Coral Reef Diagnostics

Kenya - Coral Garden (Kisite National Park)

REEFolution Foundation
⬇ Download this page as a report card
05
Photo: Anderson Mayfield/Coral Reef Diagnostics
Country
Survey date(s)
2024-03-21
Coordinates
-4.7163, 39.3658
Coral cover
55%
Manual point count (178 photos) · other methods below
Coral bleached
59%
of hard coral tissue · Mayfield (2025), Environments 12:276
Observations
Heat stress
Most recent heat load record
26 Oct 2026 · No heat stress
5-year thermal stress load
5-year mean max. degree heating weeks (DHW)
2021–2025
NOAA Coral Reef Watch — Tanzania virtual station
i 5-year mean max. DHW is the mean of the annual maximum DHWs over the five complete years named above, not conditions today.
More infoTanzania (NOAA CRW virtual station)
Photographs
160
20 shown on this page; 179 analyzed
Site summary
Read this summary in:

Coral Garden, in Kisite Marine National Park, had 55% cover, wall-to-wall coral in many frames, and 59% of tissue bleached — an enormous carpet of knobby Galaxea coral held its color well, while the acroporid thickets growing on and around it took most of the damage, producing clear side-by-side healthy-versus-bleached imagery. A green turtle, batfish, and streaming anthias rounded out the site, and no crown-of-thorns starfish were seen.

Water temp. during survey
31.5°C
(estimated from the TG7 underwater camera, not validated (Mayfield 2025, Environments 12:276, Table 1))

Fourteen independent survey stations shown with the program’s logo — click one to see how far it is from this site.

Three other CRD dive sites with their own pages within 5 km shown in orange — click a marker to open its page.

4 of the 20 photographs on this page are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.

567891011121314151617181920

Photo credit & attribution

Site description

Setting

Across the 161 reviewed frames (179 analyzed; 160 on file) the water is clear, deep open blue above the reef in almost every wide frame, and it is genuinely rail-to-rail coral.

General benthic features

Frame after frame is wall-to-wall living colony with no bare substrate in view at all. The feature the site is named for is real and it is enormous. Two of Anderson's own frames are both wide views of a single unbroken hillside of knobby, nodular columnar Galaxea running out of frame in every direction — hundreds of square meters of one growth form, gray-mauve on the high ground grading to tan and chocolate-brown in the hollows, with only a handful of small white colonies dotted across it (e.g., Image 1, Image 3).

At closer range the same carpet is a broad pinkish-mauve knuckled field. Around and above it the reef is acroporid: multi-tiered stacked Acropora tables, corymbose bushes, digitate stands, and dense staghorn thickets that run for whole frames at a time (e.g., Image 2).

Other taxa and fauna across the set: broad yellow-green foliose Turbinaria stands; cream and tan lobed Sarcophyton leathers; a large tan-orange Dendronephthya-type soft coral bush standing clear of the reef; orange encrusting sponges; a green turtle resting in the shade of a boulder overhang draped in pink soft corals; a batfish (Platax) over a maroon thicket; a ray on the reef top; yellow-and-blue snappers; anthias and fusiliers streaming over the crest; and clouds of chromis in most wide frames. The wide set also shows that the reef is not gapless everywhere. The carpet and the thickets are continuous across the reef top, but the base of the structure meets clean sand and coral-rubble aprons in six frames, and two large rock outcrops rise clear of the coral into open blue in two more frames.

Coral cover

Stressors

Here the healthy-versus-bleached contrast is legible, because both states sit side by side in the same frame over and over. One frame has a brilliant white corymbose Acropora at center with a chocolate-tan digitate colony directly above it and a pastel lavender massive colony immediately right (e.g., Image 4).

Two frames put one large bone-white corymbose bush in the middle of an otherwise pigmented tan-brown field. The starkest single image in the set shows a meter-scale massive dome bleached to flat porcelain white, ringed on all sides by fully pigmented brown fine-branched acroporid, with two white meandroid brains beside it. The same within-frame split runs through five more frames — white branching colonies pressed against olive, gold, and maroon neighbors. Massive Porites and the brains did NOT largely keep their color here. Several of the most completely white colonies in the set are massives: the porcelain dome described above, a row of massive domes bleached white on rubble, a large lobate Porites gone cream-white across its whole surface, more white domes in another frame, and a large Platygyra brain bleached to pale cream. A pale cream massive Porites also anchors the left of one frame. A minority of massives did hold pigment and are worth naming as the exception: a mauve-brown brain and a green massive colony together in one frame, a tan-brown dome, and the brown lobate colonies of two more frames. The group that most conspicuously retained pigment at Coral Garden is the Galaxea carpet itself, together with the dark maroon and red-brown branching fields — one is an entire frame of deep maroon branching coral with barely a pale tip in it, and three more frames are the same story. Because that carpet is also the single largest area of coral at the site, the reef reads far healthier in wide shot than the 59% bleached figure implies; the bleaching is concentrated in the acroporids on top of and around it. The acroporid tier took the damage: two frames are close-ups of branching Acropora bleached to bare white with only a faint pink blush left at the tips, and a consecutive run of frames shows whole staghorn fields gone gray-white above still-brown columnar coral beneath. A third condition state is present and should not be read as bleaching. One of Anderson's frames (not shown) is a close-up of a pigmented brown massive colony crossed by bands of bare skeleton carrying a green algal film. A sharp white advancing margin, where tissue is being lost against otherwise fully colored tissue, marks a tissue-loss lesion; the colony itself had not bleached. Anderson's frame of an acroporid with partial mortality shows a discrete white patch set inside a continuous brown pigmented acroporid thicket. Three frames show broader gray-white areas that read as recently dead skeleton under a fine algal film rather than as live bleached tissue. Stress coloration is well represented: a vivid lavender-blue verrucose Pocillopora beside a brown-mantled Tridacna, and lilac and violet colonies in three more frames. These are pastel rather than white and, given the color-adjusted frames, are called as probable stress coloration rather than asserted. No crown-of-thorns seastar appears anywhere in the 161 frames reviewed. Typical recent thermal stress: mean annual maximum of 5.1 degree heating weeks (2021-2025, NOAA CRW; Tanzania virtual station, whose polygon covers the Kisite-Mpunguti area). Seawater here was an estimated 31.5°C during the survey (read from the TG7 underwater camera and not validated, per Mayfield 2025, Environments 12:276, Table 1; the Kenya survey-wide mean of 32.0°C matched the 1998 event), and NOAA's Kenya virtual station recorded a peak of 13.5 degree-heating weeks on 18 April 2024, a level not reached there before in records going back to 1985; the Tanzania virtual station that covers this reef peaked at 16.0 on 16 April 2024. For the 2024 Kenya survey as a whole, Mayfield (2025, Environments 12:276) estimated that in situ temperatures ran about 1.3°C above NOAA's, so that "nearly 22 DHWs may actually have transpired"; those in situ readings came from the TG7 underwater camera and have not been validated.

Comparisons with other data

Karisa et al. (2020) surveyed this site (Coral Gardens, Kisite National Park) in 2015, 0.09 km from the pin. Within 5 km, thirteen independent stations recorded hard coral cover between 1998 and 2020: six by benthic survey, station-year means of 0.0–53%, and seven by MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats, station-year means of 21–56%; the nearest of these, REEFolution Foundation at Kisite 2, 0.26 km away, read 29–48% between 2017 and 2018.

Dive record

Dived 21 Mar 2024 in Kisite Marine National Park during the 2024 Western Indian Ocean mass bleaching event. Surveys were run with REEFolution.

Other notes

REEFolution divers appear in three frames, one of which shows two divers above a bank of stacked acroporid tables.

CV model comparison

Computer-vision estimates from this site's own photographs are listed in the comparison table below, alongside the headline rather than merged into it.
Headline is the reference value; every other row is listed beside it for comparison and none is averaged in. ⚠ The methods did not all read the same photographs: the published manual value covers the site's 178 photographs; CoralNet ran on 178 and the in-house DINOv3 classifier on 179 unedited photographs, Claude (blind) on 27 of them, and CoralSCOP on 150.
More infoRecomputed on only the 27 frames Claude scored, the manual count is 51%; that like-for-like figure, not the published value, is the fair comparison for Claude. ⚠ Claude's value counts all 30 points in the denominator, while the published manual value, CoralNet, and DINOv3 exclude water and fish points (the Mayfield 2025 convention), so Claude reads somewhat low on that basis alone. CoralSCOP (SAM-based mask-sum), edited photos: n/a — CoralSCOP was run only on the unedited Kenya photographs.
MethodHard coral cover (%)Photos (n) ± SE
Manual (published)55.0
CoralNet46.4n = 178
In-house DINOv346.0n = 179
CoralSCOP unedited20.9n = 150
Claude43.8n = 27 · SE 2.9

The four computer-vision methods disagree by 25.5 pp (20.9–46.4%) and read 8.6–34.1 pp below the manual point count (55.0%); the headline is the manual point count because a person's point count of the site's photographs is the reference the models are measured against.

Independent surveys nearby

Data availability near this site
Agency / programYear(s)Stations / distanceLink
McClanahan et al. (1996)19962 stations, 0.62–1.59 kmRecords ↓
McClanahan et al. (2007)19981 station, 0.95 kmRecords ↓
REEFolution Foundation2017–20194 stations, 0.26–4.57 kmRecords ↓
WCS Kenya / WCS Tanzania via MERMAID20201 station, 4.19 kmRecords ↓
WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats)2008–20167 stations, 0.26–1.73 kmRecords ↓
Hard coral cover over time — this site and every independent station within 5 km. Programs are shown separately because they use different methods at different stations; the lines are not one comparable series.
0%15%30%45%60%199820112024WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats) 2008: 37%WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats) 2009: 46%WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats) 2010: 56%WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats) 2012: 44%WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats) 2012: 44%WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats) 2013: 21%WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats) 2013: 42%WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats) 2015: 48%WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats) 2015: 52%WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats) 2016: 47%WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats) 2016: 50%REEFolution Foundation 2017: 2.4%REEFolution Foundation 2017: 15%REEFolution Foundation 2017: 29%REEFolution Foundation 2017: 39%REEFolution Foundation 2018: 8.0%REEFolution Foundation 2018: 48%REEFolution Foundation 2018: 53%REEFolution Foundation 2019: 0.0%REEFolution Foundation 2019: 40%WCS Kenya / WCS Tanzania via MERMAID 2020: 29%McClanahan et al. (2007) 1998: 10%McClanahan et al. (2007) 1998: 22%Coral Reef Diagnostics 2024: 55%Year-averaged across all programs: illustrative only; the programs differ in stations and method, so no trend is claimed (6 years)
WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats) REEFolution Foundation WCS Kenya / WCS Tanzania via MERMAID McClanahan et al. (2007) Coral Reef DiagnosticsYear-average (illustrative only, programs differ; quadrats left out)

Within 5 km, 13 independent survey stations recorded hard coral cover in 46 surveys between 1998 and 2020. Of the 3 stations with benthic surveys in more than one year, 1 declined (by 2.4 points) and 2 increased (by 1.0–19 points) between their first and latest surveys. Two stations share the longest span (2017–2019); one, Outer Kisite (REEFolution Foundation, 1.47 km away), went from 39% in 2017 to 40% in 2019 (mean of 2 surveys). With MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats, of the 3 stations surveyed in more than one year, 3 increased (by 3.0–9.0 points) between their first and latest surveys. The most recent nearby survey is from 2020, so these values predate recent heat stress. This site's own estimate (55%) sits 2 points above the range of these station-year means up to 2 km away excluding quadrats (10–53%); the methods differ, so the comparison is context, not a like-for-like test. Quadrats up to 2 km away read 21–56%. 2 further rows in the table have no survey date, so they are listed but not part of this summary.

Collected by other programs using different methods (MERMAID is a data platform: each MERMAID row names the organization that did the survey, and its method is in the row's hover text), so these are context for the figures above, not a like-for-like comparison. Where a station was surveyed more than once, the cell shows either the range of its values or, as a single value, the mean of surveys made in one year. Station names are not dive-site names.

Show all 46 independent surveys
Independent survey data near this site
AgencySite / locationDateHard coral cover (%)DistanceLink
McClanahan et al. (1996)Kisite Islandby 1996 (published)27% (2 records)0.62 kmdoi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1996.10010136.x
McClanahan et al. (1996)Kisite Islandby 1996 (published)19%1.59 kmdoi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1996.10010136.x
McClanahan et al. (2007)Kisite, Kenya (KN)post-199810%0.95 km—
McClanahan et al. (2007)Kisite, Kenya (KN)pre-199822%0.95 km—
WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats)Kisite2008–200937–46% (2 surveys)0.85 kmDarling E. 2018. Kenya CRCP legacy. MERMAID
WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats)Kisite South of Site 1201056%0.95 kmDarling E. 2018. Kenya CRCP legacy. MERMAID
WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats)Kisite 22012–201544–52% (2 surveys)0.26 kmDarling E. 2018. Kenya CRCP legacy. MERMAID
WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats)Kisite 12012–201644–48% (3 surveys)0.85 kmDarling E. 2018. Kenya CRCP legacy. MERMAID
WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats)Kisite Edge 2201321%0.69 kmDarling E. 2018. Kenya CRCP legacy. MERMAID
WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats)Kisite Edge 1201342%1.73 kmDarling E. 2018. Kenya CRCP legacy. MERMAID
WCS Kenya via MERMAID (MERMAID bleaching-protocol quadrats)Kisite corner201650%1.73 kmDarling E. 2018. Kenya CRCP legacy. MERMAID
REEFolution FoundationKisite 22017–201829–48% (range of yearly means; 3 surveys)0.26 km2023. REEFolution Kenya. MERMAID
REEFolution FoundationKisite Edge 2201715%0.69 km2023. REEFolution Kenya. MERMAID
REEFolution FoundationOuter Kisite2017–201939–53% (range of yearly means; 13 surveys)1.47 km2023. REEFolution Kenya. MERMAID
REEFolution FoundationLower Mpunguti2017–20190.0–8.0% (range of yearly means; 15 surveys)4.57 km2023. REEFolution Kenya. MERMAID
WCS Kenya / WCS Tanzania via MERMAIDMkwiro202029%4.19 kmDarling E, Mensa J, O'Leary J, Schwarz A. 2020. BAF 1 - 2020. MERMAID

Data & links

All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from Coral Reef Diagnostics and the organizations named in the data sources above.

© Coral Reef Diagnostics.

References

  1. Mayfield AB (2025). A Citizen Science Approach for Documenting Mass Coral Bleaching in the Western Indian Ocean. Environments 12:276. PDF
  2. McClanahan TR, Kamukuru AT, Muthiga NA, Yebio MG, Obura D (1996). Effect of Sea Urchin Reductions on Algae, Coral, and Fish Populations. Conservation Biology 10:136-154. DOI
  3. Karisa JF, Obura DO, Chen CA (2020). Spatial heterogeneity of coral reef benthic communities in Kenya. PLOS ONE 15:e0237397. DOI
  4. McClanahan TR, Ateweberhan M, Muhando CA, Maina J, Mohammed MS (2007). EFFECTS OF CLIMATE AND SEAWATER TEMPERATURE VARIATION ON CORAL BLEACHING AND MORTALITY. Ecological Monographs 77:503-525. DOI