Coral Reef Diagnostics

Kenya - MMP snorkel site (Mombasa) snorkel

⬇ Download this page as a report card
05
Photo: Anderson Mayfield/Coral Reef Diagnostics
Country
Survey date(s)
2024-03-14
Coordinates
-3.9984, 39.7453
Coral cover
40%
Manual point count (54 photos) · other methods below
Heat stress
Today’s heat load
16 Sep 2026 · No heat stress
5-year thermal stress load
5-year mean max. degree heating weeks (DHW)
2021–2025
NOAA Coral Reef Watch — Kenya virtual station
i 5-year mean max. DHW is the mean of the annual maximum DHWs over the five complete years named above, not conditions today.
More infoKenya (NOAA CRW virtual station) · East African Coral Coast ecoregion mean=4.1°C-heating weeks
Photographs
4
Site summary
Read this summary in:

This shallow Mombasa Marine Park snorkel site is a back-reef field of Porites bommies substantially draped in fleshy brown algae, and it suffered the most severe bleaching of any Mombasa site reviewed here - 89.9% of hard coral tissue, well above the 77.1% Kenya-wide average - leaving whole frames of chalk-white and cream domes with only scattered pigmented holdouts, including a few strikingly unbleached deep-purple Acropora colonies. Two crown-of-thorns starfish were photographed on one tabular Acropora, though not repeated elsewhere. Published cover was 40%, more than double a 2022 reading nearby (19.5%).

Max. depth dived
3 m
Water temp. during survey
32.5°C
+4.4°C vs the 2024 mean sea temperature (28.1°C)

Seventeen independent survey stations shown with the program’s logo — click one to see how far it is from this site.

Two other CRD dive sites within 5 km shown in orange — click a marker to open its page.

3 of these 4 photographs are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.

3

Photo credit & attribution

Site description

Setting

Surface light, wave shimmer, and a snorkeler's fins at the surface appear in the wide frames, confirming very shallow water throughout; visibility is moderate, green-tinged, and plankton-laden, with the far bommies fading into haze.

General benthic features

Habitat. The full set confirms the site as a shallow back-reef bommie field: coalescing knobby, lobate, and columnar mounds of Porites type, a meter or so of relief, separated by floors of coarse sand, rubble, and low pavement. Frame after frame is the same architecture -- dome beside dome, sand between. What the four published frames understated is the algae. Roughly a third of the set shows a dense fleshy canopy, brown, rust-red, and olive, draping whole bommie flanks and crests and in places burying the substratum between colonies (the frame Anderson himself named algal-choked is representative, not exceptional) (e.g., Image 1).

This is a defining feature of the site, not incidental turf. Community. Massive and knobby Porites dominate overwhelmingly, in every size from cobble-scale lobes to domes two meters across, along with columnar and finger-form Porites. But the earlier statement that there is essentially no branching framework here does not survive the full set. Tabular and corymbose Acropora recur throughout -- a meter-wide table growing off a bommie flank, several dinner-plate corymbose colonies wedged between Porites lobes, and two large bushy, finely branched Acropora-type colonies standing free on sand. Digitate and columnar corals in pale lilac, small encrusting and plating colonies (Montipora type, one distinctly green), and a scatter of cerioid massives fill in. Branching coral is subordinate to Porites but it is genuinely present and structurally conspicuous. A pink encrusting sponge or coralline and a tan barrel-form sponge occupy interstitial rock; a red whip-like organism rises from an algae-covered mound.

Coral cover

Coral cover 40% -- and 89.9% of hard coral tissue bleached (March-April 2024). Measured from 54 white-balanced photographs taken at this site during the 2024 Western Indian Ocean mass bleaching event and point-annotated in CoralNet, published in Mayfield, A.B. (2025) A Citizen Science Approach for Documenting Mass Coral Bleaching in the Western Indian Ocean. Environments 12(8):276. doi:10.3390/environments12080276. This is a published diver-photograph point-annotation value, not a computer vision estimate, and it is not recomputed here. Across the 20 Kenyan sites the mean was 30% coral cover and 77.1% of tissue bleached.

Stressors

Condition. Bleaching is severe and site-wide, entirely consistent with the published 89.9%. Whole wide frames read as fields of chalk-white, cream, and wan mint domes with only occasional pigmented colonies among them (e.g., Image 4).

Because these frames are color-adjusted, the strongest evidence is not absolute color but within-frame contrast and structure: one cream Porites dome retains a single discrete brown pigment patch on an otherwise uniformly whitened surface; several frames set fully pigmented ochre, tan, and orange-brown colonies immediately beside stark white ones under the same exposure; and the bleached surfaces show skeletal corallite texture reading straight through the tissue. Two large bushy branching colonies are bleached to a uniform white-lilac from base to branch tip. The pattern is a colony-by-colony mosaic rather than a total whiteout. Fully pigmented holdouts are more numerous than the published four frames suggested. At least four separate deep violet-purple corymbose Acropora colonies appear across the set, each sitting unbleached in an otherwise chalk-white Porites pavement -- so the vivid purple colony is a recurring feature of this reef, not a one-off (e.g., Image 2).

Several large Porites domes hold full orange-brown or ochre pigment, and a fully pigmented tan tabular Acropora sheltering a cloud of black-and-white humbug damselfish appears in two separate frames, confirming a note that had previously been questioned. Crown-of-thorns. One frame is a close-up of a large pale, mottled tabular Acropora with at least two crown-of-thorns seastars on and beside it -- purple-red bodies with long white-tipped spines, unmistakable at this magnification. This is the only frame in which they appear, and no crown-of-thorns are visible anywhere else in the set, so the photographs do not support an outbreak. The plate's pale mottling could be bleaching, feeding scars, or both; the frame does not separate them. The near-total whitening across the full 52-frame set is entirely consistent with that 89.9%. Typical recent thermal stress: mean annual maximum of 4.1 degree heating weeks (2021-2025, NOAA CRW; East African Coral Coast ecoregion). Also on record for this site: Nearly every massive coral was stark white or wan beige; the one striking holdout was a single staghorn thicket that stayed a defiant ochre, sheltering a cloud of humbug dascyllus. Seawater here measured 32.5°C during the survey (the Kenya survey-wide mean of 32.0°C matched the 1998 event), and NOAA recorded a peak of 13.5 degree-heating weeks on 18 April 2024, the highest for Kenya since records began in 1985. In situ temperatures ran 1.3°C above NOAA's estimates, so the true heat stress was likely nearer 22 DHWs.

Fish and other fauna

Other life. Sergeant majors are everywhere over the bleached mounds. Humbug damselfish in the pigmented Acropora tables, a blackspotted sweetlips along a bommie flank, a dark surgeonfish over the crest, a small orange wrasse in the bushy branching colonies, and two frames of a large school of yellow-striped, yellow-tailed fish (goatfish- or snapper-type) drifting over open sand off the reef edge.

Comparisons with other data

No independent survey was made at this exact site; the nearest ones are listed in the table below.

Dive record

Snorkeled 14 Mar 2024 at 1-3 m inside Mombasa Marine Park, during the 2024 Western Indian Ocean mass bleaching event. Surveys were run with Tropical Diving Kenya.

Other notes

This account replaces a four-frame pass: all 52 photographs from the site's edited set were opened and read across 5 contact sheets.

CV model comparison

Computer vision on this site's own photographs gives In-house DINOv3 point classifier 54%; CoralSCOP 23% — reported alongside rather than merged, because as of September 2026 no computer-vision method estimates coral cover accurately on new images.
Headline is the reference value; every other row is listed beside it for comparison and none is averaged in.
MethodHard-coral cover (%)
Manual (published)39.6
CoralNet39.6
In-house DINOv354.2
CoralSCOP unedited23.3

Independent surveys nearby

Data availability near this site
Agency / programYear(s)Stations / distanceLink
Global bleaching + environmental database20164 stations, 0.53–0.55 kmRecords ↓
Mangubhai et al. (2007)20031 station, 2.11 kmRecords ↓
McClanahan et al. (1996)19941 station, 3.90 kmRecords ↓
McClanahan et al. 201620161 station, 2.91 kmRecords ↓
WCS Kenya via MERMAID2009–202214 stations, 0.52–3.42 kmRecords ↓
Hard coral cover over time — this site and every independent station within 5 km. Programs are shown separately because they use different methods at different stations; the lines are not one comparable series.
0%15%30%45%60%199420092024McClanahan et al. (1996) 1994: 27%Mangubhai et al. (2007) 2003: 22%WCS Kenya via MERMAID 2009: 9.7%WCS Kenya via MERMAID 2009: 14%WCS Kenya via MERMAID 2009: 24%WCS Kenya via MERMAID 2010: 10%WCS Kenya via MERMAID 2010: 19%WCS Kenya via MERMAID 2013: 20%WCS Kenya via MERMAID 2016: 15%WCS Kenya via MERMAID 2016: 18%WCS Kenya via MERMAID 2016: 23%WCS Kenya via MERMAID 2017: 21%WCS Kenya via MERMAID 2017: 54%WCS Kenya via MERMAID 2022: 20%McClanahan et al. 2016 2016: 22%Global bleaching + environmental database 2016: 14%Global bleaching + environmental database 2016: 15%Global bleaching + environmental database 2016: 15%Global bleaching + environmental database 2016: 20%Dr. Coral (CRD) 2024: 40%Year-averaged across all programs: no detectable trend (+0.26 pp per year, not separable from zero; 9 years)
McClanahan et al. (1996) Mangubhai et al. (2007) WCS Kenya via MERMAID McClanahan et al. 2016 Global bleaching + environmental database Dr. Coral (CRD)Year-average (no detectable trend)

Within 5 km, 21 independent survey stations recorded hard coral cover in 72 records between 1994 and 2022. Of the 1 station surveyed in more than one year, 1 changed by less than 5 percentage points between their first and latest surveys. The longest record, Mombasa (WCS Kenya via MERMAID, 0.86 km away), went from 20% in 2013 to 20% in 2022. One survey since 2021 recorded 20%. This site's own estimate (40%) sits 20.1 points above the recent value (20%); the methods differ, so the comparison is context, not a like-for-like test.

Collected by other programs using different methods (MERMAID is a data platform: each MERMAID row names the organization that did the survey, and its method is in the row's hover text), so these are context for the figures above, not a like-for-like comparison. Where a station was surveyed more than once the range is shown. Station names are not dive-site names.

Show all 21 independent survey records
Independent survey data near this site
AgencySite / locationDateHard coral cover (%)DistanceLink
McClanahan et al. (1996)—199427%3.90 kmHeatCRD database
Mangubhai et al. (2007)Coral Gardens200322%2.11 kmHeatCRD database
WCS Kenya via MERMAIDMombasa Starfish200924% (2 images)0.86 kmDarling E. 2018. Kenya CRCP legacy. MERMAID
WCS Kenya via MERMAIDMombasa Braincoral200914% (6 images)3.07 kmDarling E. 2018. Kenya CRCP legacy. MERMAID
WCS Kenya via MERMAIDTaa200914% (2 images)3.10 kmDarling E. 2018. Kenya CRCP legacy. MERMAID
WCS Kenya via MERMAIDShark Point 220099.7% (6 images)3.42 kmDarling E. 2018. Kenya CRCP legacy. MERMAID
WCS Kenya via MERMAIDBamburi Wreck201010% (2 images)0.94 kmDarling E. 2018. Kenya CRCP legacy. MERMAID
WCS Kenya via MERMAIDKasa_Mombasa (mean of 4 surveys, 2009–2010)201019% (12 images)1.68 kmDarling E. 2018. Kenya CRCP legacy. MERMAID
WCS Kenya via MERMAIDMombasa2013–202220% (4 images)0.86 kmDarling E. 2018. Kenya CRCP legacy. MERMAID; Darling E, Kosgei J, McClanahan T, Muthiga N, Oddenyo R. 2022. Kenya-Marine Monitoring_2022. MERMAID
WCS Kenya via MERMAIDMombasa 3201615% (4 images)0.52 kmDarling E. 2018. Kenya CRCP legacy. MERMAID
WCS Kenya via MERMAIDMombasa 2201618% (4 images)0.54 kmDarling E. 2018. Kenya CRCP legacy. MERMAID
WCS Kenya via MERMAIDMombasa Coral Gardens 3201623% (2 images)0.86 kmDarling E. 2018. Kenya CRCP legacy. MERMAID
WCS Kenya via MERMAIDMombasa Coral Gardens 2201623% (2 images)0.86 kmDarling E. 2018. Kenya CRCP legacy. MERMAID
WCS Kenya via MERMAIDMombasa Mushroom (mean of 2 surveys, 2009–2016)201623% (4 images)2.29 kmDarling E. 2018. Kenya CRCP legacy. MERMAID
McClanahan et al. 2016RasIwatine (Kenya)201622%2.91 km—
Global bleaching + environmental databaseMombasa 32016-04-1015%0.53 km—
Global bleaching + environmental databaseMombasa 22016-04-1020%0.55 km—
Global bleaching + environmental databaseCoral gardens 3 (starfish)2016-05-1214%0.53 km—
Global bleaching + environmental databaseCoral gardens 22016-05-1215%0.55 km—
WCS Kenya via MERMAIDMombasa Coral Gardens (mean of 6 surveys, 2009–2017)201721% (12 images)0.86 kmDarling E. 2018. Kenya CRCP legacy. MERMAID
WCS Kenya via MERMAIDMombasa Green turtle201754% (3 images)1.68 kmDarling E. 2018. Kenya CRCP legacy. MERMAID

Data & links

All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from Coral Reef Diagnostics and the organizations named in the data-sources table above.

© Coral Reef Diagnostics.

References

  1. McClanahan TR, Kamukuru AT, Muthiga NA, Yebio MG, Obura D (1996). Effect of Sea Urchin Reductions on Algae, Coral, and Fish Populations. Conservation Biology 10:136-154. DOI
  2. Mangubhai S, Harrison P, Obura D (2007). Patterns of coral larval settlement on lagoon reefs in the Mombasa Marine National Park and Reserve, Kenya. Marine Ecology Progress Series 348:149-159. PDF
  3. Mayfield AB (2025). A Citizen Science Approach for Documenting Mass Coral Bleaching in the Western Indian Ocean. Environments 12:276. PDF