Part of the regional summaries: Maldives - Central (Male Atolls / Ari / Vaavu) and Maldives

A reef caught mid-recovery a year after 2016 bleaching: coralline-algae-capped dead framework and lingering crown-of-thorns scars alongside actively recruiting cauliflower corals and surviving dome corals. Cover is modest at a computer-vision-estimated 14.2%.
Five independent survey stations shown with the program’s logo — click one to see how far it is from this site.
Three other CRD dive sites within 5 km shown in orange — click a marker to open its page.
10 of these 25 photographs are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.
But look closer: knee-high cauliflower corals compatible with Pocillopora are recruiting everywhere across the rubble (e.g., Image 8), massive dome corals soldier on (e.g., Image 18), and the fish never left.
Coral cover: 14% — photo-derived, and the two methods broadly agree (14% vs 15%). This site's figure is the mean of two independent computer vision passes over Anderson's own frames: a DINOv3 calibrated point classifier reads 13.9% and a CoralSCOP computer vision reads 14.6%, a spread of 0.7 percentage points. The map publishes the mean so sites can be sorted against one another, but the honest statement of what is known here is the 14–15% range: the two products have different denominators and should not be treated as one measurement.
A year after the 2016 bleaching, whole terraces of dead framework here have been shrink-wrapped in pink crustose coralline algae (e.g., Image 1, Image 3) — nature's primer coat — with dead table corals still standing like abandoned furniture (e.g., Image 12) and crown-of-thorns seastars (plus their fresh feeding scars) hiding in the wreckage.
Dense black schools boil over the slope (e.g., Image 16), a titan-type triggerfish patrols the rubble (e.g., Image 9), morays — including a gape-jawed honeycomb moray — thread the crevices (e.g., Image 23, Image 25), and the macro hunt turns up a banded boxer shrimp (e.g., Image 20), Clark's-type anemonefish in a red-lipped anemone, and a giant clam flashing a blue-violet mantle.
No independent survey was made at this exact site; the nearest ones are listed in the table below.
Dived three times across the trip, Back Faru reads like a field report on how a Maldivian reef rebuilds.
| Method | Hard-coral cover (%) |
|---|---|
| In-house DINOv3 | 13.9 |
| CoralSCOP | 14.6 |
| Mean (± SD) | 14.2 ± 0.5 |
| Range | 13.9–14.6 |
Mean ± SD and range are across the computer-vision methods shown.
| Agency / program | Year(s) | Stations / distance | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| Montefalcone et al. (2020) | 2015–2019 | 2 stations, 0.62–2.91 km | Records ↓ |
| Reef Check | 2010–2019 | 2 stations, 1.15–2.52 km | Records ↓ |
| XL Catlin Seaview Survey | 2015–2017 | 1 station, 2.81 km | Records ↓ |
Dr. Coral (CRD)Year-average (decreasing)Within 5 km, 5 independent survey stations recorded hard coral cover in 12 records between 2010 and 2019. Of the 4 stations surveyed in more than one year, 4 declined between their first and latest surveys. The longest record, Banana Reef (Montefalcone et al. 2020, 2.91 km away), went from 40% in 2015 to 19% in 2019. The most recent nearby survey is from 2019, so these values predate recent heat stress. This site's own estimate (14%) sits within the range of these surveys (1.8–41%); the methods differ, so the comparison is context, not a like-for-like test.
Collected by other programs using different methods (Reef Check uses point-intercept transects; the XL Catlin Seaview Survey uses photo-transects with automated image annotation), so these are context for the figures above, not a like-for-like comparison. Where a station was surveyed more than once the range is shown. Station names are not dive-site names.
| Agency | Site / location | Date | Hard coral cover (%) | Distance | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reef Check | Banana Reef | 2010–2014 | 16–33% (2 surveys) | 1.15 km | — |
| Montefalcone et al. (2020) | Hulumale Beyru | 2015–2016 | 15–41% (2 surveys) | 0.62 km | HeatCRD database |
| XL Catlin Seaview Survey | transect 37001 | 2015–2017 | 1.8–14% (2 images) | 2.81 km | — |
| Montefalcone et al. (2020) | Banana Reef | 2015–2019 | 12–40% (4 surveys) | 2.91 km | HeatCRD database |
| Reef Check | Kuda Banana Reef | 2019 | 7.2% (2 surveys) | 2.52 km | — |
All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from Coral Reef Diagnostics and the organizations named in the data-sources table above.
© Coral Reef Diagnostics.