Coral Reef Diagnostics

Kenya - Lower Mpunguti-site 2 (Kisite National Park)

REEFolution Foundation
⬇ Download this page as a report card
05
Photo: Anderson Mayfield/Coral Reef Diagnostics
Country
Survey date(s)
2024-03-21
Coordinates
-4.6849, 39.3951
Coral cover
34%
Manual point count (27 photos) · other methods below
Observations
Heat stress
Today’s heat load
16 Sep 2026 · No heat stress
5-year thermal stress load
5-year mean max. degree heating weeks (DHW)
2021–2025
NOAA Coral Reef Watch — Kenya virtual station
i 5-year mean max. DHW is the mean of the annual maximum DHWs over the five complete years named above, not conditions today.
More infoKenya (NOAA CRW virtual station) · East African Coral Coast ecoregion mean=4.1°C-heating weeks
Photographs
4
Site summary
Read this summary in:

Lower Mpunguti-site 2 is a densely covered reef flat where nearly everything was found bleached at once - continuous corymbose Acropora thickets gone bone-white to the branch tips, and even massive Porites domes (normally the growth form that holds on best) whitened over their entire surface. A mound of ruffled leather soft corals was found paling too, alongside two giant clams set into the rock. Published cover was 34%, above the Kenya-wide average, with 81.9% of coral tissue bleached, also above the 77.1% survey mean.

Max. depth dived
0.5 m
Water temp. during survey
32.1°C
+3.9°C vs the 2024 mean sea temperature (28.2°C)

25 independent survey stations shown with the program’s logo — click one to see how far it is from this site.

Seven other CRD dive sites within 5 km shown in orange — click a marker to open its page.

Photo credit & attribution

Site description

Setting

The set is a shallow, sunlit reef flat, and most frames are shot straight down or at a low oblique onto it -- sun banding is visible across the pavement in a third of them and there is no blue-water horizon anywhere in the sequence. Water is green-tinged and visibility moderate, well short of the clear blue at Coral Garden or Kisite site 4.

General benthic features

Frame by frame, this is a genuinely dense flat and an almost completely bleached one. The signature of the site is fine-branched corymbose Acropora growing as continuous multi-colony thickets rather than scattered heads: four consecutive frames near the end of the run are filled corner to corner with such thickets, every colony blanched to a uniform bone-white or pale lilac-white down to the branch tips, the individual rosettes still structurally intact with no algal overgrowth yet -- recent bleaching, not old mortality (e.g., Image 4).

One frame is the best overhead record of the flat itself: near-total substrate occupancy, with mauve-purple foliose and encrusting plate colonies whose lobed margins have blanched white, yellow-green pocilloporid and small knobby colonies packed between them, coralline-crusted pavement filling the gaps -- and at least two giant clams (Tridacna) set into the rock, the larger showing a thick, brilliant white fluted shell margin around a dark gape, a smaller one showing a green-mottled, apparently pigmented mantle (e.g., Image 1).

One frame stands apart. It is a low mound carpeted almost entirely in ruffled, cabbage-like leather soft corals (Sarcophyton/Lobophytum type) -- dozens of colonies packed shoulder to shoulder across the whole rise, all a uniform pale cream-yellow rather than the usual olive-khaki -- sitting over a dark rust-red algal turf, with small white branching Acropora dotted on the rock below (e.g., Image 3).

Algae are the other constant. Rust-red and olive fleshy fronds and dense filamentous green canopy blanket the pavement between coral stands in most frames, and one is almost nothing but that canopy over pale rock.

Coral cover

Coral cover 34% -- and 81.9% of hard coral tissue bleached (March-April 2024). Measured from 27 white-balanced photographs taken at this site during the 2024 Western Indian Ocean mass bleaching event and point-annotated in CoralNet, published in Mayfield, A.B. (2025) A Citizen Science Approach for Documenting Mass Coral Bleaching in the Western Indian Ocean. Environments 12(8):276. doi:10.3390/environments12080276. This is a published diver-photograph point-annotation value, not a computer vision estimate. Across the 20 Kenyan sites the mean was 30% coral cover and 77.1% of tissue bleached, so this reef held above-average structure while bleaching above the survey average. The full photographic set is consistent with that: the flat is well covered, and nearly everything on it is white.

Stressors

In one of them a single small pinkish-brown pigmented colony sits in the middle of that white field and is the only colored thing in the frame. Another frame shows the same growth form at wider scale: several distinct corymbose and tabular stands separated by sand and turf channels, grading from olive-yellow (pigmented) through pale gray-lilac to white across a few meters of reef. The massive corals -- normally the growth form that holds on -- did not here. Two frames capture the same pair of large nodular Porites-type domes, each roughly a meter across, one chalk-white and the other pale lilac-pink, both whitened over the entire colony surface with no pigmented margin left, standing on sand and green turf. Another frame has a second such pair overhead: a cream-white ridged dome beside a pale lavender one whose meandering valleys have gone dark where turf has taken the skeleton, the clearest tissue-loss signal in the set. Further pale nodular domes recur in two frames. One frame is the exception and the most informative single image on pattern: a large olive-brown digitate Acropora bommie that has kept most of its pigment but carries a stark snow-white bleached patch across its crown -- partial-colony bleaching within one stand, alongside a cream-tan massive dome and pale gray digitate colonies. Another frame repeats that mosaic with the pale lilac-white and cream colonies dominant and olive-brown patches surviving between them (e.g., Image 2).

Soft corals were paling here alongside the stony corals, and they are not counted in the hard coral figure. Typical recent thermal stress: mean annual maximum of 4.1 degree heating weeks (2021-2025, NOAA CRW; East African Coral Coast ecoregion).

Fish and other fauna

Fish are sparse: a pair of sergeant majors over a bleached tabular colony in one frame, scattered damselfish, small dark fish working the thickets. No large aggregation, no turtle, no ray, no crown-of-thorns, and no lesion or band suggesting disease anywhere in the 27 frames reviewed.

Comparisons with other data

No independent survey was made at this exact site; the nearest ones are listed in the table below.

Dive record

Surveyed 21 Mar 2024 in Kisite-Mpunguti Marine Protected Area during the 2024 Western Indian Ocean mass bleaching event -- the eighth and last reef of the Shimoni run, shot 22 minutes end to end immediately after the neighboring Lower Mpunguti site (camera clock 19:55-20:17 UTC, a continuous roll). Surveys were run with REEFolution.

Other notes

This account is written from all 27 in-water frames, not a four-frame select.

CV model comparison

Computer vision on this site's own photographs gives In-house DINOv3 point classifier 43%; CoralSCOP 17% — reported alongside rather than merged, because as of September 2026 no computer-vision method estimates coral cover accurately on new images.
Headline is the reference value; every other row is listed beside it for comparison and none is averaged in.
MethodHard-coral cover (%)
Manual (published)34.2
CoralNet34.2
In-house DINOv342.6
CoralSCOP unedited16.9

Independent surveys nearby

Data availability near this site
Agency / programYear(s)Stations / distanceLink
McClanahan et al. (1996)19961 station, 4.79 kmRecords ↓
MERMAID project “KenyaBleachingSurveys_2024”*20241 station, 2.86 kmRecords ↓
REEFolution Foundation2017–202310 stations, 0.59–4.91 kmRecords ↓
WCS Kenya / WCS Tanzania via MERMAID20201 station, 2.61 kmRecords ↓
WCS Kenya via MERMAID2009–201912 stations, 2.26–4.53 kmRecords ↓
Hard coral cover over time — this site and every independent station within 5 km. Programs are shown separately because they use different methods at different stations; the lines are not one comparable series.
0%17%34%51%68%199620102024McClanahan et al. (1996) 1996: 27%WCS Kenya via MERMAID 2009: 42%WCS Kenya via MERMAID 2010: 56%WCS Kenya via MERMAID 2011: 25%WCS Kenya via MERMAID 2013: 42%WCS Kenya via MERMAID 2014: 25%WCS Kenya via MERMAID 2015: 48%WCS Kenya via MERMAID 2016: 32%WCS Kenya via MERMAID 2016: 46%WCS Kenya via MERMAID 2016: 50%WCS Kenya via MERMAID 2019: 22%WCS Kenya via MERMAID 2019: 26%REEFolution Foundation 2017: 2.4%REEFolution Foundation 2017: 20%REEFolution Foundation 2017: 29%REEFolution Foundation 2017: 39%REEFolution Foundation 2018: 8.0%REEFolution Foundation 2018: 28%REEFolution Foundation 2018: 32%REEFolution Foundation 2018: 37%REEFolution Foundation 2018: 39%REEFolution Foundation 2018: 48%REEFolution Foundation 2018: 49%REEFolution Foundation 2018: 52%REEFolution Foundation 2018: 53%REEFolution Foundation 2019: 0.0%REEFolution Foundation 2019: 7.1%REEFolution Foundation 2019: 21%REEFolution Foundation 2019: 27%REEFolution Foundation 2019: 34%REEFolution Foundation 2019: 40%REEFolution Foundation 2019: 42%REEFolution Foundation 2019: 50%REEFolution Foundation 2019: 59%REEFolution Foundation 2020: 18%REEFolution Foundation 2020: 25%REEFolution Foundation 2021: 66%REEFolution Foundation 2022: 23%REEFolution Foundation 2022: 56%REEFolution Foundation 2023: 4.9%REEFolution Foundation 2023: 23%REEFolution Foundation 2023: 29%WCS Kenya / WCS Tanzania via MERMAID 2020: 29%MERMAID project “KenyaBleachingSurveys_2024”* 2024: 36%Dr. Coral (CRD) 2024: 34%Year-averaged across all programs: no detectable trend (+0.06 pp per year, not separable from zero; 16 years)
McClanahan et al. (1996) WCS Kenya via MERMAID REEFolution Foundation WCS Kenya / WCS Tanzania via MERMAID MERMAID project “KenyaBleachingSurveys_2024”* Dr. Coral (CRD)Year-average (no detectable trend)

Within 5 km, 25 independent survey stations recorded hard coral cover in 202 records between 1996 and 2024. Of the 9 stations surveyed in more than one year, 3 declined, 4 increased, and 2 changed by less than 5 percentage points between their first and latest surveys. The longest record, Kikuyu House (REEFolution Foundation, 2.92 km away), went from 32% in 2018 to 23% in 2023. Surveys since 2021 average 34% (range 4.9–66%, n=7). This site's own estimate (34%) sits within the recent range (4.9–66%); the methods differ, so the comparison is context, not a like-for-like test.

Collected by other programs using different methods (MERMAID is a data platform: each MERMAID row names the organization that did the survey, and its method is in the row's hover text. *Conducted by citizen scientists), so these are context for the figures above, not a like-for-like comparison. Where a station was surveyed more than once the range is shown. Station names are not dive-site names.

Show all 26 independent survey records
Independent survey data near this site
AgencySite / locationDateHard coral cover (%)DistanceLink
McClanahan et al. (1996)Kisite Island199627% (2 surveys)4.79 kmHeatCRD database
WCS Kenya via MERMAIDKisite (mean of 2 surveys, 2008–2009)200942% (4 images)4.13 kmDarling E. 2018. Kenya CRCP legacy. MERMAID
WCS Kenya via MERMAIDKisite South of Site 1201056% (2 images)3.84 kmDarling E. 2018. Kenya CRCP legacy. MERMAID
WCS Kenya via MERMAIDWaga201125% (2 images)3.95 kmDarling E. 2018. Kenya CRCP legacy. MERMAID
WCS Kenya via MERMAIDWaga 2201125% (2 images)3.95 kmDarling E. 2018. Kenya CRCP legacy. MERMAID
WCS Kenya via MERMAIDKisite Edge 1201342% (2 images)4.03 kmDarling E. 2018. Kenya CRCP legacy. MERMAID
WCS Kenya via MERMAIDJiwe la kale East201425% (2 images)2.77 kmDarling E. 2018. Kenya CRCP legacy. MERMAID
WCS Kenya via MERMAIDKisite 2 (mean of 2 surveys, 2012–2015)201548% (4 images)4.53 kmDarling E. 2018. Kenya CRCP legacy. MERMAID
WCS Kenya via MERMAIDMpunguti201632% (3 images)2.26 kmDarling E. 2018. Kenya CRCP legacy. MERMAID
WCS Kenya via MERMAIDKisite corner201650% (2 images)4.03 kmDarling E. 2018. Kenya CRCP legacy. MERMAID
WCS Kenya via MERMAIDKisite 1 (mean of 3 surveys, 2012–2016)201646% (6 images)4.13 kmDarling E. 2018. Kenya CRCP legacy. MERMAID
REEFolution FoundationLower Mpunguti2017–20190.0–8.0% (15 surveys)0.59 km2023. REEFolution Kenya. MERMAID
REEFolution FoundationDolphin Point2017–201920–42% (14 surveys)3.13 km2023. REEFolution Kenya. MERMAID
REEFolution FoundationOuter Kisite2017–201939–53% (13 surveys)3.80 km2023. REEFolution Kenya. MERMAID
REEFolution FoundationHouse Reef Firefly2017–202139–66% (21 surveys)3.88 km2023. REEFolution Kenya. MERMAID
REEFolution FoundationKisite 22017–201829–48% (3 surveys)4.53 km2023. REEFolution Kenya. MERMAID
REEFolution FoundationKikuyu House2018–202323–32% (24 surveys)2.92 km2023. REEFolution Kenya. MERMAID
REEFolution FoundationMkwiro CMA2018–202329–37% (7 surveys)2.97 km2023. REEFolution Kenya. MERMAID
REEFolution FoundationPilli Pipa Restaurant2018–20234.9–56% (31 surveys)3.38 km2023. REEFolution Kenya. MERMAID
REEFolution FoundationWasini Tengefu2018–201952–59% (15 surveys)4.91 km2023. REEFolution Kenya. MERMAID
REEFolution FoundationLower Mpunguti (mean of 15 surveys, 2017–2019)20197.1% (15 surveys)0.59 km2023. REEFolution Kenya. MERMAID
WCS Kenya via MERMAIDMji wa Kale 2 (Mkwiro) (mean of 2 surveys, 2015–2019)201922% (4 images)2.85 kmDarling E, Kosgei J, McClanahan T, Muthiga N. 2019. Kenya MACMON 2016-17. MERMAID
WCS Kenya via MERMAIDMji wa Kale 1 (Mkwiro) (mean of 2 surveys, 2015–2019)201926% (4 images)2.97 kmDarling E, Kosgei J, McClanahan T, Muthiga N. 2019. Kenya MACMON 2016-17. MERMAID
WCS Kenya / WCS Tanzania via MERMAIDMkwiro202029% (3 surveys)2.61 kmDarling E, Mensa J, O'Leary J, Schwarz A. 2020. BAF 1 - 2020. MERMAID
MERMAID project “KenyaBleachingSurveys_2024”*Mji wa Kale 1 (Mkwiro)202436% (2 images)2.86 kmKosgei J, Musembi P. 2024. KenyaBleachingSurveys_2024. MERMAID
not named in MERMAIDproject not stated2026——REEFolution Foundation. MERMAID project “REEFolution Kenya”. datamermaid.org, accessed 10 Sep 2026

Data & links

All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from Coral Reef Diagnostics and the organizations named in the data-sources table above.

© Coral Reef Diagnostics.

References

  1. McClanahan TR, Kamukuru AT, Muthiga NA, Yebio MG, Obura D (1996). Effect of Sea Urchin Reductions on Algae, Coral, and Fish Populations. Conservation Biology 10:136-154. DOI
  2. Mayfield AB (2025). A Citizen Science Approach for Documenting Mass Coral Bleaching in the Western Indian Ocean. Environments 12:276. PDF