Coral Reef Diagnostics

Kenya - Reefolution nursery (Shimoni-Wasini)

REEFolution Foundation
⬇ Download this page as a report card
05
Photo: Anderson Mayfield/Coral Reef Diagnostics
Country
Survey date(s)
2024-03-20
Coordinates
-4.6594, 39.3822
Approximate position.
Coral cover
40%
Manual point count (258 photos) · other methods below
Coral bleached
73%
of hard coral tissue · Mayfield (2025), Environments 12:276
Observations
artificial structurebleachingalgal overgrowth
Heat stress
Most recent heat load record
26 Oct 2026 · No heat stress
5-year thermal stress load
5-year mean max. degree heating weeks (DHW)
2021–2025
NOAA Coral Reef Watch — Kenya virtual station
i 5-year mean max. DHW is the mean of the annual maximum DHWs over the five complete years named above, not conditions today.
More infoKenya (NOAA CRW virtual station)
Photographs
276
28 shown on this page
Site summary
Read this summary in:

This REEFolution restoration site in the Shimoni-Wasini channel pairs an engineered coral nursery — rope trees, rebar frames, and concrete modules bearing outplanted Acropora fragments — with the natural fringing reef around it, heavily overgrown with fleshy macroalgae. Bleaching on the nursery stock was patchy, with pigmented and stark-white fragments hanging side by side on the same structure, while on the natural reef massive Porites domes largely held their color even as brain corals went mostly bone-white and branching Acropora and Pocillopora took the worst damage, some already dead and turf-covered. Published cover was 40% with 73% of hard coral tissue bleached.

Water temp. during survey
32.0°C
(estimated from the TG7 underwater camera, not validated (Mayfield 2025, Environments 12:276, Table 1))

Nineteen independent survey stations shown with the program’s logo — click one to see how far it is from this site.

Three other CRD dive sites with their own pages within 5 km shown in orange — click a marker to open its page.

13 of the 28 photographs on this page are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.

456789101112131415161819

Photo credit & attribution

Site description

Setting

Visibility is not uniform across the set. A large block of frames is green, milky, and heavily particle-laden with only a few meters of horizontal range, but many others — the tree frames, the tabular-Acropora arrays, several reef panoramas — are shot in blue water with the far end of a nursery structure still resolvable, so the day ranged from murky to reasonably clear rather than being uniformly bad.

General benthic features

The nursery is more varied than a single frame suggests. Four distinct kinds of structure appear. (1) Rope trees: vertical trunks with horizontal steel cross-bars, fragments hung on individual short droppers — exactly the hanging-nursery design, photographed repeatedly (e.g., Image 1).

(2) Rigid welded rebar frames and A-frame tables with fragments fixed directly onto the bars, several now carrying grown-out branching and tabulate Acropora that has fused across the metal. (3) Cast concrete modules — squat cylindrical plinths, tiered "cake-stand" and stepped ziggurat blocks, and long ladder-like concrete beams with small fragments cemented onto the upper faces. (4) A bottle-and-cement substrate carrying fire coral, Millepora, in mustard-yellow branching plates (e.g., Image 20).

The mature end of the program: three tiers of broad tabulate Acropora plates, each a meter or so across, stacked above one another on the array in open water. The natural reef around the array is a low-relief carbonate hardground with heavy macroalgal load. Whole frames are given over to brown fleshy algae — Sargassum and Dictyota-type turf — overtopping the substrate (e.g., Image 21).

The stony fauna on it splits sharply by growth form. Foliose and encrusting agariciids, Galaxea with brown-and-white tipped tentacles, and mustard Turbinaria plates round out the assemblage. Soft corals and a pigmented purple-brown Tridacna giant clam are among the few saturated colors in the wide shots.

Coral cover

Stressors

Nursery stock condition is the interesting part, and it is patchy rather than uniformly bad. Across the array most fragments and grown-out colonies are pigmented — dense tan, gold-brown, and rust-brown Acropora, some corymbose, some staghorn, some tabulate, several with pale-blue or white growing tips that read as growth rather than bleaching. Against that, individual colonies and whole droppers are stark white with corallite structure still crisp and no algal film — bleached but alive — and the two states sit side by side on the same bar at the same depth. One frame catches it best: one table half rust-brown and half bone-white along a sharp margin. A minority of frames show the failure end of the range: one nursery tree where most droppers hang bare or carry only pale stubs (e.g., Image 22), and one with whitened fragments on an otherwise stripped bar.

So the picture is neither "the nursery was fine" nor "the nursery was dying" — on this day, on these structures, bleaching was strongly colony-by-colony. Massive Porites domes, some several meters across, are still fully pigmented in dull olive, gold, and tan and appear repeatedly (e.g., Image 3).

Meandroid brains — Platygyra and relatives — are mostly bone-white with the ridge-and-valley surface intact (e.g., Image 23, Image 2), though one frame shows a fully pigmented pink-and-cream Platygyra a few frames away (e.g., Image 24).

Lobophyllia is bleached white with the fleshy lobes still turgid (e.g., Image 25, Image 26).

Branching Acropora and Pocillopora on the natural reef carry heavy apparent damage: fields of white staghorn (photos not shown), white corymbose colonies (e.g., Image 27), and a bleached bushy Seriatopora (e.g., Image 17), plus pocilloporids that are past bleaching and into death, their skeletons furred with turf (e.g., Image 28).

Anemones are conspicuously affected — several large host anemones are white to blush-pink with tentacles extended, one still holding an anemonefish. Because the frames are color-adjusted, bleaching here is called on structure, not on hue: bare white surfaces with crisp corallites and no algal film (bleached, tissue alive), against dull white or gray surfaces already furred with turf and red algae (recently dead). Both are present, side by side, and the split between them is the clearest signal in the set. One frame shows a pale plating colony with black, branching dead portions. Typical recent thermal stress: mean annual maximum of 4.9 degree heating weeks (2021-2025, NOAA CRW; Kenya virtual station). Seawater here was an estimated 32.0°C during the survey (read from the TG7 underwater camera and not validated, per Mayfield 2025, Environments 12:276, Table 1; the Kenya survey-wide mean of 32.0°C matched the 1998 event), and NOAA recorded a peak of 13.5 degree-heating weeks on 18 April 2024, the highest for Kenya since records began in 1985. For the 2024 Kenya survey as a whole, Mayfield (2025, Environments 12:276) estimated that in situ temperatures ran about 1.3°C above NOAA's, so that "nearly 22 DHWs may actually have transpired"; those in situ readings came from the TG7 underwater camera and have not been validated. No crown-of-thorns starfish (COTS) or other corallivores were evident.

Fish and other fauna

Fauna seen around the array: a flying gurnard fanning its wings on sand, a blue-legged hermit crab seen twice, a pufferfish, a giant clam, and divers working the array.

Comparisons with other data

REEFolution Kenya surveyed a nearby station (Pilli Pipa Restaurant) between 2018 and 2023, 0.24 km from the pin. Within 5 km, nineteen independent stations (REEFolution Foundation, WCS Kenya via MERMAID, and submitted to MERMAID by Kosgei J, Musembi P.*) recorded hard coral cover between 2010 and 2024: six by benthic survey, station-year means of 0.0–66%, and thirteen by MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats, station-year means of 18–55%; the nearest, REEFolution Foundation at Pilli Pipa Restaurant, 0.24 km away, read 4.9–56% between 2018 and 2023.

Dive record

Dived 20 March 2024 in the Shimoni-Wasini channel, on and around REEFolution's restoration site, at the height of the 2024 Western Indian Ocean mass bleaching event. Surveys were run with REEFolution.

Other notes

This description draws on 206 of the 276 frames on file, and the site turns out to be two things photographed together: an engineered nursery/outplant array, and the natural fringing reef it sits on. Roughly thirty frames are close-focus macro of pocilloporid and acroporid polyps, mostly pale to white and many soft-focus; three are blue-light fluorescence images (a green-glowing meandroid brain, glowing polyp mouths, an anemone) and carry no cover information at all.

CV model comparison

Computer-vision estimates from this site's own photographs are listed in the comparison table below, alongside the headline rather than merged into it.
Headline is the reference value; every other row is listed beside it for comparison and none is averaged in.
MethodHard coral cover (%)Photos (n) ± SE
Manual (published)40.2
CoralNet39.6n = 258
In-house DINOv343.8n = 264
CoralSCOP unedited16.3n = 141

The three computer-vision methods disagree by 27.5 pp (16.3–43.8%) and read on both sides of the manual point count (40.2%); the headline is the manual point count because a person's point count of the site's photographs is the reference the models are measured against.

Independent surveys nearby

Data availability near this site
Agency / programYear(s)Stations / distanceLink
REEFolution Foundation2017–20236 stations, 0.24–3.77 kmRecords ↓
submitted to MERMAID by Kosgei J, Musembi P.* (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats)20243 stations, 0.99–4.81 kmRecords ↓
WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats)2010–201910 stations, 0.44–4.80 kmRecords ↓
Hard coral cover over time — this site and every independent station within 5 km. Programs are shown separately because they use different methods at different stations; the lines are not one comparable series.
0%17%34%51%68%201020172024WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats) 2010: 30%WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats) 2011: 25%WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats) 2011: 25%WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats) 2012: 47%WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats) 2014: 25%WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats) 2014: 47%WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats) 2015: 18%WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats) 2015: 20%WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats) 2019: 24%WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats) 2019: 33%WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats) 2019: 38%REEFolution Foundation 2017: 2.4%REEFolution Foundation 2017: 39%REEFolution Foundation 2018: 8.0%REEFolution Foundation 2018: 28%REEFolution Foundation 2018: 31%REEFolution Foundation 2018: 37%REEFolution Foundation 2018: 49%REEFolution Foundation 2018: 52%REEFolution Foundation 2019: 0.0%REEFolution Foundation 2019: 21%REEFolution Foundation 2019: 27%REEFolution Foundation 2019: 34%REEFolution Foundation 2019: 50%REEFolution Foundation 2019: 59%REEFolution Foundation 2020: 18%REEFolution Foundation 2020: 25%REEFolution Foundation 2021: 66%REEFolution Foundation 2022: 23%REEFolution Foundation 2022: 56%REEFolution Foundation 2023: 4.9%REEFolution Foundation 2023: 23%REEFolution Foundation 2023: 29%submitted to MERMAID by Kosgei J, Musembi P.* (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats) 2024: 36%submitted to MERMAID by Kosgei J, Musembi P.* (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats) 2024: 41%submitted to MERMAID by Kosgei J, Musembi P.* (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats) 2024: 55%Coral Reef Diagnostics 2024: 40%Year-averaged across all programs: illustrative only; the programs differ in stations and method, so no trend is claimed (8 years)
WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats) REEFolution Foundation submitted to MERMAID by Kosgei J, Musembi P.* (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats) Coral Reef DiagnosticsYear-average (illustrative only, programs differ; quadrats left out)

Within 5 km, 19 independent survey stations recorded hard coral cover in 128 surveys between 2010 and 2024. Of the 6 stations with benthic surveys in more than one year, 4 declined (by 2.4–23 points) and 2 increased (by 7.0–27 points) between their first and latest surveys. Three stations share the longest span (2018–2023); one, Pilli Pipa Restaurant (REEFolution Foundation, 0.24 km away), went from 28% in 2018 (mean of 16 surveys) to 4.9% in 2023. With MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats, the one station surveyed in more than one year changed by less than 1 point between its first and latest surveys. Since 2021, station-year means excluding quadrats average 34% (range 4.9–66%; n = 6 station-years from 14 surveys). Quadrats since 2021 read 36–55% (n = 3 station-years). This site's own estimate (40%) sits within the recent range of station-year means up to 2 km away excluding quadrats (4.9–66%); the methods differ, so the comparison is context, not a like-for-like test. Quadrats up to 2 km away read 36%.

Collected by other programs using different methods (MERMAID is a data platform: each MERMAID row names the organization that did the survey, and its method is in the row's hover text. *Conducted by citizen scientists), so these are context for the figures above, not a like-for-like comparison. Where a station was surveyed more than once, the cell shows either the range of its values or, as a single value, the mean of surveys made in one year. Station names are not dive-site names.

Show all 128 independent surveys
Independent survey data near this site
AgencySite / locationDateHard coral cover (%)DistanceLink
WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats)Kibuyuni 2 (West or A)201030%4.80 kmDarling E. 2018. Kenya CRCP legacy. MERMAID
WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats)Waga201125%1.77 kmDarling E. 2018. Kenya CRCP legacy. MERMAID
WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats)Waga 2201125%1.77 kmDarling E. 2018. Kenya CRCP legacy. MERMAID
WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats)Changai2012–201447% (2 surveys)2.44 kmDarling E. 2018. Kenya CRCP legacy. MERMAID
WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats)Jiwe la kale East201425%0.87 kmDarling E. 2018. Kenya CRCP legacy. MERMAID
WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats)Mji wa Kale 1 (Mkwiro)201518%0.44 kmDarling E. 2018. Kenya CRCP legacy. MERMAID
WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats)Mji wa Kale 2 (Mkwiro)201520%0.84 kmDarling E. 2018. Kenya CRCP legacy. MERMAID
REEFolution FoundationHouse Reef Firefly2017–202139–66% (range of yearly means; 21 surveys)1.25 km2023. REEFolution Kenya. MERMAID
REEFolution FoundationLower Mpunguti2017–20190.0–8.0% (range of yearly means; 15 surveys)3.77 km2023. REEFolution Kenya. MERMAID
REEFolution FoundationPilli Pipa Restaurant2018–20234.9–56% (range of yearly means; 31 surveys)0.24 km2023. REEFolution Kenya. MERMAID
REEFolution FoundationKikuyu House2018–202323–31% (range of yearly means; 24 surveys)0.60 km2023. REEFolution Kenya. MERMAID
REEFolution FoundationMkwiro CMA2018–202329–37% (range of yearly means; 7 surveys)1.29 km2023. REEFolution Kenya. MERMAID
REEFolution FoundationWasini Tengefu2018–201952–59% (range of yearly means; 15 surveys)2.17 km2023. REEFolution Kenya. MERMAID
WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats)Mji wa Kale 1 (Mkwiro)201933%0.44 kmDarling E, Kosgei J, McClanahan T, Muthiga N. 2019. Kenya MACMON 2016-17. MERMAID
WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats)Mji wa Kale 2 (Mkwiro)201924%0.84 kmDarling E, Kosgei J, McClanahan T, Muthiga N. 2019. Kenya MACMON 2016-17. MERMAID
WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats)Kibuyuni 2 (West or A)201938%4.80 kmDarling E, Kosgei J, McClanahan T, Muthiga N. 2019. Kenya MACMON 2016-17. MERMAID
submitted to MERMAID by Kosgei J, Musembi P.* (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats)Mji wa Kale 1 (Mkwiro)202436%0.99 kmKosgei J, Musembi P. 2024. KenyaBleachingSurveys_2024. MERMAID
submitted to MERMAID by Kosgei J, Musembi P.* (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats)Wasini202455%2.17 kmKosgei J, Musembi P. 2024. KenyaBleachingSurveys_2024. MERMAID
submitted to MERMAID by Kosgei J, Musembi P.* (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats)Kibuyuni202441% (2 surveys)4.81 kmKosgei J, Musembi P. 2024. KenyaBleachingSurveys_2024. MERMAID

Data & links

All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from Coral Reef Diagnostics and the organizations named in the data sources above.

© Coral Reef Diagnostics.