Part of the regional summary: Mauritius

Not a coral reef but a true anemone garden: large bommies on a Mauritius lagoon flat carpeted almost entirely by magnificent-type sea anemones, attended by clouds of damselfish, with hard coral at just 2.7%. Trumpetfish, honeycomb grouper, a whitemouth moray, and bannerfish were also seen.
Non pas un récif corallien mais un véritable jardin d'anémones : de grandes patates sur un platier lagunaire mauricien, tapissées presque entièrement d'anémones de mer de type magnifica, entourées de nuées de poissons-demoiselles, avec seulement 2.7 % de corail dur. Un poisson-trompette, un mérou nid d'abeille, une murène à bouche blanche et des poissons-cochers ont également été observés.
Traduction par IA de ce résumé ; la version anglaise fait foi.
Two independent survey stations shown with the program’s logo — click one to see how far it is from this site.
14 of the 46 photographs on this page are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.
Not a coral reef but a true anemone garden: large bommies on a sand-and-algae lagoon flat carpeted nearly wholesale by magnificent-type sea anemones (consistent with Heteractis magnifica), attended by clouds of dark Dascyllus-type damselfish (e.g., Image 3, Image 11, Image 12, Image 13, Image 14, Image 16).
No widespread bleaching was evident. Two sea anemones were bleached, one with white to faintly pink-cream tentacles (e.g., Image 16) and one with stark-white tentacles over a dark red column (e.g., Image 51), among tan, orange, and pink neighbors.
Highlights included a trumpetfish, honeycomb grouper, whitemouth moray, longfin bannerfish, spiny cushion stars, and sea cucumbers (e.g., Image 1, Image 2, Image 10, Image 17).
WCS Kenya / University of Mauritius surveyed a nearby station (Anenome/Mahebourg) in 2019, 0.04 km from the pin (data via MERMAID). Within 5 km, two independent stations (WCS Kenya / University of Mauritius via MERMAID and WCS via MERMAID) recorded station-year means of 18–73% hard coral cover between 2016 and 2019, all with MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats; the nearest, WCS Kenya / University of Mauritius via MERMAID (quadrats) at Anenome/Mahebourg, 0.04 km away, read 18% in 2019.
| Method | Hard coral cover (%) | Photos (n) ± SE |
|---|---|---|
| Manual (reference) | 2.7 | |
| CoralNet | 7.7 | n = 40 |
| Coralscapes v1 | 17.4 | |
| CoralSCOP | 30.5 | n = 40 |
| DINOv3 | 33.3 | n = 40 |
| Claude (context) | 2.9 | n = 40 |
The four computer-vision methods disagree by 30.4 pp (2.9–33.3%) and read 0.2–30.6 pp above the manual point count (2.7%); the headline is the manual point count because a person's point count of the site's photographs is the reference the models are measured against.
The Coralscapes v1 row is shown for reference only, outside this comparison.
See a more detailed, stand-alone version of this table.
| Agency / program | Year(s) | Stations / distance | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| WCS Kenya / University of Mauritius via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats) | 2019 | 1 station, 0.04 km | Records ↓ |
| WCS via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats) | 2016 | 1 station, 1.78 km | Records ↓ |
Within 5 km, 2 independent survey stations recorded hard coral cover in 2 surveys between 2016 and 2019. The most recent nearby survey is from 2019, so these values predate recent heat stress. This site's own estimate (2.7%) sits 15.3 points below the one nearby survey station with MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats (18%, excluding 1 best-patch value above 70% that is not a site mean); the methods differ, so the comparison is context, not a like-for-like test.
Collected by other programs using different methods (MERMAID is a data platform: each MERMAID row names the organization that did the survey, and its method is in the row's hover text), so these are context for the figures above, not a like-for-like comparison. Where a station was surveyed more than once, the cell shows either the range of its values or, as a single value, the mean of surveys made in one year. Station names are not dive-site names. Values above 70% are marked “best patch”: surveys often target the densest coral on a reef, so these may overstate the site as a whole.
| Agency | Site / location | Date | Hard coral cover (%) | Distance | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WCS via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats) | Pointe D'Esny | 2016 | 73% best patch | 1.78 km | Briand J, Darling E. 2016. 2016 bleaching surveys. MERMAID |
| WCS Kenya / University of Mauritius via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats) | Anenome/Mahebourg | 2019 | 18% | 0.04 km | Darling E, McClanahan T, Muthiga N. 2019. Mauritius 2019-2020. MERMAID |
All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from Coral Reef Diagnostics and the organizations named in the data sources above.
© Coral Reef Diagnostics.