Coral Reef Diagnostics

Maldives - Kandooma Thila

Reef Check Foundation
⬇ Download this page as a report card
05
Photo: Anderson Mayfield/Coral Reef Diagnostics
Country
Survey date(s)
2017-05-19
2017-05-22
Coordinates
3.9067, 73.4789
Coral cover
6.3%*
Claude computer vision (18 edited photos) · other methods below · median 5.3%
*Based on only 18 reef-habitat photos; this estimate is less certain.
Observations
None tagged; see Stressors below
Heat stress
Most recent heat load record
26 Oct 2026 · Bleaching Watch
5-year thermal stress load
5-year mean max. degree heating weeks (DHW)
2021–2025
NOAA Coral Reef Watch — Maldives virtual station
i 5-year mean max. DHW is the mean of the annual maximum DHWs over the five complete years named above, not conditions today.
More infoMaldives (NOAA CRW virtual station)
Photographs
51
25 shown on this page
Site summary
Read this summary in:

A current-swept pinnacle known for parades of gray reef sharks, barracuda walls, and unicornfish squadrons rather than its coral.

Max. depth dived
31.1 m
sample-sheet maximum
Sea surface temp. (satellite)
29.9°C
mean; range 29.7–30.0°C
satellite sea surface temperature (SST), mean of the 2 survey dates (NOAA Coral Reef Watch, Maldives), not an in-water reading; it is the warmest-pixel (90th percentile) reading in the station area and can run 1–1.5°C above the reef

Eighteen independent survey stations shown with the program’s logo — click one to see how far it is from this site.

Three other CRD dive sites with their own pages within 5 km shown in orange — click a marker to open its page.

20 of the 25 photographs on this page are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.

38171920

Photo credit & attribution

Site description

Setting

Kandooma Thila is where the current does the introductions.

General benthic features

On the reef itself, pink coralline crusts and dark coral bushes frame the residents — a big turtle wedged in asleep, a striped oriental sweetlips with buttercup fins, a grumpy puffer parked between the branches, and a massive dome coral that has clearly seen decades of currents like today's (e.g., Image 9, Image 12, Image 14, Image 15, Image 16, Image 18, Image 21).

Coral cover

Stressors

Divers from Coral Reef CPR and Carpe Diem Maldives saw no crown-of-thorns starfish on either of the two dives here in May 2017.

Fish and other fauna

Two dives here — one at first light, one in afternoon glass — produced a parade of gray reef sharks, from hazy dawn silhouettes to a spotlight-crisp frontal pass, one shark trailing a retinue of little jacks (e.g., Image 4, Image 5, Image 22, Image 10, Image 24, Image 25, Image 11).

The pinnacle's edges churned with life: a chevron wall of barracuda, horned unicornfish squadrons, dense blue riverine schools of fusiliers, and surgeonfish darting up to chase divers' bubbles (e.g., Image 6, Image 1, Image 2, Image 7, Image 13, Image 23).

Comparisons with other data

Coral Reef CPR and Carpe Diem Maldives surveyed this site for crown-of-thorns sea stars in May 2017. Within 5 km, eighteen independent stations recorded station-year means of 7.1–83% hard coral cover between 2012 and 2025; the nearest, Montefalcone et al. (2020) at Kandooma Beyru, 0.75 km away, read 7.7–34% between 2016 and 2019.

CV model comparison

Mean 6.3%, median 5.3% across 18 photos.
More infoA few colony-focused photos raise the mean; the median is the typical photo. No computer-vision method yet estimates coral cover accurately on new images, so treat this as indicative rather than a measurement; it is revised as the methods improve.
Headline: Claude computer vision, a blind point count of this site's own photographs.
More infoOther rows are for comparison only and are never averaged. No diver transect exists for these photos, so agreement between rows is not accuracy.
MethodHard coral cover (%)Photos (n) ± SE
In-house DINOv313.2
CoralSCOP edited7.3
Claude (edited photos)6.3*n = 18 · SE 1.6

The two computer-vision methods agree within 5.9 pp (7.3–13.2%) and read within 6.9 pp of Claude's blind point count (6.3%).

*Based on only 18 reef-habitat photos; this estimate is less certain.

Independent surveys nearby

Data availability near this site
Agency / programYear(s)Stations / distanceLink
Montefalcone et al. (2020)2015–20194 stations, 0.75–4.38 kmRecords ↓
Montefalcone et al. 20262023–20253 stations, 0.79–3.23 kmRecords ↓
Reef Check2012–20259 stations, 0.79–4.15 kmRecords ↓
XL Catlin Seaview Survey20152 stations, 4.26–4.91 kmRecords ↓
Hard coral cover over time — this site and every independent station within 5 km. Programs are shown separately because they use different methods at different stations; the lines are not one comparable series.
0%22%44%66%88%201220182025Reef Check 2012: 18%Reef Check 2017: 21%Reef Check 2018: 8.8%Reef Check 2018: 18%Reef Check 2019: 20%Reef Check 2019: 24%Reef Check 2019: 28%Reef Check 2019: 30%Reef Check 2022: 16%Reef Check 2022: 20%Reef Check 2024: 25%Reef Check 2024: 25%Reef Check 2024: 31%Reef Check 2025: 25%Reef Check 2025: 26%Reef Check 2025: 27%XL Catlin Seaview Survey 2015: 7.1%XL Catlin Seaview Survey 2015: 38%Montefalcone et al. (2020) 2015: 51%Montefalcone et al. (2020) 2015: 83%Montefalcone et al. (2020) 2016: 7.7%Montefalcone et al. (2020) 2016: 12%Montefalcone et al. (2020) 2016: 18%Montefalcone et al. (2020) 2017: 8.0%Montefalcone et al. (2020) 2017: 45%Montefalcone et al. (2020) 2018: 17%Montefalcone et al. (2020) 2018: 19%Montefalcone et al. (2020) 2019: 34%Montefalcone et al. (2020) 2019: 38%Montefalcone et al. 2026 2023: 72%Montefalcone et al. 2026 2024: 60%Montefalcone et al. 2026 2024: 73%Montefalcone et al. 2026 2025: 37%Montefalcone et al. 2026 2025: 43%Montefalcone et al. 2026 2025: 43%Coral Reef Diagnostics 2017: 6.3%Year-averaged across all programs: illustrative only; the programs differ in stations and method, so no trend is claimed (10 years)
Reef Check XL Catlin Seaview Survey Montefalcone et al. (2020) Montefalcone et al. 2026 Coral Reef DiagnosticsYear-average (illustrative only, programs differ)

Within 5 km, 18 independent survey stations recorded hard coral cover in 51 records between 2012 and 2025. Of the 12 stations surveyed in more than one year, 7 declined (by 3.0–71 points) and 5 increased (by 1.0–27 points) between their first and latest surveys. The longest record, Guraidhoo backreef (Reef Check, 2.40 km away), went from 28% in 2019 (mean of 2 surveys) to 25% in 2025 (mean of 2 surveys). Since 2021, station-year means average 32% (range 16–60%; n = 12 station-years from 19 records); 2 best-patch values above 70% are left out, as they are not site means. This site's own estimate (6.3%) sits 30.7 points below the recent range of station-year means up to 2 km away (37–43%); the methods differ, so the comparison is context, not a like-for-like test.

Collected by other programs using different methods (Reef Check uses point-intercept transects; the XL Catlin Seaview Survey uses photo-transects with automated image annotation), so these are context for the figures above, not a like-for-like comparison. Where a station was surveyed more than once, the cell shows either the range of its values or, as a single value, the mean of surveys made in one year. Station names are not dive-site names. Values above 70% are marked “best patch”: surveys often target the densest coral on a reef, so these may overstate the site as a whole.

Show all 51 independent survey records
Independent survey data near this site
AgencySite / locationDateHard coral cover (%)DistanceLink
Reef CheckBiyadhoo House Reef201218%, mean of 3 surveys (4 m, 7 m, and 12 m)3.44 km—
XL Catlin Seaview Surveytransect 37036201538%4.26 kmdoi:10.14264/uql.2019.930
Montefalcone et al. (2020)Villivaru Kuda Giri2015–20198.0–51% (range of yearly means; 4 records)4.38 kmdoi:10.3389/fmars.2020.00587
Montefalcone et al. (2020)Guraidhoo Kuda Giri2015–201612–83% (range of yearly means; 2 records) best patch4.38 kmdoi:10.3389/fmars.2020.00587
XL Catlin Seaview Surveytransect 3703520157.1%4.91 kmdoi:10.14264/uql.2019.930
Montefalcone et al. (2020)Kandooma Beyru2016–20197.7–34% (range of yearly means; 3 records)0.75 kmdoi:10.3389/fmars.2020.00587
Montefalcone et al. (2020)Maadhu Faru Beyru2016–201718–45% (range of yearly means; 2 records)2.10 kmdoi:10.3389/fmars.2020.00587
Reef CheckGuraidhoo Corner201721%, mean of 2 surveys (5 m and 10 m)2.29 km—
Reef CheckKandooma Beyru2018–201918–30% (range of yearly means; 4 surveys)0.79 km—
Reef CheckVillivaru Giri20188.8%, mean of 2 surveys (5 m and 10 m)3.81 km—
Reef CheckGuraidhoo backreef2019–202520–31% (range of yearly means; 8 surveys)2.40 km—
Reef CheckGuridhoo outer2019–202216–20% (range of yearly means; 3 surveys)2.61 km—
Reef CheckVillivaru Kuda Giri201924%, mean of 2 surveys (5 m and 10 m)4.15 km—
Montefalcone et al. 2026Cocoa Beyru2023–202537–72% (2 surveys) best patch0.93 kmdoi:10.1007/s00338-026-02850-x
Montefalcone et al. 2026Kandooma Beyru2024–202543–73% (2 surveys) best patch0.79 kmdoi:10.1007/s00338-026-02850-x
Reef CheckGuraidhoo Banana2024–202525–27% (range of yearly means; 4 surveys)2.55 km—
Reef CheckGuraidhoo Forereef2024–202525–26% (range of yearly means; 4 surveys)2.72 km—
Montefalcone et al. 2026Bajiy Giri2024–202543–60% (2 surveys)3.23 kmdoi:10.1007/s00338-026-02850-x

Data & links

All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from Coral Reef Diagnostics and the organizations named in the data sources above.

© Coral Reef Diagnostics.

References

  1. Montefalcone M, Morri C, Bianchi CN (2020). Influence of Local Pressures on Maldivian Coral Reef Resilience Following Repeated Bleaching Events, and Recovery Perspectives. Frontiers in Marine Science 7:587. PDF
  2. Montefalcone M, Bianchi CN, Morri C, Ahmed H, Pancrazi I (2026). Outcomes of the fourth global coral bleaching (2023–2024) in the Maldives. Coral Reefs. DOI
  3. Gonzalez-Rivero M, et al. (2019). Seaview Survey photo-quadrat and image classification dataset. The University of Queensland (UQ eSpace) data collection. DOI