Coral Reef Diagnostics

Maldives - Anantara Dhigu house reef

Reef Check Foundation
⬇ Download this page as a report card
05
Photo: Anderson Mayfield/Coral Reef Diagnostics
Country
Survey date(s)
2016-01-18
Coordinates
3.9725, 73.5021
This site is in the vicinity of a land-based point.
Coral cover
22%
Claude computer vision (44 edited photos) · other methods below · median 22%
Observations
None tagged; see Stressors below
Heat stress
Most recent heat load record
26 Oct 2026 · Bleaching Watch
5-year thermal stress load
5-year mean max. degree heating weeks (DHW)
2021–2025
NOAA Coral Reef Watch — Maldives virtual station
i 5-year mean max. DHW is the mean of the annual maximum DHWs over the five complete years named above, not conditions today.
More infoMaldives (NOAA CRW virtual station)
Photographs
52
25 shown on this page
Site summary
Read this summary in:

Anantara Dhigu's house reef is carpeted in tabletop corals running to the edge of visibility, and a honeycomb moray swam free across the open reef. The January 2016 photos catch the reef just months before the 2016 El Niño bleaching, with a few small colonies already showing recent mortality.

Max. depth dived
26.9 m
sample-sheet maximum
Sea surface temp. (satellite)
29.1°C
satellite sea surface temperature (SST) on the survey date (NOAA Coral Reef Watch, Maldives), not an in-water reading; it is the warmest-pixel (90th percentile) reading in the station area and can run 1–1.5°C above the reef

Five independent survey stations shown with the program’s logo — click one to see how far it is from this site.

Nine other CRD dive sites with their own pages within 5 km shown in orange — click a marker to open its page.

10 of the 25 photographs on this page are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.

25891112141516171819202123

Photo credit & attribution

Site description

General benthic features

In January 2016, the top of this house reef held tabletop corals by the hundred, tiered like café parasols and running unbroken to the edge of visibility (e.g., Image 1, Image 24, Image 25).

Slip over the edge and the slope turns wilder — rubble and pink coralline crusts, ledges daubed with red sponge, orange anthias swirling mid-water, and a river of silvery fusiliers passing overhead (e.g., Image 3, Image 4).

Coral cover

Stressors

Months later the 2016 El Niño would bleach these reefs catastrophically. A cushion star, an armless pentagonal sea star that feeds on coral, rests on the rubble in one frame (e.g., Image 10); no crown-of-thorns starfish appear in the photographs.

Several small branching colonies already carry white sections, recent mortality of unstated cause (e.g., Image 13).

Fish and other fauna

The dive belonged to a honeycomb moray: boldly patterned in giraffe-print black and white, it posed for portrait after portrait and then did something morays rarely do in daylight — slid fully out of its hole and swam free across the open reef (e.g., Image 6, Image 7, Image 22).

A spiny lobster's banded antennae gave away its hiding place under an overhang, and a sea cucumber sprawled across the coral.

Comparisons with other data

Migliaccio (2024) and Bin Mohamad & Migliaccio (2025) surveyed this site (Anantara reef system) after the 2024 bleaching. Within 5 km, five independent stations recorded station-year means of 5.5–76% hard coral cover between 2015 and 2025; the nearest, Montefalcone et al. 2026 at Kuda Giri Wreck, 1.21 km away, read 39–43% between 2024 and 2025.

CV model comparison

Mean 22%, median 22% across 44 photos.
More infoMean and median agree. No computer-vision method yet estimates coral cover accurately on new images, so treat this as indicative rather than a measurement; it is revised as the methods improve.
Headline: Claude computer vision, a blind point count of this site's own photographs.
More infoOther rows are for comparison only and are never averaged. No diver transect exists for these photos, so agreement between rows is not accuracy.
MethodHard coral cover (%)Photos (n) ± SE
In-house DINOv324.4
CoralSCOP edited37.6
Claude (edited photos)22.1n = 44 · SE 2.6

The two computer-vision methods disagree by 13.2 pp (24.4–37.6%) and read 2.3–15.5 pp above Claude's blind point count (22.1%); the headline is Claude's blind point count because no transect or manual count exists here.

Independent surveys nearby

Data availability near this site
Agency / programYear(s)Stations / distanceLink
Montefalcone et al. (2020)20151 station, 1.21 kmRecords ↓
Montefalcone et al. 20262024–20251 station, 1.21 kmRecords ↓
Reef Check20221 station, 2.54 kmRecords ↓
XL Catlin Seaview Survey2015–20172 stations, 2.90–3.64 kmRecords ↓
Hard coral cover over time — this site and every independent station within 5 km. Programs are shown separately because they use different methods at different stations; the lines are not one comparable series.
0%20%40%60%80%201520202025Montefalcone et al. (2020) 2015: 76%XL Catlin Seaview Survey 2015: 7.1%XL Catlin Seaview Survey 2015: 38%XL Catlin Seaview Survey 2017: 5.5%Reef Check 2022: 19%Montefalcone et al. 2026 2024: 43%Montefalcone et al. 2026 2025: 39%Coral Reef Diagnostics 2016: 22%Year-averaged across all programs: illustrative only; the programs differ in stations and method, so no trend is claimed (6 years)
Montefalcone et al. (2020) XL Catlin Seaview Survey Reef Check Montefalcone et al. 2026 Coral Reef DiagnosticsYear-average (illustrative only, programs differ)

Within 5 km, 5 independent survey stations recorded hard coral cover in 7 records between 2015 and 2025. Of the 2 stations surveyed in more than one year, 1 was scored by divers or by people annotating photographs: declined by 4.0 points between its first and latest surveys. The other 1 was scored by automated image analysis: changed by 7 points or less, inside the 7-point method-noise floor (inconclusive). The longest record, transect 37035 (XL Catlin Seaview Survey, 2.90 km away), went from 7.1% in 2015 to 5.5% in 2017. Since 2021, station-year means average 34% (range 19–43%; n = 3 station-years from 3 records). This site's own estimate (22%) sits 17 points below the recent range of station-year means up to 2 km away (39–43%); the methods differ, so the comparison is context, not a like-for-like test.

Collected by other programs using different methods (Reef Check uses point-intercept transects; the XL Catlin Seaview Survey uses photo-transects with automated image annotation), so these are context for the figures above, not a like-for-like comparison. Where a station was surveyed more than once, the cell shows either the range of its values or, as a single value, the mean of surveys made in one year. Station names are not dive-site names. Values above 70% are marked “best patch”: surveys often target the densest coral on a reef, so these may overstate the site as a whole.

Independent survey data near this site
AgencySite / locationDateHard coral cover (%)DistanceLink
Montefalcone et al. (2020)Cocoa Corner201576% best patch1.21 kmdoi:10.3389/fmars.2020.00587
XL Catlin Seaview Surveytransect 370352015–20175.5–7.1% (2 surveys)2.90 kmdoi:10.14264/uql.2019.930
XL Catlin Seaview Surveytransect 37036201538%3.64 kmdoi:10.14264/uql.2019.930
Reef CheckGulhi Island Backreef202219%2.54 km—
Montefalcone et al. 2026Kuda Giri Wreck2024–202539–43% (2 surveys)1.21 kmdoi:10.1007/s00338-026-02850-x

Data & links

All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from Coral Reef Diagnostics and the organizations named in the data sources above.

© Coral Reef Diagnostics.

References

  1. Montefalcone M, Morri C, Bianchi CN (2020). Influence of Local Pressures on Maldivian Coral Reef Resilience Following Repeated Bleaching Events, and Recovery Perspectives. Frontiers in Marine Science 7:587. PDF
  2. Montefalcone M, Bianchi CN, Morri C, Ahmed H, Pancrazi I (2026). Outcomes of the fourth global coral bleaching (2023–2024) in the Maldives. Coral Reefs. DOI
  3. Migliaccio O (2024). Coral gardening in a changing climate: Rapid assessment of the 4th recorded bleaching event at the Anantara Lagoon and reef system, South Male Atoll, Maldives. Journal of Marine Studies 2:2101. DOI
  4. Bin Mohamad E, Migliaccio O (2025). Post-bleaching patterns of Acanthaster planci, Culcita schmideliana, and Drupella spp. in coral nurseries and natural reefs, Kaafu Atoll, Maldives. Journal of Marine Studies 2:2301. DOI
  5. Gonzalez-Rivero M, et al. (2019). Seaview Survey photo-quadrat and image classification dataset. The University of Queensland (UQ eSpace) data collection. DOI