Coral Reef Diagnostics

Maldives - Baa Atoll (Hanifaru)

⬇ Download this page as a report card
05
Photo: Anderson Mayfield/Coral Reef Diagnostics
Country
Survey date(s)
2016-01-23
2016-01-24
2016-01-25
Coordinates
5.3000, 73.0500
Coral cover
27%
Computer vision analysis of images · details below
Observations
Heat stress
Today’s heat load
16 Sep 2026 · Bleaching Watch
5-year thermal stress load
5-year mean max. degree heating weeks (DHW)
2021–2025
NOAA Coral Reef Watch — Maldives virtual station
i 5-year mean max. DHW is the mean of the annual maximum DHWs over the five complete years named above, not conditions today.
More infoMaldives (NOAA CRW virtual station) · Maldives ecoregion mean=2.9°C-heating weeks
Photographs
45
Site summary

These January 2016 Baa Atoll research dives (parked on the coarse atoll pin since the exact reefs couldn't be geocoded) documented tagged monitoring sites ranging from a high-relief Acropora- and Pocillopora-rich reef front to a gentler field of Porites domes and leather corals - with the first hint of trouble already visible as scattered bone-white branch tips, photographed roughly three months before the 2016 El Nino bleaching event that devastated Baa's study reefs. Computer-vision analysis of these frames puts live cover at 27%.

One independent survey station shown with the program’s logo — click one to see how far it is from this site.

One other CRD dive site within 5 km shown in orange — click a marker to open its page.

23 of these 45 photographs are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.

5192627282930313233343536373839404142434445

Photo credit & attribution

Site description

General benthic features

Site 8: a high-relief reef front tumbling from a coral-crowded crest into deep blue, with terraced table Acropora, staghorn thickets, cauliflower Pocillopora, clouds of orange anthias, a school of bannerfish, and a nurse shark resting under a ledge (e.g., Image 10, Image 11, Image 12, Image 13).

Site 9: a knife-edged coral ridge, the moodiest of the set — much of it shot by flashlight against dark water — with big Porites domes, pink coralline-crusted rock, honeycomb faviids, and a maze-patterned coral compatible with Psammocora, divers stretching measuring tapes across the slope (e.g., Image 2, Image 15, Image 16, Image 17, Image 18).

Site 10, the last of the run: a gently sloping field of Porites domes and bommies some the size of armchairs, leather corals crowning the gaps, a lone table Acropora, and — the first hint of trouble at any of the five sites — scattered bone-white branch tips among the tagged colonies (e.g., Image 1, Image 3, Image 4, Image 6, Image 7, Image 8, Image 9, Image 14, Image 20, Image 21, Image 22, Image 23, Image 24, Image 25).

Coral cover

Coral cover: 27% — photo-derived, from two computer vision methods. The figure is the mean of a DINOv3 calibrated point classifier and a CoralSCOP computer vision run over Anderson's own frames from this site. The site record does not carry the two individual method values, so the spread between them cannot be shown here; where both are recorded elsewhere on this map they routinely differ by 3-19 percentage points. Anderson keeps an eye out for newer CV models and will refresh this CoralSCOP and DINOv3 figure once a more trustworthy option is available.

Stressors

All three were tagged-and-measured monitoring work, photographed roughly three months before the 2016 El Niño bleached the vast majority of corals across Baa's study reefs. No crown-of-thorns starfish (COTS) or other corallivores evident.

Comparisons with other data

No independent survey was made at this exact site; the nearest ones are listed in the table below.

Other notes

Three more January 2016 Baa Atoll research dives, parked here on the coarse atoll marker because the exact reefs (candidates include Kashidhoo Giri and Vinaneiy Faru, per Anderson's own bleaching spreadsheet) couldn't be geocoded from any public source — not necessarily Hanifaru itself.

Coral cover: method notes

As of September 2026 no computer-vision method estimates coral cover accurately on new images, so treat this as indicative rather than a measurement; it is revised as the methods improve.

Independent surveys nearby

Hard coral cover over time — this site and every independent station within 5 km. Programs are shown separately because they use different methods at different stations; the lines are not one comparable series.
0%10%20%30%201120132016ReefCloud 2011: 21%ReefCloud 2012: 19%ReefCloud 2016: 13%Dr. Coral (CRD) 2016: 27%Year-averaged across all programs: no detectable trend (-0.04 pp per year, not separable from zero; 3 years)
ReefCloud Dr. Coral (CRD)Year-average (no detectable trend)

Within 5 km, 1 independent survey station recorded hard coral cover in 4 surveys between 2011 and 2016. Of the 1 station surveyed in more than one year, 1 declined between their first and latest surveys. The longest record, Kendhoo (ReefCloud, 4.96 km away), went from 21% in 2011 to 13% in 2016. The most recent nearby survey is from 2016, so these values predate recent heat stress. This site's own estimate (27%) is indistinguishable from the range of these surveys (13–21%): the 5.9-point gap is inside the ±7 percentage-point noise between methods; the methods differ, so the comparison is context, not a like-for-like test.

Collected by other programs using different methods, so these are context for the figures above, not a like-for-like comparison. Where a station was surveyed more than once the range is shown. Station names are not dive-site names.

Independent survey data near this site
AgencySite / locationDateHard coral cover (%)DistanceLink
ReefCloudKendhoo2011–201613–21% (4 surveys)4.96 kmHeatCRD database

Data & links

All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from Coral Reef Diagnostics and the organizations named in the data-sources table above.

© Coral Reef Diagnostics.