/a — no edited copies exist; EDITED_UNEDITED_RULES.md records Mauritius as verified 347/347 unedited
MethodHard-coral cover (%)
Site cover estimate16.7
Manual (draft manuscript)17.2
CoralNet11.8
In-house DINOv319.9
CoralSCOP unedited16.9
Claude13.8

Independent surveys nearby

Data availability near this site
Agency / programYear(s)Stations / distanceLink
Pisternick et al. 2020 (PANGAEA)201817 stations, 1.09–2.83 kmRecords ↓
WCS Kenya / University of Mauritius via MERMAID20193 stations, 2.32–2.51 kmRecords ↓
Hard coral cover over time — this site and every independent station within 5 km. Programs are shown separately because they use different methods at different stations; the lines are not one comparable series.
0%10%20%30%201820212025Pisternick et al. 2020 (PANGAEA) 2018: 0.0%Pisternick et al. 2020 (PANGAEA) 2018: 4.0%Pisternick et al. 2020 (PANGAEA) 2018: 12%Pisternick et al. 2020 (PANGAEA) 2018: 13%Pisternick et al. 2020 (PANGAEA) 2018: 29%WCS Kenya / University of Mauritius via MERMAID 2019: 13%WCS Kenya / University of Mauritius via MERMAID 2019: 17%WCS Kenya / University of Mauritius via MERMAID 2019: 30%Dr. Coral (CRD) 2025: 17%Year-averaged across all programs: no detectable trend (+0.30 pp per year, not separable from zero; 3 years)
Pisternick et al. 2020 (PANGAEA) WCS Kenya / University of Mauritius via MERMAID Dr. Coral (CRD)Year-average (no detectable trend)

Within 5 km, 20 independent survey stations recorded hard coral cover in 20 records between 2018 and 2019. The most recent nearby survey is from 2019, so these values predate recent heat stress. This site's own estimate (17%) sits within the range of these surveys (0.0–30%); the methods differ, so the comparison is context, not a like-for-like test.

Collected by other programs using different methods (MERMAID is a data platform: each MERMAID row names the organization that did the survey, and its method is in the row's hover text), so these are context for the figures above, not a like-for-like comparison. Where a station was surveyed more than once the range is shown. Station names are not dive-site names.

Show all 20 independent survey records
Independent survey data near this site
AgencySite / locationDateHard coral cover (%)DistanceLink
Pisternick et al. 2020 (PANGAEA)FEF_C_1_1 (Flic en Flac, Control)20180.0%1.09 km—
Pisternick et al. 2020 (PANGAEA)FEF_C_7_1 (Flic en Flac, Control)20180.0%1.15 km—
Pisternick et al. 2020 (PANGAEA)FEF_C_13_1 (Flic en Flac, Control)20180.0%1.21 km—
Pisternick et al. 2020 (PANGAEA)FEF_C_3_1 (Flic en Flac, Control)20180.0%1.26 km—
Pisternick et al. 2020 (PANGAEA)FEF_C_9_1 (Flic en Flac, Control)20180.0%1.31 km—
Pisternick et al. 2020 (PANGAEA)FEF_C_15_1 (Flic en Flac, Control)20180.0%1.36 km—
Pisternick et al. 2020 (PANGAEA)FEF_C_5_1 (Flic en Flac, Control)20180.0%1.43 km—
Pisternick et al. 2020 (PANGAEA)FEF_C_11_1 (Flic en Flac, Control)20180.0%1.47 km—
Pisternick et al. 2020 (PANGAEA)FEF_C_17_1 (Flic en Flac, Control)20180.0%1.53 km—
Pisternick et al. 2020 (PANGAEA)FEF_SGD_1_1 (Flic en Flac, SGD)20180.0%2.40 km—
Pisternick et al. 2020 (PANGAEA)FEF_SGD_9_1 (Flic en Flac, SGD)201829%2.41 km—
Pisternick et al. 2020 (PANGAEA)FEF_SGD_13_1 (Flic en Flac, SGD)20180.0%2.43 km—
Pisternick et al. 2020 (PANGAEA)FEF_SGD_3_1 (Flic en Flac, SGD)201812%2.61 km—
Pisternick et al. 2020 (PANGAEA)FEF_SGD_11_1 (Flic en Flac, SGD)20184.0%2.61 km—
Pisternick et al. 2020 (PANGAEA)FEF_SGD_15_1 (Flic en Flac, SGD)201813%2.63 km—
Pisternick et al. 2020 (PANGAEA)FEF_SGD_7_1 (Flic en Flac, SGD)20184.0%2.81 km—
Pisternick et al. 2020 (PANGAEA)FEF_SGD_17_1 (Flic en Flac, SGD)20180.0%2.83 km—
WCS Kenya / University of Mauritius via MERMAIDFlic&Flac ReefSlope201913%2.32 kmDarling E, McClanahan T, Muthiga N. 2019. Mauritius 2019-2020. MERMAID
WCS Kenya / University of Mauritius via MERMAIDFlic&Flac Reef lagoon201917%2.51 kmDarling E, McClanahan T, Muthiga N. 2019. Mauritius 2019-2020. MERMAID
WCS Kenya / University of Mauritius via MERMAIDFlic and Flac201930%2.51 kmDarling E, McClanahan T, Muthiga N. 2019. Mauritius 2019-2020. MERMAID

Data & links

All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from Coral Reef Diagnostics and the organizations named in the data-sources table above.

© Coral Reef Diagnostics.