Coral Reef Diagnostics

Kenya - Chipopo (Pate [Lamu]) snorkel

⬇ Download this page as a report card
05
Coral Reef Diagnostics
Photo: Anderson Mayfield/Coral Reef Diagnostics
Country
Survey date(s)
2024-04-03
Coordinates
-2.1744, 41.0037
Coral cover
13%
Manual point count (40 photos) · other methods below
Coral bleached
76%
of hard coral tissue · Mayfield (2025), Environments 12:276
Observations
bleachingalgal overgrowth
Heat stress
Most recent heat load record
26 Oct 2026 · No heat stress
5-year thermal stress load
5-year mean max. degree heating weeks (DHW)
2021–2025
NOAA Coral Reef Watch — Kenya virtual station
i 5-year mean max. DHW is the mean of the annual maximum DHWs over the five complete years named above, not conditions today.
More infoKenya (NOAA CRW virtual station)
Photographs
47
21 shown on this page
Site summary
Read this summary in:

Chipopo, on Pate Island in the remote Lamu archipelago, is a coral-restoration site — rope-and-rebar nursery trees and concrete outplant tables — where most hanging fragments were found bleached chalk-white, with only a pigmented minority of shorter, tighter branching stock surviving. The natural reef around the array is thinly documented but shows the same split: some massive Porites held color while others bleached completely, with early signs of tissue loss already visible on a few colonies. Published cover was 13% (largely reflecting how much coral has been placed here rather than natural growth) with 76% of that standing stock bleached.

Water temp. during survey
32.0°C
(estimated from the TG7 underwater camera, not validated (Mayfield 2025, Environments 12:276, Table 1))

Two other CRD dive sites with their own pages within 5 km shown in orange — click a marker to open its page.

7 of the 21 photographs on this page are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.

56789101112131617181920

Photo credit & attribution

Site description

Setting

Water quality is not uniform across the pass: the tree frames early in the run are green and particle-laden with the structure fading into murk within a few meters, while the later frames over hardground and the wide tree shot are appreciably clearer and blue-green.

General benthic features

What the photographs show first is infrastructure. Multi-tiered rope-and-rebar nursery trees carry fragments on short droppers from every cross-arm, and separate steel and concrete outplant tables sit on sand nearby (e.g., Image 3).

One steel outplant frame carries no coral at all — bare, algae-filmed metal over sand (photographed at 10:48) — and another frame shows a table with just two small fragments on it, so the array is not uniformly stocked (e.g., Image 4).

The natural benthos around the array is thinly but genuinely documented, and it is not simply sand. Low hardground boulders carry dense red-brown fleshy macroalgae and turf with coral colonies emerging from it. One dense natural patch is a single boulder carrying orange-brown encrusting and submassive colonies that are clearly pigmented, with a bleached white meandroid brain coral (Platygyra-type) on its upper surface.

Coral cover

Stressors

Bleaching is the dominant signal and it is unambiguous on structure, not just on color. On the nursery trees the majority of hanging fragments are chalk-white with crisp, unfouled branch tips (one frame holds roughly a dozen white fragments to three or four pigmented ones; another shows a whole tree of white fragments and nothing else). The tables are the same: one table has about ten stark-white branching fragments in a single frame against one or two cream-tan ones, and four more frames each repeat the pattern with five or six white fragments to one gold-tan holdout (e.g., Image 1).

The clearest single piece of evidence is a frame where a thumbs-down gesture is held between two branching colonies on the same beam: one gold-tan and pigmented, the immediately adjacent one bone-white. That within-frame contrast is what the bleaching call rests on, and it survives any color adjustment. A real pigmented minority does persist on the structures, concentrated on the shorter, tighter branching stock rather than the fine staghorn Acropora: rust-orange to gold-brown clusters recur in six frames, and a gold-tan branching colony with humbug damselfish sheltering in it sits on a concrete beam. Whether all of that rust-brown is living pigment rather than algal fouling on dead skeleton cannot be settled from color-adjusted frames, and it should not be over-read. Several massive corals here held their pigment: a salmon-orange lobate Porites beside a paler coarse-textured massive colony, a knobby tan-gold Porites-type bommie with pink coralline and sponges around its base, tan-brown massive domes in two frames, and a strikingly green massive colony with large corallites that Anderson singled out for a thumbs-up. Others did not: one frame shows a meter-scale multi-lobed massive Porites bleached chalk-white from base to crown with a faint lilac cast, another shows a second white dome on macroalgal rock, and a third shows two more white lobate colonies. Partial mortality is visible, which matters because it is a step beyond paling. The crown of the big bleached Porites carries a discrete khaki-green algal-filmed patch and a rust-brown streak down its flank where tissue has gone (e.g., Image 15), verified at full resolution; another frame shows a comparable filmed patch on a second dome (e.g., Image 14); and one frame — a hand pointing at a single outplant plug — shows a pale, polyp-extended colony ( Goniopora -type) whose entire center is overgrown with green filamentous algae while its margins are still pale living tissue (e.g., Image 21).

So the site is not purely at the peak-paling stage: some tissue was already lost by 3 April. No crown-of-thorns starfish and no disease lesions appear anywhere in the 45 frames. Seawater here was an estimated 32.0°C during the survey (read from the TG7 underwater camera and not validated, per Mayfield 2025, Environments 12:276, Table 1; the Kenya survey-wide mean of 32.0°C matched the 1998 event), and NOAA recorded a peak of 13.5 degree-heating weeks on 18 April 2024, the highest for Kenya since records began in 1985. For the 2024 Kenya survey as a whole, Mayfield (2025, Environments 12:276) estimated that in situ temperatures ran about 1.3°C above NOAA's, so that "nearly 22 DHWs may actually have transpired"; those in situ readings came from the TG7 underwater camera and have not been validated.

Fish and other fauna

Fish life on and around the array is conspicuous and the structure is plainly working as habitat regardless of the state of the coral on it. Dense aggregations of snapper- and emperor-type fish crowd the trees, schools of yellow bluestripe snapper (Lutjanus kasmira) with dark surgeonfish behind work the tables, and a loose school of blue-green parrotfish passes through in another frame. The single best fish sighting was a dark-bodied terminal-phase parrotfish with vivid blue and red fins and flank stripes swimming through the hanging bleached fragments. Also recorded: humbug damselfish in a gold Pocillopora-type colony, blue-purple surgeonfish and fusiliers over a table, a rabbitfish and butterflyfish, and a bright blue-green parrotfish over the outplant table. Invertebrates are sparse but include one clear highlight — a gray-blue pentagonal cushion star (Culcita) sitting in a shaded bay of a concrete outplant table surrounded by bleached fragments (verified at full resolution) — plus orange encrusting sponges on the frames, mauve and lilac encrusting patches on the concrete, and mauve-pink nubbin colonies set into the table itself (e.g., Image 2).

Comparisons with other data

Apart from our own published survey shown here, we found no other surveys at this site as of 2026. If you would like to share yours, please email us.

Dive record

Snorkeled 3 April 2024 off Pate Island in the Lamu archipelago, northern Kenya, during the 2024 Western Indian Ocean mass bleaching event. The 45 reviewed frames (of 47 on file) run 10:41 to 11:06 — one continuous working pass over a coral-restoration site. Surveys were run with the Pate Marine Community Conservancy and the Northern Rangelands Trust.

Other notes

Pate, at the northern end of the Kenya series, is documented here by 45 of the 47 frames on file. They document a nursery and outplant array in detail and the reef immediately around it in outline. They do not document a reef traverse, a depth profile, or anything beyond a few tens of meters of the array, and nothing on this page should be read as a statement about the wider Lamu reef system. Two frames show a spherical mooring buoy heavily fouled with red-brown algae and carrying two small pale coral colonies growing on it — settlement on floating hardware, which is worth noting at a restoration site.

CV model comparison

Computer-vision estimates from this site's own photographs are listed in the comparison table below, alongside the headline rather than merged into it.
Headline is the reference value; every other row is listed beside it for comparison and none is averaged in. ⚠ The methods did not all read the same photographs: the published manual value covers the site's 40 photographs; CoralNet and the in-house DINOv3 classifier ran on all 40 unedited photographs, Claude (blind) on all 40, and CoralSCOP on 35.
More infoOn the 40 frames Claude scored, with all 30 points in the denominator as in Claude's value, the manual count is 8.6%; that like-for-like figure, not the published value, is the fair comparison for Claude. ⚠ Claude's value counts all 30 points in the denominator, while the published manual value, CoralNet, and DINOv3 exclude water and fish points (the Mayfield 2025 convention), so Claude reads somewhat low on that basis alone. CoralSCOP (SAM-based mask-sum), edited photos: n/a — CoralSCOP was run only on the unedited Kenya photographs.
MethodHard coral cover (%)Photos (n) ± SE
Manual (published)12.8
CoralNet17.3n = 40
In-house DINOv321.5n = 40
CoralSCOP unedited11.8n = 35
Claude7.3n = 40 · SE 1.5

The four computer-vision methods disagree by 14.2 pp (7.3–21.5%) and read on both sides of the manual point count (12.8%); the headline is the manual point count because a person's point count of the site's photographs is the reference the models are measured against.

Data & links

All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from Coral Reef Diagnostics.

© Coral Reef Diagnostics.