Coral Reef Diagnostics

Kenya - Lower Mpunguti-site 1 (Kisite National Park)

REEFolution Foundation
⬇ Download this page as a report card
05
Photo: Anderson Mayfield/Coral Reef Diagnostics
Country
Survey date(s)
2024-03-21
Coordinates
-4.6884, 39.4034
Coral cover
18%
Manual point count (36 photos) · other methods below
Observations
Heat stress
Today’s heat load
16 Sep 2026 · No heat stress
5-year thermal stress load
5-year mean max. degree heating weeks (DHW)
2021–2025
NOAA Coral Reef Watch — Kenya virtual station
i 5-year mean max. DHW is the mean of the annual maximum DHWs over the five complete years named above, not conditions today.
More infoKenya (NOAA CRW virtual station) · East African Coral Coast ecoregion mean=4.1°C-heating weeks
Photographs
4
Site summary
Read this summary in:

Lower Mpunguti-site 1 has the lowest coral cover of the Kisite-Mpunguti pins (18.1%) because coral here sits as isolated colonies embedded in a thick carpet of fleshy macroalgae rather than as a continuous framework. Branching and massive corals took the worst bleaching (79.7% of tissue overall), while golden-olive Turbinaria bowl corals were the clear survivors, holding full pigment throughout; three sea anemones with tentacles blanched snow-white above deep crimson columns were also documented here, alongside unbleached giant clams and a blue-spotted ribbontail ray.

Max. depth dived
5 m
Water temp. during survey
31.9°C
+3.8°C vs the 2024 mean sea temperature (28.1°C)

23 independent survey stations shown with the program’s logo — click one to see how far it is from this site.

Six other CRD dive sites within 5 km shown in orange — click a marker to open its page.

Photo credit & attribution

Site description

General benthic features

The loudest signal in the set is still algae, not bleaching, and the full run makes the case far more strongly than the four published frames did. Fleshy macroalgae -- rust-red and olive foliose fronds, brown Sargassum- and Dictyota-like blades, and green Halimeda-type tufts -- blanket the hardground in nearly every wide frame. Anderson named two frames for it outright: one is a reef mound almost wholly upholstered in weed with only two white coral heads showing through, and the other is a single bleached branching colony ringed and half-buried by canopy (e.g., Image 3, Image 4).

Coral here is not a framework; it is isolated colonies set into an algal carpet, which reads as the physical expression of the site's 18% cover -- the lowest of the Kisite-Mpunguti pins.

Coral cover

Coral cover 18% -- and 79.7% of hard coral tissue bleached (March-April 2024). Measured from 36 white-balanced photographs taken at this site during the 2024 Western Indian Ocean mass bleaching event and point-annotated in CoralNet, published in Mayfield, A.B. (2025) A Citizen Science Approach for Documenting Mass Coral Bleaching in the Western Indian Ocean. Environments 12(8):276. doi:10.3390/environments12080276. This is a published diver-photograph point-annotation value, not a computer vision estimate. Across the 20 Kenyan sites the mean was 30% coral cover and 77.1% of tissue bleached; this was among the sparsest sites of the survey.

Stressors

Bleaching is extensive but not uniform, and it sorts by growth form. Branching and corymbose Acropora are the worst hit: stark bone-white thickets in six frames (one a broad fine-branched stand gone entirely white, with a second white colony below it), with a few colonies tinged pale lilac-blue rather than pure white in two others. Massive and domed colonies are close behind: chalk-white domes with dark fissures in two frames, a bone-white knobby columnar colony standing proud of the reef with a crinoid at its base in another, and a cluster of white massives over sand in a fourth (e.g., Image 1).

Anderson's own named frames add two more: one is a pale cream Astreopora dome set in macroalgae, and the other is a white-to-pale-gray digitate finger Porites colony ringed by weed. One frame is a mauve-pink encrusting mass -- the intermediate paling tone rather than full white -- and another is a pale blue-gray meandroid brain coral with its valleys still sharply defined, emerging from a thicket of brown fronds. The last frame of the dive is a large smooth-lobed chalk-white mass on the sand, most consistent with a bleached leather soft coral (Sarcophyton-type); a pale sponge cannot be excluded from the frame alone. Against that, the foliose cup and plate corals are the clear survivors, and the full set turns what the earlier pass called a single refugium into a repeated pattern. Turbinaria-type bowls appear fully pigmented golden-olive to tan in four frames, including a top-down stack of tiered bowls with fine concentric growth lines and a large healthy cabbage-form colony -- and one of them confirms what the earlier description had only inferred, showing a small pufferfish tucked down inside the bowl (e.g., Image 2).

Two frames are broad tan-brown foliose plates whose only whitening is a narrow band along the growing margin, which on these color-adjusted frames could as easily be the normal pale growth edge as a bleaching front. The one foliose colony that does look genuinely bleached is a large stacked whorl-form plate gone uniformly pale cream on an algal ridge. One frame places a bleached white Acropora directly against a large tan barrel sponge on the rubble. Typical recent thermal stress: mean annual maximum of 4.1 degree heating weeks (2021-2025, NOAA CRW; East African Coral Coast ecoregion). Seawater here measured 31.9°C during the survey (the Kenya survey-wide mean of 32.0°C matched the 1998 event), and NOAA recorded a peak of 13.5 degree-heating weeks on 18 April 2024, the highest for Kenya since records began in 1985. In situ temperatures ran 1.3 degrees C above NOAA's estimates, so the true heat stress was likely nearer 22 DHWs. No crown-of-thorns starfish (COTS) or other corallivores evident.

Fish and other fauna

The fauna in the wider set is richer than the published subset showed, and several of it settles earlier open questions. One frame, which Anderson himself labeled a bleached anemone, shows three magnificent sea anemones with tentacles blanched snow-white above deep crimson-magenta columns, packed together on the rock; this is the frame the site record had described for years without any published image to stand behind it. Another puts a blue-spotted ribbontail ray under a ledge on clean sand beside pale coral heads. One frame shows two giant clams (Tridacna) side by side with fluted mantles still patterned brown-gold and olive, no whitening, among crinoids and orange encrusting sponge. Another is a red-and-white striped squirrelfish resting against a bone-white dome, and a third an orange encrusting sponge worked over by small damselfish. Two more frames are views of a pale mauve-white sea cucumber on the sand, and another a sand channel beneath an algal-crusted overhang with almost no coral in it.

Comparisons with other data

No independent survey was made at this exact site; the nearest ones are listed in the table below.

Dive record

Dived 21 Mar 2024 at about 5 m off Lower Mpunguti in Kisite Marine National Park, during the 2024 Western Indian Ocean mass bleaching event. EXIF on the full set dates every frame to 21 March 2024 and brackets the photographic run between 13:20:04 and 13:35:14 -- a tight fifteen-minute sequence of 34 frames, essentially contiguous in camera numbering. Surveys were run with REEFolution.

CV model comparison

Computer vision on this site's own photographs gives Manual point count, recomputed on the CV frames only 20%; In-house DINOv3 point classifier 37%; CoralSCOP 21% — reported alongside rather than merged, because as of September 2026 no computer-vision method estimates coral cover accurately on new images.
Headline is the reference value; every other row is listed beside it for comparison and none is averaged in. ⚠ The published manual column and the four CV columns are on DIFFERENT FRAME SETS: the manual covers the site's full photo set (21–375 frames), the CV arms ran only on the 50-frame blind batch, which supplies 1–24 frames per site.
More infoThe like-for-like row is the recomputed manual, not the published one. ⚠ The CV columns are on the OLD all-30 denominator while the published manual is on the settled rule; on these frames that understates cover by ~3.0 pp. The 50-frame batch is 6.3 pp poorer in cover than the survey average, so the CV columns are subset-distorted as well as denominator-shifted. Round Reef and Uyombo roll up 15 and 16 quadrat codes respectively. CoralSCOP (SAM-based mask-sum), edited photos: n/a — CoralSCOP was never run on Kenya edited copies; owner's ruling 2026-09-17: 'for kenya, it's only on unedited'
MethodHard-coral cover (%)
Manual (published)18.1
CoralNet17.1
In-house DINOv337.3
CoralSCOP unedited20.5
Claude16.7

Independent surveys nearby

Data availability near this site
Agency / programYear(s)Stations / distanceLink
Kenyan reef survey compilation (source not identified)—1 station, 1.62 kmRecords ↓
MERMAID project “KenyaBleachingSurveys_2024”*20241 station, 3.49 kmRecords ↓
REEFolution Foundation2017–20239 stations, 0.69–4.94 kmRecords ↓
WCS Kenya / WCS Tanzania via MERMAID20201 station, 2.09 kmRecords ↓
WCS Kenya via MERMAID2009–201912 stations, 1.45–4.94 kmRecords ↓
Hard coral cover over time — this site and every independent station within 5 km. Programs are shown separately because they use different methods at different stations; the lines are not one comparable series.
0%17%34%51%68%200920162024WCS Kenya via MERMAID 2009: 42%WCS Kenya via MERMAID 2010: 56%WCS Kenya via MERMAID 2011: 25%WCS Kenya via MERMAID 2013: 42%WCS Kenya via MERMAID 2014: 25%WCS Kenya via MERMAID 2015: 48%WCS Kenya via MERMAID 2016: 32%WCS Kenya via MERMAID 2016: 46%WCS Kenya via MERMAID 2016: 50%WCS Kenya via MERMAID 2019: 22%WCS Kenya via MERMAID 2019: 26%REEFolution Foundation 2017: 2.4%REEFolution Foundation 2017: 20%REEFolution Foundation 2017: 29%REEFolution Foundation 2017: 39%REEFolution Foundation 2018: 8.0%REEFolution Foundation 2018: 28%REEFolution Foundation 2018: 32%REEFolution Foundation 2018: 37%REEFolution Foundation 2018: 39%REEFolution Foundation 2018: 48%REEFolution Foundation 2018: 49%REEFolution Foundation 2018: 53%REEFolution Foundation 2019: 0.0%REEFolution Foundation 2019: 7.1%REEFolution Foundation 2019: 21%REEFolution Foundation 2019: 27%REEFolution Foundation 2019: 34%REEFolution Foundation 2019: 40%REEFolution Foundation 2019: 42%REEFolution Foundation 2019: 50%REEFolution Foundation 2020: 18%REEFolution Foundation 2020: 25%REEFolution Foundation 2021: 66%REEFolution Foundation 2022: 23%REEFolution Foundation 2022: 56%REEFolution Foundation 2023: 4.9%REEFolution Foundation 2023: 23%REEFolution Foundation 2023: 29%WCS Kenya / WCS Tanzania via MERMAID 2020: 29%MERMAID project “KenyaBleachingSurveys_2024”* 2024: 36%Dr. Coral (CRD) 2024: 18%Year-averaged across all programs: no detectable trend (-0.70 pp per year, not separable from zero; 15 years)
WCS Kenya via MERMAID REEFolution Foundation WCS Kenya / WCS Tanzania via MERMAID MERMAID project “KenyaBleachingSurveys_2024”* Dr. Coral (CRD)Year-average (no detectable trend)

Within 5 km, 23 independent survey stations recorded hard coral cover in 185 records between 2009 and 2024. Of the 8 stations surveyed in more than one year, 3 declined, 3 increased, and 2 changed by less than 5 percentage points between their first and latest surveys. The longest record, Kikuyu House (REEFolution Foundation, 3.63 km away), went from 32% in 2018 to 23% in 2023. Surveys since 2021 average 34% (range 4.9–66%, n=7). This site's own estimate (18%) sits within the recent range (4.9–66%); the methods differ, so the comparison is context, not a like-for-like test. One further row in the table has no survey date, so it is listed but not part of this summary.

Collected by other programs using different methods (MERMAID is a data platform: each MERMAID row names the organization that did the survey, and its method is in the row's hover text. *Conducted by citizen scientists), so these are context for the figures above, not a like-for-like comparison. Where a station was surveyed more than once the range is shown. Station names are not dive-site names.

Show all 24 independent survey records
Independent survey data near this site
AgencySite / locationDateHard coral cover (%)DistanceLink
WCS Kenya via MERMAIDKisite (mean of 2 surveys, 2008–2009)200942% (4 images)4.46 kmDarling E. 2018. Kenya CRCP legacy. MERMAID
WCS Kenya via MERMAIDKisite South of Site 1201056% (2 images)4.32 kmDarling E. 2018. Kenya CRCP legacy. MERMAID
WCS Kenya via MERMAIDWaga201125% (2 images)4.45 kmDarling E. 2018. Kenya CRCP legacy. MERMAID
WCS Kenya via MERMAIDWaga 2201125% (2 images)4.45 kmDarling E. 2018. Kenya CRCP legacy. MERMAID
WCS Kenya via MERMAIDKisite Edge 1201342% (2 images)4.14 kmDarling E. 2018. Kenya CRCP legacy. MERMAID
WCS Kenya via MERMAIDJiwe la kale East201425% (2 images)3.43 kmDarling E. 2018. Kenya CRCP legacy. MERMAID
WCS Kenya via MERMAIDKisite 2 (mean of 2 surveys, 2012–2015)201548% (4 images)4.94 kmDarling E. 2018. Kenya CRCP legacy. MERMAID
WCS Kenya via MERMAIDMpunguti201632% (3 images)1.45 kmDarling E. 2018. Kenya CRCP legacy. MERMAID
WCS Kenya via MERMAIDKisite corner201650% (2 images)4.14 kmDarling E. 2018. Kenya CRCP legacy. MERMAID
WCS Kenya via MERMAIDKisite 1 (mean of 3 surveys, 2012–2016)201646% (6 images)4.46 kmDarling E. 2018. Kenya CRCP legacy. MERMAID
REEFolution FoundationLower Mpunguti2017–20190.0–8.0% (15 surveys)0.69 km2023. REEFolution Kenya. MERMAID
REEFolution FoundationDolphin Point2017–201920–42% (14 surveys)2.36 km2023. REEFolution Kenya. MERMAID
REEFolution FoundationOuter Kisite2017–201939–53% (13 surveys)4.01 km2023. REEFolution Kenya. MERMAID
REEFolution FoundationHouse Reef Firefly2017–202139–66% (21 surveys)4.50 km2023. REEFolution Kenya. MERMAID
REEFolution FoundationKisite 22017–201829–48% (3 surveys)4.94 km2023. REEFolution Kenya. MERMAID
REEFolution FoundationMkwiro CMA2018–202329–37% (7 surveys)3.52 km2023. REEFolution Kenya. MERMAID
REEFolution FoundationKikuyu House2018–202323–32% (24 surveys)3.63 km2023. REEFolution Kenya. MERMAID
REEFolution FoundationPilli Pipa Restaurant2018–20234.9–56% (31 surveys)4.21 km2023. REEFolution Kenya. MERMAID
REEFolution FoundationLower Mpunguti (mean of 15 surveys, 2017–2019)20197.1% (15 surveys)0.69 km2023. REEFolution Kenya. MERMAID
WCS Kenya via MERMAIDMji wa Kale 2 (Mkwiro) (mean of 2 surveys, 2015–2019)201922% (4 images)3.52 kmDarling E, Kosgei J, McClanahan T, Muthiga N. 2019. Kenya MACMON 2016-17. MERMAID
WCS Kenya via MERMAIDMji wa Kale 1 (Mkwiro) (mean of 2 surveys, 2015–2019)201926% (4 images)3.72 kmDarling E, Kosgei J, McClanahan T, Muthiga N. 2019. Kenya MACMON 2016-17. MERMAID
WCS Kenya / WCS Tanzania via MERMAIDMkwiro202029% (3 surveys)2.09 kmDarling E, Mensa J, O'Leary J, Schwarz A. 2020. BAF 1 - 2020. MERMAID
MERMAID project “KenyaBleachingSurveys_2024”*Mji wa Kale 1 (Mkwiro)202436% (2 images)3.49 kmKosgei J, Musembi P. 2024. KenyaBleachingSurveys_2024. MERMAID
Kenyan reef survey compilation (source not identified)Upper Mpunguti Leeward (site code S_UPL’14), South zone—12%1.62 km—

Data & links

All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from Coral Reef Diagnostics and the organizations named in the data-sources table above.

© Coral Reef Diagnostics.