Coral Reef Diagnostics

Maldives - Fish Tank

Reef Check Foundation
⬇ Download this page as a report card
05
Photo: Anderson Mayfield/Coral Reef Diagnostics
Country
Survey date(s)
2017-05-21
Coordinates
4.2659, 73.5380
Coral cover
8.1%
Computer vision (17 photos) · details below
Observations
not yet tagged for this site
Heat stress
Today’s heat load
16 Sep 2026 · Bleaching Watch
5-year thermal stress load
5-year mean max. degree heating weeks (DHW)
2021–2025
NOAA Coral Reef Watch — Maldives virtual station
i 5-year mean max. DHW is the mean of the annual maximum DHWs over the five complete years named above, not conditions today.
More infoMaldives (NOAA CRW virtual station) · Maldives ecoregion mean=2.9°C-heating weeks
Photographs
19
Site summary

A murky, coral-free sand-and-rubble patch that functions as an open-water aquarium - huge stingrays, trevally packs, and a fallen beam packed with giraffe-patterned honeycomb morays. Coral cover is negligible, around 8%.

Max. depth dived
19.9 m
dive-log maximum

Five independent survey stations shown with the program’s logo — click one to see how far it is from this site.

Three other CRD dive sites within 5 km shown in orange — click a marker to open its page.

5 of these 19 photographs are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.

678910111213141516171819

Photo credit & attribution

Site description

Setting

The name says it all: this murky patch of sand and rubble works like a big open-water aquarium, and the haze only makes the encounters more cinematic.

General benthic features

Zero coral, unforgettable fish.

Coral cover

Coral cover: 8.1% — photo-derived, and the two methods broadly agree (11% vs 4.9%). This site's figure is the mean of two independent computer vision passes over Anderson's own frames: a DINOv3 calibrated point classifier reads 11.2% and a CoralSCOP computer vision reads 4.9%, a spread of 6.3 percentage points. The map publishes the mean so sites can be sorted against one another, but the honest statement of what is known here is the 4.9–11% range: the two products have different denominators and should not be treated as one measurement. Anderson is actively trying out other CV models and intends to redo this CoralSCOP and DINOv3-based figure once something more dependable comes along.

Stressors

No crown-of-thorns starfish (COTS) or other corallivores evident.

Fish and other fauna

Huge stingrays materialize out of the green-blue gloom — one an absolute monster — gliding past at close range with long tails trailing, while packs of trevally prowl the edges of visibility and a wall of fusiliers shimmers overhead (e.g., Image 1, Image 2, Image 5).

Down on the bottom, a fallen beam has become an eel tenement: honeycomb morays in bold giraffe-print peer from its crevices, two heads sometimes sharing one doorway, with a red squirrelfish standing guard and a spiny lobster betraying itself by nothing but a fan of white antennae under a ledge (e.g., Image 3, Image 4).

Comparisons with other data

No independent survey was made at this exact site; the nearest ones are listed in the table below.

CV model comparison

DINOv3 11%, CoralSCOP 4.9%; the headline is their mean.
More infoAs of September 2026 no computer-vision method estimates coral cover accurately on new images, so treat this as indicative rather than a measurement; it is revised as the methods improve.
The two methods broadly agree (spread 6.3 pp).
More infoThe published figure is the mean of the two methods.
MethodHard-coral cover (%)
In-house DINOv311.2
CoralSCOP4.9
Mean (± SD)8.1 ± 4.5
Range4.9–11.2

Mean ± SD and range are across the computer-vision methods shown.

Independent surveys nearby

Data availability near this site
Agency / programYear(s)Stations / distanceLink
Montefalcone et al. (2020)2015–20192 stations, 3.77–4.08 kmRecords ↓
Reef Check2010–20243 stations, 2.93–4.78 kmRecords ↓
Hard coral cover over time — this site and every independent station within 5 km. Programs are shown separately because they use different methods at different stations; the lines are not one comparable series.
0%12%24%36%48%201020172024Reef Check 2010: 33%Reef Check 2014: 16%Reef Check 2019: 7.2%Reef Check 2024: 35%Montefalcone et al. (2020) 2015: 40%Montefalcone et al. (2020) 2015: 41%Montefalcone et al. (2020) 2016: 15%Montefalcone et al. (2020) 2016: 16%Montefalcone et al. (2020) 2018: 12%Montefalcone et al. (2020) 2019: 19%Dr. Coral (CRD) 2017: 8.1%Year-averaged across all programs: no detectable trend (-0.20 pp per year, not separable from zero; 8 years)
Reef Check Montefalcone et al. (2020) Dr. Coral (CRD)Year-average (no detectable trend)

Within 5 km, 5 independent survey stations recorded hard coral cover in 12 surveys between 2010 and 2024. Of the 3 stations surveyed in more than one year, 3 declined between their first and latest surveys. The longest record, Banana Reef (Montefalcone et al. 2020, 4.08 km away), went from 40% in 2015 to 19% in 2019. One survey since 2021 recorded 35%. This site's own estimate (8.1%) sits 26.9 points below the recent value (35%); the methods differ, so the comparison is context, not a like-for-like test.

Collected by other programs using different methods (Reef Check uses point-intercept transects), so these are context for the figures above, not a like-for-like comparison. Where a station was surveyed more than once the range is shown. Station names are not dive-site names.

Independent survey data near this site
AgencySite / locationDateHard coral cover (%)DistanceLink
Reef CheckBanana Reef2010–201416–33% (2 surveys)2.93 km—
Montefalcone et al. (2020)Hulumale Beyru2015–201615–41% (2 surveys)3.77 kmHeatCRD database
Montefalcone et al. (2020)Banana Reef2015–201912–40% (4 surveys)4.08 kmHeatCRD database
Reef CheckKuda Banana Reef20197.2% (2 surveys)3.61 km—
Reef CheckBandos Island Housereef202435% (2 surveys)4.78 km—

Data & links

All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from Coral Reef Diagnostics and the organizations named in the data-sources table above.

© Coral Reef Diagnostics.