Coral Reef Diagnostics

Kenya - Lower Mpunguti-site 2 (Kisite National Park)

REEFolution Foundation
⬇ Download this page as a report card
05
Photo: Anderson Mayfield/Coral Reef Diagnostics
Country
Survey date(s)
2024-03-21
Coordinates
-4.6849, 39.3951
Coral cover
34%
Manual point count (27 photos) · other methods below
Coral bleached
82%
of hard coral tissue · Mayfield (2025), Environments 12:276
Observations
Heat stress
Most recent heat load record
26 Oct 2026 · No heat stress
5-year thermal stress load
5-year mean max. degree heating weeks (DHW)
2021–2025
NOAA Coral Reef Watch — Kenya virtual station
i 5-year mean max. DHW is the mean of the annual maximum DHWs over the five complete years named above, not conditions today.
More infoKenya (NOAA CRW virtual station)
Photographs
27
16 shown on this page
Site summary
Read this summary in:

Lower Mpunguti-site 2 is a densely covered reef flat where nearly everything was found bleached at once — continuous corymbose Acropora thickets gone bone-white to the branch tips, and even massive Porites domes (normally the growth form that holds on best) whitened over their entire surface. A mound of ruffled leather soft corals was found paling too, alongside two giant clams set into the rock. Published cover was 34%, with 82% of coral tissue bleached.

Water temp. during survey
32.1°C
(estimated from the TG7 underwater camera, not validated (Mayfield 2025, Environments 12:276, Table 1))

27 independent survey stations shown with the program’s logo — click one to see how far it is from this site.

Seven other CRD dive sites with their own pages within 5 km shown in orange — click a marker to open its page.

4 of the 16 photographs on this page are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.

5678910111213141516

Photo credit & attribution

Site description

Setting

The set is a shallow, sunlit reef flat, and most frames are shot straight down or at a low oblique onto it — sun banding is visible across the pavement in a third of them and there is no blue-water horizon anywhere in the sequence. Water is green-tinged and visibility moderate, well short of the clear blue at Coral Garden or Kisite site 4.

General benthic features

Frame by frame, this is a genuinely dense flat and an almost completely bleached one. The signature of the site is fine-branched corymbose Acropora growing as continuous multi-colony thickets rather than scattered heads: four consecutive frames near the end of the run are filled corner to corner with such thickets, every colony blanched to a uniform bone-white or pale lilac-white down to the branch tips, the individual rosettes still structurally intact with no algal overgrowth yet — recent bleaching, not old mortality (e.g., Image 4).

One frame is the best overhead record of the flat itself: near-total substrate occupancy, with mauve-purple foliose and encrusting plate colonies whose lobed margins have blanched white, yellow-green pocilloporid and small knobby colonies packed between them, coralline-crusted pavement filling the gaps — and at least two giant clams (Tridacna) set into the rock, the larger showing a thick, brilliant white fluted shell margin around a dark gape, a smaller one showing a green-mottled, apparently pigmented mantle (e.g., Image 1).

One frame stands apart. It is a low mound carpeted almost entirely in ruffled, cabbage-like leather soft corals (Sarcophyton/Lobophytum type) — dozens of colonies packed shoulder to shoulder across the whole rise, all a uniform pale cream-yellow rather than the usual olive-khaki — sitting over a dark rust-red algal turf, with small white branching Acropora dotted on the rock below (e.g., Image 3).

Algae are the other constant. Rust-red and olive fleshy fronds and dense filamentous green canopy blanket the pavement between coral stands in most frames, and one is almost nothing but that canopy over pale rock.

Coral cover

Stressors

In one of the four bone-white thicket frames a single small pinkish-brown pigmented colony sits in the middle of that white field and is the only colored thing in the frame. Another frame shows the same growth form at wider scale: several distinct corymbose and tabular stands separated by sand and turf channels, grading from olive-yellow (pigmented) through pale gray-lilac to white across a few meters of reef. The massive corals — normally the growth form that holds on — did not here. Two frames capture the same pair of large nodular Porites-type domes, each roughly a meter across, one chalk-white and the other pale lilac-pink, both whitened over the entire colony surface with no pigmented margin left, standing on sand and green turf. Another frame has a second such pair overhead: a cream-white ridged dome beside a very pale lavender colony with one small turf-covered dead patch; the dark lines across it are the valleys between its lobes (shading and sediment), not tissue loss. Further pale nodular domes recur in two frames. One frame is the exception and the most informative single image on pattern: a large olive-brown digitate Acropora bommie that has kept most of its pigment but carries a stark snow-white bleached patch across its crown — partial-colony bleaching within one stand, alongside a cream-tan massive dome and pale gray digitate colonies. Another frame repeats that mosaic with the pale lilac-white and cream colonies dominant and olive-brown patches surviving between them (e.g., Image 2).

Soft corals were paling here alongside the stony corals, and they are not counted in the hard coral figure. Typical recent thermal stress: mean annual maximum of 4.9 degree heating weeks (2021-2025, NOAA CRW; Kenya virtual station).

Fish and other fauna

Fish are sparse: a pair of sergeant majors over a bleached tabular colony in one frame, scattered damselfish, small dark fish working the thickets. No large aggregation, no turtle, no ray, no crown-of-thorns, and no lesion or band suggesting disease anywhere in the 27 frames reviewed.

Comparisons with other data

REEFolution Foundation surveyed a station named Lower Mpunguti, 0.59 km away. Within 5 km, 26 independent stations recorded hard coral cover between 2008 and 2024: ten by benthic survey, station-year means of 0.0–66%, and sixteen by MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats, station-year means of 18–56%; the nearest, REEFolution Foundation at Lower Mpunguti, 0.59 km away, read 0.0–8.0% between 2017 and 2019.

Dive record

Surveyed 21 Mar 2024 in Kisite-Mpunguti Marine Protected Area during the 2024 Western Indian Ocean mass bleaching event — the eighth and last reef of the Shimoni run, shot 22 minutes end to end immediately after the neighboring Lower Mpunguti site. Surveys were run with REEFolution.

CV model comparison

Computer-vision estimates from this site's own photographs are listed in the comparison table below, alongside the headline rather than merged into it.
Headline is the reference value; every other row is listed beside it for comparison and none is averaged in.
MethodHard coral cover (%)Photos (n) ± SE
Manual (published)34.2
CoralNet (published survey's own annotation)34.2n = 27
In-house DINOv342.6n = 27
CoralSCOP unedited16.9n = 27

The three computer-vision methods disagree by 25.7 pp (16.9–42.6%) and read on both sides of the manual point count (34.2%); the headline is the manual point count because a person's point count of the site's photographs is the reference the models are measured against.

Independent surveys nearby

Data availability near this site
Agency / programYear(s)Stations / distanceLink
McClanahan et al. (1996)19961 station, 4.79 kmRecords ↓
REEFolution Foundation2017–20239 stations, 0.59–4.91 kmRecords ↓
submitted to MERMAID by Kosgei J, Musembi P.* (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats)20242 stations, 2.86–4.89 kmRecords ↓
WCS Kenya / WCS Tanzania via MERMAID20201 station, 2.61 kmRecords ↓
WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats)2008–201914 stations, 2.26–4.53 kmRecords ↓
Hard coral cover over time — this site and every independent station within 5 km. Programs are shown separately because they use different methods at different stations; the lines are not one comparable series.
0%17%34%51%68%200820162024WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats) 2008: 37%WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats) 2009: 46%WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats) 2010: 56%WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats) 2011: 25%WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats) 2011: 25%WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats) 2012: 44%WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats) 2012: 44%WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats) 2013: 42%WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats) 2014: 25%WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats) 2015: 18%WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats) 2015: 20%WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats) 2015: 48%WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats) 2015: 52%WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats) 2016: 32%WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats) 2016: 47%WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats) 2016: 50%WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats) 2019: 24%WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats) 2019: 33%REEFolution Foundation 2017: 2.4%REEFolution Foundation 2017: 20%REEFolution Foundation 2017: 29%REEFolution Foundation 2017: 39%REEFolution Foundation 2017: 39%REEFolution Foundation 2018: 8.0%REEFolution Foundation 2018: 28%REEFolution Foundation 2018: 31%REEFolution Foundation 2018: 37%REEFolution Foundation 2018: 39%REEFolution Foundation 2018: 48%REEFolution Foundation 2018: 49%REEFolution Foundation 2018: 52%REEFolution Foundation 2018: 53%REEFolution Foundation 2019: 0.0%REEFolution Foundation 2019: 21%REEFolution Foundation 2019: 27%REEFolution Foundation 2019: 34%REEFolution Foundation 2019: 40%REEFolution Foundation 2019: 41%REEFolution Foundation 2019: 50%REEFolution Foundation 2019: 59%REEFolution Foundation 2020: 18%REEFolution Foundation 2020: 25%REEFolution Foundation 2021: 66%REEFolution Foundation 2022: 23%REEFolution Foundation 2022: 56%REEFolution Foundation 2023: 4.9%REEFolution Foundation 2023: 23%REEFolution Foundation 2023: 29%WCS Kenya / WCS Tanzania via MERMAID 2020: 29%submitted to MERMAID by Kosgei J, Musembi P.* (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats) 2024: 36%submitted to MERMAID by Kosgei J, Musembi P.* (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats) 2024: 55%Coral Reef Diagnostics 2024: 34%Year-averaged across all programs: illustrative only; the programs differ in stations and method, so no trend is claimed (8 years)
WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats) REEFolution Foundation WCS Kenya / WCS Tanzania via MERMAID submitted to MERMAID by Kosgei J, Musembi P.* (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats) Coral Reef DiagnosticsYear-average (illustrative only, programs differ; quadrats left out)

Within 5 km, 26 independent survey stations recorded hard coral cover in 164 surveys between 2008 and 2024. Of the 9 stations with benthic surveys in more than one year, 4 declined (by 2.4–23 points) and 5 increased (by 1.0–27 points) between their first and latest surveys. Three stations share the longest span (2018–2023); one, Kikuyu House (REEFolution Foundation, 2.92 km away), went from 31% in 2018 (mean of 9 surveys) to 23% in 2023 (mean of 2 surveys). With MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats, of the 3 stations surveyed in more than one year, 3 increased (by 3.0–9.0 points) between their first and latest surveys. Since 2021, station-year means excluding quadrats average 34% (range 4.9–66%; n = 6 station-years from 14 surveys). Quadrats since 2021 read 36–55% (n = 2 station-years). This site's own estimate (34%) sits 26.0 points above the range of these station-year means up to 2 km away (0.0–8.0%); the methods differ, so the comparison is context, not a like-for-like test. One further row in the table has no survey date, so it is listed but not part of this summary.

Collected by other programs using different methods (MERMAID is a data platform: each MERMAID row names the organization that did the survey, and its method is in the row's hover text. *Conducted by citizen scientists), so these are context for the figures above, not a like-for-like comparison. Where a station was surveyed more than once, the cell shows either the range of its values or, as a single value, the mean of surveys made in one year. Station names are not dive-site names.

Show all 164 independent surveys
Independent survey data near this site
AgencySite / locationDateHard coral cover (%)DistanceLink
McClanahan et al. (1996)Kisite Islandby 1996 (published)27% (2 records)4.79 kmdoi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1996.10010136.x
WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats)Kisite2008–200937–46% (2 surveys)4.13 kmDarling E. 2018. Kenya CRCP legacy. MERMAID
WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats)Kisite South of Site 1201056%3.84 kmDarling E. 2018. Kenya CRCP legacy. MERMAID
WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats)Waga201125%3.95 kmDarling E. 2018. Kenya CRCP legacy. MERMAID
WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats)Waga 2201125%3.95 kmDarling E. 2018. Kenya CRCP legacy. MERMAID
WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats)Kisite 12012–201644–48% (3 surveys)4.13 kmDarling E. 2018. Kenya CRCP legacy. MERMAID
WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats)Kisite 22012–201544–52% (2 surveys)4.53 kmDarling E. 2018. Kenya CRCP legacy. MERMAID
WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats)Kisite Edge 1201342%4.03 kmDarling E. 2018. Kenya CRCP legacy. MERMAID
WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats)Jiwe la kale East201425%2.77 kmDarling E. 2018. Kenya CRCP legacy. MERMAID
WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats)Mji wa Kale 2 (Mkwiro)201520%2.85 kmDarling E. 2018. Kenya CRCP legacy. MERMAID
WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats)Mji wa Kale 1 (Mkwiro)201518%2.97 kmDarling E. 2018. Kenya CRCP legacy. MERMAID
WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats)Mpunguti201632%2.26 kmDarling E. 2018. Kenya CRCP legacy. MERMAID
WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats)Kisite corner201650%4.03 kmDarling E. 2018. Kenya CRCP legacy. MERMAID
REEFolution FoundationLower Mpunguti2017–20190.0–8.0% (range of yearly means; 15 surveys)0.59 km2023. REEFolution Kenya. MERMAID
REEFolution FoundationDolphin Point2017–201920–41% (range of yearly means; 14 surveys)3.13 km2023. REEFolution Kenya. MERMAID
REEFolution FoundationOuter Kisite2017–201939–53% (range of yearly means; 13 surveys)3.80 km2023. REEFolution Kenya. MERMAID
REEFolution FoundationHouse Reef Firefly2017–202139–66% (range of yearly means; 21 surveys)3.88 km2023. REEFolution Kenya. MERMAID
REEFolution FoundationKisite 22017–201829–48% (range of yearly means; 3 surveys)4.53 km2023. REEFolution Kenya. MERMAID
REEFolution FoundationKikuyu House2018–202323–31% (range of yearly means; 24 surveys)2.92 km2023. REEFolution Kenya. MERMAID
REEFolution FoundationMkwiro CMA2018–202329–37% (range of yearly means; 7 surveys)2.97 km2023. REEFolution Kenya. MERMAID
REEFolution FoundationPilli Pipa Restaurant2018–20234.9–56% (range of yearly means; 31 surveys)3.38 km2023. REEFolution Kenya. MERMAID
REEFolution FoundationWasini Tengefu2018–201952–59% (range of yearly means; 15 surveys)4.91 km2023. REEFolution Kenya. MERMAID
WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats)Mji wa Kale 2 (Mkwiro)201924%2.85 kmDarling E, Kosgei J, McClanahan T, Muthiga N. 2019. Kenya MACMON 2016-17. MERMAID
WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats)Mji wa Kale 1 (Mkwiro)201933%2.97 kmDarling E, Kosgei J, McClanahan T, Muthiga N. 2019. Kenya MACMON 2016-17. MERMAID
WCS Kenya / WCS Tanzania via MERMAIDMkwiro202029%2.61 kmDarling E, Mensa J, O'Leary J, Schwarz A. 2020. BAF 1 - 2020. MERMAID
submitted to MERMAID by Kosgei J, Musembi P.* (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats)Mji wa Kale 1 (Mkwiro)202436%2.86 kmKosgei J, Musembi P. 2024. KenyaBleachingSurveys_2024. MERMAID
submitted to MERMAID by Kosgei J, Musembi P.* (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats)Wasini202455%4.89 kmKosgei J, Musembi P. 2024. KenyaBleachingSurveys_2024. MERMAID

Data & links

All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from Coral Reef Diagnostics and the organizations named in the data sources above.

© Coral Reef Diagnostics.

References

  1. Mayfield AB (2025). A Citizen Science Approach for Documenting Mass Coral Bleaching in the Western Indian Ocean. Environments 12:276. PDF
  2. McClanahan TR, Kamukuru AT, Muthiga NA, Yebio MG, Obura D (1996). Effect of Sea Urchin Reductions on Algae, Coral, and Fish Populations. Conservation Biology 10:136-154. DOI