Coral Reef Diagnostics

Mauritius - Anemone Garden

University of Mauritius
⬇ Download this page as a report card
05
Photo: Anderson Mayfield/Coral Reef Diagnostics
Country
Survey date(s)
2025-02-10
Coordinates
-20.3997, 57.7220
Coral cover
2.7%
Manual point count (40 photos) · other methods below
Observations
bleachingpredation
Heat stress
Most recent heat load record
26 Oct 2026 · No heat stress
5-year thermal stress load
5-year mean max. degree heating weeks (DHW)
2021–2025
NOAA Coral Reef Watch — Southern Mauritius virtual station
i 5-year mean max. DHW is the mean of the annual maximum DHWs over the five complete years named above, not conditions today.
More infoSouthern Mauritius (NOAA CRW virtual station)
Photographs
73
46 shown on this page
Site summary
Read this summary in:

Not a coral reef but a true anemone garden: large bommies on a Mauritius lagoon flat carpeted almost entirely by magnificent-type sea anemones, attended by clouds of damselfish, with hard coral at just 2.7%. Trumpetfish, honeycomb grouper, a whitemouth moray, and bannerfish were also seen.

Max. depth dived
17.6 m
dive-log maximum
Water temp. during survey
27.0°C
+0.6°C vs the 2025 mean sea temperature (26.4°C)
Bottom time
59 min
in at 09:22

Two independent survey stations shown with the program’s logo — click one to see how far it is from this site.

14 of the 46 photographs on this page are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.

568919202122232425262728293033353637383940414243444546474850

Photo credit & attribution

Site description

Setting

Not a coral reef but a true anemone garden: large bommies on a sand-and-algae lagoon flat carpeted nearly wholesale by magnificent-type sea anemones (consistent with Heteractis magnifica), attended by clouds of dark Dascyllus-type damselfish (e.g., Image 3, Image 11, Image 12, Image 13, Image 14, Image 16).

Coral cover

Stressors

No widespread bleaching was evident. Two sea anemones were bleached, one with white to faintly pink-cream tentacles (e.g., Image 16) and one with stark-white tentacles over a dark red column (e.g., Image 51), among tan, orange, and pink neighbors.

Fish and other fauna

Highlights included a trumpetfish, honeycomb grouper, whitemouth moray, longfin bannerfish, spiny cushion stars, and sea cucumbers (e.g., Image 1, Image 2, Image 10, Image 17).

Comparisons with other data

WCS Kenya / University of Mauritius surveyed a nearby station (Anenome/Mahebourg) in 2019, 0.04 km from the pin (data via MERMAID). Within 5 km, two independent stations (WCS Kenya / University of Mauritius via MERMAID and WCS via MERMAID) recorded station-year means of 18–73% hard coral cover between 2016 and 2019, all with MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats; the nearest, WCS Kenya / University of Mauritius via MERMAID (quadrats) at Anenome/Mahebourg, 0.04 km away, read 18% in 2019.

CV model comparison

Computer-vision estimates from this site's own photographs are listed in the comparison table below, alongside the headline rather than merged into it.
Headline is the reference value; every other row is listed beside it for comparison and none is averaged in. ⚠ This region's values use all 30 points as the denominator (water and fish points included), not the Mayfield (2025) convention used at Oman, Kenya, and the Red Sea.
More infoThat convention would raise every Mauritius site by 0–3.7 pp. The Claude row is the manuscript's Claude (with image context) value, scored on the same frames as the manual count; one of its five sets of context images had been seen before, so it is not fully blind. Anemone Garden is anemone habitat rather than coral reef; its manual value stands but carries no error term. CoralSCOP (SAM-based mask-sum), edited photos: n/a — no edited copies exist; all 347 Mauritius photographs are unedited.
MethodHard coral cover (%)Photos (n) ± SE
Manual (reference)2.7
CoralNet7.7n = 40
Coralscapes v117.4
CoralSCOP30.5n = 40
DINOv333.3n = 40
Claude (context)2.9n = 40

The four computer-vision methods disagree by 30.4 pp (2.9–33.3%) and read 0.2–30.6 pp above the manual point count (2.7%); the headline is the manual point count because a person's point count of the site's photographs is the reference the models are measured against.

The Coralscapes v1 row is shown for reference only, outside this comparison.

Independent surveys nearby

Data availability near this site
Agency / programYear(s)Stations / distanceLink
WCS Kenya / University of Mauritius via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats)20191 station, 0.04 kmRecords ↓
WCS via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats)20161 station, 1.78 kmRecords ↓
Hard coral cover over time — this site and every independent station within 5 km. Programs are shown separately because they use different methods at different stations; the lines are not one comparable series.
0%20%40%60%80%201620202025WCS via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats) 2016: 73%WCS Kenya / University of Mauritius via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats) 2019: 18%Coral Reef Diagnostics 2025: 2.7%
WCS via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats) WCS Kenya / University of Mauritius via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats) Coral Reef Diagnostics

Within 5 km, 2 independent survey stations recorded hard coral cover in 2 surveys between 2016 and 2019. The most recent nearby survey is from 2019, so these values predate recent heat stress. This site's own estimate (2.7%) sits 15.3 points below the one nearby survey station with MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats (18%, excluding 1 best-patch value above 70% that is not a site mean); the methods differ, so the comparison is context, not a like-for-like test.

Collected by other programs using different methods (MERMAID is a data platform: each MERMAID row names the organization that did the survey, and its method is in the row's hover text), so these are context for the figures above, not a like-for-like comparison. Where a station was surveyed more than once, the cell shows either the range of its values or, as a single value, the mean of surveys made in one year. Station names are not dive-site names. Values above 70% are marked “best patch”: surveys often target the densest coral on a reef, so these may overstate the site as a whole.

Independent survey data near this site
AgencySite / locationDateHard coral cover (%)DistanceLink
WCS via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats)Pointe D'Esny201673% best patch1.78 kmBriand J, Darling E. 2016. 2016 bleaching surveys. MERMAID
WCS Kenya / University of Mauritius via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats)Anenome/Mahebourg201918%0.04 kmDarling E, McClanahan T, Muthiga N. 2019. Mauritius 2019-2020. MERMAID

Data & links

All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from Coral Reef Diagnostics and the organizations named in the data sources above.

© Coral Reef Diagnostics.