Maldives - Ghuli Faru
Part of the regional summaries: Maldives - Central (Male Atolls / Ari / Vaavu) and Maldives
More info
Maldives (NOAA CRW virtual station)A fast, plankton-thick drift dive better known for its wildlife than its coral — a coffee-table-sized bumphead parrotfish, a Napoleon wrasse, spotted eagle rays, and a river of snappers, all in poor visibility.
ހިރިގާއަށްވުރެ ދިރުންތަކުން މަޝްހޫރު، ޕްލަންކްޓަން ގިނަ، އަވަސް ޑްރިފްޓް ފީނުމެކެވެ. މިތާގައި ކޮފީ މޭޒެއްގެ ބޮޑުމިނުގެ bumphead parrotfish އެއް، Napoleon wrasse އެއް، spotted eagle ray ތަކެއް، އަދި ކޯރެއް ފަދައިން ދުވާ snapper ތަކެއް ފެނުނެވެ. މިހުރިހާ އެއްޗެއް ފެނުނީ ފެނުމުގެ ދުރުމިން (visibility) ވަރަށް ދަށްކޮށް ހުއްޓައެވެ.
AI translation of this summary; the English is authoritative. (low confidence)
Four independent survey stations shown with the program’s logo — click one to see how far it is from this site.
Eight other CRD dive sites with their own pages within 5 km shown in orange — click a marker to open its page.
9 of the 22 photographs on this page are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.
Site description
Setting
The water at Ghuli Faru was thick with plankton and moving like a freight train — one photo shows a diver pinned flat, bubbles streaming sideways — and that soup is exactly why the big animals came (e.g., Image 21).
General benthic features
Whip corals leaned hard into the current beside an unfurled black crinoid, and a blotchy map-type puffer sat out the chaos wedged among the corals (e.g., Image 24).
Coral cover
- Reference: Claude CV point count (this site's photos)
- Coral cover: 5.4% — a blind Claude computer-vision point count of 17 of Anderson's edited photographs (20 points per photo; water, fish, and obstructions excluded). Other computer-vision methods are listed in the method table.
Stressors
In May 2017 divers from Coral Reef CPR and Carpe Diem Maldives found no crown-of-thorns starfish on this reef. The only corallivore photographed is a cushion star, Culcita by Anderson's own identification (e.g., Image 1).
Fish and other fauna
Out of the violet haze loomed the dive's monster: a bumphead parrotfish the size of a coffee table, photographed bulldozing the rubble and then point-blank, flank filling the frame (e.g., Image 6, Image 15).
A Napoleon wrasse ghosted past twice, once trailing an entourage of jacks; spotted eagle rays sailed by on the edge of visibility; and a golden river of bluestripe-type snappers ran along the reef (e.g., Image 2, Image 9, Image 12, Image 17).
Comparisons with other data
Coral Reef CPR and Carpe Diem Maldives surveyed this site for crown-of-thorns sea stars in May 2017. Within 5 km, four independent stations recorded station-year means of 5.5–76% hard coral cover between 2015 and 2025; the nearest, Montefalcone et al. (2020) at Cocoa Corner, 0.85 km away, read 76% in 2015.
Dive record
An hour in the current, barely any visibility — and, in Anderson's field notes, a very large bumphead parrotfish.
CV model comparison
More info
A few colony-focused photos raise the mean; the median is the typical photo. No computer-vision method yet estimates coral cover accurately on new images, so treat this as indicative rather than a measurement; it is revised as the methods improve.More info
Other rows are for comparison only and are never averaged. No diver transect exists for these photos, so agreement between rows is not accuracy.| Method | Hard coral cover (%) | Photos (n) ± SE |
|---|---|---|
| In-house DINOv3 | 10.3 | |
| CoralSCOP edited | 12.7 | |
| Claude (edited photos) | 5.4* | n = 17 · SE 2.3 |
The two computer-vision methods agree within 2.4 pp (10.3–12.7%) and read 4.9–7.3 pp above Claude's blind point count (5.4%); the headline is Claude's blind point count because no transect or manual count exists here.
*Based on only 17 reef-habitat photos; this estimate is less certain.
See a more detailed, stand-alone version of this table.
Independent surveys nearby
| Agency / program | Year(s) | Stations / distance | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| Montefalcone et al. (2020) | 2015 | 1 station, 0.85 km | Records ↓ |
| Montefalcone et al. 2026 | 2024–2025 | 1 station, 2.87 km | Records ↓ |
| Reef Check | 2022 | 1 station, 1.62 km | Records ↓ |
| XL Catlin Seaview Survey | 2015–2017 | 1 station, 4.71 km | Records ↓ |
Coral Reef DiagnosticsYear-average (illustrative only, programs differ)Within 5 km, 4 independent survey stations recorded hard coral cover in 6 records between 2015 and 2025. Of the 2 stations surveyed in more than one year, 1 was scored by divers or by people annotating photographs: declined by 4.0 points between its first and latest surveys. The other 1 was scored by automated image analysis: changed by 7 points or less, inside the 7-point method-noise floor (inconclusive). The longest record, transect 37035 (XL Catlin Seaview Survey, 4.71 km away), went from 7.1% in 2015 to 5.5% in 2017. Since 2021, station-year means average 34% (range 19–43%; n = 3 station-years from 3 records). This site's own estimate (5.4%) sits 13.6 points below the recent value up to 2 km away (19%); the methods differ, so the comparison is context, not a like-for-like test.
Collected by other programs using different methods (Reef Check uses point-intercept transects; the XL Catlin Seaview Survey uses photo-transects with automated image annotation), so these are context for the figures above, not a like-for-like comparison. Where a station was surveyed more than once, the cell shows either the range of its values or, as a single value, the mean of surveys made in one year. Station names are not dive-site names. Values above 70% are marked “best patch”: surveys often target the densest coral on a reef, so these may overstate the site as a whole.
| Agency | Site / location | Date | Hard coral cover (%) | Distance | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Montefalcone et al. (2020) | Cocoa Corner | 2015 | 76% best patch | 0.85 km | doi:10.3389/fmars.2020.00587 |
| XL Catlin Seaview Survey | transect 37035 | 2015–2017 | 5.5–7.1% (2 surveys) | 4.71 km | doi:10.14264/uql.2019.930 |
| Reef Check | Gulhi Island Backreef | 2022 | 19% | 1.62 km | — |
| Montefalcone et al. 2026 | Kuda Giri Wreck | 2024–2025 | 39–43% (2 surveys) | 2.87 km | doi:10.1007/s00338-026-02850-x |
Data & links
All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from Coral Reef Diagnostics and the organizations named in the data sources above.
© Coral Reef Diagnostics.
References
- Montefalcone M, Morri C, Bianchi CN (2020). Influence of Local Pressures on Maldivian Coral Reef Resilience Following Repeated Bleaching Events, and Recovery Perspectives. Frontiers in Marine Science 7:587. PDF
- Montefalcone M, Bianchi CN, Morri C, Ahmed H, Pancrazi I (2026). Outcomes of the fourth global coral bleaching (2023–2024) in the Maldives. Coral Reefs. DOI
- Gonzalez-Rivero M, et al. (2019). Seaview Survey photo-quadrat and image classification dataset. The University of Queensland (UQ eSpace) data collection. DOI