Coral Reef Diagnostics

Kenya - North Canyon (Watamu)

Global Fund for Coral Reefs (GFCR)
⬇ Download this page as a report card
05
Photo: Anderson Mayfield/Coral Reef Diagnostics
Country
Survey date(s)
2024-03-29
Coordinates
-3.3743, 40.0115
Coral cover
22%
Manual point count (83 photos) · other methods below
Coral bleached
95%
of hard coral tissue · Mayfield (2025), Environments 12:276
Observations
Heat stress
Most recent heat load record
26 Oct 2026 · No heat stress
5-year thermal stress load
5-year mean max. degree heating weeks (DHW)
2021–2025
NOAA Coral Reef Watch — Kenya virtual station
i 5-year mean max. DHW is the mean of the annual maximum DHWs over the five complete years named above, not conditions today.
More infoKenya (NOAA CRW virtual station)
Photographs
85
24 shown on this page
Site summary
Read this summary in:

North Canyon, despite its name, is not a canyon at all — the full photographic record shows a low-relief hardground reef top with discrete, well-separated colonies rather than continuous framework, with 22% cover and 95% of tissue bleached. Nearly every scleractinian in view is bone-white, cream, or pastel, with many colonies turning a distinctive salmon-pink to lilac stress coloration rather than pure white — a fluorescent-pigment response to losing their symbionts — and even host anemones were found bleached alongside the coral.

Water temp. during survey
32.3°C
(estimated from the TG7 underwater camera, not validated (Mayfield 2025, Environments 12:276, Table 1))

Seven independent survey stations shown with the program’s logo — click one to see how far it is from this site.

Two other CRD dive sites with their own pages within 5 km shown in orange — click a marker to open its page.

9 of the 24 photographs on this page are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.

5678910111314151617181920

Photo credit & attribution

Site description

Setting

Despite the name, the photographs do not show a canyon. There is no frame in the whole set of a vertical wall, a swim-through, or a steep undercut face. What the set shows is an extensive hardground reef top of low to moderate relief — coralline-encrusted pavement, boulder and rubble aprons, sand pockets, and low bommie mounds — with the outer edge sloping away into open blue in the wider frames (e.g., Image 4).

General benthic features

The reef is also not densely packed with coral. Across most of the set, colonies sit as discrete, well-separated individuals on algal pavement, and several frames hold only two or three corals in the whole field of view. Foliose and laminar plates are the commonest growth form — Turbinaria-, Echinopora-, and Montipora-type laminae and agariciid plates, some a meter or more across, stacked and overlapping on the low mounds. Massive and meandroid colonies are the second element: Platygyra brains, Lobophyllia and Symphyllia with thick banded ridges, cerioid Favites and Goniastrea, and nodular Astreopora and Porites boulders. Branching coral is present but subordinate and always in small isolated stands. Free-living fungiid discs sit on the rubble in two frames. Soft corals and leathers are scattered rather than dominant, and orange, red, and gray sponges and pink crustose coralline fill the interstitial rock. Deep red fleshy and coralline algae are conspicuous across the pavement in roughly half the set, with bright green filamentous and Halimeda-type turf increasing through the later frames.

Coral cover

Stressors

The full set is emphatic, and it confirms rather than softens the published 95%. In frame after frame every scleractinian colony in view is bone-white, cream, pale mint, pale blue, or pastel lilac (e.g., Image 1).

The most complete examples are massive and laminar: a large sheeting meandroid colony gone uniformly chalk-white in one frame; big white plates in ten frames; a fully white knobby dome in another; a white Platygyra in another (e.g., Image 3).

Branching coral fared no better — every branching colony in the set is bone-white, with the corymbose and digitate Acropora in five frames white right down to the branch bases. The striking thing at North Canyon is the color the surviving colonies turned. A large number of massive and meandroid corals are not brown and not white but pastel: violet and mauve cerioid Favites, lilac and pink-gray lobate colonies, salmon-pink and cream banded Lobophyllia, a pale pink Platygyra abutting a stark white lobate colony in one frame, a mauve-pink brain dome, and lilac free-living fungiids (e.g., Image 2).

One frame is the clearest single example: a large gray-blue encrusting colony carrying a distinct patch of retained salmon-pink. This is the fluorescent-pigment stress response of a colony that has lost its symbionts but not yet its tissue, and it is the visual signature of this site. A small minority of colonies held normal brown or olive pigment, and they are worth naming because they are the exception and because they act as the internal control on the color-adjusted frames: a dark brown Platygyra dome (e.g., Image 21), a tan tabular Acropora with a clean white growing margin (e.g., Image 12), a dark olive-green encrusting colony among red algae (e.g., Image 22), tan-brown tabulate plates (e.g., Image 23), and a brown-gray brain hard against a bright white lobate colony in one frame (e.g., Image 24).

That last frame, and the frame with the pale pink Platygyra abutting a white lobate colony, are the two clearest within-frame contrasts in the set: pigmented and bleached skeletons side by side under one exposure. Several white colonies carry dark mottled patches that could be turf settling on newly dead skeleton, but the photographs do not resolve whether these are early tissue loss or sediment and shadow, and no unambiguous disease lesion is visible anywhere in the set. No crown-of-thorns seastars appear in any of the 82 frames. What does recur is bleached anemones: large host anemones with fully expanded but stark white or cream tentacles in four frames, and paler ones in two others — a non-scleractinian bleaching signal on top of the coral figure. Typical recent thermal stress: mean annual maximum of 4.9 degree heating weeks (2021-2025, NOAA CRW; Kenya virtual station). Seawater here was an estimated 32.3°C during the survey (read from the TG7 underwater camera and not validated, per Mayfield 2025, Environments 12:276, Table 1; the Kenya survey-wide mean of 32.0°C matched the 1998 event), and NOAA recorded a peak of 13.5 degree-heating weeks on 18 April 2024, the highest for Kenya since records began in 1985. For the 2024 Kenya survey as a whole, Mayfield (2025, Environments 12:276) estimated that in situ temperatures ran about 1.3°C above NOAA's, so that "nearly 22 DHWs may actually have transpired"; those in situ readings came from the TG7 underwater camera and have not been validated.

Fish and other fauna

Large mixed schools of yellow-and-blue fusiliers stream over the reef through the first third of the dive and are the dominant fish signal. Dark damselfish and chromis hang over the plates, an angelfish passes, and a red squirrelfish- or soldierfish-type fish sits in a crevice. Fish life reads as normal and abundant over an almost entirely bleached benthos.

Comparisons with other data

WCS Tanzania and WCS Kenya (via MERMAID) surveyed a nearby station (Watamu), 0.50 km from the pin; we could not confirm that it is the same reef. Within 5 km, seven independent stations (WCS Kenya / WCS Tanzania via MERMAID and WCS Kenya via MERMAID) recorded hard coral cover between 2008 and 2024: one by benthic survey, 28%, and seven by MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats, station-year means of 8.8–25% (one station appears in both); the nearest, WCS Kenya / WCS Tanzania via MERMAID at Watamu, 0.50 km away, read a mean of 28% in 2024.

Dive record

Dived 29 Mar 2024 off Watamu, at the height of the 2024 Western Indian Ocean mass bleaching event. Surveys were run with Extra Divers.

CV model comparison

Computer-vision estimates from this site's own photographs are listed in the comparison table below, alongside the headline rather than merged into it.
Headline is the reference value; every other row is listed beside it for comparison and none is averaged in.
MethodHard coral cover (%)Photos (n) ± SE
Manual (published)21.6
CoralNet (published survey's own annotation)21.6n = 83
In-house DINOv320.3n = 82
CoralSCOP unedited19.1n = 79

The three computer-vision methods agree within 2.5 pp (19.1–21.6%) and read within 2.5 pp of the manual point count (21.6%).

Independent surveys nearby

Data availability near this site
Agency / programYear(s)Stations / distanceLink
WCS Kenya / WCS Tanzania via MERMAID20241 station, 0.50 kmRecords ↓
WCS Kenya / WCS Tanzania via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats)20231 station, 0.50 kmRecords ↓
WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats)2008–20226 stations, 0.50–4.02 kmRecords ↓
Hard coral cover over time — this site and every independent station within 5 km. Programs are shown separately because they use different methods at different stations; the lines are not one comparable series.
0%10%20%30%200820162024WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats) 2008: 9.0%WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats) 2009: 12%WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats) 2014: 12%WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats) 2014: 12%WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats) 2014: 19%WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats) 2014: 20%WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats) 2016: 25%WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats) 2022: 8.8%WCS Kenya / WCS Tanzania via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats) 2023: 8.8%WCS Kenya / WCS Tanzania via MERMAID 2024: 28%Coral Reef Diagnostics 2024: 22%
WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats) WCS Kenya / WCS Tanzania via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats) WCS Kenya / WCS Tanzania via MERMAID Coral Reef Diagnostics

Within 5 km, 7 independent survey stations recorded hard coral cover in 12 surveys between 2008 and 2024. The one station surveyed in more than one year with MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats increased by 16 points between its first and latest surveys. The longest record, Watamu (WCS Kenya via MERMAID, quadrats, 0.50 km away), went from 9.0% in 2008 to 25% in 2016 (mean of 2 surveys). One station-year since 2021 excluding quadrats (2 surveys) averaged 28%. Quadrats since 2021 read 8.8% (n = 2 station-years). This site's own estimate (22%) sits 6 points below the recent value up to 2 km away excluding quadrats (28%); the methods differ, so the comparison is context, not a like-for-like test. Quadrats up to 2 km away read 8.8%.

Collected by other programs using different methods (MERMAID is a data platform: each MERMAID row names the organization that did the survey, and its method is in the row's hover text), so these are context for the figures above, not a like-for-like comparison. Where a station was surveyed more than once, the cell shows either the range of its values or, as a single value, the mean of surveys made in one year. Station names are not dive-site names.

Independent survey data near this site
AgencySite / locationDateHard coral cover (%)DistanceLink
WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats)Watamu2008–20169.0–25% (range of yearly means; 4 surveys)0.50 kmDarling E. 2018. Kenya CRCP legacy. MERMAID
WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats)Watamu Tewa201420%0.66 kmDarling E. 2018. Kenya CRCP legacy. MERMAID
WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats)Watamu Canyon201419%1.64 kmDarling E. 2018. Kenya CRCP legacy. MERMAID
WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats)Watamu Caracas201412%2.74 kmDarling E. 2018. Kenya CRCP legacy. MERMAID
WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats)Watamu Deep reef201412%4.02 kmDarling E. 2018. Kenya CRCP legacy. MERMAID
WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats)Watamu20228.8%2.04 kmDarling E, Kosgei J, McClanahan T, Muthiga N, Oddenyo R. 2022. Kenya-Marine Monitoring_2022. MERMAID
WCS Kenya / WCS Tanzania via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats)Watamu20238.8%0.50 kmHassan J, Julius P, Mensa J, Mkwavila S, Musembi P. 2024. Miamba Yetu Program - Kenya & Tanzania. MERMAID
WCS Kenya / WCS Tanzania via MERMAIDWatamu202428% (2 surveys)0.50 kmHassan J, Julius P, Mensa J, Mkwavila S, Musembi P. 2024. Miamba Yetu Program - Kenya & Tanzania. MERMAID

Data & links

All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from Coral Reef Diagnostics and the organizations named in the data sources above.

© Coral Reef Diagnostics.