Coral Reef Diagnostics

Kenya - Outer Kisite (Kisite National Park)

REEFolution Foundation
⬇ Download this page as a report card
05
Photo: Anderson Mayfield/Coral Reef Diagnostics
Country
Survey date(s)
2024-03-21
Coordinates
-4.7162, 39.3828
Coral cover
37%
Manual point count (85 photos) · other methods below
Coral bleached
66%
of hard coral tissue · Mayfield (2025), Environments 12:276
Observations
Heat stress
Most recent heat load record
26 Oct 2026 · No heat stress
5-year thermal stress load
5-year mean max. degree heating weeks (DHW)
2021–2025
NOAA Coral Reef Watch — Tanzania virtual station
i 5-year mean max. DHW is the mean of the annual maximum DHWs over the five complete years named above, not conditions today.
More infoTanzania (NOAA CRW virtual station)
Photographs
98
20 shown on this page
Site summary
Read this summary in:

Outer Kisite is a high-relief reef of long coral ridges and buttresses where bleaching sorted sharply by growth form: massive Porites hillsides and foliose plate terraces stayed largely pigmented, while the branching and corymbose Acropora thickets on the crest took the damage, with entire beds gone bone-white. An enormous school of bluestripe snapper, an octopus in a rubble den, and a hawksbill turtle resting beneath a soft-coral overhang were fauna highlights. Published cover was 37%, and 66% of coral tissue was bleached.

Water temp. during survey
31.6°C
(estimated from the TG7 underwater camera, not validated (Mayfield 2025, Environments 12:276, Table 1))

Sixteen independent survey stations shown with the program’s logo — click one to see how far it is from this site.

Five other CRD dive sites with their own pages within 5 km shown in orange — click a marker to open its page.

4 of the 20 photographs on this page are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.

567891011121314151617181920

Photo credit & attribution

Site description

Setting

Visibility is moderate and blue-green, hazier than at Coral Garden, with a persistent green cast over the deeper background in many wide frames. A big, high-relief structure: long coral ridges and buttresses running out and down, separated by sand- and rubble-floored channels, with a coral-dense crest that the wide frames show as near-continuous living cover for meters at a stretch. Several frames look straight down the flank of a ridge from the crest into open blue; others sit on the sand at the base looking up at a wall of coral.

General benthic features

Between the ridges are rubble aprons of broken branch fragments and coralline-crusted pavement, and a few genuinely bare sand patches. Four elements repeat across the set and between them account for most of what is in frame. Massive nodular Porites-type hillsides. Whole slope faces are covered by a single knobby, close-packed massive coral in brown-mauve, knob after rounded knob to the edge of frame with only small pale cerioid Goniastrea/Favites-type colonies wedged into the gaps. These near-monospecific hillsides are massive Porites-type coral, not plate coral. Shingled foliose plate terraces. Just as abundant and just as characteristic: whorled, crisped plates overlapping plate on plate for the whole frame, every surface sculpted with fine concentric ridges and edged in pale cream (e.g., Image 2).

Color runs dusty mauve-pink to brick-brown — pigmented, if muted. One superb rosette colony a meter or more across sits alone on rubble. The concentric-ridge sculpture is consistent with Pachyseris/Merulina- or Echinopora-type taxa but is not resolvable to genus at this range, so growth form is what is claimed here. Branching and corymbose Acropora thickets. The crest and upper slope carry dense corymbose, digitate, and staghorn Acropora (e.g., Image 1).

Meandroid brain corals. Scattered rather than dominant but conspicuous: a large cream-and-tan Platygyra-type dome resting on sand, a smaller salmon-pink meandroid colony ringed by bleached-white neighbors and soft coral, and a broad meandroid pavement into which a giant clam is set. Elsewhere, feathery red and pink Dendronephthya-type soft corals stand on the sand, red and orange encrusting sponges fill the interstitial rock, and a sea cucumber lies across a bleached Acropora bed.

Coral cover

Stressors

One isolated dome on sand is a textbook of partial bleaching — the same knob texture throughout, but irregular chalk-white and pale-mint zones bleeding across a mauve-brown colony, with no tissue loss. Branching Acropora is the growth form the heat took: frame after frame shows beds of bone-white and pale-lavender branching colonies — skeletal architecture intact, branch tips sharp, no algal fouling, which reads as fresh bleaching rather than old mortality — interleaved with tan and olive colonies that held pigment. The single most telling frame sets a fully pigmented yellow-green corymbose dome directly against a bed of stark white branching Acropora, margin to margin. Bleaching is unmistakable and widespread in the set, and it is strongly growth-form structured. The branching and corymbose Acropora stands are the casualties — in several frames the majority of branching colonies in view are white. The massive Porites hillsides and the foliose plate terraces are, by contrast, largely pigmented, with bleaching on them showing as patches on otherwise colored colonies rather than whole-colony whitening; one bleached foliose plate colony and one bleached tabular plate do appear. Older mortality is present too: at least one large plate colony is entirely dead and carpeted in turf and sediment, and the rubble aprons are made of branch fragments. No crown-of-thorns seastar appears in any of the 87 frames, and no unambiguous disease lesion is visible. Typical recent thermal stress: mean annual maximum of 5.1 degree heating weeks (2021-2025, NOAA CRW; Tanzania virtual station, whose polygon covers the Kisite-Mpunguti area). Seawater here was an estimated 31.6°C during the survey (read from the TG7 underwater camera and not validated, per Mayfield 2025, Environments 12:276, Table 1; the Kenya survey-wide mean of 32.0°C matched the 1998 event), and NOAA's Kenya virtual station recorded a peak of 13.5 degree-heating weeks on 18 April 2024, a level not reached there before in records going back to 1985; the Tanzania virtual station that covers this reef peaked at 16.0 on 16 April 2024. For the 2024 Kenya survey as a whole, Mayfield (2025, Environments 12:276) estimated that in situ temperatures ran about 1.3°C above NOAA's, so that "nearly 22 DHWs may actually have transpired"; those in situ readings came from the TG7 underwater camera and have not been validated.

Fish and other fauna

The headline is a genuinely enormous school of bluestripe snapper (Lutjanus kasmira) — packed edge to edge in places and standing off the reef as a solid yellow wall in others. Two further schools of deep-red crescent-tail bigeye-type fish hang over the slope, and single soldierfish and red squirrelfish sit in the reef matrix. Also present: yellow-and-blue fusiliers, damselfish, and anthias over the coral, a large octopus tucked into a rubble den beside a red sponge (photographed four times, from four angles), a big giant clam (Tridacna) with a purple-brown mantle beaded in pearly white, set into a brain coral pavement, and a hawksbill turtle resting on a rubble floor beneath a drape of ruffled cream-olive leather soft corals (Sarcophyton/Lobophytum-type) — a distinctly soft-coral-dominated overhang, quite unlike the hard coral ridges above it (e.g., Image 3, Image 4).

Comparisons with other data

REEFolution Foundation surveyed a station named Outer Kisite, 0.43 km away. Within 5 km, fifteen independent stations recorded hard coral cover between 1998 and 2020: seven by benthic survey, station-year means of 0.0–53%, and eight by MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats, station-year means of 21–56%; the nearest, WCS Kenya via MERMAID (quadrats) at Kisite corner, 0.30 km away, read 50% in 2016.

Dive record

Dived 21 Mar 2024 on the outer side of Kisite Marine National Park, during the 2024 Western Indian Ocean mass bleaching event; in-water temperature 31.6°C. Surveys were run with REEFolution.

CV model comparison

Computer-vision estimates from this site's own photographs are listed in the comparison table below, alongside the headline rather than merged into it.
Headline is the reference value; every other row is listed beside it for comparison and none is averaged in.
MethodHard coral cover (%)Photos (n) ± SE
Manual (published)36.6
CoralNet36.0n = 83
In-house DINOv342.6n = 83
CoralSCOP unedited17.3n = 68

The three computer-vision methods disagree by 25.3 pp (17.3–42.6%) and read on both sides of the manual point count (36.6%); the headline is the manual point count because a person's point count of the site's photographs is the reference the models are measured against.

Independent surveys nearby

Data availability near this site
Agency / programYear(s)Stations / distanceLink
McClanahan et al. (1996)19962 stations, 1.48–2.09 kmRecords ↓
McClanahan et al. (2007)19981 station, 1.60 kmRecords ↓
REEFolution Foundation2017–20195 stations, 0.43–3.35 kmRecords ↓
WCS Kenya / WCS Tanzania via MERMAID20201 station, 2.41 kmRecords ↓
WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats)2008–20168 stations, 0.30–3.30 kmRecords ↓
Hard coral cover over time — this site and every independent station within 5 km. Programs are shown separately because they use different methods at different stations; the lines are not one comparable series.
0%15%30%45%60%199820112024WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats) 2008: 37%WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats) 2009: 46%WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats) 2010: 56%WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats) 2012: 44%WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats) 2012: 44%WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats) 2013: 21%WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats) 2013: 42%WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats) 2015: 48%WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats) 2015: 52%WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats) 2016: 32%WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats) 2016: 47%WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats) 2016: 50%REEFolution Foundation 2017: 2.4%REEFolution Foundation 2017: 15%REEFolution Foundation 2017: 20%REEFolution Foundation 2017: 29%REEFolution Foundation 2017: 39%REEFolution Foundation 2018: 8.0%REEFolution Foundation 2018: 39%REEFolution Foundation 2018: 48%REEFolution Foundation 2018: 53%REEFolution Foundation 2019: 0.0%REEFolution Foundation 2019: 40%REEFolution Foundation 2019: 41%WCS Kenya / WCS Tanzania via MERMAID 2020: 29%McClanahan et al. (2007) 1998: 10%McClanahan et al. (2007) 1998: 22%Coral Reef Diagnostics 2024: 37%Year-averaged across all programs: illustrative only; the programs differ in stations and method, so no trend is claimed (6 years)
WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats) REEFolution Foundation WCS Kenya / WCS Tanzania via MERMAID McClanahan et al. (2007) Coral Reef DiagnosticsYear-average (illustrative only, programs differ; quadrats left out)

Within 5 km, 15 independent survey stations recorded hard coral cover in 61 surveys between 1998 and 2020. Of the 4 stations with benthic surveys in more than one year, 1 declined (by 2.4 points) and 3 increased (by 1.0–21 points) between their first and latest surveys. Three stations share the longest span (2017–2019); one, Outer Kisite (REEFolution Foundation, 0.43 km away), went from 39% in 2017 to 40% in 2019 (mean of 2 surveys). With MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats, of the 3 stations surveyed in more than one year, 3 increased (by 3.0–9.0 points) between their first and latest surveys. The most recent nearby survey is from 2020, so these values predate recent heat stress. This site's own estimate (37%) sits within the range of these station-year means up to 2 km away excluding quadrats (10–53%); the methods differ, so the comparison is context, not a like-for-like test. Quadrats up to 2 km away read 37–56%. 2 further rows in the table have no survey date, so they are listed but not part of this summary.

Collected by other programs using different methods (MERMAID is a data platform: each MERMAID row names the organization that did the survey, and its method is in the row's hover text), so these are context for the figures above, not a like-for-like comparison. Where a station was surveyed more than once, the cell shows either the range of its values or, as a single value, the mean of surveys made in one year. Station names are not dive-site names.

Show all 61 independent surveys
Independent survey data near this site
AgencySite / locationDateHard coral cover (%)DistanceLink
McClanahan et al. (1996)Kisite Islandby 1996 (published)27% (2 records)1.48 kmdoi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1996.10010136.x
McClanahan et al. (1996)Kisite Islandby 1996 (published)19%2.09 kmdoi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1996.10010136.x
McClanahan et al. (2007)Kisite, Kenya (KN)post-199810%1.60 km—
McClanahan et al. (2007)Kisite, Kenya (KN)pre-199822%1.60 km—
WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats)Kisite2008–200937–46% (2 surveys)1.05 kmDarling E. 2018. Kenya CRCP legacy. MERMAID
WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats)Kisite South of Site 1201056%1.60 kmDarling E. 2018. Kenya CRCP legacy. MERMAID
WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats)Kisite 12012–201644–48% (3 surveys)1.05 kmDarling E. 2018. Kenya CRCP legacy. MERMAID
WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats)Kisite 22012–201544–52% (2 surveys)1.65 kmDarling E. 2018. Kenya CRCP legacy. MERMAID
WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats)Kisite Edge 1201342%0.30 kmDarling E. 2018. Kenya CRCP legacy. MERMAID
WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats)Kisite Edge 2201321%2.09 kmDarling E. 2018. Kenya CRCP legacy. MERMAID
WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats)Kisite corner201650%0.30 kmDarling E. 2018. Kenya CRCP legacy. MERMAID
WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats)Mpunguti201632%3.30 kmDarling E. 2018. Kenya CRCP legacy. MERMAID
REEFolution FoundationOuter Kisite2017–201939–53% (range of yearly means; 13 surveys)0.43 km2023. REEFolution Kenya. MERMAID
REEFolution FoundationKisite 22017–201829–48% (range of yearly means; 3 surveys)1.65 km2023. REEFolution Kenya. MERMAID
REEFolution FoundationKisite Edge 2201715%2.09 km2023. REEFolution Kenya. MERMAID
REEFolution FoundationDolphin Point2017–201920–41% (range of yearly means; 14 surveys)3.26 km2023. REEFolution Kenya. MERMAID
REEFolution FoundationLower Mpunguti2017–20190.0–8.0% (range of yearly means; 15 surveys)3.35 km2023. REEFolution Kenya. MERMAID
WCS Kenya / WCS Tanzania via MERMAIDMkwiro202029%2.41 kmDarling E, Mensa J, O'Leary J, Schwarz A. 2020. BAF 1 - 2020. MERMAID

Data & links

All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from Coral Reef Diagnostics and the organizations named in the data sources above.

© Coral Reef Diagnostics.

References

  1. Mayfield AB (2025). A Citizen Science Approach for Documenting Mass Coral Bleaching in the Western Indian Ocean. Environments 12:276. PDF
  2. McClanahan TR, Kamukuru AT, Muthiga NA, Yebio MG, Obura D (1996). Effect of Sea Urchin Reductions on Algae, Coral, and Fish Populations. Conservation Biology 10:136-154. DOI
  3. McClanahan TR, Ateweberhan M, Muhando CA, Maina J, Mohammed MS (2007). EFFECTS OF CLIMATE AND SEAWATER TEMPERATURE VARIATION ON CORAL BLEACHING AND MORTALITY. Ecological Monographs 77:503-525. DOI