Coral Reef Diagnostics

Maldives - Camel Point

Reef Check Foundation
⬇ Download this page as a report card
05
Photo: Anderson Mayfield/Coral Reef Diagnostics
Country
Survey date(s)
2017-05-23
Coordinates
3.6000, 72.9650
Approximate position.
Coral cover
21%
Claude computer vision (76 edited photos) · other methods below · median 20%
Observations
None tagged; see Stressors below
Heat stress
Most recent heat load record
26 Oct 2026 · Bleaching Watch
5-year thermal stress load
5-year mean max. degree heating weeks (DHW)
2021–2025
NOAA Coral Reef Watch — Maldives virtual station
i 5-year mean max. DHW is the mean of the annual maximum DHWs over the five complete years named above, not conditions today.
More infoMaldives (NOAA CRW virtual station)
Photographs
84
50 shown on this page
Site summary
Read this summary in:

A dive that opens on a quiet sand plain waiting for mantas before giving way to a lively coral ridge — staghorn and table thickets, giant boulder corals, and anemone-draped rock faces, plus jewel-toned free-living mushroom corals.

Max. depth dived
20.3 m
sample-sheet maximum
Sea surface temp. (satellite)
29.7°C
satellite sea surface temperature (SST) on the survey date (NOAA Coral Reef Watch, Maldives), not an in-water reading; it is the warmest-pixel (90th percentile) reading in the station area and can run 1–1.5°C above the reef

Nine independent survey stations shown with the program’s logo — click one to see how far it is from this site.

19 of the 50 photographs on this page are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.

12345917262728293031323334353637383940414243444647484950

Photo credit & attribution

Site description

Setting

A dive of two moods. It starts on a bright sand plain where the divers settle in like spectators — the photographer's captions say it all: "waiting for Mantas," "garden eels" — with only a tantalizing winged shadow passing far out in the blue (e.g., Image 10, Image 24).

General benthic features

Then the point itself takes over: a coral ridge with staghorn and table coral thickets running as far as visibility allows, giant boulder corals rising off the sand, and whole rock faces upholstered in swaying sea anemones (e.g., Image 6, Image 7, Image 8, Image 11, Image 12, Image 13, Image 14, Image 23, Image 25).

Two jewel-toned mushroom corals — free-living discs rimmed in pink and violet — steal the macro show, alongside a giant clam with a dark, pale-rimmed mantle (e.g., Image 15).

Coral cover

Stressors

One branching colony has a large section of clean white skeleton at its margins grading into a fine algal film, recent partial mortality of unclear cause; the rest of the colony and its neighbors keep normal brown tissue (e.g., Image 45).

No crown-of-thorns starfish (COTS) or other corallivores were evident.

Fish and other fauna

Around it all, orange anthias smoke off the outcrops and neon fusiliers rush past in mid-water like traffic (e.g., Image 16, Image 18, Image 19, Image 20, Image 21, Image 22).

Comparisons with other data

We found no other surveys at this site as of 2026. Within 5 km, nine independent stations recorded station-year means of 1.0–45% hard coral cover between 1998 and 2017; the nearest, XL Catlin Seaview Survey at transect 37011, 0.90 km away, read 15–21% between 2015 and 2017.

CV model comparison

Mean 21%, median 20% across 76 photos.
More infoA few colony-focused photos raise the mean; the median is the typical photo. No computer-vision method yet estimates coral cover accurately on new images, so treat this as indicative rather than a measurement; it is revised as the methods improve.
Headline: Claude computer vision, a blind point count of this site's own photographs.
More infoOther rows are for comparison only and are never averaged. No diver transect exists for these photos, so agreement between rows is not accuracy.
MethodHard coral cover (%)Photos (n) ± SE
In-house DINOv322.9
CoralSCOP edited25.5
Claude (edited photos)21.4n = 76 · SE 1.7

The two computer-vision methods agree within 2.6 pp (22.9–25.5%) and read within 4.1 pp of Claude's blind point count (21.4%).

Independent surveys nearby

Data availability near this site
Agency / programYear(s)Stations / distanceLink
Montefalcone et al. (2020)20171 station, 2.77 kmRecords ↓
Reef Check1998–20177 stations, 2.11–4.11 kmRecords ↓
XL Catlin Seaview Survey2015–20171 station, 0.90 kmRecords ↓
Hard coral cover over time — this site and every independent station within 5 km. Programs are shown separately because they use different methods at different stations; the lines are not one comparable series.
0%12%24%36%48%199820072017Reef Check 1998: 5.0%Reef Check 1998: 5.6%Reef Check 1998: 6.3%Reef Check 1998: 9.1%Reef Check 1998: 12%Reef Check 1998: 12%Reef Check 2012: 45%Reef Check 2017: 26%XL Catlin Seaview Survey 2015: 15%XL Catlin Seaview Survey 2017: 21%Montefalcone et al. (2020) 2017: 1.0%Coral Reef Diagnostics 2017: 21%Year-averaged across all programs: illustrative only; the programs differ in stations and method, so no trend is claimed (4 years)
Reef Check XL Catlin Seaview Survey Montefalcone et al. (2020) Coral Reef DiagnosticsYear-average (illustrative only, programs differ)

Within 5 km, 9 independent survey stations recorded hard coral cover in 20 records between 1998 and 2017. Of the 2 stations surveyed in more than one year, 1 was scored by divers or by people annotating photographs: increased by 39 points between its first and latest surveys. The other 1 was scored by automated image analysis: changed by 7 points or less, inside the 7-point method-noise floor (inconclusive). The longest record, Vilm05/Vilamendhoo southwest (Reef Check, 3.94 km away), went from 6.3% in 1998 (mean of 2 surveys) to 45% in 2012 (mean of 3 surveys). The most recent nearby survey is from 2017, so these values predate recent heat stress. This site's own estimate (21%) sits just above the range of these station-year means up to 2 km away (15–21%); the two round to the same whole number, inside the 7-point method-noise floor (inconclusive); the methods differ, so the comparison is context, not a like-for-like test.

Collected by other programs using different methods (Reef Check uses point-intercept transects; the XL Catlin Seaview Survey uses photo-transects with automated image annotation), so these are context for the figures above, not a like-for-like comparison. Where a station was surveyed more than once, the cell shows either the range of its values or, as a single value, the mean of surveys made in one year. Station names are not dive-site names.

Independent survey data near this site
AgencySite / locationDateHard coral cover (%)DistanceLink
Reef CheckVilm0119985.0%, mean of 2 surveys (3 m and 10 m)3.65 km—
Reef CheckVilm0319989.1%, mean of 2 surveys (3 m and 10 m)3.81 km—
Reef CheckVilm04199812%, mean of 2 surveys (3 m and 10 m)3.87 km—
Reef CheckVilm05/Vilamendhoo southwest1998–20126.3–45% (range of yearly means; 5 surveys)3.94 km—
Reef CheckVilm0219985.6%, mean of 2 surveys (3 m and 10 m)3.96 km—
Reef CheckBanana Reef199812%, mean of 2 surveys (3 m and 10 m)4.11 km—
XL Catlin Seaview Surveytransect 370112015–201715–21% (2 surveys)0.90 kmdoi:10.14264/uql.2019.930
Reef CheckDangethi Inner Reef201726%, mean of 2 surveys (5 m and 10 m)2.11 km—
Montefalcone et al. (2020)Dangethi House Reef20171.0%2.77 kmdoi:10.3389/fmars.2020.00587

Data & links

All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from Coral Reef Diagnostics and the organizations named in the data sources above.

© Coral Reef Diagnostics.

References

  1. Montefalcone M, Morri C, Bianchi CN (2020). Influence of Local Pressures on Maldivian Coral Reef Resilience Following Repeated Bleaching Events, and Recovery Perspectives. Frontiers in Marine Science 7:587. PDF
  2. Gonzalez-Rivero M, et al. (2019). Seaview Survey photo-quadrat and image classification dataset. The University of Queensland (UQ eSpace) data collection. DOI