Coral Reef Diagnostics

Maldives - Veli

Reef Check Foundation
⬇ Download this page as a report card
05
Photo: Anderson Mayfield/Coral Reef Diagnostics
Country
Survey date(s)
2016-01-16
April 2016 (transect survey)
July 2016 (transect survey)
Coordinates
3.9642, 73.4989
Coral cover
fore reef 16% · lagoon 5.3%
Diver transect survey, July 2016 (Anderson's HARP / Coral Reef CPR long-term monitoring PIT transects; fore reef n=8, lagoon n=6) · details below
↘ 72%, 2016-04 → 2016-07
Cover declined by 41 points, from 57% in April 2016 to 16% in July 2016 (same program; 6 and 8 transects, not the same set).
Observations
crown-of-thornsbleachingrecent mortality
Heat stress
Most recent heat load record
26 Oct 2026 · Bleaching Watch
5-year thermal stress load
5-year mean max. degree heating weeks (DHW)
2021–2025
NOAA Coral Reef Watch — Maldives virtual station
i 5-year mean max. DHW is the mean of the annual maximum DHWs over the five complete years named above, not conditions today.
More infoMaldives (NOAA CRW virtual station)
Photographs
210
34 shown on this page
Site summary
Read this summary in:

Veli is table-coral country: a gently shelving terrace where plate-shaped Acropora stack in tiers from saucer-sized juveniles to meter-wide slabs, with anthias and bluestripe snapper over the reef. In January 2016 Anderson's sample sheet recorded 22 colonies killed by crown-of-thorns starfish on the two research transects. By April 2016 nearly half the corals on Veli's channel reef were bleached; the April count did not score bleaching on the Veli Lagoon reef, which had lost most of its live coral by July.

Max. depth dived
18.5 m
sample-sheet maximum
Sea surface temp. (satellite)
29.3°C
satellite sea surface temperature (SST) on the survey date (NOAA Coral Reef Watch, Maldives), not an in-water reading; it is the warmest-pixel (90th percentile) reading in the station area and can run 1–1.5°C above the reef

Six independent survey stations shown with the program’s logo — click one to see how far it is from this site.

Ten other CRD dive sites with their own pages within 5 km shown in orange — click a marker to open its page.

19 of the 34 photographs on this page are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.

61012171921222627282930323637

Photo credit & attribution

Site description

General benthic features

Table-coral country: a gently shelving terrace off Veli where plate-shaped Acropora stack in tiers like café tables, from saucer-sized juveniles to slabs a meter across, with cauliflower Pocillopora and massive Porites mounds filling the gaps (e.g., Image 4, Image 7, Image 15, Image 20, Image 25).

Coral cover

Stressors

Anderson's January 2016 sample sheet records 22 colonies killed by crown-of-thorns starfish on the two research transects (11 on each). The note reads: "No COTS seen at site, though damage is extensive." A few white branch tips and one ghost-white staghorn appear in the January photographs, and in one habitat frame about a dozen flat-topped branch ends on two pigmented colonies are stark white (e.g., Image 40); these are recent mortality, cause not stated.

By April 2016 nearly half the corals on Veli's channel reef were bleached; the April count did not score bleaching on the sheltered Veli Lagoon reef, which had lost most of its live coral by July.

Fish and other fauna

Clouds of orange anthias shimmer over the coral, and the signature spectacle is a river of yellow — a dense school of bluestripe snapper pouring across the reef in formation.

Comparisons with other data

Apart from our own transect survey shown here, we found no other surveys at this site as of 2026. Within 5 km, six independent stations recorded station-year means of 5.5–76% hard coral cover between 2015 and 2025; the nearest, Montefalcone et al. 2026 at Kuda Giri Wreck, 1.37 km away, read 39–43% between 2024 and 2025.

Dive record

The January 2016 research dive threaded transect tape between the table colonies, tagging round, shag-pile table colonies photographed from above with little white number plates (e.g., Image 1, Image 2, Image 3, Image 5, Image 8, Image 9, Image 11, Image 13, Image 14, Image 16, Image 18, Image 23, Image 24).

CV model comparison

Two habitats, shown separately and never pooled: fore reef 16% (n=8 transects, SD 6.0, median 14%) and lagoon 5.3% (n=6, SD 1.5, median 6.0%), July 2016 PIT transects.
More infoSingle-number uses (map color, regional mean, score-card sort) take the fore-reef value. Same site, April 2016 → July 2016: 57% → 16% (Same reef, same survey program: Anderson's HARP / Coral Reef CPR long-term monitoring PIT transects, April 2016 → July 2016 (fore reef; channel in April)).
Headline: Anderson's own July 2016 point-intercept transects (after the 2016 bleaching); April 2016 is the earlier survey.
More infoClaude computer vision on the January 2016 photos predates the bleaching and is shown beside both the April 2016 and the July 2016 transects; other rows are comparisons and are never averaged.
MethodHard coral cover (%)Photos (n) ± SE
Transect, July 2016, fore reef (headline)16.1
Transect, July 2016, lagoon (shown separately)5.3
Transect, April 2016, channel / fore reef (during the bleaching)56.7
Transect, April 2016, lagoon (during the bleaching)69.0
In-house DINOv3, January 2016 photos30.8
CoralSCOP edited, January 2016 photos38.6
Claude, January 2016 photos (before the bleaching)44.1*n = 12 · SE 3.4

The three computer-vision methods disagree by 13.3 pp (30.8–44.1%) and read 14.7–28.0 pp above the in-water transect (16.1%); the headline is the in-water transect because a diver transect is independent of the photographs.

*Based on only 12 reef-habitat photos; this estimate is less certain.

Independent surveys nearby

Data availability near this site
Agency / programYear(s)Stations / distanceLink
Montefalcone et al. (2020)20151 station, 2.14 kmRecords ↓
Montefalcone et al. 20262024–20252 stations, 1.37–4.93 kmRecords ↓
Reef Check20221 station, 3.48 kmRecords ↓
XL Catlin Seaview Survey2015–20172 stations, 1.98–2.69 kmRecords ↓
Hard coral cover over time — this site and every independent station within 5 km. Programs are shown separately because they use different methods at different stations; the lines are not one comparable series.
0%20%40%60%80%201520202025XL Catlin Seaview Survey 2015: 7.1%XL Catlin Seaview Survey 2015: 38%XL Catlin Seaview Survey 2017: 5.5%Montefalcone et al. (2020) 2015: 76%Reef Check 2022: 19%Montefalcone et al. 2026 2024: 43%Montefalcone et al. 2026 2024: 60%Montefalcone et al. 2026 2025: 39%Montefalcone et al. 2026 2025: 43%Coral Reef Diagnostics 2016: 16%Year-averaged across all programs: illustrative only; the programs differ in stations and method, so no trend is claimed (6 years)
XL Catlin Seaview Survey Montefalcone et al. (2020) Reef Check Montefalcone et al. 2026 Coral Reef DiagnosticsYear-average (illustrative only, programs differ)

Within 5 km, 6 independent survey stations recorded hard coral cover in 9 records between 2015 and 2025. Of the 3 stations surveyed in more than one year, 2 were scored by divers or by people annotating photographs: 2 declined (by 4.0–17 points) between their first and latest surveys. The other 1 was scored by automated image analysis: changed by 7 points or less, inside the 7-point method-noise floor (inconclusive). The longest record, transect 37035 (XL Catlin Seaview Survey, 1.98 km away), went from 7.1% in 2015 to 5.5% in 2017. Since 2021, station-year means average 41% (range 19–60%; n = 5 station-years from 5 records). This site's own estimate (fore reef 16% · lagoon 5.3%) sits 23 points below the recent range of station-year means up to 2 km away (39–43%); the methods differ, so the comparison is context, not a like-for-like test.

Collected by other programs using different methods (Reef Check uses point-intercept transects; the XL Catlin Seaview Survey uses photo-transects with automated image annotation), so these are context for the figures above, not a like-for-like comparison. Where a station was surveyed more than once, the cell shows either the range of its values or, as a single value, the mean of surveys made in one year. Station names are not dive-site names. Values above 70% are marked “best patch”: surveys often target the densest coral on a reef, so these may overstate the site as a whole.

Independent survey data near this site
AgencySite / locationDateHard coral cover (%)DistanceLink
XL Catlin Seaview Surveytransect 370352015–20175.5–7.1% (2 surveys)1.98 kmdoi:10.14264/uql.2019.930
Montefalcone et al. (2020)Cocoa Corner201576% best patch2.14 kmdoi:10.3389/fmars.2020.00587
XL Catlin Seaview Surveytransect 37036201538%2.69 kmdoi:10.14264/uql.2019.930
Reef CheckGulhi Island Backreef202219%3.48 km—
Montefalcone et al. 2026Kuda Giri Wreck2024–202539–43% (2 surveys)1.37 kmdoi:10.1007/s00338-026-02850-x
Montefalcone et al. 2026Bajiy Giri2024–202543–60% (2 surveys)4.93 kmdoi:10.1007/s00338-026-02850-x

Data & links

All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from Coral Reef Diagnostics and the organizations named in the data sources above.

© Coral Reef Diagnostics.

References

  1. Montefalcone M, Morri C, Bianchi CN (2020). Influence of Local Pressures on Maldivian Coral Reef Resilience Following Repeated Bleaching Events, and Recovery Perspectives. Frontiers in Marine Science 7:587. PDF
  2. Montefalcone M, Bianchi CN, Morri C, Ahmed H, Pancrazi I (2026). Outcomes of the fourth global coral bleaching (2023–2024) in the Maldives. Coral Reefs. DOI
  3. Gonzalez-Rivero M, et al. (2019). Seaview Survey photo-quadrat and image classification dataset. The University of Queensland (UQ eSpace) data collection. DOI