Coral Reef Diagnostics

Kenya - Kisite National Park-site 4 (Kisite National Park)

REEFolution Foundation
⬇ Download this page as a report card
05
Photo: Anderson Mayfield/Coral Reef Diagnostics
Country
Survey date(s)
2024-03-21
Coordinates
-4.7023, 39.4010
Coral cover
46%
Manual point count (71 photos) · other methods below
Coral bleached
89%
of hard coral tissue · Mayfield (2025), Environments 12:276
Heat stress
Most recent heat load record
26 Oct 2026 · No heat stress
5-year thermal stress load
5-year mean max. degree heating weeks (DHW)
2021–2025
NOAA Coral Reef Watch — Tanzania virtual station
i 5-year mean max. DHW is the mean of the annual maximum DHWs over the five complete years named above, not conditions today.
More infoTanzania (NOAA CRW virtual station)
Photographs
77
20 shown on this page
Site summary
Read this summary in:

Kisite site 4 combined high coral cover (46%) with near-total bleaching (89% of tissue) — a shallow coral garden dominated by dense knobby Galaxea sheets that read as a white 'snowfield' across entire hillsides, though close-up frames show some colonies retain pigmented polyp centers even when they look fully white from a distance. A crown-of-thorns starfish was photographed directly on bleached coral here, and a scattering of colonies — an olive-and-gold branching bommie, salmon-orange knobby corals — held full color as clear exceptions.

Water temp. during survey
31.6°C
(estimated from the TG7 underwater camera, not validated (Mayfield 2025, Environments 12:276, Table 1))

22 independent survey stations shown with the program’s logo — click one to see how far it is from this site.

Six other CRD dive sites with their own pages within 5 km shown in orange — click a marker to open its page.

4 of the 20 photographs on this page are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.

567891011121314151617181920

Photo credit & attribution

Site description

Setting

Water is clear and blue in the deeper wide frames and hazier and green-cast over the shallow reef flat. Relief is real: discrete bommies rising off sand with fish clouds over them, and between them broad low-relief hardground of turf, rubble, and coralline pavement.

General benthic features

The 72 reviewed frames show a shallow, high-cover coral garden of almost continuous knobby columnar coral, photographed while nearly all of it was white. The reef itself is dominated to an unusual degree by one growth form: dense, knobby-to-columnar coral in continuous hummocked sheets that run out of frame in every direction. About a third of the set (21 frames) is this one habitat. Anderson identified this coral as Galaxea in two of the frames: one is a wide shot of exactly this field, and another is a single colony of it in close-up with the polyps still extended; neither frame is among the four published here. Massive Porites is present as discrete lobate boulders rather than as the matrix, and meandroid Platygyra brains appear as isolated domes. Corymbose and digitate Acropora sit on the pavement between the Galaxea sheets, cauliflower-form Pocillopora is woven through, and Plerogyra bubble coral, foliose plate corals, and cream leather corals round out the assemblage. Three frames are the most colorful in the set, with pink and tan soft corals, red and yellow sponges, and gold crinoids among the pale coral. Between the coral, the pavement carries heavy turf and dark red fleshy macroalgae.

Coral cover

Stressors

On bleaching the set is emphatic, and it is emphatic on structure, not just on color. One frame is a whole hillside of columnar coral gone uniformly white from the bottom of the frame to the ridgeline against open blue — a snowfield (e.g., Image 2).

A wide frame of the Galaxea field shows the same thing. The Galaxea sheets read white to pale gray-lavender across the wide frames, with whiteness carried unbroken across entire colony surfaces rather than in patches, which is the pattern of thermal bleaching rather than of shading or camera cast. The discrete taxa follow suit: one frame is a large Platygyra dome gone chalk-white with dead eroded depressions already opening on its upper surface; another is a meter-scale lobate Porites bleached pale gray-lavender with only small brown remnant patches; a third is a Plerogyra with every vesicle stark white; the close-up Galaxea is white with tentacles still fully expanded, i.e. alive and bleached rather than dead. Branching Acropora is the most absolutely white group in the set, and the cleanest evidence is within-frame contrast rather than absolute color: one frame is a single bone-white corymbose colony sitting inside a ring of dark red-brown fleshy macroalgae, and five others all show white branching colonies against dark turfed rock in the same exposure (e.g., Image 3).

Two close-ups explain why the published figure is 89% of tissue and not 100%. Both are macro views of the knobby coral in which each individual knob is bleached white or pale pink at its margins but still carries a dense gold-yellow polyp center. Tissue is present and partly pigmented at the polyp scale on colonies that read as fully white from a meter away. The same partial retention shows at colony scale in one frame, where paling mauve-white lobes sit beside knobs holding faint tan. A minority of the reef kept obvious pigment, and it is worth naming because it is the exception. One frame is an olive-and-gold branching bommie beside the diver, plainly pigmented in the same frame as pale surroundings. Another is a bommie of salmon-orange knobby colonies (e.g., Image 1).

A third is a dark gray-purple encrusting dome on otherwise pale pavement. A fourth is a dark red-brown foliose plate. One more frame is a broad field of cream-tan ruffled leather corals, and another a deep maroon soft coral on sand — both show soft corals holding color, while a pale nephtheid soft coral (which Anderson identified as a cauliflower soft coral) is white-pink throughout (e.g., Image 4), so bleaching of soft corals alongside the stony corals is only partly supported.

Crown-of-thorns predation is directly documented here in four frames. In every one the animal is draped directly onto white bleached coral, surrounded by pink fleshy macroalgae and red sponge — predation stacked on top of thermal stress. The frames are mutually consistent with one or two individuals photographed repeatedly rather than an outbreak, and should not be read as four animals. Outright mortality is in the set too. One frame, which Anderson labeled as dying coral, shows an elongate mound of fine branching coral being smothered by cyanobacteria. The bleached Platygyra dome has open dead patches. Typical recent thermal stress: mean annual maximum of 5.1 degree heating weeks (2021-2025, NOAA CRW; Tanzania virtual station, whose polygon covers the Kisite-Mpunguti area). Seawater here was an estimated 31.6°C during the survey (read from the TG7 underwater camera and not validated, per Mayfield 2025, Environments 12:276, Table 1; the Kenya survey-wide mean of 32.0°C matched the 1998 event), and NOAA's Kenya virtual station recorded a peak of 13.5 degree-heating weeks on 18 April 2024, a level not reached there before in records going back to 1985; the Tanzania virtual station that covers this reef peaked at 16.0 on 16 April 2024. For the 2024 Kenya survey as a whole, Mayfield (2025, Environments 12:276) estimated that in situ temperatures ran about 1.3°C above NOAA's, so that "nearly 22 DHWs may actually have transpired"; those in situ readings came from the TG7 underwater camera and have not been validated.

Fish and other fauna

Other fauna recorded: a Phyllidia nudibranch, blue-gray with yellow tubercles, in three frames; a purple-and-orange Pseudoceros flatworm in three frames; a giant clam with a fully pigmented dark maroon mantle — notable because it held color while the corals around it did not; dense clouds of damselfish and orange anthias over the bommies; and butterflyfish over the reef top.

Comparisons with other data

WCS Kenya surveyed a station named Kisite, 3.38 km away (data via MERMAID). Within 5 km, twenty independent stations recorded hard coral cover between 2008 and 2024: eight by benthic survey, station-year means of 0.0–53%, and twelve by MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats, station-year means of 20–56%; the nearest, WCS Kenya / WCS Tanzania via MERMAID at Mkwiro, 0.57 km away, read 29% in 2020.

Dive record

Dived 21 Mar 2024 in Kisite Marine National Park during the 2024 Western Indian Ocean mass bleaching event. Surveys were run with REEFolution.

Other notes

Two frames put a diver in the scene for scale.

CV model comparison

Computer-vision estimates from this site's own photographs are listed in the comparison table below, alongside the headline rather than merged into it.
Headline is the reference value; every other row is listed beside it for comparison and none is averaged in.
MethodHard coral cover (%)Photos (n) ± SE
Manual (published)45.5
CoralNet (published survey's own annotation)45.5n = 71
In-house DINOv336.1n = 71
CoralSCOP unedited17.9n = 50

The three computer-vision methods disagree by 27.6 pp (17.9–45.5%) and read 9.4–27.6 pp below the manual point count (45.5%), except one that matches it; the headline is the manual point count because a person's point count of the site's photographs is the reference the models are measured against.

Independent surveys nearby

Data availability near this site
Agency / programYear(s)Stations / distanceLink
McClanahan et al. (1996)19962 stations, 3.96–4.62 kmRecords ↓
REEFolution Foundation2017–20237 stations, 1.29–4.96 kmRecords ↓
submitted to MERMAID by Kosgei J, Musembi P.* (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats)20241 station, 4.88 kmRecords ↓
WCS Kenya / WCS Tanzania via MERMAID20201 station, 0.57 kmRecords ↓
WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats)2008–201911 stations, 0.81–4.89 kmRecords ↓
Hard coral cover over time — this site and every independent station within 5 km. Programs are shown separately because they use different methods at different stations; the lines are not one comparable series.
0%15%30%45%60%200820162024WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats) 2008: 37%WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats) 2009: 46%WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats) 2010: 56%WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats) 2012: 44%WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats) 2012: 44%WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats) 2013: 21%WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats) 2013: 42%WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats) 2014: 25%WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats) 2015: 20%WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats) 2015: 48%WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats) 2015: 52%WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats) 2016: 32%WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats) 2016: 47%WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats) 2016: 50%WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats) 2019: 24%REEFolution Foundation 2017: 2.4%REEFolution Foundation 2017: 15%REEFolution Foundation 2017: 20%REEFolution Foundation 2017: 29%REEFolution Foundation 2017: 39%REEFolution Foundation 2018: 8.0%REEFolution Foundation 2018: 31%REEFolution Foundation 2018: 37%REEFolution Foundation 2018: 39%REEFolution Foundation 2018: 48%REEFolution Foundation 2018: 53%REEFolution Foundation 2019: 0.0%REEFolution Foundation 2019: 27%REEFolution Foundation 2019: 34%REEFolution Foundation 2019: 40%REEFolution Foundation 2019: 41%REEFolution Foundation 2020: 25%REEFolution Foundation 2022: 23%REEFolution Foundation 2023: 23%REEFolution Foundation 2023: 29%WCS Kenya / WCS Tanzania via MERMAID 2020: 29%submitted to MERMAID by Kosgei J, Musembi P.* (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats) 2024: 36%Coral Reef Diagnostics 2024: 46%Year-averaged across all programs: illustrative only; the programs differ in stations and method, so no trend is claimed (7 years)
WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats) REEFolution Foundation WCS Kenya / WCS Tanzania via MERMAID submitted to MERMAID by Kosgei J, Musembi P.* (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats) Coral Reef DiagnosticsYear-average (illustrative only, programs differ; quadrats left out)

Within 5 km, 20 independent survey stations recorded hard coral cover in 94 surveys between 2008 and 2024. Of the 6 stations with benthic surveys in more than one year, 3 declined (by 2.4–8.0 points) and 3 increased (by 1.0–21 points) between their first and latest surveys. Two stations share the longest span (2018–2023); one, Kikuyu House (REEFolution Foundation, 4.96 km away), went from 31% in 2018 (mean of 9 surveys) to 23% in 2023 (mean of 2 surveys). With MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats, of the 3 stations surveyed in more than one year, 3 increased (by 3.0–9.0 points) between their first and latest surveys. Since 2021, station-year means excluding quadrats average 25% (range 23–29%; n = 3 station-years from 9 surveys). Quadrats since 2021 read 36% (n = 1 station-year). This site's own estimate (46%) sits 5 points above the range of these station-year means up to 2 km away excluding quadrats (0.0–41%); the methods differ, so the comparison is context, not a like-for-like test. Quadrats up to 2 km away read 32%. 2 further rows in the table have no survey date, so they are listed but not part of this summary.

Collected by other programs using different methods (MERMAID is a data platform: each MERMAID row names the organization that did the survey, and its method is in the row's hover text. *Conducted by citizen scientists), so these are context for the figures above, not a like-for-like comparison. Where a station was surveyed more than once, the cell shows either the range of its values or, as a single value, the mean of surveys made in one year. Station names are not dive-site names.

Show all 94 independent surveys
Independent survey data near this site
AgencySite / locationDateHard coral cover (%)DistanceLink
McClanahan et al. (1996)Kisite Islandby 1996 (published)27% (2 records)3.96 kmdoi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1996.10010136.x
McClanahan et al. (1996)Kisite Islandby 1996 (published)19%4.62 kmdoi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1996.10010136.x
WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats)Kisite2008–200937–46% (2 surveys)3.38 kmDarling E. 2018. Kenya CRCP legacy. MERMAID
WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats)Kisite South of Site 1201056%3.49 kmDarling E. 2018. Kenya CRCP legacy. MERMAID
WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats)Kisite 12012–201644–48% (3 surveys)3.38 kmDarling E. 2018. Kenya CRCP legacy. MERMAID
WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats)Kisite 22012–201544–52% (2 surveys)3.94 kmDarling E. 2018. Kenya CRCP legacy. MERMAID
WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats)Kisite Edge 1201342%2.83 kmDarling E. 2018. Kenya CRCP legacy. MERMAID
WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats)Kisite Edge 2201321%4.58 kmDarling E. 2018. Kenya CRCP legacy. MERMAID
WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats)Jiwe la kale East201425%4.80 kmDarling E. 2018. Kenya CRCP legacy. MERMAID
WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats)Mji wa Kale 2 (Mkwiro)201520%4.89 kmDarling E. 2018. Kenya CRCP legacy. MERMAID
WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats)Mpunguti201632%0.81 kmDarling E. 2018. Kenya CRCP legacy. MERMAID
WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats)Kisite corner201650%2.83 kmDarling E. 2018. Kenya CRCP legacy. MERMAID
REEFolution FoundationDolphin Point2017–201920–41% (range of yearly means; 14 surveys)1.29 km2023. REEFolution Kenya. MERMAID
REEFolution FoundationLower Mpunguti2017–20190.0–8.0% (range of yearly means; 15 surveys)1.45 km2023. REEFolution Kenya. MERMAID
REEFolution FoundationOuter Kisite2017–201939–53% (range of yearly means; 13 surveys)2.82 km2023. REEFolution Kenya. MERMAID
REEFolution FoundationKisite 22017–201829–48% (range of yearly means; 3 surveys)3.94 km2023. REEFolution Kenya. MERMAID
REEFolution FoundationKisite Edge 2201715%4.58 km2023. REEFolution Kenya. MERMAID
REEFolution FoundationKikuyu House2018–202323–31% (range of yearly means; 24 surveys)4.96 km2023. REEFolution Kenya. MERMAID
REEFolution FoundationMkwiro CMA2018–202329–37% (range of yearly means; 7 surveys)4.96 km2023. REEFolution Kenya. MERMAID
WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats)Mji wa Kale 2 (Mkwiro)201924%4.89 kmDarling E, Kosgei J, McClanahan T, Muthiga N. 2019. Kenya MACMON 2016-17. MERMAID
WCS Kenya / WCS Tanzania via MERMAIDMkwiro202029%0.57 kmDarling E, Mensa J, O'Leary J, Schwarz A. 2020. BAF 1 - 2020. MERMAID
submitted to MERMAID by Kosgei J, Musembi P.* (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats)Mji wa Kale 1 (Mkwiro)202436%4.88 kmKosgei J, Musembi P. 2024. KenyaBleachingSurveys_2024. MERMAID

Data & links

All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from Coral Reef Diagnostics and the organizations named in the data sources above.

© Coral Reef Diagnostics.

References

  1. Mayfield AB (2025). A Citizen Science Approach for Documenting Mass Coral Bleaching in the Western Indian Ocean. Environments 12:276. PDF
  2. McClanahan TR, Kamukuru AT, Muthiga NA, Yebio MG, Obura D (1996). Effect of Sea Urchin Reductions on Algae, Coral, and Fish Populations. Conservation Biology 10:136-154. DOI