Coral Reef Diagnostics

Maldives - Raaeundi Reef

Reef Check Foundation
⬇ Download this page as a report card
05
Photo: Anderson Mayfield/Coral Reef Diagnostics
Country
Survey date(s)
2016-01-15
April 2016 (transect survey)
July 2016 (transect survey)
Coordinates
4.0120, 73.4800
Coral cover
8.0%
Diver transect survey, July 2016 (Anderson's HARP / Coral Reef CPR long-term monitoring PIT transects; n=5 transects) · details below · median 6.0%
↘ 76%, 2016-04 → 2016-07
Cover declined by 25.0 points, from 33% in April 2016 to 8.0% in July 2016 (same program; 6 and 5 transects, not the same set).
Heat stress
Most recent heat load record
26 Oct 2026 · Bleaching Watch
5-year thermal stress load
5-year mean max. degree heating weeks (DHW)
2021–2025
NOAA Coral Reef Watch — Maldives virtual station
i 5-year mean max. DHW is the mean of the annual maximum DHWs over the five complete years named above, not conditions today.
More infoMaldives (NOAA CRW virtual station)
Photographs
128
24 shown on this page
Site summary
Read this summary in:

Raaeundi Reef is a shallow flat with a ghost-forest feel, where old staghorn skeletons gray with algae stand beneath scattered living corals, and a leopard-spotted sea cucumber lounges among the dead branches. Some colonies were already pale or partly white in January 2016, and by the April 2016 resurvey at the peak of El Niño the colonies recorded here were 100% bleached.

Max. depth dived
10.5 m
sample-sheet maximum
Sea surface temp. (satellite)
29.1°C
satellite sea surface temperature (SST) on the survey date (NOAA Coral Reef Watch, Maldives), not an in-water reading; it is the warmest-pixel (90th percentile) reading in the station area and can run 1–1.5°C above the reef

Three independent survey stations shown with the program’s logo — click one to see how far it is from this site.

Five other CRD dive sites with their own pages within 5 km shown in orange — click a marker to open its page.

11 of the 24 photographs on this page are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.

2359111416182021222325

Photo credit & attribution

Site description

General benthic features

A shallow, sun-flooded reef flat with a ghost-forest feel: extensive stands of old staghorn skeletons, gray with algal turf, stand as the framework this reef built in better days — with the living corals scattered over the top like survivors (e.g., Image 7, Image 8, Image 24).

Coral cover

Stressors

In January some colonies were already pale or partly white (e.g., Image 10, Image 12, Image 19); by the April 2016 resurvey, at the peak of the El Niño, the colonies recorded here were 100% bleached.

Already in January, Anderson's sampling sheet noted that the site had been ravaged by crown-of-thorns starfish, with low coral cover on both transects, and recorded one of the 15 colonies sampled as sickly and dying, one as mostly dead, and three with partial mortality.

Fish and other fauna

Look between the dead branches for a leopard-spotted sea cucumber lounging across the quadrats (e.g., Image 8).

Comparisons with other data

AquaReef Project surveyed a nearby station (Raimas) in 2026, 0.23 km from the pin. Cover values from that work are not among the survey records shown on this page. Within 5 km, three independent stations recorded station-year means of 19–76% hard coral cover between 2015 and 2025; the nearest of these, Reef Check at Gulhi Island Backreef, 3.08 km away, read 19% in 2022.

Dive record

The January 2016 research dives tagged dozens of the living colonies: fat-fingered and bottlebrush Acropora and blue-tinged Pocillopora heads, each numbered and measured along the transect line (e.g., Image 1, Image 4, Image 6, Image 13, Image 17).

CV model comparison

Mean 8.0%, median 6.0% across 5 transects.
More infoSame site, April 2016 → July 2016: 33% → 8.0% (Same reef, same survey program: Anderson's HARP / Coral Reef CPR long-term monitoring PIT transects, April 2016 → July 2016).
Headline: Anderson's own July 2016 point-intercept transects (after the 2016 bleaching); April 2016 is the earlier survey.
More infoThe other rows are comparisons and are never averaged.
MethodHard coral cover (%)Photos (n) ± SE
Transect, July 2016 (headline)8.0
Transect, April 2016 (during the bleaching)32.8
In-house DINOv3, January 2016 photos24.2
CoralSCOP edited, January 2016 photos19.3

The two computer-vision methods agree within 4.9 pp (19.3–24.2%) and read 11.3–16.2 pp above the in-water transect (8.0%); the headline is the in-water transect because a diver transect is independent of the photographs.

Independent surveys nearby

Data availability near this site
Agency / programYear(s)Stations / distanceLink
Montefalcone et al. (2020)20151 station, 4.87 kmRecords ↓
Montefalcone et al. 20262024–20251 station, 4.42 kmRecords ↓
Reef Check20221 station, 3.08 kmRecords ↓
Hard coral cover over time — this site and every independent station within 5 km. Programs are shown separately because they use different methods at different stations; the lines are not one comparable series.
0%20%40%60%80%201520202025Montefalcone et al. (2020) 2015: 76%Reef Check 2022: 19%Montefalcone et al. 2026 2024: 43%Montefalcone et al. 2026 2025: 39%Coral Reef Diagnostics 2016: 8.0%Year-averaged across all programs: illustrative only; the programs differ in stations and method, so no trend is claimed (5 years)
Montefalcone et al. (2020) Reef Check Montefalcone et al. 2026 Coral Reef DiagnosticsYear-average (illustrative only, programs differ)

Within 5 km, 3 independent survey stations recorded hard coral cover in 4 records between 2015 and 2025. The one station surveyed in more than one year declined by 4.0 points between its first and latest surveys. The longest record, Kuda Giri Wreck (Montefalcone et al. 2026, 4.42 km away), went from 43% in 2024 to 39% in 2025. Since 2021, station-year means average 34% (range 19–43%; n = 3 station-years from 3 records). This site's own estimate (8.0%) is not compared with these surveys: none lies within 2 km.

Collected by other programs using different methods (Reef Check uses point-intercept transects), so these are context for the figures above, not a like-for-like comparison. Where a station was surveyed more than once, the cell shows either the range of its values or, as a single value, the mean of surveys made in one year. Station names are not dive-site names. Values above 70% are marked “best patch”: surveys often target the densest coral on a reef, so these may overstate the site as a whole.

Independent survey data near this site
AgencySite / locationDateHard coral cover (%)DistanceLink
Montefalcone et al. (2020)Cocoa Corner201576% best patch4.87 kmdoi:10.3389/fmars.2020.00587
Reef CheckGulhi Island Backreef202219%3.08 km—
Montefalcone et al. 2026Kuda Giri Wreck2024–202539–43% (2 surveys)4.42 kmdoi:10.1007/s00338-026-02850-x

Data & links

All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from Coral Reef Diagnostics and the organizations named in the data sources above.

© Coral Reef Diagnostics.

References

  1. Montefalcone M, Morri C, Bianchi CN (2020). Influence of Local Pressures on Maldivian Coral Reef Resilience Following Repeated Bleaching Events, and Recovery Perspectives. Frontiers in Marine Science 7:587. PDF
  2. Montefalcone M, Bianchi CN, Morri C, Ahmed H, Pancrazi I (2026). Outcomes of the fourth global coral bleaching (2023–2024) in the Maldives. Coral Reefs. DOI