Coral Reef Diagnostics

Maldives - Maafushi

Reef Check Foundation
⬇ Download this page as a report card
05
Photo: Anderson Mayfield/Coral Reef Diagnostics
Country
Survey date(s)
2016-01-18
April 2016 (transect survey)
July 2016 (transect survey)
Coordinates
3.9273, 73.4957
Coral cover
16%
Diver transect survey, July 2016 (Anderson's HARP / Coral Reef CPR long-term monitoring PIT transects; n=6 transects) · details below · median 13%
↘ 64%, 2016-04 → 2016-07
Cover declined by 27 points, from 43% in April 2016 to 16% in July 2016 (same program; 5 and 6 transects, not the same set).
Heat stress
Most recent heat load record
26 Oct 2026 · Bleaching Watch
5-year thermal stress load
5-year mean max. degree heating weeks (DHW)
2021–2025
NOAA Coral Reef Watch — Maldives virtual station
i 5-year mean max. DHW is the mean of the annual maximum DHWs over the five complete years named above, not conditions today.
More infoMaldives (NOAA CRW virtual station)
Photographs
164
43 shown on this page
Site summary
Read this summary in:

A densely packed Maldivian reef slope of lime-green staghorn thickets and cauliflower corals, photographed in January 2016 — months before an April El Niño bleaching event left roughly 95% of Maafushi's colonies bleached.

Max. depth dived
6.6 m
sample-sheet maximum
Water temp. during survey
28.5°Cii
-0.8°C vs the 2016 mean sea temperature (29.3°C)
ii CTD cast reading at the site (Anderson's 2016 samples sheet: 28.5°C from CTD), 18 January 2016; not a dive-computer reading.

Nine independent survey stations shown with the program’s logo — click one to see how far it is from this site.

Five other CRD dive sites with their own pages within 5 km shown in orange — click a marker to open its page.

18 of the 43 photographs on this page are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.

1131517262728293031323334353637383941444547484950

Photo credit & attribution

Site description

Setting

Off Maafushi the reef is crowded: a rugged limestone slope plated in pink coralline algae and packed almost shoulder to shoulder with corals, falling away into open blue on its seaward edge (e.g., Image 21, Image 22).

General benthic features

Chocolate- and orange-brown cauliflower colonies compatible with Pocillopora dominate, but look closer and the bushy thickets compatible with Acropora steal the show — their corallites glow an improbable lime-green, each branch tipped with a smooth ivory bud of brand-new growth (e.g., Image 2, Image 4, Image 5, Image 8, Image 9, Image 10, Image 12, Image 16, Image 19, Image 20).

Honeycomb-patterned mounds compatible with Goniastrea fill the gaps (e.g., Image 3, Image 6, Image 11, Image 14, Image 18).

Coral cover

Stressors

These research photos from January 2016 caught Maafushi vibrant and densely alive — months before the April El Niño resurvey found roughly 95% of its coral colonies bleached (e.g., Image 7).

Anderson's January sheet does record one crown-of-thorns starfish at the site (impaled on the transect B rebar) and one of the 15 colonies sampled with possible disease (tissue necrosis in its interior).

Comparisons with other data

We found no other surveys confirmed at this site as of 2026. Within 5 km, nine independent stations recorded station-year means of 5.5–73% hard coral cover between 2012 and 2025; the nearest, XL Catlin Seaview Survey at transect 37036, 1.43 km away, read 38% in 2015.

CV model comparison

Mean 16%, median 13% across 6 transects.
More infoSame site, April 2016 → July 2016: 43% → 16% (Same reef, same survey program: Anderson's HARP / Coral Reef CPR long-term monitoring PIT transects, April 2016 → July 2016).
Headline: Anderson's own July 2016 point-intercept transects (after the 2016 bleaching); April 2016 is the earlier survey.
More infoThe other rows are comparisons and are never averaged.
MethodHard coral cover (%)Photos (n) ± SE
Transect, July 2016 (headline)15.7
Transect, April 2016 (during the bleaching)43.3
In-house DINOv3, January 2016 photos21.2
CoralSCOP edited, January 2016 photos40.1

The two computer-vision methods disagree by 18.9 pp (21.2–40.1%) and read 5.5–24.4 pp above the in-water transect (15.7%); the headline is the in-water transect because a diver transect is independent of the photographs.

Independent surveys nearby

Data availability near this site
Agency / programYear(s)Stations / distanceLink
Montefalcone et al. (2020)2016–20191 station, 3.50 kmRecords ↓
Montefalcone et al. 20262023–20253 stations, 2.04–3.72 kmRecords ↓
Reef Check2012–20253 stations, 3.72–4.91 kmRecords ↓
XL Catlin Seaview Survey2015–20172 stations, 1.43–2.08 kmRecords ↓
Hard coral cover over time — this site and every independent station within 5 km. Programs are shown separately because they use different methods at different stations; the lines are not one comparable series.
0%20%40%60%80%201220182025Reef Check 2012: 18%Reef Check 2018: 18%Reef Check 2019: 28%Reef Check 2019: 30%Reef Check 2024: 31%Reef Check 2025: 25%XL Catlin Seaview Survey 2015: 7.1%XL Catlin Seaview Survey 2015: 38%XL Catlin Seaview Survey 2017: 5.5%Montefalcone et al. (2020) 2016: 7.7%Montefalcone et al. (2020) 2018: 17%Montefalcone et al. (2020) 2019: 34%Montefalcone et al. 2026 2023: 72%Montefalcone et al. 2026 2024: 60%Montefalcone et al. 2026 2024: 73%Montefalcone et al. 2026 2025: 37%Montefalcone et al. 2026 2025: 43%Montefalcone et al. 2026 2025: 43%Coral Reef Diagnostics 2016: 16%Year-averaged across all programs: illustrative only; the programs differ in stations and method, so no trend is claimed (9 years)
Reef Check XL Catlin Seaview Survey Montefalcone et al. (2020) Montefalcone et al. 2026 Coral Reef DiagnosticsYear-average (illustrative only, programs differ)

Within 5 km, 9 independent survey stations recorded hard coral cover in 25 records between 2012 and 2025. Of the 7 stations surveyed in more than one year, 6 were scored by divers or by people annotating photographs: 4 declined (by 3.0–35 points) and 2 increased (by 12–26 points) between their first and latest surveys. The other 1 was scored by automated image analysis: changed by 7 points or less, inside the 7-point method-noise floor (inconclusive). The longest record, Guraidhoo backreef (Reef Check, 4.91 km away), went from 28% in 2019 (mean of 2 surveys) to 25% in 2025 (mean of 2 surveys). Since 2021, station-year means average 40% (range 25–60%; n = 6 station-years from 8 records); 2 best-patch values above 70% are left out, as they are not site means. This site's own estimate (16%) sits 22 points below the one survey station up to 2 km away (38%); the methods differ, so the comparison is context, not a like-for-like test.

Collected by other programs using different methods (Reef Check uses point-intercept transects; the XL Catlin Seaview Survey uses photo-transects with automated image annotation), so these are context for the figures above, not a like-for-like comparison. Where a station was surveyed more than once, the cell shows either the range of its values or, as a single value, the mean of surveys made in one year. Station names are not dive-site names. Values above 70% are marked “best patch”: surveys often target the densest coral on a reef, so these may overstate the site as a whole.

Independent survey data near this site
AgencySite / locationDateHard coral cover (%)DistanceLink
Reef CheckBiyadhoo House Reef201218%, mean of 3 surveys (4 m, 7 m, and 12 m)4.66 km—
XL Catlin Seaview Surveytransect 37036201538%1.43 kmdoi:10.14264/uql.2019.930
XL Catlin Seaview Surveytransect 370352015–20175.5–7.1% (2 surveys)2.08 kmdoi:10.14264/uql.2019.930
Montefalcone et al. (2020)Kandooma Beyru2016–20197.7–34% (range of yearly means; 3 records)3.50 kmdoi:10.3389/fmars.2020.00587
Reef CheckKandooma Beyru2018–201918–30% (range of yearly means; 4 surveys)3.72 km—
Reef CheckGuraidhoo backreef2019–202525–31% (range of yearly means; 6 surveys)4.91 km—
Montefalcone et al. 2026Cocoa Beyru2023–202537–72% (2 surveys) best patch2.04 kmdoi:10.1007/s00338-026-02850-x
Montefalcone et al. 2026Bajiy Giri2024–202543–60% (2 surveys)3.23 kmdoi:10.1007/s00338-026-02850-x
Montefalcone et al. 2026Kandooma Beyru2024–202543–73% (2 surveys) best patch3.72 kmdoi:10.1007/s00338-026-02850-x

Data & links

All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from Coral Reef Diagnostics and the organizations named in the data sources above.

© Coral Reef Diagnostics.

References

  1. Montefalcone M, Morri C, Bianchi CN (2020). Influence of Local Pressures on Maldivian Coral Reef Resilience Following Repeated Bleaching Events, and Recovery Perspectives. Frontiers in Marine Science 7:587. PDF
  2. Montefalcone M, Bianchi CN, Morri C, Ahmed H, Pancrazi I (2026). Outcomes of the fourth global coral bleaching (2023–2024) in the Maldives. Coral Reefs. DOI
  3. Gonzalez-Rivero M, et al. (2019). Seaview Survey photo-quadrat and image classification dataset. The University of Queensland (UQ eSpace) data collection. DOI